KombuchaKip | Anyone know how to get my music to resume playing instead of pausing when I lock my machine under Ubuntu Trusty? Rhythmbox just pauses for some reason. | 03:16 |
---|---|---|
sarnold | KombuchaKip: I think that's a logind byproduct; I think you can set permissions on audio devices in /dev/ to something your user account can write to.. | 03:19 |
KombuchaKip | sarnold: Thanks man. | 03:20 |
maclin | pitti, hi,the language pack is still 0408 version. Will it be updated before released? | 03:54 |
=== FJKong_afk is now known as FJKong | ||
pitti | maclin: yes; the LP export finished yesterday evening; I kicked off the package build, and will test and upload it now | 05:16 |
Mirv | maclin: I think the base packages will be updated (too) to the 0410 which is mentioned at https://translations.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+language-packs - which is needed because only the base packs apparently include help translations | 05:16 |
Mirv | ah | 05:16 |
Mirv | timing +1 | 05:17 |
maclin | pitti, thanks. we are waiting for that to test:) | 05:38 |
pitti | maclin: would you be willing to test some locally built .debs, as a confirmation that they are good and what you expect? | 05:39 |
pitti | I test the German and English ones | 05:40 |
maclin | pitti, of course. Our QA team just want to confirm that. Where can we get the debs? | 05:41 |
pitti | maclin: hang on (just scp'ing the built sources from the DC machine) | 05:41 |
maclin | pitti, good, we are waiting for the Chinese ones:) | 05:43 |
pitti | maclin: I put them on http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/tmp/langpack/ | 05:49 |
maclin | pitti, great, we will get and test, thanks:) | 05:51 |
pitti | maclin: how does it look like? | 06:37 |
pitti | maclin: they are waiting in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+queue?queue_state=1 now; I accepted all others, as they generally look fine | 06:39 |
JackYu | pitti, great, it seems good. maclin is out for a meeting:) | 06:45 |
pitti | JackYu: thanks | 06:49 |
seb128 | good morning desktoper | 07:17 |
seb128 | brrrr it's cold today | 07:17 |
pitti | bonjour seb128 | 07:17 |
seb128 | pitti, salut, ça va ? | 07:17 |
pitti | seb128: but still sunny | 07:17 |
pitti | seb128: ça va bien, merci ! j'attends avec impatience le releas | 07:17 |
pitti | e | 07:17 |
seb128 | yeah | 07:18 |
pitti | seb128: I uploaded fresh langpacks this morning, FYI | 07:18 |
seb128 | moi aussi, mais j'aurais bien aimé pouvoir mettre à jour quelques paquets tjs | 07:18 |
seb128 | pitti, nice! | 07:18 |
pitti | gedit is back to German for me now | 07:19 |
pitti | seb128: Je crois tu peux encore le faire -- parles à infinity ? | 07:22 |
pitti | "crois que" | 07:22 |
seb128 | pitti, oui, je prépare quelques changements là | 07:22 |
seb128 | but I can see busy SRU time until .1 | 07:23 |
seb128 | so many details/annoyances we didn't get to | 07:23 |
seb128 | like my ipod showing with an usb stick icon | 07:23 |
seb128 | dvds still being listed in the UI after being ejected | 07:23 |
seb128 | it feels like we have been fire fighting until freeze and didn't have time for polish :/ | 07:24 |
pitti | oh, right, DVDs -- what was that again? | 07:26 |
didrocks | an hardware technology | 07:27 |
pitti | oh right, these stone disks with enchiseled bits, right? | 07:27 |
didrocks | with real objects | 07:27 |
seb128 | the thing that came after floppies | 07:27 |
seb128 | I'm pretty sure we still have bugs with those btw | 07:27 |
pitti | you bet | 07:27 |
seb128 | ;-) | 07:27 |
seb128 | oh can we release with bugs in floppy handling!? | 07:27 |
pitti | I'm fairly sure I've seen a bug report about udisks not handling 45 rpm records right | 07:28 |
seb128 | hehe | 07:28 |
seb128 | joke aside, lot of polish I want to do for .1 | 07:28 |
pitti | *nod* | 07:28 |
andyrock | seb128, https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1281058 | 07:28 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1281058 in unity (Ubuntu) "The system shutdowns when multiple accounts are open" [High,In progress] | 07:28 |
andyrock | it's an oem-priority | 07:29 |
andyrock | do I need to open another bug for the UIFe | 07:29 |
andyrock | ? | 07:29 |
pitti | please, no | 07:29 |
seb128 | andyrock, no | 07:29 |
pitti | it's utterly confusing to track an issue in two dfiferent places | 07:29 |
seb128 | just retitle the existing one | 07:29 |
pitti | seems my right hand is lagging today | 07:29 |
seb128 | andyrock, Trevinho: btw is somebody investigating the lockscreen giving input to what is behind it sometimes? | 07:30 |
seb128 | that seems a release blocker/security issue | 07:30 |
pitti | ah yeah, the new lock screen is still rather buggy, too -- .1 material for sure | 07:31 |
pitti | especially with user switching | 07:31 |
pitti | and it still reveals the actual desktop for about a second or so | 07:31 |
seb128 | right | 07:31 |
seb128 | though some fixes landed this night | 07:31 |
andyrock | well g-s used to do the same | 07:31 |
didrocks | yeah, it's like, "it's there. Ahaha! ah no it's not :p" | 07:31 |
seb128 | I need to upgrade/restart my session | 07:31 |
andyrock | so it's not a regression... and using the system-indicator to switch user should call PromptLock that skips fading | 07:33 |
seb128 | andyrock, you are speaking about the "show for a second", not about the "sometime input is on the win behind the lock" (which can be IRC, annoying when you type your password) | 07:34 |
andyrock | sure | 07:39 |
