| RAOF | kirkland: looks sensible to me. Enjoy your testing. | 00:01 |
|---|---|---|
| kirkland | RAOF: cheers, thanks | 00:01 |
| ScottK | Fun. So ruby2.1 downloads config.guess and config.sub from the network. | 00:24 |
| jose | infinity: ping, have a minute? | 00:24 |
| xnox | ScottK: haha =) good that ubuntu builders don't have network, unlike debian. Sounds like an RC bug to me. | 00:25 |
| jose | or xnox | 00:25 |
| xnox | jose: hey! what's up? | 00:25 |
| jose | xnox: hey, someone cancelled his OpenWeek slot tomorrow at 17 UTC and I was wondering if you would like to do a session about the Ubuntu Release Team | 00:26 |
| jose | it's basically what you do on the team and how can people contribute | 00:26 |
| jose | all for an hour | 00:26 |
| xnox | jose: haha =) well i'm not actually in fact on the release team. | 00:27 |
| jose | oh, I thought you were | 00:28 |
| xnox | jose: and unfortunately i have an ~ 1.5h meeting at 17 UTC. | 00:28 |
| jose | uh, good luck with that one | 00:28 |
| jose | well, if anyone else from the release team was reading and wants to do it I'll be happy to set it up (as long as someone else doesn't snag the slot before!) | 00:29 |
| xnox | jose: here are the members https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/+members | 00:29 |
| * jose pings 100 people | 00:29 | |
| jose | thanks for the link :) | 00:29 |
| * ScottK will be in the middle of a 9 hour meeting. | 00:29 | |
| xnox | jose: it's only 10 =) well 7-8 if you discard the not so active people. | 00:30 |
| * jose strikes ScottK from the list :( | 00:30 | |
| xnox | ScottK: =))))) 9 hour meetings -> sounds utopic | 00:30 |
| * jose puts an ice cream cone on his head | 00:30 | |
| ScottK | xnox: Even better I'm the presenter for about 4 hours of it. They'd notice if I was missing. | 00:34 |
| xnox | ScottK: one would think that.... | 00:34 |
| xnox | ScottK: one of my mates in university had a slide 30/38 that said "WAKE UP B#$@#" and nothing else, he had it up for good 20 seconds and only a couple of people smirked/giggled and everyone just stared akwardly, not realising what the giggles are for. | 00:36 |
| ScottK | Fun. | 00:36 |
| ScottK | I once had a slide that had a nice summary box at the bottom that said (in Latin) "everything sounds better in Latin". The presentation was very close to being given before anyone asked what it meant. | 00:37 |
| ScottK | xnox: It gets worse. The configure check it has to see if config.sub/guess have already been downloaded looks in the wrong place. | 00:46 |
| ScottK | And now I have to update distro-info-data before I can upload... | 00:56 |
| xnox | ScottK: i think that's updated already | 00:56 |
| ScottK | In trusty? | 00:56 |
| ScottK | It is in Utopic | 00:56 |
| xnox | ScottK: in trusty-proposed | 00:58 |
| ScottK | Faster to edit /usr/share/distro-info/ubuntu.csv than to enable proposed. | 00:59 |
| xnox | true =) | 00:59 |
| xnox | infinity: cjwatson: the three boost packages are in the unapproved queue. Would be handy to build them & promote binaries from the "main-only" boost1.55 as per: $ rmadison -S boost1.54 -s trusty | grep -v universe | 01:01 |
| xnox | i'll do transition tracker for it tomorrow. | 01:02 |
| infinity | ScottK: distro-info-data is updated in all releases now. | 01:10 |
| ScottK | infinity: Thanks. | 01:10 |
| infinity | xnox: Does boost-mpi need to build-dep on boost*? | 02:00 |
| infinity | xnox: The shlibdeps seem to be unhappy. | 02:00 |
| ScottK | infinity: once the 2.1 binaries are published, I'll upload defaults. | 02:03 |
| infinity | ScottK: Looks like they're all going to succeed, so go ahead and upload. | 02:03 |
