[00:00] thomi, so I would recommend, just merge this MP by hand, then create a new empty MP to shove through CI train. I've seen this a couple times already [00:00] I had to hit 'force rebuild' since the branch I'm merging in to has a different changelog [00:00] robru: ok, will do [00:00] thomi, thaks === jhodapp|afk is now known as jhodapp [01:19] robru, done! everything was correctly build \o/ [01:20] robru, afaik everything should be ok now, can you take a quick look and I'll go to bed (3 am here) [01:20] mandel, sure [01:21] mandel, looks really good to me! publishing! [01:21] robru, awesome!!! thx! [01:21] robru, I'm off then for the day/night, thx a lot for the help, I really appreciate it [01:22] mandel, should hit distro in an hour or so [01:22] mandel, you're welcome! get some sleep! [01:22] robru, that is awesome, means we will soon have browser downloads in the touch image :) [01:22] robru, laters o/ [01:22] robru, have a good evening [01:22] you too === jhodapp is now known as jhodapp|afk [02:04] === trainguard: IMAGE 4 building (started: 20140430 02:05) === [03:25] === trainguard: IMAGE 4 DONE (finished: 20140430 03:25) === [03:25] === changelog: http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/4.changes === [03:25] yay, new image [03:32] coool [03:32] rsalveti: would you please reconfigure the silo9? [03:46] Mirv: would you please reconfigure the silo9? [03:52] bzoltan, on it [03:53] bzoltan, alright, please build [03:55] robru: thanks [03:56] bzoltan, you're welcome [03:59] ok :) === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === vila changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Ubuntu CI Engineering Team | Vanguard: vila | CI Train support - US: robru, cyphermox, rrsalveti - EU: sil2100, Mirv, didrocks | CITrain support no answer: use mup bot after 30 minutes, but choose right timezone | Known issues: - [07:14] didrocks: sil2100: it seems the autopkg auth problem is here to stay for a bit. do you think we could merge&clean the unity8 silo while it's still in -proposed so that SDK team can move forards? [07:14] Mirv: sounds the right path to me [07:14] Mirv: please put a comment so that it's tracked manually! [07:14] ok, thanks [07:15] Mirv: +1, thanks ;) [07:20] Mirv, didrocks: once unity8 lands, I'll also assign the silo for Mir again [07:20] Mirv, didrocks: and even press build so that when Kevin appears he can do the testing and we can land [07:21] ok [07:21] great! [07:21] thanks guys [07:23] sil2100: yes, I was thinking about doing that as well [07:23] but feel free [07:24] Mirv: hey, I was wondering is a bank holiday for you as well? [07:24] didrocks: yes, if that clause is missing "tomorrow" [07:24] *if tomorrow* [07:24] :) [07:24] yeah [07:25] sil2100: mind telling that we are off for business tomorrow? ^ [07:25] it's the first time in two years I get to actually have it since we've had Oakland trips in the past.. [07:25] sil2100: at least, in the EU time [07:25] Mirv: yeah, same for me :) [07:25] Mirv: back on Friday? [07:25] Sure, I'll also mention that in the e-mail ;p [07:25] didrocks: back on Friday, yes [07:26] Mirv: ok, it will be only us two! :) [07:26] sil2100: maybe check if cyphermox and other in US timezone will be there though [07:26] :) [07:27] ok, sil2100 mentionned that the bot was disconnecting a lot [07:28] Mirv: sil2100: I'm removing the --no-profile (the thing avoiding using a lot of CPU) [07:28] and then, let's compare [07:29] done [07:30] didrocks: yes, but as kgunn mentioned it's also pretty sympathique *) when it says Choo Choo at random intervals [07:30] *) it seems English lacks that word [07:31] Mirv: well, it's the French word, so I don't care :p [07:32] yeah, seems only "pleasant" or "likeable" in English… [07:37] sil2100, any news on the utopic bots? === mhr3__ is now known as mhr3 [07:41] huuh [07:42] sil2100, can you explain silo 007? it