andyrock | last time I checked the code there was code to avoid it... | 07:40 |
seb128 | andyrock, Trevinho: could be https://code.launchpad.net/~sjakthol/unity/fix-grab-after-blank/+merge/215360 ? | 07:40 |
andyrock | yep | 07:41 |
Laney | hey | 08:04 |
seb128 | Laney, happy friday! how are you? | 08:05 |
Laney | good thanks! happy friday to you too ;-) | 08:06 |
Laney | how are you? | 08:06 |
seb128 | good! | 08:06 |
Laney | i see sun and blue sky | 08:07 |
Laney | Launchpad (136) | 08:09 |
Laney | wtf | 08:09 |
seb128 | is that the queue? | 08:09 |
Laney | bug mail overnight | 08:09 |
seb128 | oh | 08:09 |
seb128 | fun | 08:09 |
seb128 | my inbox was rather quiet this nigh | 08:10 |
seb128 | t | 08:10 |
Laney | erm, weird | 08:10 |
Laney | it's mainly translation import errors for cinder | 08:10 |
Laney | why in the world did i get those? | 08:10 |
Laney | that's an openstack thing | 08:10 |
seb128 | the bottom of the emails should say? | 08:11 |
Laney | not for those, but it does say in the body | 08:11 |
Laney | On 2013-10-30 16:41z (162 days 7 hours 48 minutes ago), you uploaded | 08:11 |
Laney | ... | 08:11 |
seb128 | haha | 08:11 |
seb128 | andyrock, Trevinho: is anyone reviewing https://code.launchpad.net/~sjakthol/unity/fix-grab-after-blank/+merge/215360 ? | 08:12 |
seb128 | Laney, we are likely going to need an unity upload today btw | 08:14 |
seb128 | Laney, I hope ^ fixes the "input goes under the lock" issue didrocks&I saw yesterday | 08:14 |
Laney | if we can fix that and ideally the grab thing it should go in | 08:16 |
seb128 | cool | 08:16 |
Laney | having a test user in lightdm offends my eyes | 08:17 |
* Laney deletes with fire | 08:17 | |
didrocks | Laney: you reenabled that plugin? :p | 08:23 |
Laney | I have a precision blowtorch next to my ssd for such events | 08:23 |
didrocks | heh | 08:26 |
seb128 | Laney, I guess it's too late/not realistic to want to land indicator-keyboard change to use an upstart job? (knowing it would require a one liner change to ubiquity as well) | 08:32 |
Laney | probably | 08:32 |
Laney | what does it fix? | 08:32 |
seb128 | nothing reported | 08:33 |
seb128 | it's just that the indicator would have its own log and be respawned if it hit a segfault | 08:33 |
seb128 | would also be consistent with other indicators | 08:33 |
Laney | I think best not, the time for that kind of stuff has been and gone | 08:34 |
seb128 | k | 08:34 |
Laney | also considering there's been little errors in these things before | 08:34 |
seb128 | maybe as an SRU (without the path change since ubiquity hardcode directories) | 08:34 |
seb128 | mvo, hey | 08:40 |
seb128 | mvo, did we say we should land https://code.launchpad.net/~brian-murray/aptdaemon/bug-1266844/+merge/207276 ? even if it's not a proper solution that's better than no change? | 08:40 |
seb128 | mvo, that's currently the most reported trusty issue | 08:41 |
andyrock | seb128, approved | 08:41 |
seb128 | andyrock, thanks | 08:41 |
andyrock | np | 08:41 |
mvo | seb128: didn't I upload this yesterday? | 08:41 |
andyrock | seb128, now i've an exam | 08:41 |
andyrock | i'll be online | 08:41 |
seb128 | andyrock, good luch! | 08:41 |
seb128 | luck even | 08:41 |
seb128 | mvo, oh | 08:42 |
seb128 | autopkgtest for aptdaemon 1.1.1-1ubuntu4: FAIL (Jenkins: public, private) | 08:42 |
andyrock | this afternoon to fix other bugs ;) | 08:42 |
seb128 | mvo, it's blocked in proposed | 08:42 |
seb128 | andyrock, k! | 08:42 |
mvo | seb128: meh, can this be overriden? afaik its failing since the begining of time | 08:42 |
seb128 | hum | 08:42 |
seb128 | https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Trusty/view/AutoPkgTest/job/trusty-adt-aptdaemon/ | 08:42 |
seb128 | yeah | 08:42 |
seb128 | I wonder how the previous version went through | 08:42 |
seb128 | I guess somebody overwrote it | 08:42 |
seb128 | Laney, ^ | 08:42 |
Laney | I don't see evidence of that | 08:43 |
Laney | probably one of the bugs let it in | 08:43 |
Laney | It started failing with the ubuntu3 upload | 08:43 |
Laney | hang on, might be being misled | 08:44 |
Laney | I don't think we have enough history there | 08:44 |
Laney | anyway, it didn't fail since the beginning of time but got broken some point this cycle | 08:45 |
seb128 | mvo, is the test looking like something that can be easily fixed? | 08:46 |
mvo | seb128: I check it now | 08:47 |
Laney | On ci.debian.net the output includes the diff of dependency and base system changes since the last run | 08:48 |
Laney | pretty useful http://ci.debian.net/data/unstable-amd64/packages/p/pango1.0/2014-03-23.log | 08:48 |
seb128 | nice | 08:48 |
Laney | we should get that ;-) | 08:48 |
Laney | let me skip this test if mvo is going to look at fixing it | 08:48 |
Laney | thanks mvo! | 08:48 |
seb128 | Laney, mvo: thanks | 08:49 |
mvo | Laney: is it possible to (re)test 1.1.1-1ubuntu2 ? I would not be suprised if it actually fails now too | 08:51 |
Laney | Dunno about on jenkins, but you should be able to fetch it and do that locally | 08:51 |
Laney | Jenkins doesn't seem to keep the first test that failed and the last one that passed so it's not very easy to compare what changed | 08:52 |
mvo_ | re | 08:54 |
seb128 | mvo_, wb! | 08:54 |
mvo_ | silly network | 08:54 |
=== om26er is now known as om26er|lunch | ||
=== vrruiz_ is now known as rvr | ||
seb128 | Laney, not sure if you saw my telepathy-indicator mention on #u-release | 09:20 |
seb128 | quite busy discussion | 09:20 |
Laney | yeah, will look shortly | 09:20 |
seb128 | thanks | 09:20 |
Laney | scripting fun | 09:20 |
