[03:02] huwshimi I replied to your comment on y our branch [03:11] hatch: Thanks [12:07] morning [12:49] bac: morning [12:49] marcoceppi: I just pushed the trusty charm to lp:~juju-gui-charmers/charms/trusty/juju-gui/trunk . Could you please promulgate it? [12:55] frankban: promulgated, third official trusty charm \o [12:55] \o/ [12:55] marcoceppi: great thanks! [12:58] frankban: marcoceppi woot! :) ahead of the game [13:17] jujugui: can someone go to https://staging.manage.jujucharms.com and click the login button? after returning from the openid login i'm still not logged in. [13:18] bac: same here [13:19] bac: it seems I was able to log in [13:19] frankban: the button now says 'logout'? [13:19] bac: yes [13:19] go to another page [13:19] huh [13:19] it's kept for one page and then clears on the next link clicked [13:20] rick_h_: mine always says 'login' [13:20] bac: so right after the login redirect I get logout [13:20] I then clicked charms to see if I had logged in links and it went back to login [13:21] frankban: can you verify you're still logged in after navigating away? [13:21] rick_h_, bac: I see "logout" unless I go to the charms tab, in which I see "login" again [13:21] bac: and if I switch tab again I see "logout" [13:22] bac: and if I click "logout" it does not log me out [13:22] frankban: oh, interesting. i was *on* the charms tab. now i see the same behavior you see. logged in everywhere except that tab [13:22] well, really, do you ever need to logout? [13:22] heh [13:22] frankban: just don't manage charms on a public computer! [13:23] * bac goes to check production... [13:25] frankban: if you go to https://staging.manage.jujucharms.com/charms/precise/apache2 do you get 'feature' and 'delete' under links? [13:25] bac: no [13:26] bac: oh, now I see them [13:27] bac: after a refresh... [13:27] weird [13:28] rick_h_, hey so what's the status of the URLs? Do you have an idea? [13:28] quantum-auth [13:29] jcastro: of which urls? [13:35] the ones where we search for charms on the internet [13:35] and we can't find them [13:38] bac: do you have time for a quick documentation review? https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/240 [13:38] frankban: sure [13:38] thanks [13:39] ugh, in-line diffs now make my eyes hurt. [13:40] bac: there's the plugin in the notes for side by side github diffs [13:41] bac: but funny how launchpad went years with giant diffs inline and now it's hard to process sometimes lol [13:47] rick_h_: yeah. preferences are very temporal. [13:47] i like what i liked...yesterday [13:49] rick_h_: a buddy who goes to LV a lot says you need to plan pretty well in advance to get reservations at some places. just a heads up. oh, and the night i'm unavailable got moved to wednesday. that said, there must be tons of places we can just waltz right in to. [13:49] bac: ok, jcsackett had a suggestion I was going to look into [13:49] it's on my todo list when I get back into the states [13:49] rt [13:50] thanks for the heads up on the day you're unavail [13:50] rick_h_: if you want, though, i can make a reservation through opentable now and just cancel it if you decide it isn't what you want [13:51] bac: forwarded the email to you [13:51] take a peek [13:53] cs:trusty/juju-gui-1 is out there \o/ [13:55] rick_h_: our markdown renderer does not seem to work very well with ordered lists (https://jujucharms.com/sidebar/search/trusty/juju-gui-1/#readme and then scroll down to "Builtin server") [13:55] frankban: k, we can file a bug to see if there's an update to it. or find a decent replacement for it [13:59] frankban: i've made comments based on just reading the doc. do i need to QA it by actually doing the steps, i guess up to pushing? [14:00] frankban: also, we often document procedures like this that may be better suited to just writing a script. maybe an idea for next time? [14:00] bac: no QA required [14:00] ok [14:01] uh-oh, i clicked 'close'. is that bad? [14:01] bac: the upgrade check is not easily scriptable [14:01] frankban: yeah, that's where i was iffy [14:14] frankban https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/233#issuecomment-40573463 I think you're the best to answer this q [14:14] and good morning :) [14:15] hatch: morning, I'll do [14:16] rick_h_: that place looks fine by me. you want to do thursday at 7? just our team -- 7 people? [14:16] frankban thanks [14:17] Ooo where are we going? [14:17] bac: make it for 10 at the moment and it might shrink [14:17] rick_h_: ok, ten is too many to do online and will require calling them later [14:17] bac: 9? [14:17] :) [14:17] what's that limit I guess [14:18] i experimentally discovered 7 is the limit [14:18] but i can call them later [14:18] hah, well we'll definitely be over that [14:18] bac: definitely not 7. that's your team count now (according to directory) and i'll be on your team then. :p [14:18] ok cool thanks for doing that bac [14:19] we'll have one other new person at least with us, and hopefully 2 or 3. [14:19] ok, i'll call for ten [14:19] the