[08:05] <aleb> How can I become a maintainer of the Launchpad package I'm developing (upstream)? https://launchpad.net/pitivi
[08:06] <aleb> I want to mark as won't fix bugs like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pitivi/+bug/594658 (0.13 and 0.15 are not supported anymore as large parts of the app have been refactored)
[08:07] <wgrant> aleb: Those bugs are in the pitivi package in Ubuntu, not the upstream Pitivi project. You need to be a member of ~ubuntu-bugcontrol (https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl) to set an Ubuntu bug to Won't Fix.
[08:39] <ersi> I'd suggest hanging out with the Ubuntu Bug Squad as well, since plenty of them are members of ~ubuntu-bugcontrol and can help changing bug statuses. They're in #ubuntu-bugs on this very same network.
[10:04] <aleb> What's the difference between https://launchpad.net/pitivi and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pitivi ? - as a Pitivi developer with some interest in helping Ubuntu, which one should I care about?
[10:15] <geser> aleb: the first is about the upstream project, the second about the Ubuntu package of it; of course bugs filed against the Ubuntu package might be bugs not in the packaging itself but bugs in the software (upstream), so it probably would be best to check both
[11:11] <rbasak> May I have my personal PPAs (~racb) armhf enabled, please?
[11:12] <rbasak> I use an ARM Chromebook and it's a pain to get modified package builds on it some other way.
[12:49] <MannerMan> launchpad.net seems down
[12:49] <stxaBe> MannerMan: when?
[12:50] <MannerMan> stxaBe: right now
[12:50] <eLBati> stxaBe, now :-)
[12:50] <MannerMan> its back!
[12:50]  * stxaBe checking
[12:50] <eLBati> affirmative
[13:11] <Durzo> how long does it take to fully delete a PPA once i have clicked deleted? seems to be hanging around a while...
[13:17] <wgrant> Durzo: Usually 10-30 minutes.
[13:17] <Durzo> kthx
[15:04] <stxaBe> are you performing maintenance right now?
[15:05] <cjwatson> no but there's some kind of datacentre packet loss problem, sysadmins are aware
[15:22] <rdf> Greetings.  Is anyone from Launchpad support active in this channel?
[15:22] <dobey> rdf: just ask your question, don't ask to ask.
[15:23] <dobey> rdf: if it's about launchpad being "down" though, there are some network problems that sysadmins are working on
[15:23] <rdf> No, it's about a support ticket I put in a couple of weeks ago that seems to have been forgotten
[15:23] <rdf> on gaining access to a username that appears to have been abandoned for the last 6 years
[15:24] <Adri2000> hi
[15:24] <rdf> Hi!
[15:24] <dobey> rdf: oh, then i think you will have to just be patient
[15:25] <dobey> rdf: you opened a question on answers.launchpad.net/launchpad right?
[15:25] <rdf> Umm, no.  I contacted support
[15:26] <Adri2000> anyone familiar with bzr/lp interaction could help with this please :) : % bzr lp-propose lp:~adri2000/neutron/juno-rename-fixes
[15:26] <Adri2000> bzr: ERROR: Not a branch: "bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~adri2000/neutron/juno-rename-fixes/".
[15:26] <dobey> rdf: how exactly?
[15:26] <wgrant> rdf: What was the ticket ID?
[15:27] <wgrant> Adri2000: That branch doesn't exist. You need to push it before you can propose it.
[15:27] <rdf> 00066498
[15:28] <rdf> wgrant, exact email subject reads: Re:Other:No.00066498 [ ref:_00D20145O._500D0bdrGQ:ref ]
[15:29] <wgrant> rdf: I don't know where you sent that email, but that looks nothing like any of our support systems.
[15:29] <dobey> yeah that is very weird
[15:29] <wgrant> Which address did you use?
[15:29] <wgrant> https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad or feedback@launchpad.net are the places to go
[15:29] <rdf> I sent it though launchpad, and received that email from noreply@canonical.com
[15:30] <wgrant> How did you send it?
[15:30] <rdf> rich.fleming@gmail.com
[15:30] <wgrant> Not which address, but how?
[15:30] <rdf> umm
[15:31] <rdf> https://forms.canonical.com/sso-support/
[15:31] <dobey> that is not launchpad support
[15:32] <dobey> i wonder how you even managed to get to that page :)
[15:33] <rdf> Contact Support at the bottom of the page when logged off
[15:33] <rdf> SSO support
[15:33]  * rdf facepalms
[15:33] <rdf> no wonder
[15:33] <rdf> explains why they told me to delete the account or merge it :)
[15:34] <rdf> Alright... what's the correct way to ask for the nick on an abandoned account?
[15:34] <rdf> err username
[15:34] <dobey> if you were told that, it's also not "no reply for the last 2 weeks and forgotten about" :)
[15:35] <dobey> rdf: 11:27 < wgrant> https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad or  feedback@launchpad.net are the places to go
[15:35] <rdf> got it
[15:35] <rdf> also, is there a restriction on 3 character usernames?
[15:36] <rdf> I was giving up on using one name, and decided to use rdf, but was told it was blocked.
[15:36] <wgrant> No.
[15:37] <dobey> there is no rdf user currently
[15:37] <rdf> The name 'rdf' has been blocked by the Launchpad administrators. Contact Launchpad Support if you want to use this name.
[15:37] <dobey> but maybe "rdf" is in a blacklist, because it conflicts with a certain standard or something
[15:38] <dobey> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Description_Framework
[15:39] <rdf> doesn't look like I'll be able to use that name then :)
[15:40] <dobey> anyway, you cana use any username that's not already taken, or blocked, and you can change your "username" anytime later to anything that's not already taken, or blocked, as well
[15:43] <Adri2000> wgrant: got it, thanks
[15:44] <Adri2000> (I thought it'd create and push on its own)
[15:54] <rdf> dobey, wgrant: thanks for setting me straight.
[15:54] <rdf> I've posted my question on answers.launchpad.net with question #247578
[15:56] <wgrant> rdf: Done.
[15:56] <RFleming> Thanks! :)
[15:57] <RFleming> wgrant, out of curiosity, is RDF blocked for the reason dobey stated above, for Resource Description Framework?
[15:58] <wgrant> RFleming: It is.
[15:59] <RFleming> makes sense.  Thanks for RFleming, I doubt rdf would have been permitted :)
[16:28] <rbasak> May I have my personal PPAs (~racb) armhf enabled, please? I use an ARM Chromebook and it's a pain to get modified package builds on it some other way.
[18:18] <saiarcot895> I have a bit of an annoyance with the website. There's an invisible help frame in the top-left section of the page (around 580 pixels by 280 pixels). In Chromium, right-clicking in that area brings up the context menu for that page, and not what's underneath it (say, a link). This makes it a little harder to open links in a new tab
[18:24] <dobey> huh?
[18:25] <dobey> oh it's from yui
[18:26] <dobey> saiarcot895: i guess you could adblock that frame, to work around chromium apparently doing the wrong thing
[18:28] <saiarcot895> dobey: ok, I added an adblock rule for the frame.
[18:28] <saiarcot895> dobey: works fine now, thanks
[18:29] <dobey> saiarcot895: it seems chromium is deciding to prefer display: block; over the visibility: hidden; from the css
[18:30] <saiarcot895> dobey: strange. I thought visibility:hidden would mean there would be no effects triggered or anything
[18:31] <dobey> saiarcot895: it might be a bug in new chromium (>= 34)
[22:03] <knome> hey, any admin around? i need some assistance to remove some projects etc :)
[22:03] <knome> it's not just one thing, so i'd rather go through it with somebody when they pop up :)