[06:07] <stoned> hi
[06:07] <stoned> how do you enable TLS 1.2 for apache in 10.04 LTS
[06:07] <stoned> Lucid
[06:25] <bekks> stoned: Like this e.g.: http://blog.joefallon.net/2010/08/configure-tls-and-ssl-in-ubuntu-10-04-lts/
[06:27] <stoned> thanks
[06:27] <stoned> aptitude install openssl
[06:27] <stoned> ok
[06:27] <stoned> well see, this is where the problem lies.
[06:27] <stoned> The packages are too old.
[06:28] <stoned> I should have asked a different question
[06:28] <stoned> hang on let me rephrase my question
[06:28] <stoned> I am on ubuntu Lucid server LTS. I am on the distro's latest apache httpd w/ mod ssl and the distro's openssl and openssh packges.
[06:29] <stoned> They don't provide TLS 1.2 but only TLS 1.0
[06:29] <stoned> I need to get openssl (latest patched version I suppose) in order to tet the TLS 1.2 extentions
[06:29] <stoned> So I am looking for open ssl and open ssh server/client packeages (possibly backported)
[06:29] <stoned> I am on open ssl 0.9.8k
[06:30] <stoned> I need a newer updated version as well as I need openssh 5.7+
[06:30] <bekks> !sslbug | stoned
[06:30] <bekks> Write less, read more :)
[06:31] <stoned> 0.9.8k is not affected by heartbleed.
[06:31] <stoned> Also, I am aware that the bugfixes have been pushed out.
[06:32] <stoned> since Lucid has only 0.9.8k which is not affected by heartbleed, there is no updated openssl for Lucid.
[06:32] <bekks> you already said that.
[06:32] <stoned> How about you don't say inflammatory things to people.
[06:33] <stoned> bekks, alright, find me the latest openssh and openssl packages for lucid
[06:33] <stoned> I need openssh 5.7+ for lucid
[06:33] <bekks> Uh, you think someone providing informtion is inflammatory. Let's see how inflammator someone is who doesnt speak with you anymore.
[06:33] <stoned> yak yak yak
[06:35] <stoned> worst come to worst I'll build from source myself
[06:35] <stoned> :)
[06:35] <stoned> <- former DD who is stuck managing an ubuntu server for someone
[06:35] <stoned> I wouldn't touch ubuntu w/ a 100 foot pole
[06:35] <stoned> absolute garbage distro.
[06:36] <stoned> I was just hoping someone has already backported it
[06:36] <stoned> if not no big deal, be built in a little while.
[06:37] <stoned> lol, I'm looking for packages and he's telling me a link to how to setup it up, hahaha. Brilliant. Classic example of the oh-so-wonderful Ubuntu support.
[06:37] <stoned> Spot on.
[06:37] <bekks> classic example of the ranting troll in ubuntu. ignore set.
[06:37] <stoned> lol, a debian dev a troll.
[06:37] <stoned> Hahaha omg.
[06:37] <stoned> you're THAT guy.
[06:37] <stoned> :)
[06:37] <stoned> Welcome to who you are.
[08:45] <lordievader> Good morning.
[10:15] <stetho> Morning all. I'm having trouble finding the answer to something I know is simple. I'm PXE booting precise/saucy with a preseed file. The machines get their name using DNS/DHCP and then wait for me to press return to carry on - everything else then carries on without intervention. Does anyone know the preseed command for "use the name you get from DHCP"?
[12:39] <maveas> Anybody else having a problem with missing log files? Ie. /var/log/messages haven't been written to since monday the 7th of april on my server. Any ideas?
[18:22] <mortrca> Dovecot seems to be crashing on me again and again. Every time I start it (service dovecot start) it appears to start normally, but if I check the status of the service, it says it isn't running. I have checked the log files for anything that might explain this, but there is nothing, absolutely nothing in the logs from Dovecot. Without any logs, I don't have any idea how to debug this. Does anyone have a suggestion?
[18:24] <mortrca> Oh, and according to "doveadm log find", the log files do exist, so I don't think that's the problem. There just isn't anything to read in the logs
[19:37] <bananapie> Sometimes I have to compile software for my servers. Should I be building packages even when I am only installing the software on one server?
[19:38] <bekks> Sure
[19:39] <lordievader> bananapie: If you want apt/dpkg to be able to track it, yes.
[19:44] <bananapie> a while ago I was yelled at for using checkinstall to make packages for easier tracking. So that means I have to manually create the debian folder and all it's files each time ?