new team won't be fully formed yet so going to wrap them into our stuff [14:19] for vegas [14:19] thanks bac [14:21] hatch: from that github discussion it's not clear to me to what comment he is replying [14:21] jcsackett: i forgot huw. out of sight... [14:22] frankban I don't think he is replying to anyone. Instead he is asking how to make a machine into a container [14:23] hatch: ok [14:27] hatch: done [14:28] frankban thanks! [14:31] relocating... [14:46] ugh I really hate our test suite [14:46] code works, tests work, tests fail when run with other tests [14:47] rick_h_ can I propose a test-refactoring sprint somewhere sometime soon? lol [14:50] jujugui call in 10 [14:56] hatch: Running through the tests with your patch right now… [14:56] ok so that's good right? Because it woudl have failed already [14:58] jujugui call in 2 [14:58] team notifications...w00t look at us go [15:02] jujugui call? [15:02] 2fa >:T [15:34] heading back [15:48] ugh my vehicle insurance rates are going up 15% [15:48] gona be $1350/yr ouch [15:50] per mile actually driven that's pretty pricey lol [15:54] kadams54 is it your plan to push another commit of changes up to your PR? [15:59] rick_h_ are you around today? [15:59] hatch: maybe [16:00] haha, just wondering if we are having the 1:1 today [16:00] hatch: oh, hadn't planned on it. If we need to chat I can get away. [16:00] Makyo: ^ +1 [16:00] and I guess everyone as I'm traveling back tomorrow [16:00] jujugui if we need 1-1 time maybe let's get a schedule setup for Friday [16:01] rick_h_, Friday sounds good if needed. [16:01] I've got nothing to chat about, so unless you've got something for me [16:01] I will be in Friday morning for the call though because I have a horrible work-life balance :P [16:01] hatch: the big thins is I've asked kadams54 to reach out to you before you disappear to he can help complete the landing of the state/sidebar stuff [16:02] hatch: so please make sure you guys can get in touch so he can continue any work next week as I REALLY want to get that landed/wiped and only have MV for vegas on [16:02] rick_h_ yeah I'm pretty darn close now - especially now that I've finally found the test bug [16:02] hatch: ok cool [16:02] it's all the fiddly inspector bits that someone will likely have to implement [16:02] there are a lot of interactions with the app heh [16:02] hatch: vaca is important and all. So don't kill yourself over any of it, but please make sure to have a nice handoff [16:02] hatch: :) [16:02] I love the new state system though, so nice to work with [16:03] hatch: very cool, glad the tough branches leading up to here are paying off [16:03] I LOVE getting a good api/foundation to work on top of. Makes life so much nicer [16:04] I want to consider rewriting the sidebar into a static element but that can be done later sometime [16:05] hatch: hmm, true I guess. We'll see. I fear for some future work that won't be a good idea [16:05] but that's speculative [16:06] yeah - it's super low down on the todo list right now [16:06] :) [16:09] hatch: yeah, running another commit through the test suite [16:13] sounds good, I'll re-review at that point so you can get it landed [16:21] hey hatch [16:21] have you guys test the -gui charm on trusty? [16:21] I am getting bustage [16:21] jcastro: hmm, it just landed and was qa'd I thought by frankban and bac [16:21] jcastro hey, there is a trusty version now....but it was running fine [16:21] it could also just be me [16:21] what's the bustage? [16:21] subprocess.CalledProcessError: Command '['apt-get', '-y', 'install', 'libapt-pkg-dev', 'python-apt', 'python-launchpadlib', 'python-tempita', 'python-yaml']' r│····eturned non-zero exit status 100 [16:22] though this is a branched charm [16:22] what's the canonical location of the trusty one? I can just regrab the fresh one [16:22] jcastro: you should pull the trusty charm [16:22] yeah [16:22] lp:~juju-gui-charmers/charms/trusty/juju-gui/trunk [16:22] yea, there were fixes in it. ^ [16:22] ta [16:22] jcastro yeah you'll need to pull from the new trusty charm [16:22] it's the same codebase as the precise one but has some fixes [16:23] ack [16:23] jcastro: yes cs:trusty/juju-gui-1 was released today. anyway, that error seems weird [16:23] jcastro: charm get cs:trusty/juju-gui will work too, since it's promulgated [16:24] yeah I think the one on this power box was the precise one [16:26] man, I should have done a lightweight checkout, you guys have been busy. :) [16:29] sheesh the bzr gods didn't like that....they kicked me offline :P === hatch__ is now known as hatch [17:24] jujugui looking for a review/qa plz and thanks https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/241 [17:25] doh lint failures [17:25] hatch: I'll take a look since I need to get on this state stuff [17:26] thanks [17:26] after this branch lands I'm really close to getting the inspector left and state stuff done [17:26] bunch of fiddly bugs now [17:29] lint failures fixed [18:00] kadams54 I'm going to grab some lunch, so I'll fix/land