got landed, and is cleaning silo, but the new unity8 is still in proposed? [07:42] didrocks, ↑? [07:43] 09:14:03 Mirv | didrocks: sil2100: it seems the autopkg auth problem is here to stay for a bit. do you think we could merge&clean [07:43] | the unity8 silo while it's still in -proposed so that SDK team can move forards? [07:43] 09:14:24 didrocks | Mirv: sounds the right path to me [07:43] 09:14:37 didrocks | Mirv: please put a comment so that it's tracked manually! [07:43] Saviq: ^ [07:43] kk [07:43] missed it [07:43] Saviq: basically, everything is going to be stuck in proposed until the CI team help fixing the cred issue [07:44] didrocks, understood [07:44] we just help you guys getting your piece moving :) [07:44] jibel: do you mind sending an email about it to -devel and -phone? [07:44] then, we can answer telling what we are doing for getting things merged and not having a silo congestion [07:49] sil2100: I ignore-conflict configured the Mir landing since your run failed. the greeter split preparation silo is still there. [07:49] Mirv: ah, right, thanks! Sorry I missed that [07:50] * sil2100 still in the process of conjuring coffee [07:50] ..and it's building now [07:53] dbarth: you'd probably like to mark the unity-webapps-googleplus SRU bug as verification-done instead of waiting for additional outside verification (if you're happy with your testing), so that it has a chance of migrating to updates pocket tomorrow when it has been 7 days in the proposed pocket [07:54] +1 [07:55] Mirv: I actually thought it got verified alongside of the webbrowser-app component [07:55] That was my understanding [07:56] sil2100: it got verified, but not marked so as commented on the bug report by david [07:56] http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html is again our friend [08:03] psivaa: good morning! Could you maybe try to re-run shorts_app for mako on the latest image? [08:03] sil2100: ack, will do [08:03] Thank you :) [08:03] sil2100: jfyi, shorts app had failied in the previous image too, r3 [08:05] psivaa: do you know if those were retried on r3? Since on the dashboard they seem to look as if they were re-ran and still failed [08:06] sil2100: yes, that was retried in r3 and failed again. i'm running with r4 now too [08:12] hmm, wasnt Mir supposed to land over night ? [08:13] ogra_: unity8 complications [08:13] ah, i didnt know it depends on that landing, yeah, saw that [08:13] ogra_: the unity8 landing got blocked in -proposed due to a autopkg auto problem etc. [08:14] yup [08:14] ogra_: unity8 landing had unity-mir locked, which is needed by the Mir one [08:14] Mir is already building in the silo so I hope we'll release it today [08:21] vila: could you take a look at the jenkins log for https://code.launchpad.net/~renatofilho/ubuntu-calendar-app/fix-1311125/+merge/217251 please? http://91.189.93.70:8080/job/generic-mediumtests-trusty/2288/console [08:21] vila: it seemed to die due to some packaging issue? [08:21] aha, calendar-app : Depends: qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-syncmonitor0.1 but it is not installable [08:22] vila: ignore me ☻ [08:25] I can positively say that yesterday's functional BT headset was a one-time event. now I can't playback or record smoothly so I'm back to speaker/internalmicrophone :( [08:26] uh [08:26] Mirv: just like that? [08:26] How could that be broken suddenly ;p [08:26] sil2100: well of course a couple of more utopic updates in-between ;) but it seems pretty random all in all. [08:27] it may be that the duplex mode has always been broken (I was using USB microphone yesterday) and that the A2DP part fails to switch often (but not yesterday) [08:29] maybe it's a AR3012 BT controller bug since Launchpad is not swarmed with BT related reports. network over BT does work properly though. [08:31] and now I lost my camera I think somehow :S [08:40] Mirv: