| jcsackett | morning, all. | 13:09 |
|---|---|---|
| rick_h_ | party | 13:09 |
| rick_h_ | jujugui please update the kanban board with what got done (even if not on the board) and where things are at today | 13:11 |
| jcsackett | how many of us are actually working today? | 13:26 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: well the only request for swap day I got was from frankban | 13:31 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: so I have no idea | 13:31 |
| jcsackett | rick_h_: dig. | 13:36 |
| kadams54 | rick_h_: for this new search header view that I'm working on, should I keep it in the subapp/browser space? | 14:21 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: yes | 14:21 |
| kadams54 | Or do we want that to go away? | 14:21 |
| kadams54 | kk | 14:22 |
| rick_h_ | jujugui (repeat for the folks joined recently) please update the kanban board with what got done (even if not on the board) and where things are at today | 14:24 |
| rick_h_ | ccccccbtujivddegtrcuebbulfrhrjkfngkbjireglbe | 14:30 |
| redir | cat | 14:30 |
| hatch | dog | 14:30 |
| * hatch is sick | 14:31 | |
| rick_h_ | doh | 14:31 |
| hatch | stupid sick people traveling | 14:31 |
| rick_h_ | double doh | 14:31 |
| rick_h_ | redir: did you get the leankit email? | 14:31 |
| rick_h_ | redir: looks like you did. You should have full access to the board now https://canonical.leankit.com/Boards/View/102529849 | 14:32 |
| redir | rick_h_: yup. but no permissions on the boards yet | 14:32 |
| rick_h_ | redir: let me know if you want to hangout pre call to get a run down of the board | 14:32 |
| redir | OK. Just tried creating a card but didn't have permissions. | 14:33 |
| rick_h_ | yea, just updated it | 14:33 |
| rick_h_ | you should be full user now | 14:33 |
| redir | k | 14:34 |
| redir | card created | 14:39 |
| redir | rick_h_: can I get a rundown of the board tomorrow morning? | 14:39 |
| rick_h_ | redir: sure thing | 14:39 |
| rick_h_ | redir: it uses gravatar for the head pics on the cards | 14:39 |
| redir | OK. I'll find a good headshot | 14:41 |
| hatch | rick_h_ kadams54 after the standup can you guys explain to me the email re the sidebar changes? I don't really see where the proposed changes are any different than what we have been doing | 14:42 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: k, will do | 14:42 |
| jcsackett | juju-gui: call in 4 minutes, i suppose. | 14:56 |
| jcsackett | (hope i'm not stepping on toes there, but hadn't seen a warning) | 14:56 |
| rick_h_ | oh yea, jujugui call in 4 :) | 14:56 |
| rick_h_ | no - | 14:56 |
| * rick_h_ is heads down atm and missed it and makyo normally catches it | 14:57 | |
| rick_h_ | speaking of which | 14:57 |
| Makyo | Sorry, late morning. | 14:58 |
| rick_h_ | hah it's all good. I think all of us are moving a bit slow today | 14:59 |
| rick_h_ | I'm still recovering form that 2.5mi hike to the sharks on friday | 14:59 |
| rick_h_ | /form/from | 14:59 |
| hatch | haha | 14:59 |
| jcsackett | jujugui: going to be a moment late, i've misplaced my earphones when unpacking. | 15:00 |
| rick_h_ | redir: joining or are you on the train? | 15:01 |
| rick_h_ | https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/canonical.com/daily-standup?authuser=1 | 15:01 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: I don't see you at all | 15:25 |
| jcsackett | rick_h_: you don't see me at all, like in canonicaladmin? b/c i can verify curtis is getting my expenses. | 15:25 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: right, you're not listed on my team in canonical admin | 15:26 |
| jcsackett | rick_h_: right...so do i need to complain to P&C, or do you? | 15:26 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: writing the email now. don't worry about it | 15:27 |
| jcsackett | rick_h_: cool, thanks. | 15:27 |
| hatch | P&C sounds like a big corporate conglomerate | 15:27 |
| rick_h_ | Makyo: on your branch, jcsackett I think did some initial ideas towards that. The idea being that we whitelist good states and if it's not a good state we fallback to a default | 15:29 |
| Makyo | rick_h_, oh, okay. I was going to see if a state was possible, then fall back, but that may be overthinking it. | 15:31 |
