[00:58] <nith1210> quit
[02:44] <Guest67771> Hi I tried to install Moodle on my 12.04 Ubuntu server. I already had LAMP, so I just used sudo apt-get install Moodle. The instructions I followed were a little out of kilter, and so the install failed. Is there any way to resume the install, now that I've fixed the items that were missing?
[08:44] <cylee_> Hi all, does anybody know what kind of technical support Canonical provide? If I want to pay for it.
[08:45] <jamespage> cylee_, its called ubuntu advantage
[08:45] <cylee_> !! thank you
[08:45] <jamespage> cylee_, http://www.ubuntu.com/management/ubuntu-advantage
[08:52] <cylee_> ??
[08:54] <cylee_> Thank you james, does it include openstack deploy/development consulting service ?  Because I don't see that in product info.
[08:55] <rbasak> cylee_: openstack consulting thing is http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud/tools/jumpstart
[08:56] <cylee_> thank you, it looks like what we want :D
[09:00] <rbasak> jamespage: thanks! Back now.
[09:02] <jamespage> cylee_, there is a specific ubuntu advantage offering for openstack clouds
[09:02] <jamespage> cylee_, an as rbasak points out Canonical do jumpstarts to get you up and running as well
[09:03]  * jamespage feels like he's in sales this morning :-)
[09:06] <cylee_> it's ok, my manager want me compare support between Canonical and Red Hat
[09:06] <cylee_> So I need more information to him
[09:09] <andol> cylee_: Sounds like you wnt to contact Canoical directly then? :)
[09:13] <cylee_> I contacted their sales before but I am not native speaker.  He said he will forward request to China team but  no response yet.
[09:14] <cylee_> That's why I ask for help here
[09:14] <cfhowlett> !cn|cylee_
[09:17] <stephank> AMIs on the locator site are apparently already tagged 14.04 LTS, but the release date is from before heartbleed. Should I wait before using these?
[09:20] <stephank> Oh, it looks like those are the beta images. I'll wait a bit, not in too much of a hurry. :-)
[09:22] <jamespage> stephank, the dailies are OK
[09:22] <jamespage> stephank, and release is today :-)
[09:27] <stephank> Cool. Yeah, hence my excitement. :-)
[09:34] <zul> jamespage:  swift got accepted
[09:35] <jamespage> zul, good
[09:35] <zul> just buidlign ceilometer now
[09:38] <zul> jamespage:  ceilometer up
[09:44] <rbasak> jamespage: who's doing the iso testing for this release? infinity was asking.
[09:44] <jamespage> rbasak, beisner has been doing it
[09:45] <rbasak> jamespage: is beisner familiar with the testing tracker etc? Nothing's showing up there for server ISOs at all right now, or is that due to a recent respin?
[09:45] <rbasak> Looks like there was one yesterday :-/
[09:46] <jamespage> rbasak, he is
[09:47] <rbasak> Great!
[09:59] <zul> jamespage:  trove up
[10:01] <jamespage> zul, ditto keystone
[10:05] <zul> jamespage:  trove and keystone have both been accepted
[10:06] <jamespage> zul, great
[10:13] <lordievader> Good morning.
[10:18] <jamespage> zul, nova uploading
[10:18] <zul> jamespage:  ack
[10:19] <zul> that was quick
[10:21] <jamespage> rbasak, was that a request todo iso testing?
[10:27] <zul> jamespage:  cinder is building now
[10:32] <rbasak> jamespage: yes - we have no results atm
[10:32] <zul> jamespage:  cinder up
[10:33] <zul> jamespage:  nova accepted but you already knew that
[10:36] <jamespage> rbasak, I'll pull down images and do at least the iscsi testing
[10:36] <rbasak> jamespage: thanks!
[10:37] <rbasak> I've only an armhf machine here with no virt :-/
[10:37] <jamespage> beisner, coreycb, zul, smoser, roaksoax, hallyn, rharper: ^^ iso testing please
[10:37] <jamespage> rbasak, urgh - are you in london?