* larsu hears something about telepathy-indicator | 09:21 | |
seb128 | larsu, trying to land your fix from yesterday evening | 09:22 |
larsu | ah cool, thanks | 09:22 |
larsu | I wonder what's going on in bug #1259564 | 09:22 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1259564 in indicator-messages (Ubuntu) "GPG_AGENT_INFO not being passed to thunderbird" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1259564 | 09:22 |
larsu | I guess GPG_AGENT_INFO isn't set in dbus' environment? | 09:23 |
larsu | for some reason, indicator-messages was not ported to upstart | 09:23 |
larsu | maybe that would help? (or is that moot now anyway?) | 09:23 |
seb128 | it was not? | 09:23 |
seb128 | we should maybe have landed those branches from tedg earlier in the cycle :/ | 09:23 |
seb128 | it is, /usr/share/upstart/sessions/indicator-messages.conf | 09:24 |
seb128 | $ status indicator-messages | 09:24 |
seb128 | indicator-messages start/running, process 2600 | 09:24 |
seb128 | larsu, use upstart here? | 09:24 |
larsu | oh, when did that land? | 09:25 |
larsu | I tried a couple of days ago and was sure it wasn't ported | 09:25 |
larsu | maybe I was just confused | 09:25 |
seb128 | larsu, oh, sorry, too much going on, we landed that earlier this week :p | 09:26 |
seb128 | larsu, ogra needed it for the touch image | 09:27 |
seb128 | larsu, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-messages/13.10.1+14.04.20140408-0ubuntu1 | 09:27 |
larsu | thanks :) | 09:27 |
seb128 | larsu, | 09:27 |
seb128 | $ strings /proc/`pidof indicator-messages-service`/environ | grep GPG | 09:27 |
seb128 | GPG_AGENT_INFO=/tmp/gpg-n3dktm/S.gpg-agent:2448:1 | 09:27 |
seb128 | larsu, bug fixed? :-) | 09:27 |
larsu | seb128: I guess?! I'll mark it as fixed an ask to reopen if it still happens to people. Thanks! | 09:28 |
seb128 | it's buggy though | 09:28 |
larsu | oh it is? | 09:28 |
seb128 | $ strings /proc/`pidof compiz`/environ | grep GPGGPG_AGENT_INFO=/run/user/1000/keyring-H21sVl/gpg:0:1 | 09:28 |
seb128 | bah, fighting agents | 09:29 |
seb128 | larsu, not an issue from the indicator though | 09:29 |
larsu | seb128: I don't see the problem? | 09:29 |
larsu | oh, different agents | 09:30 |
larsu | should I reassign to another component? | 09:30 |
seb128 | larsu, close the indicator-messages bug, saying that specific issue | 09:31 |
seb128 | is fixed | 09:31 |
larsu | ok | 09:32 |
seb128 | larsu, the other issue seems to be https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnupg2/+bug/1257706 | 09:32 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1257706 in gnupg2 (Ubuntu) "gpg-agent environment variables not correctly exported" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 09:32 |
seb128 | or similar | 09:32 |
seb128 | we have a few bugs about fighting agents I think :/ | 09:33 |
seb128 | it's another of those "we should fix that for .1" issues | 09:33 |
seb128 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-keyring/+bug/1271591 | 09:33 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1271591 in gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) "upstart job race prevents gnome-keyring from being ssh agent" [High,Triaged] | 09:33 |
seb128 | larsu, ^ use that one as reference if you want to point to another bug in your comment | 09:34 |
larsu | seb128: too late :) | 09:34 |
seb128 | k, no worry | 09:34 |
larsu | seb128: it's already linked to in a previous comment in the bug | 09:34 |
seb128 | k | 09:35 |
=== om26er|lunch is now known as om26er | ||
mvo_ | pitti: what was the best way again to run a package against adt? | 09:57 |
pitti | mvo_: the official docs are in /usr/share/doc/autopkgtest/README.running-tests.gz; which package do you want to test? | 09:59 |
pitti | mvo_: i. e. for most packages schroot is enough (and I suppose you have them already) | 09:59 |
pitti | mvo_: for some which need network or kernel bits you need to run in an LXC container or even Qemu | 09:59 |
mvo_ | pitti: as close as possible to what jenkins is doing if possible, I don't really understand the failure for aptdaemon currently | 10:01 |
mvo_ | pitti: but thanks, I will play with it and see if lxc gives me a similar failure first | 10:02 |
pitti | mvo_: I get the failures with simply running the tests on my workstation in trunk | 10:02 |
pitti | without any adt-run stuff at all | 10:03 |
mvo_ | pitti: oh, exactly the same failures? | 10:03 |
pitti | mvo_: perhaps not exactly (haven't compared bit by bit), but enough of them | 10:03 |
mvo_ | ok | 10:03 |
pitti | mvo_: as for "exactly what jenkins is doing" -> prepare-testbed and run-adt-test as per http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/auto-pkg-test.html | 10:04 |
mvo_ | thanks again | 10:04 |
pitti | mvo_: I run "adt-run -o /tmp/out aptdaemon --- schroot trusty" here to compare with jenkins output | 10:05 |
mvo_ | pitti: please update to the current ubuntu-trusty bzr, I fixes some failures already | 10:05 |
mvo_ | (I think :) | 10:05 |
pitti | ah | 10:05 |
pitti | mvo_: seems 1.1.1-1ubuntu4 is already released in the branch, but not in trusty? | 10:06 |
mvo_ | pitti: trusty-proposed maybe? | 10:07 |
pitti | mvo_: ah yes, held back by test failures | 10:07 |
mvo_ | pitti: I was using the packaging branch - should I use the bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~aptdaemon-developers/aptdaemon/ubuntu-trusty/ ? | 10:07 |
mvo_ | one? | 10:07 |
pitti | so, running | 10:07 |
pitti | adt-run -o /tmp/out aptdaemon -U --apt-pocket=proposed --- schroot trusty | 10:07 |