| jcsackett | rick_h_: we don't actuallly have any work towards that idea--we had a verification step i took out of my current branch b/c it only checked for files in flash for local insepctor. | 15:31 |
| rick_h_ | Makyo: yea, I guess the general idea is I think it'd be better to try to whitelist and control things (e.g. in sandbox a inspector/mysql view isn't valid) | 15:31 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: ok, well just saying we've had conversations so there's some background | 15:32 |
| jcsackett | rick_h_: dig. just didn't want there to be any false hope of work already done. :) | 15:32 |
| rick_h_ | lol | 15:32 |
| Makyo | Sounds good, I'll head in that direction. | 15:33 |
| hatch | is this the part where we need to check if the inspector urls are valid, if they aren't then show the charmbrowser/ | 15:40 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: yes, that's the idea. | 15:40 |
| hatch | oh, and having a section validator pre dispatching is not going to work? | 15:41 |
| rick_h_ | I think that's kind of the idea. To whitelist first before trying to do a bunch of stuff and then failing | 15:41 |
| hatch | ahh - I was thinking that because each section had such different requirements that it would validate each section individually | 15:43 |
| rick_h_ | yea, but then it's hard to maintain and find out why something failed imo | 15:43 |
| rick_h_ | I'd be curious if people are willing to trade off maintaining a white list up front that's clear/easy to read vs debugging it at the failure point | 15:43 |
| hatch | so you're thinking: URL parse to state > validate parsed state > dispatch ? | 15:45 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: yep | 15:45 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: at least it's the discussion I'd like to have :) | 15:45 |
| hatch | I think that will be considerably more work because you'd have to have these complex methods for parsing the state out instead of splitting it up into the sections. | 15:46 |
| hatch | and then dealing with them 1:1 | 15:46 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: right but there's a point where state is parsed before dispatch right? | 15:48 |
| rick_h_ | so a single call through some validation bits to say "oh, a charmbrowser state with metadata XX is invalid in this case" | 15:48 |
| hatch | no it goes from the url into state, then the state is only parsed in the dispatchers | 15:48 |
| hatch | it's "dumb" until the dispatchers | 15:48 |
| rick_h_ | ah well then sucky. Maybe we can at least force a common api? | 15:48 |
| rick_h_ | all dispatchers have a single parse/validate the state bit? | 15:49 |
| rick_h_ | I just worry that it's like we have now with browser.js. When something fails to draw correctly, you have to debug through 6 methods to figure out why | 15:49 |
| hatch | it'll need to be validated pre-dispatch because we'll need to change the url to the 'default' for that section then re-dispatch | 15:49 |
| rick_h_ | it's too spread out how you get from url to called views | 15:49 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: right | 15:50 |
| jcsackett | rick_h_: that does start to sound like the work hatch and i considered, we have a validate method that calls validateSectionXXX, and that chain starts before dispatching starts. | 15:50 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: k, yea I had hoped to make it state's job | 15:50 |
| rick_h_ | but sounds like it's not possible | 15:50 |
| rick_h_ | because at the state time, it could be changed quickly and easily | 15:50 |
| hatch | well this wuld be in state | 15:50 |
| jcsackett | rick_h_: not sure what you mean--validate/dispatch is in state. | 15:50 |
| rick_h_ | then the state is only parsed in the dispatcher | 15:51 |
| rick_h_ | is the quote hatch said | 15:51 |
| hatch | the url is parsed into sections, which make up the state, then the dispatcher runs through those sections and calls the handlers | 15:51 |
| hatch | the validation needs to happen pre dispaching | 15:52 |
| rick_h_ | ok, sounds perfect then | 15:52 |
| jcsackett | "the dispatcher" here being a dispatch method. | 15:52 |
| hatch | yes | 15:52 |
| hatch | jcsackett so sounds like the original plan is still the right direction.....agree? | 15:52 |
