[00:29] <rww> ugh, BT is a mess because of the recent netsplits
[00:29] <rww> pages and pages of nonsense from hobana
[00:32] <Flannel> we should obviously just ban hobana!
[00:32] <rww> we should obviously just CS CLEAR the banlist
[00:32] <Flannel> You would say that!
[00:32] <rww> mhm
[00:32] <rww> but yeah, I'm testing a thing now and will be doing some cleanup later if it works
[00:58] <rww> ugh, commenting in BT doesn't set ban duration. oh well
[01:07] <rww> 01:07:14 <ubottu> Failed to set duration time on 29473 (bans not in sync)
[01:07] <rww> that's an understatement.
[01:09] <rww> ohhhhhhhhhhhh
[01:09] <rww> it failed to sync some bans because they lost their forwards back when that was a thing, so they're not removable now without a bunch of spamminess, I see...
[02:08] <rww> tsimpson: fixed?
[02:09] <tsimpson> rww: seems like it
[02:15] <knome> Unit193, 05:05 » Tm_T [tm_travolt@ubuntu/member/kde.developer.jkekkonen] has quit [Read  error: error:1408F119:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:decryption failed  or bad record mac]
[02:16] <knome> Unit193, helpful?
[02:16] <Unit193> My most interesting one was: Irssi: warning SSL read error: server closed connection unexpectedly
[03:21] <rww> okays, enough o' this
 is there  a tool with motion detection for a ip webcam available taking rtsp streams?
[04:47] <bazhang> fnordistus
[04:49] <Flannel> "motion"
[04:50] <Flannel> (is that tool)
[04:51] <bazhang> thanks Flannel
[04:52] <Flannel> At least, probably.  I know it does 2/3s of those things, and have no knowledge of the third, but it'll likely.
[05:42] <rww> Somebody else sanitycheck http://paste.ubuntu.com/7253637/ before I do it, please.
[05:43] <rww> Theoretically, all the numbers there are banids for #ubuntu bans that aren't currently set.
[05:44] <rww> and since I know none of you are going to actually volunteer to do that...
[05:45] <Corey> Let's see.
[05:45] <Corey> Do it!
[05:45] <rww> Tm_Tr, elky, bazhang: I nominate you
[05:45] <Corey> rww: Worst case you remove a ban.
[05:45] <Corey> rww: If it's for someone egregious, reset it later.
[05:45] <rww> Corey: nah, worst case Bantracker thinks a ban isn't set that is
[05:45] <Corey> Not the end of the world. :-)
[05:45] <rww> so even less bad
[05:46] <elky> what corey said
[05:46] <Flannel> rww: Yep.  Those are all numbers.
[05:46] <rww> ( Tm_Tr needs to atone for earlier, elky probably needs to atone for something, and bazhang is bazhang)
[05:46] <jussi> rww: nike.
[05:46] <elky> adidas?
[05:46] <elky> reebok?
[05:46] <Corey> jussi: Oh, you'r eback.
[05:46] <jussi> no... "Just do it" (Nike)
[05:46] <Corey> And only one of you. How lovely.
[05:47] <rww> fine
[05:47] <rww> i'm blaming Corey and jussi when this breaks everything
[05:47] <Corey> Yay!
[05:47] <jussi> Corey: I am not Tm_Tr
[05:47]  * Corey watches rww flood off
[05:49]  * tsimpson watches the log fill with 'supybot clearban called by "rww!robert@rww.name"'
[05:49] <elky> < rww> lol i'm currently lagged out
[05:49] <rww> done!
[05:49] <rww> tsimpson: I am impressed at how not slow that was
[05:50] <elky> i'm impressed that you got such perfectly even division with that mess of numbers
[05:50] <elky> (all the lines are the same length)
[05:50] <rww> elky: perl script, put 50 on a line
[05:50] <elky> yes, but there was exactly the right number for that
[05:51] <tsimpson> rww: looking at the implementation, so am I
[05:51] <rww> oh lol, I have more to remove
[05:51] <rww> I forgot to account for duplicates
[05:59] <rww> alrighty, spam time again
[05:59] <jussi> quick, ban him, he is spamming!
[05:59] <jussi> :P
[06:02] <rww> oh, hrm, i forgot it would send one error per line for already removed bans
[06:02] <rww> *this* might take a while
[06:02] <jussi> hehe
[06:03]  * jussi pats ubottu
[06:03] <elky> !ping
[06:03] <elky> yep.
[06:03] <rww> whoops
[06:03] <rww> hopefully its PING response is async
[06:03] <elky> botabuser
[06:03] <rww> like, PING the IRC command, not !ping
[06:04] <elky> jussi: you might like to arrange a huge plate of botsnacks
[06:04] <elky> she's going to need some pampering
[06:04]  * jussi hands that responsibility to tsimpson
[06:04] <rww> on the upside, live fire test of ubottu's ability to handle DOS!
[06:04] <Flannel> She runs on linux, why does she need DOS?
[06:05] <elky> DoS
[06:05] <Flannel> elky: ShE rUnS oN lInUx, WhY dOeS sHe NeEd DoS?
[06:07] <tsimpson> well I didn't really anticipate that kind of usage for clearban
[06:07] <rww> well, I'm kinda using it right now 100x more than it will ever be used again ever
[06:08] <Flannel> tsimpson: That just means it's designed properly, in the spirit of unix!
