[06:21] <Unit193> What happens in cases like https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomahawk <-> http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/tomahawk.html ?  The Debian package sounded far more interesting, and I had hoped Trusty would get it.
[07:29] <Logan_> Unit193: we might want to recommend that Debian change the name of its source package to python-tomahawk :)
[07:30] <Logan_> although, well: https://lists.debian.org/debian-wnpp/2013/08/msg01629.html
[07:30] <Logan_> so maybe we should consider changing the name of our source package :P
[07:31] <Logan_> I'll look into that for u-series; remind me
[07:31] <Unit193> Python source packages are normally named without python- though, yeah.  Would really make sense to do that, and there won't be a binary package overlap at least.
[07:31] <Unit193> I have a merge pending for Unicorn too, if you don't mind. :P
[07:32] <Logan_> unless they come out with Python bindings for the Tomahawk player :P
[07:33] <Logan_> Unit193: stop living in your delusion that it will be called "Unicorn"
[07:33] <Logan_> in any case, we refer to them by their adjectives
[07:34] <Unit193> Logan_: Well I do like Uakari better, yes. :D
[07:34] <Logan_> that reminds me of that Python distribution, Wakari
[07:35] <Unit193> But anywho, do you like dscs?  :/
[07:35] <Logan_> no, Anaconda is their distribution; Wakari is the web service
[07:35] <Logan_> that's an odd question
[07:36] <Unit193> We're on -motu, makes sense to me.
[07:36] <Logan_> I guess "poorly-phrased" would be a better adjective
[07:36] <Logan_> what does "like" mean?
[07:37] <Unit193> Accept, prefer, tolerate, choice of a mix.
[07:45] <Logan_> Unit193: don't have a strong opinion either way
[13:42] <ScottK> Unit193 and Logan_: The python-foo naming policy applies to binary packages, not source packages.  It often makes sense for them to be the same, but not always.