[10:37] <jamespage> rbasak, I'm at least 45 minutes off my first iso
[10:38] <jamespage> rbasak, grrrr adsl
[10:38] <rbasak> I was and will be again. I am in Manchester this afternoon admittedly, but I don't really want to touch anything since I need to leave it unattended and depend on it.
[10:38] <jamespage> rbasak, ack
[10:39] <jamespage> rbasak, I'm trying some in nested kvm on serverstack as well but its slllooooowwww
[10:40] <zul> jamespage:  iso tracker says the tests have been ran ?
[10:42] <jamespage> zul, thats the automatic testing filing results
[10:42] <jamespage> zul, we need to fill in the gaps for release
[10:42] <zul> jamespage:  ah ok
[10:42] <jamespage> also a random sample test is always a good idea
[10:42] <jamespage> zul, I can do the iscsi ones quite quickly once i have an image
[10:43] <zul> jamespage:  lemme download the iso
[11:04] <jamespage> jacalvo, hello
[11:04] <jamespage> re bug 1252375
[11:04] <jamespage> jacalvo, someone fixed up the depends by (by way of Depends: samba (>= 4) | samba4, apparently)
[11:23] <jamespage> zul: the horizon branch was not 2014.1 so I did that as well
[11:26] <zul> jamespage:  yeah i left it yesterday since i knew we probably had to do a asset refresh
[11:26] <jamespage> as there was no change from the last rc not required
[11:35] <zul> jamespage:  heat is up
[11:38] <rostam> HI I have a general question. Currently we are using 12.04 LTS for our production. I would like to upgrade our system to 14.04 LTS, given the fact the 14.04 is just being released, is this a good idea? or should I wait for more time if it needs to get more stable? thx
[11:39] <cfhowlett> rostam the advice I usually see is to wait until the first point release e.g. 14.04.1    but then I don't run a production server ...
[11:39] <andol> rostam: Waiting an extra week or so probably won't hurt, but more importantly is of course to test the upgrade on a staging systems, to see what to expect.
[11:40] <rostam> cfhowlett, andol  thanks
[11:40] <andol> Well, in my eyes waiting for the first point release might (dependong on the situation) be a bit of an overkill, but really the important part isn't neccesary the length of the wait, but the amount of testing.
[11:41] <cfhowlett> andol agreed.
[12:08] <rostam> cfhowlett, andol  when 14.04.1 will be available ?
[12:09] <stephank> rostam: july 24th: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TrustyTahr/ReleaseSchedule
[12:10] <rostam> stephank, thanks
[12:12] <jamespage> beisner, up yet?
[12:19] <moparisthebest> where is the best place to watch for the release? assuming it's still on for today? here: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/14.04/ ?
[12:20] <andol> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-announce :)
[12:21] <moparisthebest> haha awesome, even better, thanks :)
[12:28] <rostam> HI how I can be notified for security update by ubuntu? thx
[12:29] <zul> jamespage:  glance up
[12:29] <moparisthebest> I have unattended-upgrades set up so my servers just apply security updates automatically
[12:29] <jamespage> zul, ditto neutron
[12:29] <jamespage> zul, keystone still building - release team aware
[12:29] <jamespage> ~50 mins left
[12:29] <jamespage> rostam, there is a security announce mialing list
[12:29] <moparisthebest> however it's not fool-proof, heartbleed bug for instance, it updated openssl, but didn't restart my services (nginx, postfix, etc), so server was still vulnerable until I did that rostam
[12:31] <rostam> thanks
[12:36] <beisner> jamespage - good morning!  about to take the littles to school, back in 30
[12:36] <jamespage> beisner, ack
[12:36] <jrwren> happy launch day!
[12:39] <mdeslaur> hallyn: any hope the libvirt in saucy-proposed will get released some day?
[12:40] <cfhowlett> mdeslaur saucy has a 9 month life cycle and it's already 6 months in so ...
[12:41] <mdeslaur> cfhowlett: so you're saying I should just push my security update over it?
[12:43] <cfhowlett> mdeslaur responding ONLY to the libvirt saucy-proposed question, I was suggesting that it may not get backported but may (hopefully) be contained in the trusty release.
[12:53] <Daviey> utlemming: bug 1305418, is this the third SRU regression in a row?