| infinity | ScottK: And pick a version that will let us sync with Debian later when they switch. | 02:04 |
| infinity | 1:2.1.0.0~ubuntu1 maybe | 02:04 |
| ScottK | Oddly, I have 2.1.0.0~ubuntu1 | 02:04 |
| ScottK | (with the epoch) | 02:04 |
| infinity | Heh. | 02:04 |
| ScottK | Uploaded. | 02:05 |
| infinity | Man, this is the worst part of a new release. It takes forever for firefox to learn that "qu" means utopic/+queue instead of trusty/+queue | 02:05 |
| ScottK | I just leave the tab open. | 02:06 |
| RAOF | Man, we need better tooling for reviewing SRUs-that-are-syncs-from-PPAs. | 02:08 |
| infinity | RAOF: Yeahp. Or we need to give wgrant enough breathing room to fix the queue so syncs aren't opaque blobs of awful. | 02:08 |
| ScottK | I keep thinking ectopic instead of utopic. | 02:08 |
| infinity | (It's in progress, just slow going) | 02:08 |
| infinity | ScottK: Rick made that same joke. | 02:09 |
| infinity | "utopic pregnancy". | 02:09 |
| wgrant | No breathing for me for a while... | 02:09 |
| infinity | wgrant: Please keep breathing. | 02:09 |
| infinity | wgrant: But, seriously, I know you're being pulled in 17 directions. If there's any way we can push the queue stuff forward by leveraging any of your minions, or hiring infinite monkeys, it's a massive pain point for AAs. | 02:10 |
| wgrant | A few months ago it was second on my list of big features. Now I can't even count :/ | 02:12 |
| infinity | wgrant: So, it's third, and you need more fingers? :P | 02:12 |
| infinity | ScottK: Looks like that needs more changes than just rules/postinst | 02:15 |
| ScottK | I don't think so, but I'll look again. | 02:15 |
| infinity | ScottK: debian/control points everything at ruby2.0 | 02:16 |
| infinity | ScottK: The only one that's (accidentally) correct is ruby-all-dev, since it depends on both. | 02:16 |
| ScottK | Good point. Please reject. | 02:16 |
| infinity | ScottK: Lots of (currently v2.0) in there too. | 02:18 |
| ScottK | Yeah. Fixing that too | 02:18 |
| infinity | ScottK: (Also, you can probably drop the versioned deps while you're switching) | 02:19 |
| ScottK | Already did | 02:19 |
| infinity | Well, not the ones for ruby-all-dev, but the others. | 02:19 |
| infinity | Right, I'll stop being annoying. :) | 02:19 |
| ScottK | I should probably also add 1.9 into supported. | 02:20 |
| ScottK | For now. | 02:20 |
| infinity | Should you? | 02:20 |
| infinity | I imagine the intent is to drop it. | 02:20 |
| infinity | We already defaulted to 2.0 for trusty, 1.9 should die. | 02:20 |
| infinity | Oh, no we didn't. | 02:21 |
| * infinity scratches his head. | 02:21 | |
| infinity | 1.9.1 was default in trusty. Curious. | 02:21 |
| infinity | We had two in main. Bleh. | 02:22 |
| ScottK | Yep. | 02:22 |
| infinity | Oh, but Debian's dropping it from trusted. | 02:22 |
| infinity | I'd just follow their lead there. | 02:22 |
| ScottK | So I figure at least for a transitional period it ought to be supported. | 02:22 |
| infinity | s/trusted/supported/ | 02:23 |
| ScottK | Yeah, but they've had 2.0 as default for awhile already. | 02:23 |
| infinity | Well, I assume that triggers which extensions get built. | 02:23 |
| infinity | So we'd just have to transition again after dropping it out to remove them all. | 02:23 |
| infinity | Maybe as well drop it now. | 02:23 |
| ScottK | Normally for python we add the new one, rebuild shit, drop the old one, and build again. | 02:23 |
| infinity | Can transition twice if you'd prefer. | 02:24 |
| ScottK | I guess since we're changing the default, it doesn't matter much. | 02:24 |
| infinity | Boosts the upload stats. :P | 02:24 |
| infinity | But I imagine dropping it will work fine. | 02:24 |
