[19:37] Logan_ or jtaylor: Would one of you have time to look at uploading for [Bug 1291675 [19:37] bug 1291675 in lmms (Ubuntu) "[FFe] LMMS 1.0.0" [Wishlist,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1291675 [19:43] if I get a freeze exception for lz4 ;) [19:44] I want the pytables bugfix update that unfortunatelyneeds a newer lz4 with a new soversion [19:44] though pytables is its only rdepend [19:44] jtaylor: Where's the bug report? [19:44] didn't file one yet [19:44] File it and I'll be glad to look. [19:45] my motivation is somewhat vague [19:45] I think the main bug pytables fixes does not affect most of our arches [19:45] but a newer lz4 might be worthwhile on its own for trusty [19:47] OK. Feel free to ping me if you decide it's worth doing the paperwork. [20:10] ScottK: lmms is a bit confusing [20:10] upstream is git but package is based on bzr [20:10] but the orig tar does match a certain git commit, so its probably fine [20:10] I can upload though I have to assume it was tested by others [20:14] The bug indicates it was. [20:14] yes [20:15] So if you're comfortable with the packaging bits, go for it. [20:16] seems resonable [20:16] copyright looks outdated [20:17] still one i386 test build and up it goes [20:18] Please file a bug about the copyright. [20:21] mh [20:22] the package may not build on non x86 [20:22] but only one way to find out [20:34] Hmm. It was in some PPA. I'd have imagined that would be noticed. [20:40] ppas don't build ppc arm etc [20:55] Oh. [20:55] Right. [20:56] You said x86 and that translated in my head to 386. [20:56] We'll see shortly, accepted. [20:59] I tested i386 and amd64 [20:59] that works [20:59] but the gcc-multilib [amd64] build dep makes me wonder what happens on other arches [21:23] jtaylor: So far built on more archs than the last one did.