[01:41] <PabloRubianes> daker, ping around?
[01:53] <jose> mhall119: hey, I see a problem on the MPs from slangasek: he seems to be branching lp:summit/production, hacking, and pushing to lp:summit
[01:53] <jose> the one that has just been merged, for example, changed the version number to follow production instead of trunk
[01:54] <jose> I can fix it, but I don't think this is what we want
[01:58] <jose> mhall119: ping?
[03:27] <mhall119> jose: hey, I've merged his branches after I reverted changes to version.py
[03:27] <jose> oh, got it
[03:27] <mhall119> he knows now to branch from trunk and propose MPs back to trunk, so it shouldn't happen again
[03:27] <jose> cool
[03:28] <jose> I should get back to a bug I have assigned on 'back to schedule' buttons once I'm done with this seafile charm - seems promising
[03:28] <mhall119> jose: FYI, slangasek is going to use Summit for debconf, so there will be some changes coming in to support that
[03:28] <mhall119> for example: https://code.launchpad.net/~mhall119/summit/custom-registration-form/+merge/215795
[03:29] <jose> awesome, thanks for the heads up
[03:32] <mhall119> np, sorry I didn't mention it earlier, I've been ignoring IRC to get those landed :)
[03:34] <jose> I noticed :P
[03:36] <mhall119> alright, off to bed now
[03:37] <jose> have a good night!
[03:40] <slangasek> mhall119: well, our branch is branched from prod (because "prod"), so there's a good chance you'll continue to see traces of that in future MPs.... why is the version number on trunk different than on prod?
[03:41] <slangasek> mhall119: incidentally, have you looked at our latest code?  We have a registration form put together... it's not based on the attendee form because we've subclassed the model, not sure if the custom-registration-form above still benefits us then?
[03:43] <mhall119> slangasek: it does, you'll still need to use attendee somehow
[03:43] <slangasek> mhall119: we're using attendee by subclassing it
[03:43] <slangasek> seems to work fine :)
[03:43] <jose> slangasek: afaik, code to prod is only pushed when there's a new release
[03:43] <mhall119> you can either use a subclass of Attendee, or something with a FK to Attendee, but you're going to need to create/update the Attendee record one way or another
[03:44] <mhall119> jose is right, you should work on Summit's trunk, not prod
[03:45] <mhall119> slangasek: you'll be passed the Attendee record for the user, or a new, unsaved Attendee instance for that user, which you can use to find/create your subclass
[03:45] <slangasek> mhall119: yes, /we are already doing that/
[03:45] <mhall119> ok, perfect
[03:46] <slangasek> so I don't see how the above code change relates to what we're doing, since we already have this working without the above
[03:46] <mhall119> so with the above MP you just need to set REGISTRATION_FORM_VIEW in your debconf_settings.py
[03:46] <mhall119> slangasek: the above MP will make the current registration link and page use your view function instead of the built-in one Summit uses
[03:46] <slangasek> which replaces having a separate urlpattern declaration for it?
[03:47] <mhall119> yes
[03:47] <slangasek> ok
[03:47] <mhall119> which means the template doesn't need to change either
[03:47] <slangasek> we've modified the template a fair bit
[03:47] <mhall119> summit.html?
[03:47] <mhall119> or website_base.html?
[03:48] <slangasek> registration.html
[03:48] <mhall119> where is registration.html?
[03:48] <slangasek> debconf_website/templates/registration.html
[03:49] <mhall119> ah, that's fine then
[03:49] <mhall119> you can do whatever you want with template in debconf_website/templates/
[03:49] <mhall119> I was talking about not needing to change the summit.html template that produces the link to the registration form
[03:50] <mhall119> your REGISTRATION_FORM_VIEW can use whatever template you want to display your form
[03:50] <slangasek> ah; well we didn't need to change that either, because we just redirected the url elsewhere :)
[03:51] <mhall119> well, now you don't need to do that either :)
[03:51] <mhall119> ok, off to bed for real this time
[03:51] <mhall119> slangasek: if you can add/update test cases for any MPs against Summit, that would help them land
[03:52] <slangasek> ok
[03:52] <mhall119> I've updated trunk to fix some (5) tests that had been broken
[03:52] <mhall119> also, python-mock is now a dependency for running the test suite
[03:52] <mhall119> well, it is with my MP above, so when that is approved and lands
[18:32] <mhall119> slangasek: are you planningon using Summit's sponsorship section, or do you have your own?
[18:33] <slangasek> mhall119: would be using the summit one
[18:35] <mhall119> ok, it doesn't work in django 1.6. FYI
[19:07] <mhall119> FAILED (failures=8, errors=78) on Django 1.6, this is going to be fun