| ScottK | Nah. I'd rather do it once and blame you if there's trouble. | 02:24 |
| infinity | Works for me. | 02:24 |
| infinity | I'll pass the blame to doko. | 02:24 |
| ScottK | OK. Let's try this .... | 02:27 |
| * infinity teaches rmadison about utopic | 02:28 | |
| infinity | ScottK: You missed some descriptions. Do you care? | 02:32 |
| ScottK | I don't. | 02:32 |
| infinity | Heh. | 02:32 |
| ScottK | I'll fix it if you'd prefer. | 02:33 |
| infinity | Nope, don't care. | 02:33 |
| infinity | It'll sort itself out if/when Debian moves anyway. | 02:33 |
| ScottK | doko_: default ruby = ruby2.1 is done. | 02:43 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Alright, I put wgrant on 8 and 16. pitti's handling the ones with his name on them (35, 36, 44, 45) | 03:51 |
| infinity | cjwatson: I did livefs chroots for arm64 and ppc64el, and filed a ticket for the other 4. | 03:52 |
| infinity | cjwatson: I think we're still stuck on 19 until doko wakes up and gives his blessing. | 03:52 |
| infinity | cjwatson: And I didn't get to mangling debian-cd/cdimage, I've had an eventful evening away from work tonight. Maybe if I fail to sleep, I can tackle more things. | 03:52 |
| seb128 | RAOF, hey | 08:00 |
| seb128 | RAOF, thanks for looking at that ido bug | 08:00 |
| seb128 | RAOF, I just commented on it, let me know if what I wrote makes sense to you | 08:00 |
| RAOF | seb128: It does; I expect to approve ido at some point next week. Unless someone else gets to it first. | 08:02 |
| seb128 | RAOF, ok, thanks | 08:03 |
| seb128 | RAOF, you could maybe review nautilus in the SRU queue? ;-) | 08:05 |
| seb128 | would be nice to get that one rolling because we are likely to get other segfault fix rounds following | 08:06 |
| ogra_ | our first upload into utopic was a poporietary package ?? | 08:43 |
| ogra_ | oh my | 08:43 |
| ogra_ | :) | 08:43 |
| xnox | infinity: yeah it does, i busted it. let me fix it up. | 09:32 |
| * xnox should automate build-depends mangaling as well, too error-prone | 09:32 | |
| xnox | I get 404 on http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/utopic/Contents-i386.gz but i guess that might still be normal? | 09:54 |
| xnox | / expected | 09:54 |
| mlankhorst | probably not there yet :P | 09:55 |
| cjwatson | xnox: It generated last night but apparently isn't actually there. I wonder if there's a race with the publisher | 10:02 |
| cjwatson | (e.g. if sometimes it generates but drops the result into the wrong tree so that it then gets discarded) | 10:02 |
| cjwatson | doko_: Are you planning to upload your toolchain bits? | 10:14 |
| cjwatson | At least binutils | 10:14 |
| ogra_ | cjwatson, when do you plan to do the first image testbuilds ? this week already ? | 10:57 |
| * ogra_ needs to update some tools | 10:57 | |
| cjwatson | ogra_: I'd like to get there before EOW, but can't say for sure yet | 11:00 |
| ogra_ | ok | 11:01 |
| ogra_ | just want to be prepared :) | 11:01 |
| cjwatson | doko_: ... uploading binutils for you now with mangled series | 11:04 |
| cjwatson | infinity: Should we drop block-all source around now? Anything in -proposed should be OK if it's a valid candidate, I'd have thought | 11:11 |
| cjwatson | infinity: Also, reminder to do the big copy from trusty-proposed | 11:11 |
| mvo | could someone reject the recent ubuntu-release-upgrader upload to trusty-proposed please? I think I will include another fix there | 12:30 |
| seb128 | mvo, done | 12:32 |
| mvo | thanks seb128 | 12:32 |
| seb128 | yw! | 12:32 |
| === jhodapp|afk is now known as jhodapp | ||
| ogra_ | stgraber, hmm, you didnt move the devel/devel-proposed alias to utopic yet | 13:08 |