[12:58] <zul> Daviey:  does he win a prize?
[12:59] <Daviey> zul: Well, I want to work out if I am smoking crack and misunderstood, or if there is something dire wrong with the SRU verification process for Azure related uploads.
[12:59] <Daviey> If the former, I win a prize of rehab - if the second, then someone wins a prize of wtf?
[13:00] <zul> Daviey:  ok Amy Winehouse
[13:20] <zul> jamespage:  lol kesytone still building
[13:20] <jamespage> zul, omg
[13:23] <ivoks> :]
[13:27] <hallyn> mdeslaur: looking...
[13:28] <beisner> Good day, happy release day!
[13:29] <jamespage> zul, taskflow is still foobared
[13:29] <zul> jamespage:  ill SRU it
[13:30] <hallyn> bleh
[13:30] <mdeslaur> hallyn: thanks
[13:32] <jamespage> zul, meh - its been pushed in anyway
[13:32] <jamespage> autopkgtest failure on amd64 only
[13:32] <zul> jamespage:  meh
[13:44] <rharper> jamespage: running iso installs now
[13:45] <jamespage> rharper, hey - np - I think most things are covered off now
[13:46] <rharper> jamespage: ok
[13:46] <bismark> Anyone around that's familiar with ISC-DHCP DDNS updates to Bind9 running on 12.04 LTS?  I seem to have it configured correct according to the hundred or so pages/tutorials I've read and I can use nsupdate with the rndc key to update a DNS entry but DHCP isn't sending any information over
[13:46] <bismark> hell as far I can tell it's not even trying
[13:55] <ddsss> when editing ~/.ssh/config -> why are there both Host and HostName things? what's he difference?
[13:57] <patdk-wk> totally different
[13:57] <patdk-wk> Host defines config sections
[13:57] <patdk-wk> Hostname is the host to log in to
[14:00] <bismark> Host can actually refer to multiple hosts too, for example in this stanza
[14:00] <bismark> Host serverA, serverB, 10.10.10.10, cserver
[14:00] <bismark> Hostname 10.10.10.10
[14:01] <bismark> will allow you to ssh to any of those systems and they'll all go to Hostname 10.10.10.10
[14:03] <ddsss> bismark, hmm. I seee. thanks. sounds useful.
[14:04] <bismark> ddsss: welcome
[15:00] <alex88> hi guys, is there a tool to keep running a pool of processes
[15:01] <alex88> ?
[15:01] <mardraum> ?
[15:01] <mardraum> more information about what you need
[15:01] <alex88> mardraum: actually running a background job with upstart
[15:01] <alex88> wanted to run multiple processes of it
[15:01] <alex88> and keep them running
[15:05] <alex88> mardraum: any idea?
[15:23] <havnestance3> is there an article out there on how to get mdadm to automatically notify of a failure?
[15:23] <beisner> jamespage:  oh hey!  i forgot to holler back at ya, how goes?
[15:23] <jamespage> beisner, ok
[15:24] <havnestance3> I have configured the email and got it to send a test email but when I unplug a drive to simulate a failure it does nothing
[16:20] <roaksoax> zul: does samba support .d/ config?
[16:20] <jrwren> no
[17:47] <nthdesign> It looks like 14.04 is not yet available via do-release-upgrade. Anyone know if/when the final release will be available?
[18:11] <jrwren> works for me.
[18:11] <jrwren> you could try do-release-upgrade -d :)
[18:12] <jrwren> or -p trusty?
[18:41] <med_> pmatulis, what's the "RIGHT" way to add a DNS search? /etc/network/interfaces line? /etc/resolvconf/resolv.conf.d/base or something completely different (and what's the right way to ACTIVATE it so that it makes that change effective immediately without downing an interface?)
[18:46] <Queops> Hello! If I don't use DHCP on my server which packages can I purge? I know about isc-dhcp-client but that also takes away ubuntu-minimal? (14.04)
[18:47] <Queops> Maybe just deactivating it is enough
[18:47] <sarnold> Queops: once the ubuntu-minimal is installed it's done its job of dragging in other dependencies. I don't think you'll miss it much.
