[03:34] <osmaycruz> hellow
[03:34] <osmaycruz> im trying to display smth like this into a label
[03:35] <osmaycruz> "00:00" with a QLabel
[06:52] <dholbach> good morning
[06:54] <justCarakas> good morning dholbach
[06:59] <dholbach> hey justCarakas
[07:01] <justCarakas> does the app showdown end today at 23:59 ?
[07:03] <dholbach> no, yesterday
[07:04] <dholbach> http://developer.ubuntu.com/showdown/ → Wednesday, April 9th 2014 (23:59 UTC)
[07:04] <dholbach> which links to http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20140409T2359
[07:06] <justCarakas> dholbach there where problems yesterday, https://plus.google.com/+JonoBaconProfile/posts/55Q2mXX5Zy6
[07:07] <dholbach> oh wow
[07:07] <justCarakas> dholbach so I was wondering if it was a full 24 hours
[07:07] <dholbach> I hadn't seen it
[07:07] <dholbach> keep going then
[07:07] <justCarakas> dholbach was the only place where you could find it. There was something wrong with uploading click packages
[07:08] <justCarakas> dholbach I just wanted to verify it
[07:08] <dholbach> ok... I wasn't aware of it
[07:08] <justCarakas> dholbach no problem :)
[07:31] <DanChapman> Good Morning
[08:08] <mihir> hello all, Good Mroning :)
[08:27] <JamesTait> Good morning all; happy Safety Pin Day! :-D
[12:25] <mihir> join #ubuntu-touch-meeting
[12:37] <mihir> popey: ping !!
[12:39] <popey> mihir: pong
[12:39] <mihir> popey: can you test this bug on device and cofnrim ?
[12:39] <mihir> bug #1302439
[12:39] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1302439 in Ubuntu Calendar App "Recurrence of event , event bubble is not showing up in week view." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1302439
[12:39] <mihir> confirm*
[12:39] <popey> mihir: sure
[12:43] <popey> mihir: commented on it
[12:43] <mihir> popey: thanks :)
[12:44] <mihir> popey: it is not showing on desktop so filed bug
[12:45] <mihir> but don't know may be some issues with my machne.
[12:45] <mihir> machine*
[13:51] <sergiusens> popey: bfiller https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/click-apps/507/changerequest/
[13:52] <popey> sergiusens: has it passed AP? I don't have time to AP test right now, am about to walk out the door
[13:53] <sergiusens> popey: I'm assuming bfiller gave it the runs; I am in use of all my devices as well
[13:53] <popey> i mean specifically the click
[13:53] <popey> lemme test while I pack my stuff
[13:53] <sergiusens> popey: yeah, that's right; I'm assuming he did that :-)
[13:54] <sergiusens> popey: if you are in a hurry I'll find someone to run through this
[13:54] <popey> no, its okay
[13:57] <bfiller> sergiusens, popey : yes I ran the AP tests and they are ok
[14:02] <popey> bfiller: not that I don't believe you, but I don't want didrocks on my back, so I'll run the AP tests before I go.
[14:03] <bfiller> popey: sure, the more testing the better
[14:20] <popey> bfiller: sergiusens all passed, approved gallery click
[14:27] <dholbach> kyleN, popey, mhall119, dpm-afk, balloons: let me know if you do anything dev docs day related later on
[14:28] <dholbach> I'll start with the review of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntudeveloperportal/ bugs now
[14:28] <seb128> kenvandine, I wonder if we should drop the bound hacks we have in settings and just respect the toolkit for consistency
[14:28] <kenvandine> no :)
[14:29] <kenvandine> it annoys me soooo much :)
[14:29] <kenvandine> unless we fix Qt :)
[14:29] <kenvandine> seems to me that it should be the default
[14:30] <sergiusens> popey: ty
[14:31] <seb128> kenvandine, yeah, we should fix the toolkit
[14:32] <kenvandine> seb128, the only problem i see is making it compute the available size vs. the contentHeight
[14:33] <dholbach> kyleN, would you agree that it should be "HTML5" everywhere and not "HTML 5"?
[14:33] <kenvandine> seb128, but surely we can figure it out :)
[14:33] <kenvandine> seb128, lets merge my hack for now... and i'll take a look at patching Qt
[14:33] <kenvandine> seb128, that actually sounds kind of fun :)
[14:33] <seb128> kenvandine, yeah, better to be consistent in the settings at least
[14:33] <dholbach> kyleN, I'll do a search across the page and fix it where possible then
[14:33] <kyleN> dholbach, yes
[14:34] <dholbach> cool
[14:34] <dholbach> mhall119, in bug 1285709 is that a specific feed of wordpress blog entries?