| cjwatson | Riddell: trusty-proposed will be copied in bulk to utopic-proposed fairly soon, fyi | 13:18 |
| Riddell | cjwatson: oh ok I didn't realise that | 13:18 |
| stgraber | ogra_: considering there are no images in those channels, I thought it'd be best to wait until we have something in them and confirmed it works before changing the alises | 13:24 |
| stgraber | *aliases | 13:25 |
| ogra_ | stgraber, ok, just wanted to know if it was intentional | 13:25 |
| ogra_ | (makes sense to wait ... its is just that my tools are not multi-release aware, i have to point them somewhere, but can do that manually for the fist image) | 13:26 |
| stgraber | ogra_: so I think we should wait to have a good build in utopic-proposed, have this promoted to utopic and then flip the aliases | 13:26 |
| ogra_ | yep | 13:27 |
| cjwatson | NewReleaseCycleProcess step 17 done, I think | 13:41 |
| Laney | I'll do ben shortly | 13:59 |
| xnox | cjwatson: please unblock binutils, boost-mpi-source1.55, boost1.55. All built and look happy. | 14:02 |
| cjwatson | xnox: I was hoping to get autopkgtest results for binutils | 14:03 |
| cjwatson | (that aren't lies) | 14:03 |
| xnox | cjwatson: the qualifier makes the difference =) | 14:04 |
| cjwatson | there are some results on the private jenkins: lintian is still running, and binutils passed on amd64 but hit a testbed error on i386 | 14:05 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Yeah, block-all source is likely not needed anymore. | 14:38 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Especially now that autopkgtests are back and happy, so we don't have to pick and choose carefully. | 14:38 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Oh, unless those results are, as you said, lies. :P | 14:39 |
| infinity | doko_: | 14:40 |
| infinity | dpkg-source: info: upstream files that have been modified: | 14:40 |
| infinity | binutils-2.24.51.20140417/ld/emulparams/aarch64linux.sh.rej | 14:40 |
| infinity | doko_: Is that a sign of a broken patch, or just that you had cruft in your package when you built it? | 14:40 |
| doko_ | infinity, cruft | 14:44 |
| infinity | doko_: Kay. | 14:47 |
| infinity | cjwatson: britney reporting a pass on binutils despite the apparent i386 failure is disconcerting. Or is that passed on the private instance? | 14:51 |
| cjwatson | infinity: yeah, not sure what's up there, pitti was working on it | 14:52 |
| infinity | doko_: Can you double-check testsuite results for binutils on all arches and sign off on it? | 14:52 |
| doko_ | infinity, meh, lp doesn't reply | 15:03 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| doko | infinity, no regressions | 15:20 |
| infinity | doko: Excellent, thanks. | 15:21 |
| cjwatson | infinity: cdimage/debian-cd updated for utopic | 15:21 |
| jdstrand | hrm, I did 3 pocket copies from trusty-security to utopic-proposed (rsync, mysql-5.5 and python-django) a while ago, but now thinking that may have been a mistake | 15:24 |
| cjwatson | I think that's fine | 15:24 |
| cjwatson | assuming you copied with binaries | 15:25 |
| jdstrand | I did | 15:25 |
| jdstrand | ah, I see them in unapproved | 15:25 |
| jdstrand | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/utopic/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text= | 15:25 |
| jdstrand | ok, sorry I jumped the gun there | 15:25 |
| cjwatson | no it's fine | 15:25 |
| infinity | xnox: So, are you still happy with the boost-defaults in the queue? Nothing needed fixing there to match your new boost uploads? | 15:58 |
| xnox | infinity: it should be all good. | 16:00 |
| infinity | xnox: Accepting, then. | 16:00 |
| xnox | thanks! | 16:00 |