pitti | mvo_: yes, that's the one I usually use as well -- it's what Vcs-Bzr: says | 10:08 |
pitti | mvo_: oh, you don't use UNRELEASED? | 10:08 |
mvo_ | pitti: ok, sorry, let me fix that | 10:09 |
pitti | or tags? | 10:09 |
mvo_ | pitti: it should be on unreleased, let me double check | 10:09 |
pitti | mvo_: so, I'm not 100% sure that lp:~aptdaemon-developers/aptdaemon/ubuntu-trusty/ matches exactly what's in trusty-proposed, I just hope it does | 10:09 |
pitti | changelog-wise it fits | 10:10 |
* darkxst really wonders how release week will go with moving and house and probably no internet for a bit ;( | 10:11 | |
Laney | hopefully you have some ISO testers | 10:11 |
mvo_ | pitti: I commited my changes now to lp:~aptdaemon-developers/aptdaemon/ubuntu-trusty/ | 10:11 |
Laney | also luckily with LTSes you have a .1 release | 10:11 |
mvo_ | pitti: i.e. the ubuntu5 fixes | 10:12 |
pitti | mvo_: ah, splendid, thanks | 10:12 |
darkxst | we have lots of testers! | 10:12 |
pitti | mvo_: hmm, seems the trusty-proposed version hangs in schroot, re-trying in lxc | 10:21 |
mvo_ | pitti: I have two test failure currently, its slowly improving :) lxc seems to be working for me | 10:22 |
* pitti runs both in parallel | 10:22 | |
pitti | $ adt-run -o /tmp/out-trunk -B .// --- lxc -es adt-trusty | 10:22 |
pitti | for your trunk branch; that'll build the branch first and use the built .debs | 10:22 |
mpt | Weird, Software Updater’s “Technical Description” pane anti-aliases its text in a different way from everything else on the system | 10:28 |
pitti | mvo_: sorry, I need to leave for the afternoon | 10:28 |
Laney | I really hate software updater's progress bar when it's checking for updates | 10:29 |
pitti | mvo_: so, prepare-testbed and run-adt-test are the ultimate "production" verification | 10:31 |
ogra_ | Laney, image based upgrades will fix that :) | 10:31 |
seb128 | Laney, why? | 10:31 |
mpt | Laney, that has three factors: (1) It spends a long time checking for updates <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareUpdates#Ideas>, (2) recursive references mean it can’t predict ahead of time how many sources will need checking, and (3) the Ambiance/Radiance indeterminate progress bar is poorly designed (hi Cimi:-) | 10:32 |
seb128 | ogra_, image based upgrades also have a download bar ;-) | 10:32 |
darkxst | r0 | 10:32 |
seb128 | ogra_, though the "update" is a spinner for "checking for updates" | 10:32 |
ogra_ | seb128, yeah, but a predefined set of files | 10:32 |
Cimi | ciao mpt :P | 10:32 |
Laney | mpt: I think it's mainly (3) that I've got an issue with | 10:33 |
Laney | It moves too fast and doesn't move smoothly | 10:33 |
mpt | Yes indeed | 10:34 |
Laney | Just looks like it's jerking around | 10:34 |
seb128 | Laney, didrocks: can you please test https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/landing-011/ (lock screen fixes) | 10:34 |
mpt | And it bounces at all, like the Windows one does, which can be misleading if you glance at it at the wrong time | 10:34 |
mpt | (specifically if you glance at it when it happens to be against the left edge) | 10:34 |
mvo_ | pitti: thanks, I'm on it now | 10:37 |
Laney | Interesting; that's provided by aptdaemon | 10:37 |
darkxst | speaking of aptdaemon (well nearly) what happens when we need an appstream to make gnome-software work? | 10:39 |
seb128 | what do you mean? | 10:39 |
seb128 | what appstream exactly? | 10:40 |
darkxst | so now all gnome apps have an appdata file | 10:40 |
darkxst | but for gnome-software to work, these need to hosted by some server | 10:40 |
darkxst | fedora has it, and I think openSuse | 10:41 |
seb128 | is GNOME having one? | 10:41 |
seb128 | hum, why is that let down to distros? | 10:41 |
darkxst | GNOME is not a distro! | 10:41 |
Laney | So it can be used for all apps I guess | 10:41 |
Laney | like app-install-data or something, but hosted remotely? | 10:42 |
seb128 | why does it need a server? can't we have a package containing the db? | 10:42 |
darkxst | seb128, that is half-way hack I guess | 10:42 |
seb128 | "hack", I don't agree | 10:42 |
seb128 | but yeah, I don't see Canonical working on a such server in the near futur | 10:43 |
seb128 | not sure, you guys could perhaps have a people page/team/community maintained version | 10:43 |
darkxst | seb128, apart from phillw (who has been somewhat ejected from the community), we have no infrastructure resources | 10:45 |
darkxst | (outside of what Canonical provides) | 10:46 |
seb128 | brb, session restart to test unity lockscreen fixes | 10:47 |
Laney | seb128: what's it meant to fix? your bug from yesterday? | 10:49 |
seb128 | Laney, https://code.launchpad.net/~sjakthol/unity/fix-grab-after-blank/+merge/215360 | 10:50 |
Laney | yeah | 10:50 |
seb128 | see the description | 10:50 |
seb128 | I couldn't reproduce that alt-tab problem | 10:50 |
seb128 | but I guessed the "type through lockscreen" didrocks and I saw could be the same issue | 10:50 |
seb128 | Laney, in any case just sanity check/test that you have no regression with lock screen | 10:51 |
Laney | oh yeah I made that happen | 10:51 |
seb128 | the alt-tab thing? | 10:51 |
Laney | yep | 10:51 |
seb128 | you saw the UI on top of lock? | 10:51 |
Laney | just the alt tab switcher | 10:52 |
seb128 | k | 10:52 |
Laney | now lock screen doesn't get input | 10:52 |
seb128 | be careful | 10:52 |
seb128 | the stuff behind might | 10:52 |
Laney | and yep, input is going to windows underneath | 10:52 |
seb128 | like it could be IRC :p | 10:52 |
Laney | laney@raleigh> more bar ~ | 10:52 |
Laney | foo | 10:52 |