[06:08] <rww> until I do the same thing with #ubuntu-offtopic and every other channel I have op in, anyway
[06:08] <rww> except I'll do it right those times \o/
[06:12] <tsimpson> I'm working on a nicer implementation atm
[06:12] <tsimpson> (and by "nicer" I mean one that doesn't show just one error at a time)
[06:12]  * rww nods
[06:13] <rww> teehee
[06:15] <tsimpson> should be better now
[06:17] <rww> that's good, because I'm running round 2 now because I missed some of the really old bans, probably because of array size limits or something
[06:23] <rww> okays, everything in http://ubottu.com/bans.cgi?bans=on&page=0&channel=%23ubuntu&mutes=on is actually set in #ubuntu
[06:23] <elky> yay
[06:23]  * rww claps happily
[06:30] <elky> aside from the 3 obvious exceptions, the ban list here could do with some nuking too
[06:30] <elky> Tm_Tr: EXCUSE ME MISTER
[06:30] <rww> oh god
[06:39] <Tm_Tr> I'm not amused
[06:39] <bazhang> by what
[06:39] <elky> we are
 swap kills ssd
[06:44] <bazhang> really?
[06:45] <bazhang> this is the Romulan guy, so I check his questions carefully
[06:46] <k1l> check bantracker, he is a known problem (not only in #u)
[06:46] <bazhang> checking my memory is enough, the number of hours in PM with him
[06:46] <bazhang> !trim
[06:47] <elky> it's less of an issue now, but aiui, it's still an issue.
[06:47] <elky> read/writes are in the millions etc, but swap is going to go through those faster than normal disk usage etc
[06:48] <rww> !-trim
[06:48] <rww> yw
[07:00] <elky> oh gods, now the bazhangs are multiplying
[07:01] <rww> elky: it's the #defocus ops' new tactic
[07:01] <elky> ah
[07:01] <elky> i imagine it would confuse a portion of that channel indeed
[07:21] <rww> tsimpson: @clearban isn't working for http://ubottu.com/bans.cgi?channel=%23ubuntu-release-party&operator=&query=&bans=on&mutes=on for me :\
[07:24] <rww> but anyways. #ubuntu, #ubuntu+1, #ubuntu-offtopic, and here are all cleaned up, and that's all that matters really :P
[07:24] <tsimpson> @channel #ubuntu-release-party plugins.Bantracker.enabled True
[07:24] <tsimpson> should work now
[07:25] <bazhang> it's open?
[07:25] <tsimpson> it's never closed
[07:25] <rww> bazhang: it's been open. nobody's talking in it, though
[07:25] <rww> and I don't have ops in it, so it clearly is not cool
[07:27] <bazhang> hehe
[07:27] <bazhang> so only the ubuntu cloaked get it then
[07:29] <tsimpson> looks like it's synced with the #ubuntu access list
[07:29] <tsimpson> or is intended to be so
[07:30] <tsimpson> maybe even all core ops, I see 64 entries
[13:36] <totem> hi
[13:36] <ikonia> hello totem
[13:36] <totem> invite peoples to join #ubuntu-women is rude?
[13:36] <totem> hello ikonia
[13:36] <ikonia> what are you talking about ?
[13:36] <ikonia> (in reference to what)
[13:37] <totem> ikonia, i seen ubuntu-women is quiet channel
[13:37] <totem> may i make invite peoples to join there?
[13:38] <ikonia> why ?
[13:38] <ikonia> why does it concern you if it's busy/empty ?
[13:38] <totem> so quiet on there
[13:38] <ikonia> who do you want to invite ?
[13:38] <totem> ikonia, everyone
[13:38] <ikonia> then no
[13:38] <ikonia> that's not it's function
[13:38] <ikonia> there is a clear topic in the channel detailing the projects goals (links to it) just inviting random people there is no helpful
[13:39] <totem> no helpfully? i think many girl on the internet
[13:39] <ikonia> no
[13:40] <totem> not in 3 years ago
[13:40] <ikonia> no
[13:40] <totem> OMG, you said no in 2 times
[13:40] <totem> ikonia, i love you
[13:40] <ikonia> thanks
[13:40] <Pici> weird
[13:41] <elky> he's banned from #ubuntu-women for weird reasons
[13:41] <ikonia> he'll start inviting people anyway, so pointless discussion
[13:42] <elky> i was hoping to go to bed
[13:42] <ikonia> do so
[13:42] <ikonia> don't stay up for the sake of him
[14:24]  * DJones hands irccloud.com a replacement carrier pidgeon to help stabilise their connection
[15:40] <daftykins> "batcave" in #ubuntu spamming users and timewasting in channel again
[15:41] <ikonia> he's not in #ubuntu
[15:42] <ikonia> he left a while ago
[15:43] <daftykins> and is back
[15:43] <ikonia> ughh, really
[15:43] <ikonia> I'll deal with it, thanks daftykins
[15:43] <daftykins> (:
 tuff, please stop sending me webcam spam. thank you.    anyone can confirm?
[18:50] <Jordan_U> Confirmed.
[18:51] <k1l_> ok
[19:53] <k1l_> dealing with it
 mheinke: so instead he should be encouraged to fear a TTY, install malware, and if something goes wrong, reinstall the entire operating system?
[23:25] <Jordan_U> And 16:20 < riceandbeans> john38: head to Debian, don't tell them you use ubuntu, tell them you use debian, you'll get better help, faster
[23:25] <bazhang> on thin ice
 mheinke: ubuntu regularly forks from debian sid
[23:33] <bazhang> really?
[23:34] <Pici> bazhang: if by 'forks', they mean 'syncs', then yes.
[23:34] <bazhang> Pici, "canonical malware"
[23:34] <Pici> I was replying to you here
[23:35] <bazhang> ah right, sorry
[23:35] <bazhang> he was full on trolling, from what I could see