[07:43] <ubottu> In ubottu, Logan_ said: !forget is <alias> love-#ubuntu-offtopi
[07:43] <ubottu> In ubottu, Logan_ said: !forget forget "is <alias> love-#ubuntu-offtopi
[07:44] <ubottu> In ubottu, Logan_ said: !forget love-#ubuntu-offtopic is <alias> love-#ubuntu-offtopi
[07:47] <ubottu> In ubottu, Logan_ said: !love-#ubuntu-offtopic is <reply> Love is like racing across the frozen tundra on a snowmobile which flips over, trapping you underneath. At night, the ice-weasels come.
[07:50] <Flannel> wat
[07:51] <Unit193> http://ubottu.com/factoids.cgi?search=love
[07:52] <Flannel> Oh, it looks like we've been drunk and playing with factoids on a few occasions
[07:52] <Flannel> I'm going to consider those easter eggs!
[07:52] <rww> mainly because ubottu would probably do something wrong if you tried removing them
[07:52] <Flannel> which means we need to update !moo
[07:53] <rww> "there are four easter eggs in this bot"
[07:53] <Flannel> I don't think there'd be problems deleting them
[07:55] <valorie> I've seen that one before, yes
[07:55] <valorie> and I would guess high rather than drunk
[07:55] <valorie> lol
[08:17] <Flannel> Ah, even with the source code, I fell into the tar pit.
[08:25] <Flannel> I caught my mistake, but now I'm fairly certain that those are impossible to remove via the IRC interface.
[08:26] <valorie> ubottu needs love too....
[08:26] <ubottu> valorie: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)
[08:26] <valorie> see?
[08:44] <rww> Flannel: told you
[08:45] <Flannel> rww: well, I took the "probably" out!
[08:45] <Flannel> I missed the part where it trims proceeding non-alphanumerics
[08:46] <Flannel> otherwise the is<sed> (as an alternative of =~) and "is (from the factoid) would've cancelled out the other set-a-factoid checks
[09:47] <Aki-Thinkpad> Can I get my chat ban removed from #ubuntu?
[09:47] <Aki-Thinkpad> I was told to visit here in 24h
[10:58] <bazhang> Aki-Thinkpad, hi
[10:59] <Aki-Thinkpad> bazhang, hello
[11:00] <Aki-Thinkpad> bazhang, http://askubuntu.com/questions/449665/is-upgrading-from-lts-to-lts-as-reliable-as-doing-a-fresh-install
[11:00] <Aki-Thinkpad> I understand why you do not want to say it is not as reliable as fresh installs (At least I think I do),
[11:01] <bazhang> Aki-Thinkpad, an LTS to LTS upgrade is perfectly safe, and tested
[11:01] <Aki-Thinkpad> bazhang, *perfectly* ; should be replaced with *Reasonably*
[11:02] <bazhang> Aki-Thinkpad, as long you as refrain from saying, not safe, don't do it, I think we are ok here
[11:02] <Aki-Thinkpad> bazhang, anyways, I had no idea it was a rule to not to state otherwise
[11:03] <Aki-Thinkpad> and I did not know it was Canonicals official position
[11:03] <bazhang> are we ok?
[11:03] <Aki-Thinkpad> bazhang, oh absolutely; you are correct in that
[11:03] <Aki-Thinkpad> and for what its worth, I was incorrect to put so much emphathis on it.
[11:04] <bazhang> please try to speak in #ubuntu now Aki-Thinkpad
[11:04] <Aki-Thinkpad> And yes; I hate any sort of drama, so I am ready to put this to rest and just move on.
[11:04] <bazhang> great
[11:04] <bazhang> thanks for coming here today to resolve this
[11:04] <Aki-Thinkpad> bazhang, Thanks.
[11:05] <Aki-Thinkpad> Likewise;
=== bazhang_ is now known as bazhang
[18:45] <ubottu> In ubottu, OerHeks said: oh that factoid is removed, there is no single best!14.10
=== DalekSec_ is now known as DalekSec