| jcsackett | hatch: sounds very similar, yeah. | 15:52 |
| hatch | col | 15:52 |
| rick_h_ | I just want to make sure that the error "inspector/mysql is not valid for sandbox mode" is done somewhere high up and obvious vs in the View which then triggers a new change event | 15:52 |
| hatch | cool | 15:52 |
| hatch | rick_h_ yes in the state module for sure | 15:53 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: cool, then /me gets out of the way and carries on :) | 15:53 |
| jcsackett | Makyo: if you're working on this (and have been following along) https://github.com/jaycee/juju-gui/tree/add-flash-memory-to-state has some work you can crib, re the _validateSection logic. | 15:53 |
| Makyo | ccccccdiltnnfvenndnvnrcddkedfhlebjlnvernfcge | 15:54 |
| hatch | rick_h_ it would help in planning for the demo if we had a basic script outline of the UI actions mark will be running | 15:54 |
| Makyo | By which I mean thanks, jcsackett | 15:55 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: yes | 15:55 |
| hatch | Makyo lol | 15:55 |
| jcsackett | Makyo: i figured that's what you meant. :) | 15:55 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: I'll try to write out something and maybe even see if we can get UX to use their wireframes to mock out the journey for us | 15:55 |
| hatch | that would be awesome | 15:55 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: will do, added a card for me to do that today. | 15:56 |
| * rick_h_ is going to go afk to go yell at the car dealer | 15:56 | |
| jcsackett | Makyo: you can ignore the "flash" parts--you're just interested in the _validate stuff from view/state.js in that branch. i can land a follow up after yours to make sure the flash bits are validated using whatever you land. | 15:56 |
| jcsackett | it's not much, but it's code towards the long spiel rick_h_, hatch and i just had. :p | 15:56 |
| hatch | rick_h_ gl :) | 15:56 |
| jcsackett | hatch: i think i've addressed all your comments etc in my PR. | 15:57 |
| hatch | cool I'll take a look and QA | 15:57 |
| hatch | most were pretty trivial | 15:57 |
| hatch | jcsackett tests are failing fyi | 15:59 |
| jcsackett | hatch: well, test-server is blowing up--i can't reproduce anything locally. :/ | 16:01 |
| hatch | jcsackett doh | 16:01 |
| hatch | jcsackett when rick_h_ returns we will need to get him to killall the process | 16:02 |
| hatch | it'll be broken until then | 16:02 |
| jcsackett | hatch: fun times. well, are you happy with the PR, tests aside? | 16:02 |
| hatch | very likely, just going through still | 16:03 |
| hatch | jcsackett somewhat related - do we ever want to explicitly clear out the `flash` ATTR as well as the state one? | 16:04 |
| hatch | or do you think it's ok for the ATTR to hang around populated | 16:04 |
| jcsackett | hatch: i don't follow..."as well as the state one" | 16:08 |
| jcsackett | there's only a state ATTR. | 16:08 |
| jcsackett | or do you mean on metadata as well? | 16:09 |
| jcsackett | or am i just completely misreading you? :p | 16:09 |
| hatch | haha | 16:11 |
| hatch | ok so you reset the `flash` property on the state object | 16:11 |
| hatch | but there is also a `flash` ATTR on the state instance | 16:12 |
| hatch | which is only ever overwritten | 16:12 |
| hatch | never reset | 16:12 |
| hatch | jcsackett oh wait NM | 16:13 |
| hatch | ignore everything I Just said | 16:13 |
| hatch | I thought this https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/271/files#diff-49f77193fff0d5a96b555595ed918791R126 was resetting the state object's property | 16:14 |
| hatch | jcsackett I created a few more comments for the tests. I'm QA'ing now | 16:21 |
| hatch | jcsackett you might want to hold off pushing the final version to the PR until CI is reset | 16:28 |
| hatch | else you'll have to trigger it all manually | 16:28 |
| hatch | http://store.steampowered.com/app/244830/ python IDE on steam? | 16:35 |
| Makyo | Oh, that's kinda neat! | 16:37 |
| redir | what is the bzr equiv of git pull upstream? | 16:40 |
| Makyo | jujugui ^^^ | 16:43 |
| Makyo | (I don't remember, unfortunately) | 16:43 |
| hatch | hmm - I always just pulled to update that branch then merged in | 16:44 |
| hatch | sorry I'm no help either | 16:44 |