[14:34] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1285709 in Ubuntu App Developer site "Invalid RSS feeds for Ubuntu App Showdown" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1285709
[14:40] <mhall119> dholbach: the /showdown/feed/ is probably the WP generated feed for page comments
[14:40] <mhall119> /feed/ it likely the WP generated feed of blog posts
[14:40] <dholbach> mhall119, ok... maybe it didn't validate because of some of the Chinese characters?
[14:41] <mhall119> it looks like it doesn't validate because of some of the content of the posts
[14:41] <mhall119> which, IMO, it's really a big deal
[14:42] <dholbach> so yeah... not sure what to do about it
[14:42] <dholbach> mhall119, the main page on developer.u.c is it also updated through the WP interface?
[14:43] <mhall119> no, that's hard-coded in the theme
[14:43] <dholbach> mhall119, ok
[14:43] <mhall119> the only thing we can do about the feeds not validating is go through and fix old posts
[14:43] <mhall119> but I don't think any of the problem would actually break the feed for anybody, so I'd say very low priority or even won't fix
[14:44] <mhall119> I'm inclined to say won't fix simply because it'll always be a lower priority than other work we have, so it won't get fixed anyway if we just leave it at a low priority
[14:44] <dholbach> ok
[14:45] <dholbach> mhall119, can you review https://code.launchpad.net/~dholbach/ubuntudeveloperportal/1256571/+merge/215190?
[14:45] <mhall119> or ask the bug submitter if the non-validation is actually breaking something
[14:45] <mhall119> if it's breaking a news reader, that would make it a higher priority
[14:46] <mhall119> dholbach: approved
[14:47] <mhall119> brb
[14:47] <dholbach> mhall119, will this be auto-landed from the web team?
[14:53] <dholbach> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntudeveloperportal/+bug/1056040 looks like it's ready to land as well
[14:53] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1056040 in Ubuntu App Developer site "CSS broken in Chrome on HTTPS url" [High,Triaged]
[15:05] <mhall119> dholbach: no autolanding on that project, no
[15:07] <mhall119> ant left a comment after his approval on that, we need to check that it's still approved as-is
[15:08] <dholbach> ok
[15:28] <dholbach> beuno, noodles775: did we ever see problems like bug 912191 again?
[15:28] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 912191 in Developer registration portal "The upload process is unusably broken for large files - implement ftp/sftp uploads" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/912191
[15:33] <noodles775> dholbach: I'm not aware of any, but it certainly hasn't been fixed - it's still an upload via a browser. I'm not sure if ricardo was working on a way for clickapps to be uploaded directly via an api. I'll check with him.
[15:34] <dholbach> noodles775, on http://developer.ubuntu.com/publish/apps/packaging-click-apps/ we now say 3G
[15:34] <dholbach> so I thought it's probably better now
[15:35] <noodles775> dholbach: I'm not aware of it if it is, but pindonga or matiasb may know (pindonga is on his way)
[15:37]  * matiasb looks
[15:38] <pindonga> hi dholbach .. .about that upload issue... do we know if this was attempted via the web ui or via the api ?
[15:40] <noodles775> pindonga: 15:34 < dholbach> noodles775, on http://developer.ubuntu.com/publish/apps/packaging-click-apps/ we now say 3G
[15:41] <dholbach> pindonga, I'm not sure anyone uses the API already
[15:41] <pindonga> dholbach, k
[15:41] <noodles775> dholbach: Either way, we should test it on staging with large files. The click infrastructure is much better than the non-click.
[15:43] <pindonga> indeed, this requires someone looking into it (if the upload was done via the api I'd expect it to work properly for large files but we need to double check it anyway, just to make sure)
[15:43] <noodles775> pindonga: The bug was created a long time before click, so it may not be relevant. I know for click we're using an updown service, but I don't know if the request is still going via the app server or routed directly from the client to updown (I hope the latter).
[15:43] <pindonga> it should be the latter
[15:43] <noodles775> But yes, we need to test either way. Perhaps we should ask if davmor2 can hit staging with large files - he likes to break things :)
[15:44] <matiasb> noodles775, pindonga: yes, the upload form in devportal is uploading to updown directly
[15:44] <noodles775> matiasb: great
[15:44] <noodles775> james_w: Probably good to include in load testing too ^^
[15:45] <davmor2> noodles775: I'm not here honest govnor I can pass you a pyscohnauts.deb if you like
[15:47] <noodles775> davmor2: nah - this is specifically for click apps.
[15:47] <davmor2> noodles775: just change the .deb to .click :D
[15:47] <davmor2> noodles775: anyway off now for real
[15:48] <dholbach> dpm-afk, can you reply to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntudeveloperportal/+bug/888541?
[15:48] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 888541 in Ubuntu App Developer site "Community page needs a link to the askubuntu FAQs" [Medium,Triaged]
[15:49] <dholbach> dpm-afk, bug 912723 too
[15:49] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 912723 in Ubuntu App Developer site "Create a forwarding from dev.ubuntu.com to developer.ubuntu.com" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/912723
[16:02] <dholbach> down two 61 bugs on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntudeveloperportal/ :-)
[16:12] <qtros> popey ping
[16:14] <kenvandine> seb128, i might have a simpler hack for the bounds stuff...