ok [08:40] Mirv: yes, i will do that, i'm testing it everyday and can attest it fixes the issue [08:41] dbarth: great! it's then possible it'll be handled tomorrow. [08:43] sil2100: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-rssreader-app/+bug/1314531 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-clock-app/+bug/1314533 [08:43] (in case you lose them when the hangout closes) [08:43] popey: thanks :) [08:45] Mirv: done, if there are other things blocking let me know and i can accelerate the re-verirication [08:45] Mirv: i know i hav eanother silo which is in unappoved right now [08:48] dbarth: others are good at the moment. webbrowser-app has a chance of migration tomorrow as well, as the 7 days is full for it then too [08:55] ok [08:58] psivaa: I "got" the qmlscene crash seemingly retraced, but it didn't give anything meaningful in backtrace. bug #1314541 - I added the retrace tag there so that LP can try to backtrace it [08:59] Mirv: thanks. [09:00] I think it's time to upgrade my phone to utopic :| [09:00] Was supposed to do that yesterday... [09:02] There are some phone-ish packages that have been uploaded to trusty-updates but not to utopic, so that now trusty-updates > utopic [09:03] Normally I would just copy these up to utopic, binaries and all [09:03] Is it going to cause any problems for our CI if I do that? [09:03] (oxide-qt, unity, webbrowser-app) [09:03] cjwatson: no no, please do :) [09:04] cjwatson: we've done that on purpose until utopic opened and if it qualified as an SRU [09:04] cjwatson: some more will probably migrate until EOW [09:04] (to from trusty-proposed to -updates) [09:04] Right, just wanted to check [09:04] do you want us to ping you about them? [09:04] No need [09:04] I'll check occasionally for a while [09:04] ok, thanks :) [09:05] I never know how you handle those [09:05] And yeah, there are others in universe [09:05] as you do the sync yourself for quite a while [09:05] but there is never cut off date (at least officially) [09:05] ubuntu-archive@snakefruit:~$ for x in main restricted universe multiverse; do ~cjwatson/suite-diff.py mirror/ubuntu/dists/{trusty-updates,utopic}/$x/source/Sources.gz gt; done [09:05] basically [09:06] yeah, we've never announced it very clearly [09:06] it's usually just when it stops being worthwhile [09:06] ok, we don't plan that many SRU anymore anyway [09:06] (i.e. the bulk of -updates tend to be already otherwise changed in utopic) [09:06] for touch [09:06] yeah [09:18] Mirv, hum, did your Qt renames not reach Utopic yet? [09:19] Mirv, any idea about that dep failure https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/unity8-trusty-i386-ci/1406/console ? [09:24] Saviq, they did http://people.canonical.com/~ogra/touch-image-stats/2.changes [09:26] vila: could you see why https://code.launchpad.net/~gang65/ubuntu-docviewer-app/ubuntu-docviewer-desktop-improvements/+merge/210866 is failing? is this a packaging change? [09:27] docviewer ! [09:27] fnally !!! [09:27] Damn, my internet works like horror today [09:27] Oh, docviewer? Like, PDFs?! [09:27] That's like 75% of usecases of my smartphone [09:28] yeah [09:28] i even wrote my own ebook reader to work around that [09:28] (converting pdf books to html and turning that into a click package with included html viewer) === alan_g is now known as alan_g|afk [09:30] hmm, i see a bunch of ftbfs mails for the Mir silo [09:30] :( [09:31] popey: from http://91.189.93.70:8080/job/generic-mediumtests-trusty/1886/console :The following packages have unmet dependencies: [09:31] ubuntu-docviewer-app : Depends: file-qml-plugin but it is not going to be installed [09:31] E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. doesn't look good [09:34] ogra_: "error: 'strcmp' was not declared in this scope" basically === alan_g|afk is now known as alan_g [09:36] well, up to the Mir guys to fix ... [09:36] Mirv, hmm, should we perhaps change the seeds to reflect the renaming of the plugins [09:37] * ogra_ is just noticing that sdk-libs only lists transitional packages now [09:40] ogra_: yep, we should [09:44] * Saviq tries to build locally... [09:44] Mirv, ah, you didn't sync the rename in qtmultimedia yet? [09:45] i guess that will happen after media-hub landed [09:46] since it replaces parts [09:46] https://code.launchpad.net/~phablet-team/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu-touch.utopic_media-hub/+merge/217649 [09:46] ogra_, not really related, the media hub replaces a backend plugin for qtmultimedia, not qtmultimedia itself, does it? [09:46] well, it drops it from the seeds [09:59] Mirv: sil2100: would you please reconfigure the Silo9. I have added there an important fix. [10:02] Morning all [10:03] bzoltan: ACK [10:05] sil2100: thanks [10:06] bzoltan: uh! [10:06] bzoltan: https://code.launchpad.net/~zsombi/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/combotest-fix/+merge/217546 <- this seems to target staging instead of trunk [10:07] bzoltan: other merges are targetting trunk on the other hand it seems, CITrain needs all branches to target the same thing :0 [10:07] bzoltan: could you fix that? [10:07] sil2100: ohh darn... let me fix that [10:10] bzoltan: reminds me, since you're uploading to U now, can you take my branch from line 37? [10:11] Saviq: nope, it's less urgent as it doesn't block anything [10:11] bzoltan: or let me know if i can remove safely as a landing request [10:11] sil2100: o/ morning, i have line 40 with 2 SRUs [10:11] dbarth: it is already in the line 16 [10:11] \o/ [10:12] bzoltan: just give me a sign once the silo is ready for reconfiguring [10:13] dbarth: just to make sure - did you land anything for utopic for those projects in that SRU, or not yet? [10:14] dbarth: ah, I don't remember those components, so I guess it's safe [10:14] sil2100, didrocks first time I feel the request for a silo, line 46, can you let me know if I did it correctly? [10:15] mandel: hi! First thing: you need to give the link to the merge request, not the lp branch [10:15] bzoltan: ah ok, so i'll remove this one then; thanks ;) [10:15] sil2100, agh, I'm stupid I always get that wrong.. [10:15] dbarth: so, line 40 ready for assignment? :) [10:16] didrocks: nothing on utopic yet [10:16] sil2100: ok cool [10:16] sil2100, sorted out [10:16] uh sorry didrocks, i meant sil2100 ^^ [10:16] ;) [10:17] mandel: looking good otherwise! Assigning [10:18] sil2100, awesome, thx [10:18] mandel: I mean, I will try assigning, but we're critically low on silos ;) Although mhr3 had sooo many landings yesterday that I think he'll understand if I don't assign one instantly for him! [10:19] mhr3: am I right?! [10:19] sil2100, no problem, I'll be working on other things in the mean time, we need to get the udm qml in the sdk [10:19] sil2100, but if it is worth it, this landing should be really fast, is a simple qml change [10:20] sil2100, no, i want one! :P [10:20] pff ;) [10:20] ;p [10:20] sil2100, and you know i give them back fairly quickly :) [10:21] I'll just assign for both of you, as I guess those silos will be freed quickly [10:23] sil2100, great, thx [10:26] mandel, mhr3: silos assigned! We're officially on 0 free silos right now - please try building and testing ASAP ;) [10:26] sil2100, will do right now [10:26] Spreadsheet needs a moment to update [10:29] mandel: you should join #ubuntu-ci-choo-choo to get status update about your landings and when things are assigned [10:29] you would have got: 12:27:04 CI-SNCF | mandel (landing-020): Silo ready to build packages [10:29] for instance [10:29] didrocks, true, I forgot about the bot [10:30] sil2100, can 019 be poked? it's in unapproved [10:30] mhr3: I poked the SRU team yesterday in the morning and they said that they have a lot of things on the queue so