=== kubotu_ is now known as kubotu [09:23] stochastic: I posted to the devel mailing list as well about upgrading pitivi, but indeed my IRC channel was wrong [09:24] I've also e-mailed Michael Terry to get his opionion since he was handling the last pitivi upload and tried to keep pitivi in main the last time still. [09:25] Thanks Mirv, I'll leave a comment for now stating that I would support inclusion in 14.04 if the release team allows it since it's clearly an outdated version we're shipping at this point. [09:27] thanks stochastic for your help [09:30] OvenWerk1, any thoughts on Bug #1253009 ? [09:30] bug 1253009 in pitivi (Baltix) "[FFe] Please sync latest upstream release (0.9x) from Debian unstable - Pitivi developers recommends to use 0.92 or later" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1253009 [09:51] Mirv: stochastic: I'm sure it's fine. I'd just like to give it a test run first, to see what it changes === zequence_ is now known as zequence [11:02] it should be easy to give it a try with sudo apt-add-repository ppa:timo-jyrinki/pitivi if one just happens to have 14.04 already installed somewhere [12:23] Mirv: Gave it a try. Added an additional comment in the bug report. [12:26] thanks zequence, that should help. I'll re-ping the release team after I've also a reply from mterry regarding what he thinks about it since he was packaging it the last time. [13:15] I finally got a Windows8 laptop to do test on. [13:16] Booting worked fine, with secure boot on. going to try installing later [13:18] our wp is not zoomed, so it only looks ok in 16:9 [14:05] Installation worked. Booting worked, without disabling either fastboot or secureboot [14:06] I did poke with one setting, enabling custom signatures [14:06] So, Ubuntu Studio 14.04 is EFI capable (the 64 bit version) [14:08] the login manager has the wrong wp though [18:09] holstein: Hello again. I'm going to begin working with the image testing under UEFI starting tonight. :) === ubott2 is now known as ubottu [20:13] zequence: Sorry for the delayed reply. It looks like the -lowlatency kernel produces the same errors when in IDE mode (with AHCI disabled). So I guess it is hardware-specific. [22:07] zequence, so bug #1253009 has been approved for FFE. Is there anything we should be doing to push that through or is that something Mirv will do? [22:07] bug 1253009 in pitivi (Baltix) "[FFe] Please sync latest upstream release (0.9x) from Debian unstable - Pitivi developers recommends to use 0.92 or later" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1253009