| * mdeslaur pokes infinity for EoL announcement | 16:23 | |
| infinity | mdeslaur: Yes dear. | 16:26 |
| * mdeslaur gives cookie to infinity | 16:27 | |
| Laney | EU legislation requires your explicit confirmation to the acceptance of any cookies | 16:28 |
| * Laney confiscates it | 16:28 | |
| Laney | om nom nom | 16:28 |
| mdeslaur | lol | 16:28 |
| infinity | Laney: Neither of us are in the EU, you just violated Canadian sovereignty. | 16:29 |
| ogra_ | bah MiM attacks on IRC ! | 16:29 |
| infinity | Laney: The moose of punishment is on its way. | 16:29 |
| Laney | That'll go well with my cookie, thanks | 16:30 |
| infinity | Laney: I suspect you've ever met an angry moose... | 16:31 |
| Laney | I've never knowingly met any moose :( | 16:33 |
| Laney | WCPGW | 16:33 |
| infinity | Laney: Well, as you know, Canadians are kind and welcoming people. We achieve this by chanelling all our rage and anger in two directions: the moose population, and hockey. The Moose of Punishment plays hockey. Enjoy. | 16:34 |
| infinity | (PS: Now I want a cookie) | 16:35 |
| * whiskers75 gives infinity a cookie | 16:35 | |
| ogra_ | a moose shaped one ? | 16:35 |
| whiskers75 | A chocolate chip one. | 16:36 |
| infinity | ogra_: Hockey-puck-shaped seems like it would be easier to achieve. | 16:36 |
| ogra_ | heh | 16:36 |
| cjwatson | moose of punishment> now I'm reminded of the two toy seals Daniel Silverstone had at one point | 16:38 |
| cjwatson | Club the Seal, and the Seal of Approval | 16:38 |
| infinity | Kinnison is a strange fellow. | 16:38 |
| * whiskers75 meows at infinity | 16:45 | |
| * Laney plays some moose polo | 16:46 | |
| xnox | Why is makedev in trusty ubuntu-minimal? | 16:47 |
| ogra_ | xnox, legacy of dmraid or something like that ? | 17:04 |
| infinity | xnox: Why wouldn't it be? | 17:07 |
| infinity | xnox: It's been prio:required pretty much forever. | 17:08 |
| slangasek | infinity: because makedev is obsoleted in favor of udev in Debian | 18:11 |
| infinity | slangasek: Well, your package depends on it. ;) | 18:12 |
| infinity | slangasek: (mountall) | 18:12 |
| slangasek | yes, that's why upstart must die, long live systemd | 18:12 |
| slangasek | <cough> | 18:12 |
| infinity | Poor upstart. | 18:13 |
| slangasek | I think that dep dates back to Scott, it's been a minor annoyance that I have yet to take care of | 18:13 |
| doko | hrm, sagari already used | 18:13 |
| infinity | Anyhow, it'll be gone by the next LTS, I suppose, so I'm not sure it's worth caring deeply about removing makedev from required right now. | 18:13 |
| infinity | doko: Doing a GCC upload? We can kill it and aim it at sagari when this kernel's done. | 18:14 |
| doko | sure, waiting for it now | 18:15 |
| * infinity puts "powerpc VM buildds" on his TODO for the next week or two, too. | 18:15 | |
| infinity | I wonder if I have the time to make that happen before autosync. | 18:15 |
| infinity | I guess I'll look at that after I find some breakfast and wake up. | 18:18 |
| infinity | I need to re-do all the ppc64el VMs with trusty final too, since they're all pre-ABI-bump still, and the upgrade path there is bordering on nonexistent. | 18:19 |
| saiarcot895 | Are all the build machines on Lucid or Precise? | 18:20 |
| infinity | saiarcot895: PPAs are hardy (don't ask), ia64 and sparc are lucid, i386, amd64, armhf, and powerpc are precise, and ppc64el and arm64 are trusty. Was that a confusing enough answer? | 18:21 |
| saiarcot895 | infinity: Yes. :) What's with the disparity? | 18:22 |
| saiarcot895 | the time they were created, maybe? | 18:22 |
| infinity | saiarcot895: The PPA thing is, like I said, a don't ask. The ppc64el and arm64 ones are obvious, they didn't exist in precise. | 18:22 |