it might take some time until they push those forward [10:30] So I guess we need to be patient ;/ [10:31] sil2100, well, means i'm hogging the silo.. but well === vila changed the topic of #ubuntu-ci-eng to: Ubuntu CI Engineering Team | Vanguard: cihelp | CI Train support - US: robru, cyphermox, rrsalveti - EU: sil2100, Mirv, didrocks | CITrain support no answer: use mup bot after 30 minutes, but choose right timezone | Known issues: - [11:05] * sil2100 tries to do lunch [11:21] psivaa: so, you said that on image #3 even after re-running the filemanager tests it still failed, right? [11:22] psivaa: locally on #4 I ran twice all the filemanager tests and it passed, so maybe it was only 3-specific? [11:23] sil2100: there was no filemanager failure on #4 in the smoke, let me confirm about #3 [11:24] sil2100: yes, with #3, filemanger tests failed on the first run as well as on the rerun [11:38] * didrocks goes for a run [11:56] bug #12345 [12:00] huh? [12:00] bug #asdf1234 [12:01] psivaa: LP tracer came up with similarly empty hands to me at bug #1314541 (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtdeclarative-opensource-src/+bug/1314541) [12:02] and also claims outdated packages / symbols, so I guess the only thing to do is wait for new images and try again later [12:02] at least I should have my utopic retracing setup ok [12:02] bug #asdf bot indeed is missing [12:02] looking at this channel didrocks ran off as soon as ogra_ noticed the bugbot was dead I think we know the culprit here ;) [12:03] haha [12:07] Mirv: ack. thanks for looking into it. [12:09] sil2100, silo 20 is good to go, build + testing done [12:10] fginther, hey, will you transition active -ci/-autolanding jobs to utopic after having pruned all the jobs? [12:16] mandel: publish done [12:16] Mirv, thx! [12:17] o/ [12:17] Mirv, mandel: thanks! [12:24] mandel: congrats on the landing! [12:25] alecu, thx! now you should be unblocked, is that correct? [12:25] mandel: right, thanks a lot [12:25] alecu, no worries, I'm in the ci train team now, so things should be at least a little faster in the future === jhodapp|afk is now known as jhodapp [12:46] mhr3: hi! [12:46] sil2100, hey [12:47] mhr3: I see you added a build-dep in unity-scope-mediascanner to mediascanner2.0 <- why is that required? Isn't libmediascanner-2.0-dev enough? [12:47] Just want to make sure [12:47] And know the rationale for that [12:47] sil2100, i didn't add it, i sorted the deps alphabetically :P [12:47] AAh, damn, I'm blind [12:47] Daaamn [12:47] mhr3: ignore meeee [12:48] but i think it's for tests [12:48] probably [12:48] Ok, anyway, since I already asked, why is it there? [12:48] Thanks ;) [12:48] didrocks: packaging ACK needed - it's safe: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/landing-017-2-publish/6/artifact/packaging_changes_unity-scope-mediascanner_0.2+14.10.20140430-0ubuntu1.diff and https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/landing-017-2-publish/6/artifact/packaging_changes_unity-scope-scopes_0.1+14.10.20140430.1-0ubuntu1.diff [12:49] Just changes regarding i18n support [12:55] mandel: btw, I was just pointed out that when changing the required version of u-d-m, we should have added a check to the click scope CMake files [12:55] mandel: I'm adding that to a new branch; do you know what udm version number should I use? [12:58] mandel: pkg_check_modules(UBUNTU_DOWNLOAD_MANAGER_CLIENT REQUIRED ubuntu-download-manager-client>=0.3.0) ??? [13:01] Saviq, yes, all of the trunk and dev trunk builds will move to utopic. Most of the test jobs and infrastructure is in place now so most things should work now. if you need to transition something right now, please let me know [13:02] fginther, no worries, unity8-ci fails for me in one branch, but nothing pressing [13:04] Saviq, ok, I'll work on getting unity8 transitioned as soon as possible [13:04] there's