whatever you have for comments when I get back [18:00] k [18:47] hatch: the only days I have in admin for you are the 18th of this month [18:48] hmm that's not right....lemme take a peek [18:48] I remember because I entered the two swap days from London [18:48] let me know if you see more but that's all I'm seeing [18:48] hatch: so when are you out this week? [18:49] just friday [18:49] k [18:49] please verify the time off requests in canonical admin, for some reason they're not showing here [18:50] hmm you're right, they aren't showing there... [18:50] ohh [18:50] they are [18:50] but they are under january [18:51] because thats when they were from [18:51] the two under January 2014 [18:51] this is for next week? [18:51] the notes on both ref the London sprint [18:51] so you've got mon, tues, wed, thurs? [18:51] and friday is a holiday [18:52] https://gist.github.com/hatched/4ce2a9322f4e43fe0acc [18:52] yeah friday is easter friday [18:52] wed -> friday is gophercon [18:52] thought gophercon was fri/sat/sun? [18:52] ok, you need to file the conference days for gophercon then? [18:52] Makyo: ^ [18:53] 24th to 26th [18:53] ok [18:53] traveling on the 23rd [18:53] gotcha, off a day [18:53] ok I'll file the conf days on admin [18:53] one sec [18:53] ok, so just need the conference days for that then to sign off [18:54] done [18:54] thanks [18:54] the swap day thing is confusing [18:54] yea [18:55] well I was expecting to see something but according to canonical admin the only day off in April is the holiday [18:57] did you see the swap days? [18:57] the ones in the gist? [18:58] kadams54 any comments on the branch? [18:58] Honestly, I haven't started looking at it yet. I'm still trying to wrap up the edits on my branch to get that back to you. [18:58] I made the changes and broke a bunch of tests [18:58] oh ok, I really need this branch landed so I can continue [18:58] I'll branch off of it then and hope there aren't too many changes :) [18:58] OK, I'll get you unblocked. [18:59] oh rick_h_ Makyo is running a split day today so he might not be around (re your mention previousl) [19:00] I am, already filed. [19:01] oh haha there u are [19:17] Stepping out for a few, back later and working this evening. [19:30] hatch: finished with your PR. Everything looks good. [19:31] thanks! [19:31] kadams54 are you back home tomorrow? [19:33] Yes, though not until just before midnight [19:38] ohh ok, well ping me whenever you have some spare time and I can run you through the state/inspector business [19:50] rick_h_ you around for a quick q on the state object? [19:51] hatch: sure thing, give me a minute [19:51] ^ kadams54 you might as well join in too [19:51] https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/76cpi6lmue3c8e7c75bghs18a0?hl=en [20:00] heh something isn't quite right here... /inspector/95880351$/:flags:/state/ :) [20:00] odly enough it still works to open the proper inspector... [21:14] heh, I want juju actions right now. [21:17] rick_h_ I've added 7 cards to Project A for the unsched cards to get state+inspector ready to go [21:17] hatch: ok thanks [21:17] I'll be trying to deal with cards tomorrow, kind of messed up planning this week [21:18] it's ok - these ones are sorted by importance and bugs [21:19] the list may grow - but this is all the bugs I've found [21:19] by Vegas should be a totally doable task [21:20] ok hopefully [21:20] I'll be around to help while I'm not here :) [21:20] except during gophercon [22:30] jujugui looking for a review and qa https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/242 [22:43] kadams54 if you're up for it I have another state branch in PR [22:43] Getting ready to head out for dinner, but I can take a look after [22:44] sure np it's pretty close to EOD here [22:49] man why are ac routers so expensive! [22:59] That was a bust, jeez. [22:59] Trashy modular priced at least $50k too high. [23:00] hatch, can look. [23:00] Makyo thanks [23:00] and boo! [23:00] Excited for tomorrow's house, though. Looks fantastic. [23:01] Morning [23:01] got a link? [23:01] morning huwshimi [23:01] 1 sec. [23:01] I had frankban answer your question huwshimi [23:01] he wrote that stuff [23:01] the machine stuff [23:01] hatch: Ah yes, I see, brilliant! [23:02] hatch, http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/7533-Joel-Pl-Johnstown-CO-80534/13860898_zpid/ [23:03] ooo nice place and awesome price [23:04] at least compared to here [23:04] It's a pretty awesome price for here, too. [23:06] Makyo that here would be around $630,000 [23:06] lol [23:06] well it's a little 'old style' so maybe 550 [23:07] Yeah, closer to town and it'd easily fetch that much. [23:08] looks like it has an awesome yard and all that [23:09] Yeah. James has a small machine shop in the garage, so more space between the neighbors and us is good. [23:10] haha [23:10] well good luck [23:18] Makyo: Buying a house tomorrow? === hatch__ is now known as hatch [23:21] huwshimi, viewing, not buying. Maybe buying soon, though., [23:21] Makyo: Fun!