Laney | nah, no IRC on that machine | 10:52 |
seb128 | workaround to unlock is to use the session indicator | 10:52 |
seb128 | switch user | 10:52 |
seb128 | log back from lightdm | 10:52 |
seb128 | that unlocks the session | 10:52 |
Laney | adding the PPA and restarting session | 10:52 |
seb128 | you are testing without that ppa right? | 10:52 |
seb128 | cool | 10:52 |
Laney | seb128: seems to fix that issue indeed | 10:56 |
seb128 | Laney, seems to fix the one we were having as well | 10:56 |
seb128 | let me land that | 10:56 |
Laney | nice | 10:56 |
seb128 | Laney, thanks for testing | 10:56 |
Laney | I never had that one so can't confirm | 10:56 |
seb128 | well, improvement in any case | 10:58 |
seb128 | let's get that in | 10:58 |
* darkxst wonders.... how many servers does canonical have? surely hosting an appstream instance wouldn't even put a dent in it! | 10:59 | |
Laney | you'd have to talk to the sysadmins | 10:59 |
Laney | #canonical-sysadmin @ freenode | 10:59 |
Laney | I doubt it's very likely though, most people (LoCos etc) seem to arrange their own sponsorship | 11:00 |
seb128 | the issue is not bandwith | 11:00 |
seb128 | it's admin work/security of the machine | 11:01 |
seb128 | e.g not sure what sort of permissions appstream needs, what security record it has, etc | 11:01 |
darkxst | from the public side it would be a read-only stream of data | 11:03 |
seb128 | how/who would update the content? | 11:03 |
darkxst | appdata files come from upstream | 11:04 |
seb128 | how do they get on the server? | 11:04 |
darkxst | a script I guess! | 11:04 |
seb128 | you need a mechanism/a way to tell it what to import | 11:04 |
seb128 | the script would list all the upstream in the world with their urls? | 11:04 |
seb128 | or have an Ubuntu archive to parse | 11:04 |
seb128 | or? | 11:04 |
darkxst | hypothetically the script would parse ubuntu packages for appdata | 11:05 |
seb128 | k | 11:05 |
seb128 | well I guess somebody needs to come with a detailed plan first of what would happen on the server | 11:05 |
seb128 | what would need to be installed | 11:06 |
seb128 | who would have access, etc | 11:06 |
seb128 | then you can try asking IS for hosting | 11:06 |
darkxst | seb128, ok, I seem to be lacking time these days, but I will get one of my drones onto it! | 11:08 |
seb128 | ;-) | 11:08 |
seb128 | nice, today iso is 50M smaller | 11:17 |
seb128 | seems like to be the langpacks base refresh | 11:17 |
seb128 | well I guess it is, the manifest doesn't point to actual package dropped from the image | 11:17 |
=== MacSlow is now known as MacSlow|lunch | ||
desrt | good morning ubuntistoj | 12:05 |
=== FJKong is now known as FJKong_afk | ||
seb128 | desrt, hey | 12:46 |
desrt | hihi | 12:47 |
ochosi | hey seb128 | 12:47 |
seb128 | ochosi, hey | 12:47 |
ochosi | seb128: do you think you could review a very simple patch for indicator-bluetooth? | 12:47 |
ochosi | or would i better talk to someone else about that | 12:48 |
seb128 | ochosi, just give the url, I'm sure larsu or charles or cyphermox can do that ;-) | 12:48 |
ochosi | ok, well it's not ready yet :D | 12:48 |
ochosi | but i basically need to get an alternative depend in for indicator-bluetooth | 12:48 |
mvo_ | seb128: tests pass ! | 12:48 |
ochosi | oterwise we pull the unity-stack just for that indicator... | 12:48 |
seb128 | mvo_, wooot | 12:48 |
seb128 | ochosi, oh, that I can ack | 12:49 |
=== tkamppeter_ is now known as tkamppeter | ||
Laney | hmm | 13:06 |
Laney | did someone say there was a click updates bug in u-s-s? | 13:06 |
seb128 | Laney, https://launchpad.net/bugs/1306569 | 13:06 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1306569 in ubuntu-system-settings (Ubuntu) "Can't update clicks from store with u-s-s #287 on mako" [High,Confirmed] | 13:06 |
Laney | I was just fixing the tests (hopefully correctly...) and I think I saw a bug there that might make all click updates be ignored | 13:06 |
seb128 | Laney, \o/ | 13:10 |
seb128 | Laney, it's weird, the service doesn't even seem activated when I use the panel here | 13:10 |
Laney | I don't know how it works really | 13:11 |
Laney | so I could be wrong, but the test that checks new updates are shown was failing | 13:12 |
Laney | will test it in a bit | 13:12 |
seb128 | Laney, thanks | 13:16 |
seb128 | Laney, do you still have an ubuntu codesearch somewhere? | 13:16 |
Laney | seb128: same place it always was - http://ubuntu-codesearch.surgut.co.uk/search?weighted=1&q=seb128 | 13:22 |
charles | ochosi: if it's a packaging patch to indicator-bluetooth, cyphermox or seb128 would be the ones to look at it | 13:24 |
charles | ochosi: if it's code, me or cyphermox | 13:24 |
Laney | It'll need to call whatever xfce program instead of the control-center | 13:25 |
seb128 | Laney, weird | 13:25 |
Laney | (I guess) | 13:25 |
seb128 | Laney, http://ubuntu-codesearch.surgut.co.uk/search?weighted=1&q=indicator-keyboard-service | 13:25 |
seb128 | Laney, doesn't list http://paste.ubuntu.com/7234846/ | 13:25 |
seb128 | Laney, well, ubiquity include the string and is not listed? | 13:25 |
Laney | odd | 13:25 |
seb128 | bregma, hey | 13:26 |
bregma | uh-oh, now what? | 13:27 |
Laney | ubuntu@codesearch:/srv/mirror-unpacked/ubiquity_2.18.1$ grep -r indicator-keyboard-service * | 13:27 |
Laney | bin/ubiquity-dm: 'indicator-keyboard-service', | 13:27 |
Laney | hmm! | 13:27 |
seb128 | bregma, I did a landing of https://code.launchpad.net/~sjakthol/unity/fix-grab-after-blank/+merge/215360 while you were sleeping, hope it's ok | 13:27 |