| hatch | redir btw - in your irc client add `jujugui` and `guihelp` as notification targets | 16:44 |
| Makyo | I mean, you can bzr merge lp:<project>/trunk, I think, but don't know if that's best practice | 16:44 |
| hatch | sorry for dinging everyone :) | 16:44 |
| hatch | Makyo yeah that's what I always did heh | 16:45 |
| redir | thanks | 16:48 |
| redir | Cory Booker is sitting across the aisle from me on the train...foranyone who follwos that kind of stuff | 16:53 |
| Makyo | Sometimes, I forget that I have the xkcd substitution extension running in Chrome... | 16:54 |
| redir | Makyo: there's probably an appropriate strip for that | 16:55 |
| Makyo | "Cory Anthony Booker (born April 27, 1969) is an American politician and the junior United States Elf-Lord from New Jersey. At the time of his eating contest to the Senate, he was the Mayor of Newark." | 16:55 |
| hatch | I also had to google him | 16:55 |
| redir | awesome | 16:55 |
| hatch | and rofl Makyo | 16:55 |
| hatch | haha | 16:55 |
| hatch | I didn't think anyone cared about politics until someone does something that's ok unless a politician does it | 16:56 |
| Makyo | https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/xkcd-substitutions/jkgogmboalmaijfgfhfepckdgjeopfhk | 16:56 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: jcsackett looking at ci | 17:03 |
| hatch | thx | 17:04 |
| hatch | what was the result of the burningoilness ? | 17:04 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: jcsackett process killed | 17:04 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: just took it in, sitting here waiting now | 17:04 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: I expressed my displeasure | 17:04 |
| hatch | ahhh - what kind of car? | 17:05 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: outback | 17:05 |
| hatch | bugatti veyron ? | 17:05 |
| hatch | :P | 17:05 |
| hatch | ahh, does it only puff the smoke on startup? | 17:06 |
| rick_h_ | no, it leaks in the drive (carboard with pattern brought in this time) and when I pulled in their garage it was smoking lovely | 17:06 |
| rick_h_ | this time I think they believe me | 17:06 |
| hatch | ahh | 17:07 |
| hatch | good thing is that subies are easy to fix | 17:07 |
| hatch | I used to have an 01 WRX | 17:08 |
| hatch | with like 250,000km on it haha | 17:08 |
| rick_h_ | yea, I'm bummed we're having this at 65k mi | 17:09 |
| rick_h_ | my last one didn't have issues until closer to 100k mi | 17:09 |
| hatch | If it's leaking oil it might simply be that the smoke is because it's burning the oil on the outside, not from the valves or rings | 17:10 |
| hatch | hopefully | 17:10 |
| rick_h_ | yep | 17:11 |
| hatch | http://varianto25.com/ <--- yes yes yes | 17:14 |
| redir | highlights set, thanks hatch | 17:15 |
| hatch | np | 17:15 |
| hatch | rick_h_ do we have any code atm which takes an unplaced-unit and makes it a placed-unit ? | 17:45 |
| hatch | ^ jujugui | 17:45 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: the api calls are there to create machines and containers. | 17:46 |
| hatch | right, but it looks like everything just creates a new unit via add_unit | 17:46 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: we need the UI events to turn one into the other (e.g. on button press/etc turn unit token to machine token) | 17:46 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: so no, this is the glue stuff we need to start now that we can show tokens at all three levels | 17:46 |
| rick_h_ | unplaced, machine, and container | 17:47 |
| hatch | hmm ok | 17:47 |
| rick_h_ | we should have UI and such for all three now | 17:47 |
| hatch | right, we can create an unplaced unit....but I don't think we have any code in the back end to convert that to a placed unit | 17:47 |
| rick_h_ | well placed means a machine or container | 17:47 |
| rick_h_ | so the code is two fold, one to create a changeset to add machine or container | 17:48 |
| rick_h_ | and two, to remove the unplaced unit token and create a new machine/container token | 17:48 |
| rick_h_ | or am I missing your point on this slow minded monday of mine? | 17:48 |
| hatch | well a unit != machine/container token | 17:48 |
| rick_h_ | it does once placed? | 17:48 |
| rick_h_ | well, it'll either update a machine or container token | 17:49 |
