[05:49] <eagles0513875_> hey all :)
[05:49] <eagles0513875_> ping ScottK
[06:32] <dholbach> good morning
[06:38] <geser> good morning
[06:49] <eagles0513875_> mornig dholbach  and geser  :)
[06:52] <eagles0513875_> hey dholbach i have a question is it possible to get a package updated just before relase as I am trying to get the right LMMS package into the repos before 14.04 is released if possible
[06:54] <geser> IMHO you should take you time and make a good tested SRU instead of trying to rush it to get it in in the last second (if it would get accepted at this time at all)
[06:57] <dholbach> eagles0513875: if you feel it's super urgent, here are the instructions: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FreezeExceptionProcess
[07:02] <eagles0513875_> dholbach: your opinion here. the current 1.0 lmms in the 14.04 repos is the wrong version and contains unstable features which we dont want to give to users. would you recommend a feature freeze exception or an SRU
[07:03] <dholbach> I don't know what the impact is and haven't looked at what exactly the problem is
[07:03] <dholbach> if you're unsure, you can reach out to the release team
[07:03] <Unit193> zequence: ----^
[07:05] <eagles0513875_> dholbach: i dont think it should cause any major issues. with 14.04 as dependencies havent changed just the branch that its built against
[07:06] <dholbach> eagles0513875: feel free to file the exception and get in touch with the release team
[07:06] <eagles0513875_> ok
[07:07] <eagles0513875_> thanks dholbach
[08:01] <lanoxx> hello, I would like to request a maintainer change for the package tilda
[08:03] <Noskcaj> lanoxx, yes?
[08:04] <lanoxx> Noskcaj, the current maintainer Ira Synder has no been active since a few years and I am the current debian maintainer for this package
[08:04] <lanoxx> s/no/not
[08:05] <Unit193> You are the Debian maintainer and Ubuntu syncs directly from there.
[08:05] <lanoxx> Yes, Ubuntu has been synching my packages for some time now.
[08:05] <Noskcaj> lanoxx, try #launchpad
[08:06] <Unit193> So I suppose I don't understand the question.
[08:07] <lanoxx> https://launchpad.net/tilda <--- There, the registered Maintainer is "Ira Synder", I want it to say "lanoxx"
[08:07] <Unit193> Ahhh, I see.
[08:10] <lanoxx> I have another question, I have released tilda 1.1.11 some month ago, but Ubuntu 13.10 is still at 1.1.8, why have the last 3 updates not been synched?
[08:14] <geser> because Ubuntu 13.10 is already released and like in Debian stable only SRU are allowed for released versions
[08:15] <geser> the next Ubuntu release 14.04 will have tilda 1.1.11
[08:40] <zequence> eagles0513875_: I can get it in today, but the changelog needs to be fixed
[08:41] <lanoxx> geser, 1.1.x are only stable bug fixes.
[08:41] <zequence> unfortunately I'm not the person to ask how to fix it
[08:41] <eagles0513875_> zequence: i have poked the guy
[08:41] <eagles0513875_> zequence: mirv in stuiod dev channel helping him
[08:42] <zequence> eagles0513875_: The version number needs to be sane, and the bug needs to be in the changelog as well
[08:42] <lanoxx> geser, I am using semantic versioning in tilda, so these updates should qualify to SRU, or not/
[08:45] <eagles0513875_> zequence: have you seen mirv's merge reuqest and his suggestions on what to fix
[08:46] <geser> lanoxx: updates for a released Ubuntu version are a manual process (upload directly in Ubuntu), not an automatic sync like in the development release
[08:47] <lanoxx> geser, so that would mean I have to make a request to update the package each time i release a new version in debian, yes?
[08:54] <geser> lanoxx: see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates; if you think the bug fixes are important enough to get the fixed version in a stable Ubuntu release then yes (the process should be similar to the process to fix a package in Debian stable)
[09:09] <zequence> eagles0513875_: No. Won't have much time to look through stuff until later today
[16:19] <ESphynx> hey guys, I can't seem to be building in 32 bit anymore?
[16:20] <ESphynx> including stdint.h is broken on Trusty with -m32 :S
[16:22] <ESphynx> ah might have been missing libc6-dev-i38
=== dpm is now known as dpm-afk
=== dpm-afk is now known as dpm
=== dpm is now known as dpm-afk
=== mattgriffin is now known as mattgriffin-afk
[23:26] <md_5> anyone know if openjdk-8 is being worked on, or is it waiting for debian?