| pmatulis | will 12.04.5 include an upgraded kernel and xorg stack (ex: include the trusty xserver-xorg-video-intel)? also, what is the ETA for 12.04.5? | 00:17 |
|---|---|---|
| RAOF | pmatulis: I don't think we'll be spinning a 12.04.5; that would be after 14.04 release. If you need newer hardware support to install than in 12.04.4, then 14.04 is your oyster. | 00:42 |
| RAOF | ...aha. | 00:44 |
| RAOF | Or perhaps I missed that thread :) | 00:44 |
| RAOF | pmatulis: So, now that I've remembered the “should we do a 12.04.5 release” thread; your answers are: (a) Yes, using the Trusty stack is the whole point, and (b) Probably August or September or such. Post 14.04.1 | 00:46 |
| pmatulis | RAOF: thanks! | 03:44 |
| jarkko_ | Bus 002 Device 003: ID 148f:3070 Ralink Technology, Corp. RT2870/RT3070 Wireless Adapter spams 16913.608602] ieee80211 phy0: rt2800usb_entry_txstatus_timeout: Warning - TX status timeout for entry 13 in queue this is reported and known issue could you do something about it? | 04:04 |
| jarkko_ | it weakens the transfer speed also realibity | 04:04 |
| jhenke | hi folks, bug 1294283 just reappeared after the latest kernel upgrade on 14.04 (3.13.0-23) | 09:33 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1294283 in linux (Ubuntu) "Memory balloning in Hyper-V generation 2 does not work" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1294283 | 09:33 |
| jhenke | the vm is not able to get any more memory from the host, yesterday before I installed the latest updates all still worked | 09:34 |
| henrix | kamal: could you please take a look at this kteam-tools patch: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7234771/ | 12:49 |
| henrix | kamal: if you're ok with it, i'll just push it | 12:50 |
| kamal | henrix, your change omits the stripping of "[PATCH]" from the Subject: line ... but (?) that shouldn't be on the subject line by this point anyway, so its doesn't matter? | 13:57 |
| henrix | kamal: this will be used to build the email subject in the format: '[3.11.y.z extended stable] Patch "<SUBJECT>" has been added to staging queue | 13:59 |
| henrix | kamal: and this never contails the '[PATCH]' in the <SUBJECT> | 14:00 |
| * kamal has another sip of coffee and looks again | 14:00 | |
| henrix | (maybe i'm just confusing you :) ) | 14:00 |
| kamal | henrix, I'm talking about this line from your diff, which (before your change removes it) seems to exist in order to try to strip off "[PATCH]" in order to extract the rest of the subject line ... | 14:01 |
| kamal | - subject = sub("Subject: (\[PATCH[^\]]*\] )?", "", line.rstrip()) | 14:01 |
| kamal | I'm saying, "hey, you removed that line, so the script won't strip | 14:02 |
| henrix | ugh | 14:02 |
| kamal | '[PATCH]' anymore like it used to do. | 14:02 |
| henrix | kamal: i see what you mean now | 14:02 |
| kamal | ... but I'm then also saying ... | 14:02 |
| kamal | I bet henrix has determined that that line was pointless anyway, since we *shouldn't* have [PATCH] on the subject lines at this point anyway. yes? no? more coffee? | 14:03 |
| henrix | kamal: no, i believe you're absolutely correct. however.... | 14:04 |
| * henrix goes look at the code again | 14:05 | |
| kamal | henrix, ok, well despite my ramblings above, I think your change is actually fine -- so unless you find something actually wrong with it, you have my "ack" | 14:06 |
| henrix | kamal: cool, thanks! i'll just go fix the code (adding the '[PATCH]' removal from subject) and push it | 14:07 |
| kamal | henrix, that's fine | 14:08 |
| henrix | kamal: ok, pushed fixed patch to kteam-tools. thanks for reviewing! | 14:25 |
| infinity | BenC: Any chance of one more saucy/ppc update? :P | 16:03 |
| sconklin | o/ | 19:05 |
| miseria | "disfruto como pasajero de la capsula terrestre, los ranchos viejos de paris o roma no son mas lindos que los que veo aqui" bienvenidos: http://castroruben.com *temo_a_un_ser_sin_rival* | 19:41 |
| === hatch__ is now known as hatch] | ||
| === hatch] is now known as hatch | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!