[16:14] <kenvandine> seb128, instead of changing the boundsBehavior, changing interactive
[16:14] <kenvandine>             interactive: contentHeight > height ? true : false
[16:14] <kenvandine> and it looks like we can do the comparison with height instead of trying to calculate the height like we were doing
[16:19] <kenvandine> seb128, humm... ok, maybe we can't count on height that way
[16:20] <seb128> yeah, I'm not sure
[16:22] <kenvandine> changing interactive instead of the boundsBehavior does work
[16:23] <kenvandine> but it's annoying that we have to calculate the height
[17:08] <ahayzen> t1mp, ping
[17:09] <t1mp> ahayzen: hello
[17:09] <ahayzen> t1mp, quick question... the back button in the header ... is that gonna land before or after 14.04 release?
[17:09] <t1mp> ahayzen: after
[17:09] <ahayzen> t1mp, cool thanks
[17:09] <ahayzen> t1mp, is there a bug tracking it?
[17:10] <t1mp> ahayzen: yes, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/+bug/1256424
[17:10] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1256424 in Ubuntu UI Toolkit "Back button in Header" [High,Confirmed]
[17:10] <ahayzen> t1mp, thanks
[17:12] <t1mp> ahayzen: did you or elopio find out a reason why the clock_app AP tests were failing with this MR? https://code.launchpad.net/~andrew-hayzen/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/fix-swipe-delete-002/+merge/202171
[17:13] <ahayzen> t1mp, i didn't :/ it is really strange you run them all together and it fails then pick the tests that failed run them on their own and they pass :/
[17:16] <t1mp> that makes  it really difficult to debug
[17:16] <ahayzen> t1mp, yep
[17:17] <t1mp> elopio: ^do you have suggestions what we do with this? is there a way to fix the clock app AP tests?
[17:17] <ahayzen> t1mp, may have to write down which tests are failing... then put it on verbose mode and watch/record the screen when that test appears in the console lol
[17:17] <ahayzen> t1mp, the other problem is that tests that are failing changes between runs :/
[17:40] <elopio> t1mp: I haven't chance this week to continue debugging it. I'm sorry.
[17:40] <elopio> *I haven't had chance
[17:44] <dpm> kenvandine, on http://91.189.92.89/api/qml/sdk-14.04/Ubuntu.Content/ - what's the difference between ContentImportHint and ContentTransferHint? They seem to have exactly the same docs
[17:44] <kenvandine> oh... ContentImportHint doesn't exist anymore
[17:44] <kenvandine> Elleo, did that file not get removed?
[17:58] <kenvandine> Elleo, ignore that last question, mhall119 needs to manually drop it from the online docs
[17:58] <kenvandine> dpm, ^^
[18:34] <dpm> kenvandine, gotcha, thanks, yeah, I've been talking to mhall119 to update the online docs, and mhall119 is in touch with Elleo
[20:15] <daker> hi guys
[20:15] <daker> can anyone explain this :
[20:15] <daker> $ phablet-screenshot grab.png
[20:15] <daker> I: surfaceflinger detected
[20:15] <daker> I: Capturing screenshot with screencap ...
[20:16] <daker> a newly flashed phone trusty-proposed
[20:34] <pmcgowan> daker, what version of phablet-tools?
[20:35] <daker> pmcgowan: i am runing 14.04
[20:36] <pmcgowan> daker, stumps me then, sergiusens?
[20:36] <daker> pmcgowan: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7232379/
[20:37] <pmcgowan> I have 1.0+14.04.20140409-0ubuntu1
[20:37] <sergiusens> daker: and do you get a screenshot?
[20:37] <sergiusens> are you running sf?
[20:37] <daker> i am it keeps running for ever
[20:38] <sergiusens> daker: hmm, surfaceflinger support is no more though
[20:38] <daker> no, i didn't change anything, a newly flashed phone(just yesterday)
[20:38] <daker> trusty-proposed
[20:38] <sergiusens> daker: with --wipe or --bootstrap?
[20:38] <daker> bootstrap
[20:39] <sergiusens> daker: a mako/nexus4?
[20:39] <daker> yep
[20:39] <sergiusens> daker:  adb shell pgrep surfaceflinger <- what's the output?
[20:39] <daker> nothing...
[20:39] <sergiusens> good :-)
[20:40] <daker> ah it works again
[20:40] <daker> phablet-screenshot grab.png
[20:40] <daker> I: Dumping fb0 ...