| infinity | saiarcot895: And ia64 and sparc were dropped after lucid, hence they're not getting upgraded, and will disappear when lucid EOLs. | 18:23 |
| * infinity goes to find breakfast. | 18:25 | |
| doko | infinity, I killed ross while cancelling the GCC build | 18:41 |
| infinity | doko: Did you cancel too early? :/ | 18:46 |
| doko | maybe. shouldn't I? | 18:47 |
| infinity | doko: There's a bug where you can't cancel until it's actually into dpkg-buildpackage. | 18:48 |
| infinity | It gets a bit confused. | 18:48 |
| doko | ok, trying to avoid that in the future | 18:51 |
| xnox | infinity: does "eglibc still looks in /dev/shm" instead of "/run/shm" ? | 19:58 |
| infinity | xnox: That question didn't seem like a complete sentence... | 20:01 |
| xnox | infinity: does eglibc now default to using "/run/shm" (for whatever it may use that for) instead of "/dev/shm"? As per commented in the mounted-dev.conf upstart job that sets up /dev/shm to be symlink to /run/shm. | 20:02 |
| xnox | infinity: or do we want /dev/shm compat symlink still... | 20:03 |
| infinity | xnox: /dev/shm should probably never go away, IMO. | 20:03 |
| infinity | xnox: Why are you trying to kill it? :P | 20:03 |
| xnox | infinity: ok. | 20:03 |
| xnox | infinity: makesense in linux style "don't break user interfaces" | 20:03 |
| infinity | xnox: A decade of docs told people to use that path, even if I change glibc in Debian/Ubuntu, there's countless other bits of software I won't get to, not to mention 3rd party stuff I can't control. | 20:04 |
| infinity | (The irony here that is moved from /var/run/shm to /dev/shm 12 years ago, and now people have decided to move it back to /run isn't lost on me) | 20:06 |
| infinity | s/that is/that it/ | 20:06 |
| xnox | Haha =) | 20:06 |
| xnox | that is funny =) | 20:06 |
| infinity | xnox: Well, it makes sense, historically. | 20:06 |
| xnox | do we require devtmpfs? | 20:06 |
| xnox | ( i thought we did, by virtue of udev requirement) | 20:06 |
| infinity | The right place for state files was /var/run, but /var wasn't guaranteed to be on /, so we started dumping early-need stuff in /dev to compensate, and then /run happened to fix the problem. | 20:07 |
| infinity | Anyhow, not everyone is on the /run bandwagon, and I see no value in dropping the symlink pretty much ever. | 20:07 |
| xnox | yeah, yeah, agreed with you, will keep that bit. | 20:08 |
| xnox | i'll test openvz and lxc container and probably drop MAKEDEV usage from that job, and thus from mountall dependencies. | 20:08 |
| xnox | (well make a merge proposal to drop that) | 20:08 |
| infinity | xnox: Fair enough. Seems like a waste of time to care, since mountall itself will be gone by the next LTS, but whatever. :P | 20:09 |
| infinity | GAH. | 20:20 |
| infinity | cjwatson: germinate is exploding in the publisher. | 20:20 |
| infinity | wgrant: ^-- You were sad that everything went smoothly? | 20:22 |
| slangasek | rc/l[ | 21:42 |
| knome | hey, would anybody here know if https://launchpad.net/xubuntu-desktop/ carries any technical merit, or would it be okay to just remove that project? | 21:45 |
| stgraber | no obvious reason to keep it around if you're not using it to host code or blueprints | 21:48 |
| stgraber | Edubuntu has a similiar /edubuntu but we use it for some branches | 21:48 |
| knome | ok, good | 22:01 |
| knome | i'll get that removed :) | 22:01 |
| cjwatson | infinity: Hm, yes, reproduces with just "germinate -s ubuntu.utopic -d utopic --no-rdepends" | 23:28 |
