[06:58] * smb tries to wake up [07:11] * RAOF can spot smb a steaming pot of bees. [07:13] RAOF, To bee or not to bee... [07:13] Whether tis nobler in the mind to suffer the stings of outrageous fortune... [07:14] * smb wished he could remember any more of that just for the fun... [07:15] So I rather replenish that coffee that has vaporized from my cup [08:02] RAOF, i think you'll find your bees in high demand ... [09:12] Hi [09:12] I'm getting a panic on tcp_gso_segment on a server with 3.13 [09:12] when MASQUERADE is used [09:15] 3.13-24 to be exact [09:15] also I tried the 3.14 kernel off of the mainline ppa but I only get that bnx2 firmware is missing so it fails to load [09:16] what to do next ? [09:27] ekarlso-, so filing a bug against the package "linux" would be a good thing to do [09:34] done apw [09:34] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+filebug/677a6d72-ceb7-11e3-a597-002481e7f48a [09:34] ekarlso-: Error: Could not gather data from Launchpad for bug #677 (https://launchpad.net/bugs/677). The error has been logged [09:35] ehm [09:37] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1313591 [09:37] Launchpad bug 1313591 in linux (Ubuntu) "Panic on 3.13.0-24 with bnx2, iptables and MASQUERADE" [Undecided,New] [09:38] apw: u got a cluje on how I can get 3.143 working ? [09:41] ekarlso-, ok we really need to catch that panic stack you are getting [09:41] as the bug report didn't pick it up [09:41] so even if you have to take a photo ... [09:42] also we'd be interested in the bnx2 firmware error as emitted on the later kernels, as that is likely to affect utopic [09:43] henrix, hey ... you sent out fixes for CVE-2014-2523 for quantal, but i see lts-backport-raring is outstanding; is that dead now? [09:44] apw: let me have a look... [09:45] apw: hmm.. i thought the fix was in 3.8 stable, but i can't see it [09:45] do i get to blame kamal ? [09:45] apw: heh, no, not yet :) [09:45] let me double check [09:45] damn :) i was looking forward to some baiting [09:46] * apw puts his ratter back in its cage [09:46] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1313591/+attachment/4099285/+files/trusty_panic.png < that one [09:46] Launchpad bug 1313591 in linux (Ubuntu) "Panic on 3.13.0-24 with bnx2, iptables and MASQUERADE" [Undecided,New] [09:46] ekarlso-, i _hate_ backtraced ... the first line (and pretty much only the first line) is missing [09:47] apw: ? [09:47] I wonder if this is a openvswitch bug though [09:48] apw: ok, i'll send the fix for lts-backport-raring and also ask kamal to include it in stable as well [09:48] apw: thanks for spotting that ;) [09:49] henrix, you know me, i hate "not green" [09:49] heh don't we all? :) [09:49] ekarlso-, the most important line of that dump is the one that scrolled off the top (of course) [09:50] ekarlso-, and yeah this seems to be higher than the driver, even if the presence triggers the behaviour [09:51] it could be any number of layers at fault here indeed [09:53] god I hate this [09:53] trying to find the trace is bleh... [09:54] need to pause at the right millisecond.. [09:55] ekarlso-, these interfaces suck normally, i think the manufacturer does it just to make us go mad [09:58] hmmms [09:58] how the crap can I get the text .... [10:10] apw: what to do next ? [10:13] cry about how pants the interfaces are ... i've had a quick scan of the obvious and don't see anything which i can blame without the clues the top line would likely give us [10:13] ekarlso-, i think we need you to be able to test on the later versions, so we need to figure out the firmware issue [10:16] apw: how do we do that ? [10:20] ok apw [10:20] got it I think [10:24] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/174035085/trusty_panic_top_edited.png [10:25] apw does that provide better info ? [10:33] ekarlso-, yep that is the baby [10:36] what next then apw ? [10:50] ekarlso-, i am poking around to see if there is any chatter on that and if there is anything obvious in the area; it would be good to test a 3.14/15 mainline in this context to see if it is fixed there else we have to look backwards to see what broke it [10:51] apw: yeah, but then fthe firmware [10:52] ekarlso-, which i am sure is a soluable problem [10:52] how ? :_) [10:54] whats the exact error it produces [10:55] the other thing you can do if the newer ones don't work is look backwards for one which does [10:56] ekarlso-, is there ipv6 traffic on this link [10:56] apw: not that I know of [10:57] ekarlso-, i assume as you are using openvswitch there are vlans [10:57] bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw is missing it says. [10:57] yea, but I ain't using ovs for vlans atm [10:59] /lib/firmware/3.13.0-24-generic/bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw [10:59] that seems to be packaged in the appropriate place [10:59] linux-image-3.13.0-24-generic: /lib/firmware/3.13.0-24-generic/bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw [11:00] as far as i can see at least [11:00] you could try symlinking htat into the mainline build lib directory in a similar place [11:02] apw: sorry? [11:03] as this is packaged with the kernel, you could add a symlink in /lib/firmware/VERSION/bnx2 [11:03] for the mainline version you are running [11:05] I tired [11:06] ln -s /lib/firmware/3.14.X/bnx2 /lib/firmware [11:07] and that didn't work ? [11:07] if not, try ln -s /lib/firmware/3.14.X/bnx2 /lib/firmware/`uname -r`/bnx2 in the broke one [11:07] bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw is missing still -,,- [11:10] So