[20:40] <daker> 3099 KB/s (3932160 bytes in 1.238s)
[20:40] <daker> I: Done
[20:40] <sergiusens> daker: strange
[20:40] <daker> yep
[20:40] <pmcgowan> sergiusens, I remember seeing that a few weeks back
[20:40] <pmcgowan> never figured it
[20:40] <sergiusens> pmcgowan: daker I think I may know what it is
[20:41]  * pmcgowan waits with anticipation
[20:41] <sergiusens> pmcgowan: yup; if adb isn't running it breaks :-/
[20:41] <sergiusens> want to log a bug?
[20:41] <pmcgowan> sure
[20:41] <sergiusens> thanks
[20:41] <pmcgowan> sergiusens, where?
[20:41] <sergiusens> pmcgowan: phablet-tools
[20:42] <sergiusens> ubuntu-bug phablet-tools
[20:42] <pmcgowan> got it
[20:43] <daker> sergiusens: yes you are right
[20:43] <daker> http://paste.ubuntu.com/7232409/
[20:43] <daker> phablet-screenshot should check if adb is running
[20:44] <daker> like phablet-network
[20:45] <rpadovani> pmcgowan, sorry for the disturb, if I remember well you wrote a library to see which icons are available on the system, right?
[20:46] <ybon> I don't understand where the "model" variable is instancied from http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-calendar-dev/ubuntu-calendar-app/trunk/view/head:/TimeLineBase.qml#L40
[20:46] <rpadovani> What's the name of the programm? I lost it in update from 13.10->14.04
[20:46] <pmcgowan> rpadovani, sorry wasnt me
[20:46] <daker> ybon: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-calendar-dev/ubuntu-calendar-app/trunk/view/head:/TimeLineBase.qml#L28
[20:47] <rpadovani> pmcgowan, ops, wrong remeber,thanks anyway :-)
[20:47] <pmcgowan> np
[20:47] <ybon> daker: isn't that only a parameter passed to the resolveUrl when an event is clicked?
[20:48] <ybon> I've removed this parameter, and I still have the event showing in my dayview
[20:48] <ybon> so I wonder how the model.getItems() works :)
[20:51] <daker> ah i am not really sure...
[20:55] <ybon> something magical is around
[21:09] <justcarakas> anybody here willing to check my French / German translations ?
[21:13] <daker> justcarakas: translation of what ?
[21:26] <justcarakas> dakar my HTML5 app, I'm using a javascript library for that
[21:38] <ybon> popey: can you test again https://code.launchpad.net/~yohanboniface/ubuntu-calendar-app/AgendaView/+merge/212164 for the alarm problem?
[22:14] <daker> justcarakas: show me the frensh
[22:14] <daker> french*
[22:32] <justcarakas> dakar, http://pastebin.com/BvNvBpUN
[22:48] <justcarakas> ping dakar
[23:32] <justcarakas> popey can you review my app ? https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/click-apps/592
[23:33] <justcarakas> or somebody else who can do it :p
[23:38] <daker> justcarakas: it' daker ;) with e that's why i miss your pings
[23:41] <justcarakas> ow crap :p
[23:41] <justcarakas> well can you still have a quick look at it ? for the appshowdown ? :p
[23:42] <justcarakas> daker, sorry that I typed your name wrong :p
[23:42] <sarnold> justcarakas: you have an extra space after 'Abfahrt'
[23:42] <sarnold> justcarakas: btw, try: d<tab> see what happens :)
[23:42] <justcarakas> oww nice, didn't know that sarnold
[23:43] <sarnold> justcarakas: there's two more strings in the de error section with trailing spaces
[23:43] <sarnold> justcarakas: .. and in somethingWentWrong, there's a space before a comma
[23:44] <daker> justcarakas: ^
[23:44] <daker> departuraAndArrivalTheSame: 'Lieux de départ et de destination sont les mêmes',
[23:44] <daker> noTime: 'Choisissez l\'heure',
[23:45] <daker> http://paste.ubuntu.com/7232910/
[23:45] <justcarakas> thx daker
[23:45] <justcarakas> and sarnold
[23:46] <justcarakas> anything else daker sarnold  ?
[23:46] <sarnold> nothing here, but I'm not a native german speaker, so there is plenty I could miss :) hehe
[23:47] <daker> that's all for me(French)
[23:47] <justcarakas> thanks Ill submit it to the click store
[23:49] <justcarakas> somebody still here that can review my app ? popey ?
[23:54] <justcarakas> Anyone who can review my app here ? if not I hope it still counts if it was uploaded in time
[23:55] <daker> if it's in the store, i think it's good
[23:55] <rschroll> justcarakas: I believe so.  (But I'm not sure.)
[23:56] <justcarakas> daker: the update still needs to be approved
[23:57] <daker> yeah i think your good
[23:57] <daker> you are*
[23:57] <justcarakas> I hope so, because I've been working on going from 1 language to 4 languages for the past 8 hours (after work)