| cjwatson | So hopefully that's debuggable tomorrow | 23:29 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Kay. It's halting archive-reports, due to the way we check if the archive has changed, but I suspect there's no other serious fallout. | 23:30 |
| infinity | doko: gcc-4.9/amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: libgcc-4.9-dev (>= 1:4.9.0-1ubuntu2) | 23:36 |
| cjwatson | Alarmingly, it's not actually clear that it's infinite recursion | 23:36 |
| infinity | doko: Looks like the real package doesn't have an epoch. | 23:36 |
| infinity | cjwatson: Oh, it might just be very, very deep recursion? | 23:37 |
| cjwatson | Just crudely tracing in pdb, it seems to be walking through a legitimately deep dep tree | 23:37 |
| infinity | Well, autopkgtest still seems remarkably buggered, so I'm in no rush to let open the world. | 23:38 |
| infinity | Though we could probably thaw the queue and just keep britney in block-all for now. | 23:38 |
| cjwatson | # TODO: would be much more elegant to reduce our recursion depth! | 23:38 |
| cjwatson | sys.setrecursionlimit(2000) | 23:38 |
| infinity | Hah. | 23:38 |
| cjwatson | cranking to 3000 makes it go away, LA LA LA | 23:39 |
| infinity | Make it 9000? We have a lot more CPU and RAM than we had when that was written. | 23:40 |
| infinity | And then get someone to do a production cowboy... | 23:40 |
| cjwatson | I don't want to overdo it, 3000 should be fine | 23:41 |
| infinity | Heh. | 23:41 |
| infinity | Are we using the packaged germinate in production? | 23:41 |
| cjwatson | Yeah but a backport | 23:41 |
| infinity | If so, turning around an SRU with that 1-char fix in a few hours wouldn't hurt my feelings. | 23:41 |
| infinity | Oh. | 23:41 |
| cjwatson | Oh hey, it's just 2.8 | 23:41 |
| infinity | Yeah, I don't see a backport there. | 23:42 |
| infinity | Unless it's not using the package. | 23:42 |
| cjwatson | It should be | 23:42 |
| cjwatson | Could you file a bug for me? | 23:43 |
| infinity | Yup. | 23:43 |
| infinity | cjwatson: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/germinate/+bug/1312478 | 23:45 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 1312478 in germinate (Ubuntu Trusty) "germinate's recursion limit is too low for utopic" [Undecided,New] | 23:45 |
| infinity | cjwatson: targetted for trusty and precise SRUs. I doubt anyone cares about non-LTS germinate sadness. | 23:46 |
| cjwatson | yeah | 23:47 |
| infinity | cjwatson: I wonder if we were literally just bumping up against the limit in trusty and something tipped us over, or if this is a sign of something going more deeply wrong. | 23:47 |
| cjwatson | I didn't trace the whole stack, but it didn't look horrible | 23:48 |
| cjwatson | And it finishes very quickly after I bump the limit | 23:48 |
| infinity | Might be worth throwing a counter in and seeing if ubuntu.trusty gets us in the 1900s or something. Cause if we've gone from, say, 800 to 2500, that would perhaps point to, if not a germinate bug, us creating a Very Hard to Sort dependency tree. Which could also anger apt's resolver. | 23:49 |
| cjwatson | mm, not tonight though | 23:51 |
| * infinity nods. | 23:51 | |
| infinity | cjwatson: In lieu of trying to SRU in a hurry tonight, I might just get a GSA to cowboy your s/2000/3000/ fix in production, under the assumption that the SRU will just overwrite that in a few days. | 23:53 |
| cjwatson | Yeah that should be fine | 23:53 |
| cjwatson | But I'll do the SRUs shortly | 23:53 |
| cjwatson | Though I'd like to go to bed; indeed if I can do the SRUs tomorrow morning that'd be better | 23:54 |
| cjwatson | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/germinate/trunk/revision/552 | 23:54 |
| infinity | Ta. | 23:55 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!