a little more work involved to convert it's qml test job [13:09] davmor2: ogra_: rohhhh :p [13:10] sil2100: +1 [13:25] cyphermox: hi! Could you poke me once you're around? Want to ask you if you had any progress with LP: #1307981 [13:32] alecu, yes, 0.3 or later is the one you want [13:32] alecu, if you have the branch I can require the silo and we can land it asap [13:44] ogra_: what do you think about kicking a new image? :) [13:44] sil2100, ah, i thought you wanted to wait for Mir [13:44] ogra_: we have a new unity8 and ubuntu-download-manager in the archive now + some smaller things [13:45] ogra_: yeah, but sadly I would prefer having also a image without Mir first [13:45] yeah, we should buuld an image with u-d-m so we know if we need to roll that back so mandel doesnt get jobless *g* [13:45] sil2100, oh, right, you even said so in the meeting [13:45] * ogra_ kicks one [13:45] ogra_: since if something is broken, we won't know if it's Mir, unity8 or by any chance u-d-m ;p ;p [13:45] Thanks! [13:45] please let it not me udm! [13:46] ogra_, sil2100 but sounds good since in my silo we also had unity-scope-click [13:46] ogra_, sil2100 we wnat to have an image with that [13:46] image kicked (bot will announce in 10min) [13:48] :) [13:48] Awesome [13:50] sil2100, silo 20 for you to use for anything else [13:53] didrocks: hey, archive question, what are the rules for SRU? I want to put goget-ubuntu-touch that's in utopic into trusty; I'm also at a crux as everyone just uses the PPA for this so I even wonder if we need archive landings at all for this particular package [13:54] I guess it's the same question for other product like packages which need to live on after a release [13:54] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates [13:54] ogra_: I read that; but that's for non features [13:54] sil2100: can I have a silo for line 45 please? [13:54] for trusty a few SRUs probably make sense [13:54] === trainguard: IMAGE 5 building (started: 20140430 13:55) === [13:55] ogra_: I'm trying to think more product like [13:55] but in the end people will have to use the PPA anyway [13:55] bfiller: sure thing, got the ping earlier - been waiting for all fields being filled in :) [13:55] mandel: weird; pawel has 0.3+14.04.20140321-0ubuntu1 installed and it does not have the libu-d-m api changes [13:55] ogra_: as in, if this package gets outdated, people will just use the PPA [13:55] right [13:56] ogra_: so if people will always just default to the PPA, is there sense into having it in the archives at all [13:56] alecu, how did he install it? is that in a phone image? [13:56] bfiller: but awesome that haptic feedback is already ready for release o/ [13:56] ogra_: think of me as a poor man's steam product :-P like a partner archive I guess [13:56] sergiusens, i think there is ... to make it available to these that dont want a PPA [13:56] ogra_: my case is simple, the sdk is a more complicated one [13:56] alecu, 0.3+14.10.20140430-0ubuntu1 is the one released AFAIK [13:57] sil2100: works great, have to manually enable it though [13:57] sergiusens: you can discuss about it with the SRU team, but apart from firefox and chromium, I don't know other cases with features upgrade [13:57] alecu, 0.3+14.04.20140321-0ubuntu1 does not have them [13:57] sil2100: any idea why a rebuild was requested on landing-006? I see there is an error there, but I only asked it for building once, and it built fine [13:57] alecu, that is a little old [13:58] boiko: let me take a look [13:58] didrocks: ack [13:58] sergiusens, didrocks: -backport might be more appropriate than SRU for those cases [13:58] boiko: it seems Robert requested a rebuild, not sure why... [13:58] seb128, ++ [13:58] yeah, good idea [13:59] seb128: makes sense, thanks :-) [13:59] yw! [13:59] boiko: is the package in the PPA including all the changes which you wanted? [13:59] sil2100: can I just ignore the error and proceed with the reviewing? [13:59] sil2100: yep, this line was placed before 14.04 was released and it was never changed :) [14:00] boiko: ah, maybe robru wanted to make sure its rebuilt with the new utopic toolchain? [14:00] But I see it was built 14 hours ago so hm [14:00] It should be fine I guess [14:00] *16 [14:00] sil2100: ok, I will test using the packages in the ppa, thanks [14:00] boiko: I'll try getting rid of that error [14:00] (by a watch only build) [14:01] sil2100: well, if that won't cause any trouble, just leave it there, that's fine [14:01] sil2100: did you happen to check on status of line 25? qtorganizer5-eds still in unapproved. if it's not going to get into SRU can we just release it now into U? [14:02] bfiller: I poked release about those yesterday and they said they have a large queue of packages they need to look through, so it might take some time [14:02] sil2100: can we get it in U in parallel? how does that work? [14:04] bfiller: I guess that's possible as well, but first of all we would have to create a trusty explicit branch [14:04] bfiller: and the problem I see is that the current landing is targetting trunk right now [14:04] didrocks: ^ how could we easily proceed with this? [14:04] sil2100: maybe we should just drop the SRU request [14:04] bfiller: easier if you want to drop the SRU requests [14:05] I guess backports are an improvement over a PPA [14:05] We can do that [14:05] we just unassign and reassign [14:05] didrocks: I'll ping the release team to drop it from the queue then [14:05] sil2100: I can do it if you prefer [14:05] just give me the package names [14:05] Oh, like, do you have teh power to do that? :) [14:06] well, it's mixed with the archive admin creds [14:06] Awesome [14:06] basically, I could ack the queue, even when in freeze [14:06] but then… it's called, integrity and trust :) [14:07] didrocks: qtorganizer5-eds <- this is the source package name for the landing [14:07] Unassigning the silo and reassigning [14:07] bfiller: so, do you ACK for dropping the SRU? [14:08] sil2100: bfiller: kicked out [14:08] ...it's a yes! [14:08] ;) [14:08] There's no turning back now! [14:08] didrocks, sil2100 : thank you [14:08] yw ;) [14:08] sil2100: you reassign and just kick build for bfiller? [14:08] Sure [14:08] thanks [14:08] Just waiting for the silo to be cleaned [14:08] np ;) [14:09] yep [14:09] sil2100: what about line 21? that one is in trusty proposed but how do we also get it in U? [14:09] bfiller: once it will reach -updates, it will be copied over to U [14:09] bfiller: let's first wait for it to land in trusty and it gets copied to utopic [14:09] fginther, instead of converting that job, should we just switch to DEP-8? [14:10] s/should/could/? [14:10] sil2100: didrocks seems jhodapp is ready to land media-hub; how exiting is that? :-) [14:10] sergiusens: exit? should we ran away? :) [14:10] *exciting even ;) [14:10] lol [14:10] seems like \o/ [14:10] jhodapp: for reference, look at /topic, it has the European CI train support coverage listed [14:10] jhodapp: word play ;-) [14:11] so I need someone to help me land it, it's ready! [14:11] sil2100: I'll let you the pleasure ^ [14:11] ok [14:11] (especially as it's been rebuild in utopic I guess and you tracked it?) [14:11] * sergiusens can't connect to google docs so can't really tag stuff [14:12] didrocks, yep, rebuilt in utopic and tested by many people [14:12] it's soooo moving :) [14:12] Saviq, I'll support that. It will take a little more work to get the infrastructure properly setup to run it, but it's where we want to go with testing. [14:13] fginther, kk [14:13] so sil2100, up to the challenge? :) [14:14] Let me read up! [14:14] k [14:15] didrocks: btw, is this related to what I reported last time? http://paste.ubuntu.com/7366564/ [14:15] My my my [14:15] This is hm, stressing! [14:15]