[12:56] <arges> ppisati: hey. testing trusty on my pandaboard, dmesg is getting spammed with "gic_timer_retrigger: lost localtimer interrupt" have you seen this before?
[13:40] <ppisati> arges: nope
[13:40] <ppisati> arges: flag@panda:~$ dmesg | grep "gic_timer_retrigger" | wc -l
[13:40] <ppisati> 0
[13:40] <ppisati> 3.13.0-24-generic #46-Ubuntu
[13:41] <arges> ppisati: this is on ES Rev B 
[13:41] <arges> and i have same kernel version
[13:41] <arges> oh wait
[13:41] <ppisati> panda es rev b1
[13:41] <arges>  3.14.0-armv7-x3 
[18:30] <bjf> jsalisbury, bug #1285723
[18:30] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1285723 in linux (Ubuntu Precise) "cifs: connect: dfs doesn't work where servers using package signing are mixed with servers which don't use package signing" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1285723
[18:30] <bjf> jsalisbury, is this person testing the kernel that is in -proposed or not?
[18:32] <jsalisbury> bjf, His comment suggests that he is.  He didn't indicate if the -proposed kernel fixes the original bug or not.  Just that both have this new signature issue.
[18:33] <jsalisbury> bjf, maybe I need to clarify my comment.
[18:36] <jsalisbury> bjf, s/new signature issue/required key not available issue/
[18:36] <bjf> jsalisbury, yeah, can't tell if this helped his issue or not or if he's moved on to another issue
[18:37] <jsalisbury> bjf, I just added another comment to see if he'll respond.
[19:00] <apw> xnox, http://people.canonical.com/~apw/lp1308685-trusty/
[19:54] <rtg> hallyn, are there any unprivileged container gotchas or limitations that we should mention in our release notes ?
[19:55] <hallyn> rtg: not that I can think of.  stgraber ^ ?
[19:55] <hallyn> rtg: I'm heading out righ tnow, will be on later if there's any more qs
[19:56] <rtg> hallyn, ack. thanks
[19:58] <stgraber> might be worth mentioning the apparmor bug?
[19:58] <stgraber> dmesg getting flooded
[19:58] <rtg> stgraber, do you know that bug number off hand ?
[20:03] <stgraber> jdstrand, jjohansen: what's the bug number for that apparmor_unix_may_send flood?
[20:06] <rtg> stgraber, tough to do any LP searches when it keeps timing out
[20:32] <jjohansen> stgraber: hrmmm, I'm not sure I can't find it in the bug lists
[20:32] <stgraber> jjohansen: mind filing one then since I guess you know exactly what this is all about? :)
[20:33] <jjohansen> stgraber: yeah, I need it anyways so that I can send the patch for it
[21:03] <jjohansen> stgraber, ogasawara: bug#1308761
[21:03] <jjohansen> ogasawara: I'll send a patch for it along with some other patches to the list today
[21:03] <ogasawara> jjohansen: ack, thanks