| rick_h_ | or become one | 17:49 |
| hatch | I think you're mixing UI state with env state | 17:49 |
| hatch | for example | 17:49 |
| hatch | say I create 10 unplaced units | 17:49 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: right, but env state should be a ghost machine/container, ghost service, ghost unit | 17:49 |
| hatch | those units are now in the db without a 'machine' value | 17:50 |
| hatch | now once the user drags that unit to a machine/container | 17:50 |
| hatch | we need to update that model....or delete it and create a new one | 17:50 |
| hatch | I'm wondering if that code exists | 17:50 |
| rick_h_ | no, that code does not exist | 17:51 |
| hatch | ok for this branch I'll just call the env's add_unit method on mass scale up, and we can deal with the rest later | 17:52 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: ok | 17:52 |
| hatch | I'll fire an email to frankban as he will certainly have some input on the 'placement' implementation | 17:52 |
| rick_h_ | yea, I want to sit down a group to go through the db talk we started in vegas | 17:53 |
| rick_h_ | the whole tracking units through both machines/containers and services | 17:53 |
| hatch | yeah...can we do that....say wednesday hopefully I'll be better by then :) | 17:53 |
| rick_h_ | yea, all good | 17:54 |
| rick_h_ | I think that fits into your question a bit though | 17:54 |
| rick_h_ | because placing a unit it sticking it in the right part of the db referenced by the other super objects | 17:54 |
| hatch | yeah atm we need to create a unit on the service, then pre-sending the 'real' add-unit call, we need to have the 'machine' property updated | 17:55 |
| rick_h_ | right | 17:55 |
| rick_h_ | rogpeppe: you around today or swap day-ing it? | 17:59 |
| jcsackett | rick_h_: i see a card about browser.js needing to instantiate inspector views--i think we're already doing that now? | 17:59 |
| jcsackett | rick_h_: see various create*InspectorView functions. | 18:00 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: yes | 18:00 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: I didn't move it as the work is in progress like the local ones | 18:00 |
| jcsackett | ah, so i can move it along with my local card? | 18:00 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: sure thing, sounds ok to me | 18:00 |
| jcsackett | since i think that's the only WIP regarding that. | 18:00 |
| jcsackett | ok. | 18:00 |
| jcsackett | hatch: that sound right? all inspectors now being done in browser? ^ | 18:01 |
| hatch | reading back... | 18:01 |
| hatch | correct | 18:01 |
| jcsackett | awesome. | 18:01 |
| hatch | after your card they are all moved | 18:01 |
| rogpeppe | rick_h_: today is a public holiday | 18:06 |
| rick_h_ | rogpeppe: ah, cool then | 18:06 |
| rogpeppe | rick_h_: tomorrow i'm swap daying it | 18:06 |
| rogpeppe | rick_h_: then i'm on holiday :-) | 18:06 |
| rick_h_ | oh right cool | 18:07 |
| rogpeppe | rick_h_: will be back on 22nd May | 18:07 |
| rick_h_ | rogpeppe: cool thanks. I'll look forward to getting started then. I'm working on getting out notes and such from the sprint loaded up into docs and things | 18:08 |
| rogpeppe | rick_h_: great, that will be useful | 18:08 |
| rogpeppe | rick_h_: really looking forward to getting going on all of this stuff. | 18:09 |
| rick_h_ | rogpeppe: same here :) I'll add you to the internal list for our stuff and send some notes there | 18:10 |
| * rogpeppe goes back to his mojito | 18:11 | |
| rick_h_ | enjoy! | 18:12 |
| hatch | rick_h_ I've finished my shutdown holidays and expenses | 18:14 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: k, got the holidays in. Will go through expenses. | 18:15 |
| hatch | cool | 18:17 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: if you get yours into landing can you peek at huw's pull request and QA please? | 18:18 |
| hatch | is May 19th a holiday in the US? National Patriots Day? | 18:18 |
| hatch | rick_h_ jcsackett I already did, he needs some slight refactoring first | 18:18 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: ah ok thanks | 18:18 |
| hatch | when he gets in tonight I'll guide him through the implementation | 18:18 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: no, there's memorial day the 26th | 18:18 |