seb128 | Laney, hmm indeed! | 13:27 |
bregma | seb128, as long as you do the required paperwork | 13:27 |
seb128 | bregma, it looks like it fixes the "can type through lockscreen" issue didrocks&I we having | 13:27 |
seb128 | bregma, what paperwork? | 13:28 |
bregma | after final freeze, don't you need to SRU the fix? | 13:28 |
andyrock | seb128, https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1306211 | 13:28 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1306211 in unity (Ubuntu) "Trying to lock screen in a guest session leads to an unusable session" [Undecided,New] | 13:28 |
seb128 | bregma, well, release team judged it important enough to include it as a freeze exception | 13:28 |
andyrock | can you still reproduce it? | 13:28 |
seb128 | bregma, they are still landing some rc fixes today | 13:29 |
andyrock | seb128, it works fine here | 13:29 |
andyrock | actually there should be no "lock" button in guest session | 13:29 |
seb128 | andyrock, it took me 10 tries to get it again, and the issue stops if I touch the keyboard | 13:29 |
bregma | seb128, I have no problem with that | 13:29 |
seb128 | bregma, great, was more a fyi anyway ;-) | 13:29 |
andyrock | but what you mean for unsable | 13:30 |
andyrock | ? | 13:30 |
andyrock | lockscreen shows up? | 13:30 |
andyrock | or the screen fails to turn on? | 13:30 |
seb128 | andyrock, no, it dime and wake up the screen in loop, making the session impossible to use | 13:30 |
seb128 | like screen goes dooown up doooown up dooown up | 13:30 |
andyrock | ok | 13:30 |
seb128 | andyrock, the "lock" is in the "logout" unity dialog | 13:31 |
seb128 | another unity bug | 13:31 |
andyrock | yeah that's another story ;) | 13:32 |
seb128 | that option shouldn't be listed when lockscreen is locked down | 13:32 |
ochosi | charles: ok thanks! | 13:33 |
Trevinho | seb128: oh thanks for the landing... Last night just after the final freeze, the fever took me, si I passed a pretty bad night /morning... :( | 13:41 |
=== dpm is now known as dpm-afk | ||
seb128 | Trevinho, :-(, get better! | 13:44 |
seb128 | Trevinho, https://code.launchpad.net/~sjakthol/unity/fix-grab-after-blank/+merge/215360 might be the issue we were having yesterday | 13:45 |
Trevinho | seb128: seb yes very likely.... It's actually nux fault, since when you delete a view that is grabbing, then you should remove the grab also ;\ | 13:47 |
Trevinho | But this is fine, as we make sure the view is ungrabbed anyway. | 13:47 |
seb128 | right | 13:48 |
seb128 | Trevinho, see, it was a real bug, and not me or my box being crazy ;-) | 13:48 |
seb128 | charles, xnox: https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/indicator-power/ubiquity/+merge/215424 | 13:49 |
Trevinho | seb128: yes, in fact I also said that all the ones you report are real bugs :), but just that for some reason you always it them all! :) | 13:49 |
charles | seb128, acked | 13:50 |
Trevinho | pitti: with last landing and last indicator session, the screen on tty switch is basically shown immediately... | 13:50 |
Trevinho | As before we had not a concept of prompt or fading lock. Which now we have | 13:51 |
seb128 | right | 13:52 |
seb128 | Trevinho, andyrock: what's the deal with power off, when is it supposed to happen? | 13:52 |
seb128 | if you lock and don't touch anything it starts diming off after some seconds | 13:52 |
seb128 | I guess that's wanted | 13:52 |
seb128 | if you (or your cat) mouve the cursor though, it never goes off again then | 13:53 |
seb128 | that's a bug? | 13:53 |
Trevinho | pitti: btw in some cases I see login1 not to emit the lock signal to us... For example call multiple time the display manager lock. We get that signal only If the greeter wasn't there before | 13:53 |
Trevinho | It looks light dm does something strange | 13:53 |
Trevinho | seb128: it must go off after the defined desktop idle time | 13:54 |
Trevinho | seb128: we use a shorter delay only once | 13:54 |
andyrock | Trevinho, i think it makes sense to use a shorter timeout also the second time | 13:55 |
andyrock | etc. etc. | 13:55 |
andyrock | that's what seb128 is saying | 13:55 |
andyrock | right? | 13:55 |
seb128 | Trevinho, andyrock: doesn't seem to work, let us try | 13:55 |
seb128 | andyrock, no | 13:55 |
seb128 | didrocks did "lock, move mouse, walk away" and went away for some hours yesterday | 13:56 |
andyrock | seb128, oh so your screen does not dim anymore? | 13:56 |
seb128 | he uses a timeout of 30 min | 13:56 |
seb128 | the screen never stopped | 13:56 |
Trevinho | andyrock Not to go against the user preferences (that also might about never use Screensaver)... And say you only locked to hear the music | 13:56 |
seb128 | Trevinho, andyrock: we just tried with 1 min, doesn't work | 13:56 |
seb128 | doh | 13:57 |
seb128 | it's working :p | 13:57 |
Trevinho | seb128: it works with 1 sec | 13:57 |
seb128 | spoke too soon | 13:57 |
seb128 | ok, maybe a bug fixed in yesterday update | 13:57 |
seb128 | or maybe another corner case or something | 13:57 |
Trevinho | seb128: this wasn't Murphy... :-D | 13:57 |
seb128 | lol | 13:57 |
Trevinho | seb128: we always does it when we get the presence status dorm uss power | 13:58 |
Trevinho | From* | 14:02 |
seb128 | Laney, let me know how the click upgrade stuff goes, I did some pinging of the u1 guys about the issue earlier, I want to unping them if we fix it | 14:04 |
xnox | seb128: something weird happens to my sound indicator under ubiquity | 14:12 |
seb128 | xnox, oh, what? | 14:12 |