I linked that to the 3.14 bnx2 directory and it loads [11:11] ok, booting then into 3.14 and see if that panics [11:14] ekarlso-, i would also try v3.15-rc3 if that explodes on you, as that deffo has 2-3 suspicious sounding fixed [11:16] deffo ? [11:17] definatly [11:22] 3.14 fixed it apw -,,- [11:23] ekarlso-, ok good then there is hope [11:23] ekarlso-, put all the info in the bu [11:23] bug [11:24] just that 3.14 works ? : ) [11:27] ekarlso-, it is a start [11:34] ekarlso-, 3.14 contains at aleast two of the suspicious sounding fixes [12:12] felipec.wordpress.com/2012/11/13/git-remote-hg-bzr-2/ <- Bridge support in git for mercurial and bazaar [12:12] e.g. git clone "bzr::lp:gnuhello" [12:12] The original repository will be tracked like any git repository: [12:12] ... [12:12] awesome!!! [12:21] ppisati: is that the 'git-bzr' package? [12:39] henrix: it seems so [12:39] henrix: but i never used it [12:40] ppisati: me either... but i've installed it loooong ago so that i could give it a try. but never did :) [12:42] git clone bzr::lp:$PROJECT [12:42] and it works === sz0 is now known as sz0` === sz0` is now known as sz0 === sz0 is now known as sz0` === sz0` is now known as sz0 === sz0 is now known as sz0` === sz0` is now known as sz0 === sz0 is now known as sz0` === sz0` is now known as sz0 [14:59] http://dpaste.com/1798914/ <- has anyone seen something like this with 3.13? [15:05] backjlack, have you tried a 3.14 kernel in order to see if this issue has already been fixed ? [15:05] rtg: No, but I've tried 3.12.16 a few weeks ago and that was OK. [15:06] Are there any 3.14 kernel packages to try out? I'd rather not build 3.14 right now. [15:07] backjlack, kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.14.2-utopic/ [15:08] backjlack, also, if you've the patience you could work with jsalisbury to bisect the issue [15:08] rtg: I have patience, but I'm afraid I don't have much time. [15:09] well, thats up to you 'cause a kernel bisect can take awhile. [15:09] Yes, I'm aware of that. I build my own kernels sometimes. [15:10] Let's see if 3.14 fixes the problem. [15:10] backjlack, if you open a bug report, I'd be more than happy to help bisect with you. For your part, it would require you test some kernels after I build them, then report back if they have the bug or not. [15:10] backjlack, jsalisbury builds the kernels for you so you on'y have to install, reboot, and do your snapshot. [15:17] jsalisbury rtg: Ok, I've got 3.14 installed on the box. I'll test it for 1-2 days and file the bug afterwards. [15:17] At least we'll know what has to be done at that point. [15:17] backjlack, I'll keep an eye out for the bug report. [15:17] It really looks like it's snapshot related because I'm running into this with Docker. [15:18] docker+btrfs [16:19] apw, the patch I sent for the __udivdi3 modpost error ultimately used do_div(). I knew there was a better way. Also pushed to Utopic master-next [16:30] rtg, that looks much prettier [16:30] apw, yup [17:07] jsalisbury, please see if you can get this guy to help you with a bisect. There are a lot of bnx2s out there. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313591 [17:08] Launchpad bug 1313591 in linux (Ubuntu) "Panic on 3.13.0-24 with bnx2, iptables and MASQUERADE" [Undecided,Confirmed] [17:08] rtg, will do [17:09] rtg, looks to be fixed in 3.14.1, so I'll reverse bisect. [18:05] hello, I'm running 14.04 on a 11,1 mbp retina 13", the laptop died because of battery and on boot now hands on "X86 Booting SMP configuration" [18:06] this looks similar to my issue, but this kernel was previously booting until it died via power loss. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1284085 [18:06] Launchpad bug 1284085 in linux (Ubuntu) "unable to boot after install on 2013 macbook air" [High,Confirmed] [18:07] yea, what the bot said ^ [20:20] suomesta ketään? [20:22] I need help making my first kernel module [20:28] Why makefile says: there is no rule to producing mymodule? [21:05] bjf: jsalisbury bug 1289728 says fix committed for ubuntu-quantal. Which tree is it in? [21:05] Launchpad bug 1289728 in linux-ti-omap4 (Ubuntu Saucy) "CVE-2014-0049" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1289728 [21:07] bjf: jsalisbury n/m my brain isn't working today [21:12] bjf: http://zinc.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-quantal.git;a=commit;h=5a4214563afab122a847035bc64c6e5ef9736d80 [21:40] hay arges, you have any thoughts about this? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015989 - we're seeing the same thing on stock Ubuntu 14.04 EC2 guests [21:40] bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1015989 in kernel "kernel panic in nf_nat_cleanup_conntrack in netns_cleanup_net with Docker" [Unspecified,Assigned] [21:41] here's the upstream bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65191 [21:41] bugzilla.kernel.org bug 65191 in Netfilter/Iptables "BUG in nf_nat_cleanup_conntrack" [Normal,New] [21:41] sconklin: hey! reading through it now [21:42] I may drop due to weather. Not lack of interest :-) [21:44] sconklin:haven't seen this particular issue, was looking at a few conntrack/netfilter issues in the past few months. But this seems to be slightly different. Have you guys tried any later kernels? 3.15? [21:56] arges: no, the only thing we've tried is 14.04 [22:04] I have to deal with weather. I'll get back to you tomorrowe [22:04] take care [22:04] http://radar.weather.gov/radar.php?product=NCR&rid=GWX&loop=yes === sz0_ is now known as sz0` === sz0` is now known as sz0_