[19:37] <ScottK> Logan_ or jtaylor: Would one of you have time to look at uploading for [Bug 1291675
[19:43] <jtaylor> if I get a freeze exception for lz4 ;)
[19:44] <jtaylor> I want the pytables bugfix update that unfortunatelyneeds a newer lz4 with a new soversion
[19:44] <jtaylor> though pytables is its only rdepend
[19:44] <ScottK> jtaylor: Where's the bug report?
[19:44] <jtaylor> didn't file one yet
[19:44] <ScottK> File it and I'll be glad to look.
[19:45] <jtaylor> my motivation is somewhat vague
[19:45] <jtaylor> I think the main bug pytables fixes does not affect most of our arches
[19:45] <jtaylor> but a newer lz4 might be worthwhile on its own for trusty
[19:47] <ScottK> OK.  Feel free to ping me if you decide it's worth doing the paperwork.
[20:10] <jtaylor> ScottK: lmms is a bit confusing
[20:10] <jtaylor> upstream is git but package is based on bzr
[20:10] <jtaylor> but the orig tar does match a certain git commit, so its probably fine
[20:10] <jtaylor> I can upload though I have to assume it was tested by others
[20:14] <ScottK> The bug indicates it was.
[20:14] <jtaylor> yes
[20:15] <ScottK> So if you're comfortable with the packaging bits, go for it.
[20:16] <jtaylor> seems resonable
[20:16] <jtaylor> copyright looks outdated
[20:17] <jtaylor> still one i386 test build and up it goes
[20:18] <ScottK> Please file a bug about the copyright.
[20:21] <jtaylor> mh
[20:22] <jtaylor> the package may not build on non x86
[20:22] <jtaylor> but only one way to find out
[20:34] <ScottK> Hmm.  It was in some PPA.  I'd have imagined that would be noticed.
[20:40] <jtaylor> ppas don't build ppc arm etc
[20:55] <ScottK> Oh.
[20:55] <ScottK> Right.
[20:56] <ScottK> You said x86 and that translated in my head to 386.
[20:56] <ScottK> We'll see shortly, accepted.
[20:59] <jtaylor> I tested i386 and amd64
[20:59] <jtaylor> that works
[20:59] <jtaylor> but the gcc-multilib [amd64] build dep makes me wonder what happens on other arches
[21:23] <ScottK> jtaylor: So far built on more archs than the last one did.