| bkero | Wow, upgrade process really sucks. | 20:44 |
|---|---|---|
| bkero | 1) ppa-purge all ppas else face the 'broken packages' silent failure of update-manager or do-release-upgrade, 2) reinstall ubuntu-desktop metapackage, 3) reboot, 4) do-release-upgrade/update-manager, 5) reboot, 6) install ppas, 7) reboot | 20:45 |
| adam_g | PPAs <3 | 21:01 |
| blkperl | slangasek: :( https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-session/+bug/474392 | 22:55 |
| lubotu1 | Ubuntu bug 474392 in indicator-session (Ubuntu) "indicator-session menus are not policykit aware" [Low,Confirmed] | 22:55 |
| blkperl | how how am I suppose to stop users from clicking suspend <.< | 22:55 |
| nibalizer | move the pm-suspend binary to somewhere else lol | 22:57 |
| nibalizer | replace it with a shell script that says 'NO' | 22:57 |
| nibalizer | or better yet figlet no | 22:57 |
| blkperl | it doesn't call pm-suspend it calls the xorg-libs directly | 22:58 |
| nibalizer | oh wtf | 22:58 |
| nibalizer | blkperl: it looks like someone has a suggestion on how to patch it to work | 23:00 |
| nibalizer | i bet you could get that working in a day or 2 | 23:01 |
| nibalizer | probably would be pretty fun | 23:01 |
| blkperl | nope, don't want to maintain that | 23:01 |
| nibalizer | or incredibly frustrating | 23:01 |
| nibalizer | i mean the patch would likely be accepted into ubuntu | 23:01 |
| slangasek | blkperl: umm, that bug is ancient, how is that your bug? | 23:05 |
| blkperl | slangasek: read Trusty comment | 23:06 |
| blkperl | they re-broke it | 23:06 |
| slangasek | also, how does indicator-session being policykit aware or not have to do with anything? the indicator-session itself has no privileges to trigger a suspend; the bug is elsewhere | 23:06 |
| blkperl | I'm not saying the bug is correclty named | 23:06 |
| blkperl | but yes its broken in Trusty :) | 23:06 |
| slangasek | no, that bug is about the options being *displayed* when they shouldn't be | 23:06 |
| slangasek | but a non-policykit-aware indicator doesn't mean that users have privs to trigger a suspend | 23:07 |
| blkperl | but they do | 23:07 |
| slangasek | *because of an unrelated bug* | 23:07 |
| blkperl | bug number? | 23:08 |
| blkperl | or should I file one | 23:08 |
| slangasek | you should file one | 23:08 |
| blkperl | ok thanks! | 23:08 |
| slangasek | because the problem you're describing (users can suspend when they shouldn't) is not the same as that bug (users who can't suspend are shown a menu option) | 23:08 |
| blkperl | should I file it agasint indicator-session? | 23:09 |
| slangasek | it's not an indicator bug, better to file it on whatever indicator-session is calling that's not respecting policykit | 23:09 |
| slangasek | systemd might be the best choice initially (for logind) | 23:10 |
| blkperl | so file against logind or systemd? | 23:10 |
| slangasek | systemd | 23:10 |
| slangasek | logind isn't a package | 23:10 |
| blkperl | k | 23:10 |
| blkperl | https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-session/+bug/1165027 | 23:11 |
| lubotu1 | Ubuntu bug 1165027 in Session Menu "Indicator-session Hibernate/Suspend capabilities are inconsistent with unity dialogue" [Medium,Triaged] | 23:11 |
| blkperl | what about that ^ slangasek | 23:11 |
| slangasek | arguably a duplicate of the first bug | 23:12 |
| slangasek | your bug is that logind is honoring a suspend/hibernate request that you believe it should not | 23:12 |
| * blkperl tries to remember how to verify policykit rules | 23:14 | |
| blkperl | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1310845 | 23:21 |
| lubotu1 | Ubuntu bug 1310845 in systemd (Ubuntu) "systemd-logind is not honoring polickykit rules for suspend/reboot/shutdown" [Undecided,New] | 23:21 |
| blkperl | not really sure what else to put in the bug report | 23:21 |
| blkperl | thanks for the help slangasek :) | 23:22 |
| nibalizer | ya slangasek thanks :) | 23:22 |
| slangasek | n/p | 23:23 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!