[18:48] <pmatulis> med_: boy, it used to be so simple :)
[18:48] <Queops> sarnold, good point, didn't know about that
[18:49] <hallyn> https://www.system76.com/  now featuring 14.04LTS.  that was fast
[19:22] <med_> pmatulis, I sent you a ticket. :^)
[19:22] <med_> hallyn, sweet!
[19:24] <blahRus> anyone know when the 14.04 MAAS images will land?
[19:24] <blahRus> currently grabbing RCs still
[19:26] <sarnold> utlemming,bigjools,smoser ^^ see blahRus, is that something one of you guys can fix? :)
[19:28] <blahRus>     path: http://maas.ubuntu.com/images/ephemeral-v2/releases/ is what's currently being used
[19:28] <blahRus> Not sure which Trusty folder is picking up though
[21:26] <Lcawte> So I have this VPS, it's just been restored from a backup, all the file permissions seem the same as an identical server, the one hte backup was taken from (except this one has been running for two more days), but all sorts of things seem to give permission errors (or permission related errors)... for example MySQL can't create it's temp files, sudo can't be run, etc. Any idea why it doesn't seem
[21:26] <Lcawte> to recognise the permissions?
[21:28] <Ergo> hello, is that normal that do-release-upgrade doesnt pick up new release
[21:29] <sarnold> Lcawte: how strange. does ps auxw show the right user accounts used for the various services?
[21:29] <bekks> Ergo: Yes. Wait for the mirrors to be synced.
[21:29] <Ergo> ok
[21:29] <sarnold> Lcawte: maybe check ls -ln and ps auxwn output and make sure the numbers line up properly
[21:32] <Lcawte> sarnold: I've checked a few, including root, mysql and my own user account...
[21:33] <Lcawte> They all seem to be the same...
[21:33] <Lcawte> s/the same/match
[21:34] <Lcawte> Are there any strange daemons or commands that reload/refresh these sorts of things?
[21:34] <sarnold> Lcawte: okay.. what's ls -l /usr/bin/sudo look like? what happens if you run sudo id ?
[21:35] <sarnold> Lcawte: none that i know of
[21:35] <Lcawte> root@grunt-2:~# ls -l /usr/bin/sudo
[21:35] <Lcawte> -rwsr-xr-x 1 root root 71288 Mar 11 08:24 /usr/bin/sudo
[21:36] <sarnold> looks good enough. though it's half the size of mine, that's odd.
[21:36] <Lcawte> sudo: unable to open /etc/sudoers: Permission denied (the problem I hit with sudo)
[21:36] <sarnold> Lcawte: can you install and then run debsums -s to check file checksums?
[21:37] <sarnold> Lcawte: oh interesting; how about ls -ld /etc /etc/sudoers  ?
[21:37] <Lcawte> root@grunt-2:~# ls -ld /etc /etc/sudoers
[21:37] <Lcawte> drwxr-xr-x 100 root root 4096 Apr 17 16:51 /etc
[21:37] <Lcawte> -r--r-----   1 root root  723 Apr 17 17:22 /etc/sudoers
[21:38] <Lcawte> Looks exactly the same to root@grunt (the original), but yeah, I'll try debsums
[21:39] <sarnold> Lcawte: can you run aa-status as root? I'm wondering if you're stuck in an apparmor profile..
[21:39] <Lcawte> I get command not found
[21:41] <sarnold> Lcawte: okay.. how about cat /sys/kernel/security/apparmor/profiles  ?
[21:41] <Lcawte> debsums-s output: http://pastebin.com/4kRfbdk1
[21:42] <Lcawte> No such file or directory
[21:42] <sarnold> Lcawte: you've got a pretty good riddle going :)
[21:42] <Lcawte> yup, :(
[21:42] <sarnold> Lcawte: anything in dmesg? or elsewhere in the logs? it'll be hard to spot a root cause amidst the noise, but you never know.
[21:43] <Lcawte> . /var/log/dmesg is empty
[21:49] <Lcawte> Other than the fact my server has a bluetooth daemon for some bizare reason, nothing that shouldn't be there