xnox | seb128: https://plus.google.com/photos/109160032876474505377/albums/6001038263425551073/6001038268744851618?authkey=CKXGwua3-JS1HA&pid=6001038268744851618&oid=109160032876474505377 | 14:14 |
xnox | seb128: btw it's very painful to share a single photo from G+ without posting it on the feed! | 14:14 |
xnox | seb128: i'm dist-upgrading now, and will try without power-indicator to see if there is some weird interaction between them / width limit | 14:15 |
xnox | cause, well, Gtk+ =)))) | 14:15 |
seb128 | xnox, urg, looks like a missing icon for mute in the theme? weird | 14:16 |
seb128 | cool phone case btw ;-) | 14:16 |
seb128 | xnox, indicator-power seems happy at least ;-) | 14:17 |
Laney | are you in bed? | 14:17 |
xnox | Laney: haha. | 14:21 |
xnox | Laney: i was trying to get the lighting on the screen right for the picture. Got to figure out how to do screenshots properly from cmdline / externally triggered. | 14:21 |
xnox | seb128: missing icon sounds interesting. I'll test in the VM properly in a sec. | 14:22 |
seb128 | Laney, your branch fixes the clicks | 14:36 |
Laney | huh, how about that | 14:37 |
* seb128 line up a landing | 14:38 | |
Laney | I'd like gatox to review the changes before they actually go in | 14:38 |
Laney | but you can get it underway | 14:38 |
gatox | Laney, ack | 14:39 |
Laney | ty | 14:39 |
seb128 | Laney, ah, I was just querying him to ask for that, didn't notice he was there ;-) | 14:39 |
xnox | seb128: it's all good, once i booted into proper live cd image, instead of trying to hack things up locally. | 14:56 |
Laney | updates panel is buggy if you refuse the update then go back in | 14:56 |
xnox | seb128: so go ahead with releasing indicator-power. | 14:56 |
Laney | I have a blank panel now | 14:56 |
seb128 | xnox, great | 15:00 |
seb128 | Laney, yeah, saw that | 15:00 |
seb128 | Laney, there is one issue with your update, it restores the bug "tests fail if updates are available" | 15:00 |
Laney | it didn't happen because updates were never available? | 15:02 |
seb128 | ? | 15:04 |
seb128 | oh, right | 15:05 |
seb128 | I think it might be the fix for that issue that causes the problem | 15:05 |
seb128 | Laney, the change was http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-system-settings/click-updates/revision/647 | 15:07 |
seb128 | Laney, which was in reaction to https://code.launchpad.net/~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-system-settings/click-updates/+merge/208567/comments/499988 | 15:07 |
Laney | sec | 15:08 |
Laney | seb128: ok, fixed | 15:13 |
Laney | the issue is evident in that diff | 15:13 |
Laney | os.environ["IGNORE_UPDATES"] = "True" | 15:13 |
Laney | return value == "IGNORE_UPDATES"; | 15:13 |
Laney | This means it doesn't have any autopilot tests for when there are updates | 15:17 |
Laney | the interaction of the different bugs here is quite funny | 15:18 |
seb128 | Laney, that IGNORE_UPDATES is a bit weird, wouldn't it make sense to have it a bool as well? | 15:26 |
Laney | the other one isn't a bool | 15:27 |
Laney | it's a string which says "True" | 15:27 |
Laney | it is all weird, didn't want to get too deep | 15:27 |
Laney | I'd have just done the normal check for it being set to anything nonempty | 15:27 |
seb128 | k, makes sense | 15:27 |
seb128 | well at least it fixes the case | 15:28 |
seb128 | I'm going to put a silo with the fixes lined up | 15:28 |
seb128 | gatox, can you review the change, it's small ;-) | 15:28 |
seb128 | gatox, I'm waiting on the review to land the fix | 15:28 |
gatox | seb128, ok, on it now | 15:28 |
seb128 | gatox, thanks | 15:28 |
Laney | the other env var is inverted with respect to this one as well | 15:29 |
Laney | so double weird | 15:29 |
seb128 | yeah, let's clean that later | 15:29 |
Laney | it could do with a round of fixes | 15:29 |
seb128 | indeed | 15:29 |
gatox | seb128, Laney need info: https://code.launchpad.net/~laney/ubuntu-system-settings/fix-tests/+merge/215417 | 15:37 |
gatox | Laney, seb128 about those envs, it's that way because the api to read that, it only returns strings | 15:38 |
seb128 | is that a qt api? | 15:39 |
gatox | seb128, yes, QProcessEnvironment | 15:39 |
seb128 | k | 15:39 |
Laney | of course it does, that's what env vars are | 15:40 |
gatox | right | 15:40 |
seb128 | you can use 0/1 strings though ;-) | 15:40 |
seb128 | or 0 !0 | 15:41 |
seb128 | Laney, saw gatox's review comment? | 15:42 |
Laney | yes | 15:42 |
seb128 | cool | 15:42 |
andyrock | seb128, do you know where are located the xml files for the default rotating wallpapers? | 15:46 |
seb128 | andyrock, /usr/share/gnome-background-properties/ | 15:46 |
andyrock | thx | 15:47 |
seb128 | yw! | 15:47 |
seb128 | you are adding support for those to the lock screen? | 15:48 |
gatox | Laney, ping me when you answer the question or if you do any change, so i review it right away | 15:48 |
Laney | I did answer | 15:48 |
Laney | basically to say that I don't understand it | 15:49 |
Laney | so if you have a better fix then please do it :-) | 15:49 |
andyrock | seb128, mmm we can but there was a bug I want try to reproduce | 15:49 |
gatox | Laney, my suggestion is just to revert the changes in update_manager.cpp | 15:49 |
andyrock | https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1301842 | 15:49 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1301842 in Unity "lockscreen re-locks after unlocking if wallpaper chaged in the backgroud" [Undecided,New] | 15:49 |
Laney | gatox: not if you want the tests to work | 15:50 |
Laney | try it | 15:50 |
andyrock | seb128, i think it's just a duplicate | 15:50 |
