| facundobatista | Hi all! I'm failing to be able to do a "bzr pull" on launchpad projects, I got a "ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host" | 02:10 |
|---|---|---|
| facundobatista | is launchpad all ok? | 02:11 |
| jose | facundobatista: I'm checking with the sysadmins at the moment, they're internally checking | 02:11 |
| facundobatista | jose, thanks | 02:11 |
| dobey | facundobatista: you can try ssh -vv bazaar.launchpad.net btw | 02:25 |
| dobey | bzr info and such seem to work ok here for me anyway | 02:25 |
| jose | it started working again | 02:25 |
| facundobatista | yes, now it works | 02:26 |
| facundobatista | dobey, jose, gracias! | 02:26 |
| dpm | hi wgrant, a LP question for you if you're around. Is there a way to set up a project, so that when a new MP is submitted the maintainer team is automatically added as a reviewer? I've noticed when I submit a MP myself, that happens, but not when external contributors submit MPs | 07:45 |
| wgrant | dpm: It depends on how you've configured the reviewer of the target branch. | 07:46 |
| wgrant | You'll see a "Set branch reviewer" link on the right | 07:47 |
| * dpm looks | 07:47 | |
| dpm | wgrant, I'm looking at calendar trunk (which is always our target), and the reviewer there is already set to ubuntu-calendar-dev, which is the maintainer team. However, it seems only on the MPs I submitted ubuntu-calendar-dev was explicitly added to the list of reviewers. For all the other MPs I had to set it manually - the context here is that we use a launchpadlib script to track core app reviews, and it will only list them via the getRequestedReviews() | 07:50 |
| dpm | if the team is in the reviewers list | 07:50 |
| dpm | Another example is https://code.launchpad.net/reminders-app/+activereviews - the first MP has reminders-app-dev in the reviewers list, whereas the second doesn't | 07:58 |
| lanoxx | hello, I would like to request a maintainer change for the package tilda | 08:05 |
| czajkowski | lanoxx: if you file a question they can help you | 08:06 |
| czajkowski | lanoxx: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion | 08:07 |
| lanoxx | czajkowski, https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/247073 | 08:08 |
| wgrant | dpm: Oh. Once a member of the team reviews it, the team review request will be replaced with a vote from that person. Because there's no need for a review from that team. | 08:13 |
| dpm | wgrant, oh bummer, so effectively that means we cannot track "Needs review" branches in our script? As the initial review request for the team will disappear as soon as a team member sends a vote? | 08:15 |
| wgrant | dpm: Why not use branch.getMergeProposals? | 08:15 |
| wgrant | getRequestedReviews is a method to get the requested reviews. | 08:16 |
| dpm | wgrant, ah, nice one. I was using team.getMergeProposals and that obviously didn't return anything. I'll try branch.getMergeProposals | 08:16 |
| dpm | wgrant, do you know where I can find any snippets to get hold of a branch using launchpadlib? | 08:19 |
| wgrant | dpm: lp.branches.getByUrl(url='lp:blahblahblah') | 08:20 |
| dpm | cool, thanks! | 08:21 |
| StevenK | Oh god, it exists | 08:23 |
| StevenK | bzr: ERROR: Parent not accessible given base "bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/+branch/blahblahblah/" and relative path "../../../~gbancroft-canonical/blahblahblah/design-blog-theme/" | 08:23 |
| czajkowski | :o | 08:24 |
| StevenK | I think a project was renamed and then deactivated rather than just deactivated | 08:26 |
| wgrant | StevenK: Not deactivated, just with a weird stacked_on_location | 08:29 |
| StevenK | Hah | 08:30 |
| === JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
| dajhorn | I have a PPA that is sporadically failing with a "State: Chroot problem" error because util-linux is failing to install. Is this the right place to report it? | 15:12 |
| cjwatson | Maybe. Which PPA? | 15:13 |
| dajhorn | cjwatson, Here is an example: https://launchpad.net/~zfs-native/+archive/staging/+build/5914177/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-amd64.spl-linux_0.6.2-2.1~trusty~10.gbpedccf5_CHROOTWAIT.txt.gz | 15:13 |
| cjwatson | blink | 15:14 |
| dajhorn | cjwatson, the glitch began yesterday. I think that the pertinent line is: udev depends on util-linux (>= 2.16); however: Package util-linux is not configured yet. | 15:15 |
| cjwatson | infinity: ^- Could you please have a look? From the timing it seems like it must be something to do with your util-linux upload, but I can't see what | 15:15 |
| infinity | cjwatson: That looks a lot like an apt bug, but not sure how. | 15:27 |
| infinity | The simple workaround is probably just to refresh the chroots. | 15:28 |
| infinity | But... | 15:28 |
| dajhorn | infinity, feel free to kick over anything in those PPAs (if you can do that as an admin). I will be /away for an hour or two. (Thanks.) | 15:31 |
| cjwatson | dajhorn: thanks very much for mentioning this, I think we'll need to get an urgent fix into trusty - it affects upgrades of minimal saucy chroots to trusty | 15:36 |
| === maclin__ is now known as maclin | ||
| === dpm is now known as dpm-afk | ||
| === compholio is now known as ehoover | ||
| zyga | hi, what is the frequency of publisher runs that copies bult binaries into a PPA archive | 18:19 |
| zyga | https://code.launchpad.net/~checkbox-dev/+archive/ppa/+packages | 18:19 |
| zyga | this archive has some packages that built over an hour ago but are still not published | 18:19 |
| wgrant | It's probably fallout from the firewall issues earlier. | 18:19 |
| wgrant | Let me see. | 18:19 |
| zyga | thanks | 18:20 |
| === dpm-afk is now known as dpm | ||
| zyga | wgrant: any luck? | 18:34 |
| wgrant | zyga: It's publishing now, but there's a bit of a backlog. | 18:34 |
| zyga | wgrant: ok, thanks for your help :-) | 18:35 |
| wgrant | np | 18:35 |
| === dpm is now known as dpm-afk | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| AtnNn | Hello. What could cause this error in a launchpad build? unmet dependencies: npm : Depends: node-gyp (>= 0.10.9) but it is not going to be installed | 21:05 |
| AtnNn | I can install node-gyp 0.10.10 on trusty just fine locally | 21:05 |
| dobey | the dependency not being installable | 21:06 |
| dobey | maybe it conflicts with something else that's also trying to be installed? | 21:07 |
| AtnNn | dobey: all the dependencies install correctly on my trusty schroot. and the same package builds fine for saucy on launchpad. Is there a way I can reproduce the launchpad build environment locally? | 21:09 |
| dobey | use sbuild, but it won't be exactly the same; but it's the closest you can get | 21:11 |
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| AtnNn | that's what I used. | 21:15 |
| dobey | what's the url to the build log? | 21:19 |
| AtnNn | https://launchpadlibrarian.net/172971888/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-amd64.rethinkdb_1.12.2-0ubuntu1~trusty_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 21:19 |
| dobey | if i run that apt-get command on trusty here, it fails with the same error | 21:22 |
| dobey | libv8-dev and node-gyp conflict | 21:24 |
| dobey | not sure why, but that's what is causing the issue | 21:25 |
| AtnNn | dobey: thanks for trying. I can now get the error too. I had not run that exact apt-get command because debuild did not report any missing dependencies | 21:27 |
| === Barnabas_ is now known as BarnabasDK | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!