seb128 | andyrock, k, I was going to say that it doesn't seem to highest priority thing to look at | 15:50 |
seb128 | andyrock, please look at bugs before adding support for rotating images ;-) | 15:50 |
andyrock | seb128, i was looking at bugs ;) | 15:50 |
seb128 | great | 15:50 |
andyrock | just want to change the duration | 15:50 |
seb128 | cool | 15:50 |
andyrock | so i'll not lose 5 minutes of my life | 15:50 |
andyrock | :D | 15:50 |
seb128 | andyrock, you can also do a "sleep 5; gsettings set ...." | 15:51 |
seb128 | easier way to change the bg | 15:51 |
seb128 | andyrock, gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.background picture-uri 'file:///dir/image' | 15:52 |
andyrock | cool | 15:53 |
seb128 | andyrock, can't confirm that one | 15:56 |
seb128 | gatox, so, do you have a suggested change or should we just land that version (we can tweak/improve later) | 15:56 |
Laney | I bet the wallpaper is a red herring there | 15:56 |
Laney | i.e. Trevinho is correct | 15:56 |
gatox | seb128, running the tests here and checking the thing with update_manager.cpp, just a sec | 15:57 |
seb128 | k | 15:57 |
seb128 | Laney, andyrock: yeah, likely just the timeout thing | 15:58 |
andyrock | seb128, yeah i marked it as a duplicate | 16:04 |
gatox | seb128, Laney i just tested it here, reverting the changes in update_manager.cpp, and it works, and the tests are ok too... the other changes are correct | 16:06 |
gatox | was that failing for you? | 16:07 |
Trevinho | attente: unity side for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1291461 is done, but is it missing indicator-keyboard? | 16:07 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1291461 in Unity "Lockscreen: keyboard layout switching shortcuts not working" [Low,Triaged] | 16:07 |
Trevinho | attente: as that guy complains something,,, | 16:08 |
Laney | gatox: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7235553/ | 16:09 |
Laney | bzr merge . -r 679..678 | 16:10 |
Laney | to revert that change | 16:10 |
gatox | Laney, i was running autopilot tests... i see, that's because the test is actually wrong, if you want i can fix that and propose a branch | 16:15 |
Laney | gatox: yes, the c tests | 16:15 |
Laney | please do fix it and push a branch, don't propose it | 16:16 |
Laney | I'll pull it into that one | 16:16 |
gatox | Laney, ack | 16:16 |
Trevinho | Lol, this story is too nice https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1303698 :) | 16:23 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1303698 in unity (Ubuntu) "curiosity killed the trusty tahr" [Undecided,New] | 16:23 |
gatox | Laney, there: lp:~diegosarmentero/ubuntu-system-settings/fix-update-not-required-test | 16:28 |
Laney | ty | 16:30 |
Laney | seb128: I pushed it again, gogogo | 16:33 |
seb128 | Laney, \o/ | 16:33 |
Laney | gatox: can you approve the mp? | 16:34 |
gatox | Laney, sure | 16:34 |
Laney | mergi | 16:34 |
Laney | merci | 16:34 |
gatox | Laney, seb128 approved | 16:35 |
seb128 | gatox, thanks | 16:35 |
xnox | seb128: Laney: is there some sort of keyboard indicators fixes in the works? | 16:36 |
xnox | i'm looking into https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1301720 | 16:36 |
ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1301720 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Trusty) "[Text Entry] Missing English input in Simplified and Traditional Chinese default enviroment" [High,Triaged] | 16:36 |
xnox | and i don't see how ubiquity did anything wrong, since e.g. lightdm login screen has "english" keyboard layout / indicator. | 16:37 |
xnox | yet upon login, there is no keyboard indicator and in the keyboard layout panel in the control-center there is no layouts setup what's so ever. | 16:37 |
xnox | this is with just ubuntu desktop, executed in chinese locale, not kylin. | 16:38 |
seb128 | xnox, not sure it's a bug? | 16:38 |
seb128 | the indicator mixes layout and input methods | 16:38 |
xnox | but i will go and test kylin. | 16:38 |
xnox | seb128: and in chinese i should have a way to switch to english input method, no? | 16:39 |
seb128 | so you might have a chinese pinyin input on an english layout regrouped under 1 icon | 16:39 |
xnox | i'll test out precise, to see what hapens there. | 16:39 |
seb128 | check with attente next week | 16:39 |
seb128 | he's in eow at this time | 16:39 |
seb128 | xnox, not worth testing kylin, well at least they use a different stack (fcitx) | 16:39 |
xnox | seb128: right, i get a weird mini-overlay-popup and i can switch between english and chinese thing. So i think it's not a bug. | 16:40 |
seb128 | Laney, u-s-s building in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/landing-009/ | 16:43 |
Laney | cool | 16:43 |
xnox | i shall not deal with fr locale bugs ever again, i have no idea how to type on the console in that locale | 16:53 |
Laney | ZUT ALORS! | 16:54 |
* xnox merde... | 16:56 | |
seb128 | ok, have a good w.e everyone! | 16:58 |
Laney | you too! | 16:58 |
Laney | me too now, see you on monday | 17:03 |
=== gatox is now known as gatox_lunch | ||
=== happyaro1 is now known as happyaron | ||
=== dpm-afk is now known as dpm | ||
=== gatox_lunch is now known as gatox | ||
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
xclaesse | what was the trick again to see gnome-online-accounts in the control center? | 22:02 |
darkxst | xclaesse, XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP=GNOME gnome-control-center | 22:03 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!