| rick_h_ | for the US | 18:18 |
| hatch | ahh one week later | 18:19 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: rgr | 18:19 |
| hatch | jcsackett lint error failure in your branch | 18:19 |
| hatch | :) | 18:19 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: he might not be around tonight | 18:19 |
| rick_h_ | travel and all that | 18:19 |
| hatch | ohh ok, np, well when he does | 18:19 |
| hatch | I'm going to take lunch | 18:25 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: have fun | 18:26 |
| rick_h_ | bah, car seal goes boom! | 18:27 |
| * rick_h_ gets ready to get driven home from car dealer. back online later on | 18:33 | |
| * rick_h_ is back | 19:17 | |
| hatch | rick_h_ which seal | 19:19 |
| hatch | ? | 19:19 |
| rick_h_ | some front engine seal | 19:19 |
| rick_h_ | looks like it was coming down into the oil pan | 19:19 |
| hatch | ahh yeah - that one might be pricy to fix | 19:20 |
| rick_h_ | showed me the leak but don't know enough about cards to name the bits | 19:20 |
| rick_h_ | yea, $1k | 19:20 |
| rick_h_ | new timing belt along for the ride wheee | 19:20 |
| hatch | yeah sounds about right | 19:20 |
| hatch | :/ cars | 19:20 |
| rick_h_ | hey, I wanted to pay it off before major work, mission accomplished | 19:21 |
| rick_h_ | $1k is like 2 car payments so if it goes a year after this we're all good :) | 19:21 |
| hatch | haha yeah - that's where I'm at too, cars paid off....hard to justify the payments for the amount of k's I drive | 19:22 |
| Makyo | Excellent use of canvas: http://www.georgeandjonathan.com/ | 19:22 |
| rick_h_ | yea, that was cool | 19:22 |
| hatch | heh vwry cool | 19:24 |
| jcsackett | rick_h_: can you kick CI again? it's still doing the server death thing. | 19:26 |
| hatch | jcsackett was there a hanging run? | 19:27 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: well, it's a different error | 19:27 |
| hatch | that you killed manually | 19:28 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: I'm looking now | 19:28 |
| rick_h_ | ReferenceError: Can't find variable: YUI | 19:28 |
| rick_h_ | and connect.multipart() will be removed in connect 3.0 connect.limit() will be removed in connect 3.0 | 19:28 |
| hatch | Error: listen EADDRINUSE | 19:28 |
| hatch | it's the same....looks like it just got further before crashing | 19:28 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: in the latest? #859? | 19:28 |
| hatch | http://ci.jujugui.org:8080/job/juju-gui/859/console | 19:28 |
| rick_h_ | oh it is, wtf | 19:28 |
| hatch | yup | 19:28 |
| hatch | I don't see any manually killed runs, so I'm not sure how that got broken | 19:29 |
| hatch | maybe we should add a killall in the start of our script? | 19:29 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: yea, there's supposed to be a catch | 19:29 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: jcsackett ok, try again killed | 19:29 |
| rick_h_ | I think I missed a process last itme I ssh'd my bad | 19:29 |
| rick_h_ | there were two I needed to kill I think | 19:29 |
| rick_h_ | only got the one | 19:30 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: if it runs ok on your end just :shipit: | 19:30 |
| * rick_h_ makes a card in on deck to update to sauce connect 3.0 | 19:31 | |
| rick_h_ | dimitern: hey, do you know what you were ordered for nuc/switch? | 19:55 |
| rick_h_ | dimitern: I want to get a setup here as well and haven't heard back yet on what the standard is | 19:55 |
| dimitern | rick_h_, hey | 19:56 |
| dimitern | rick_h_, i'm yet to see dustin and take the nucs + switch | 19:56 |
| dimitern | rick_h_, i'll let you know when i have them | 19:57 |
| rick_h_ | dimitern: ok cool. If you think about it, would love to see what models and such | 19:57 |
| rick_h_ | dimitern: ty much | 19:57 |
| hatch | rick_h_ thinking for a home test box? | 19:57 |
| dimitern | rick_h_, not quite sure about the models as dustin had them ordered - for the nucs | 19:57 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: yea, I want to setup a MAAS test env here at the house | 19:57 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: and maybe see about how to share it out to the team for maas setup/testing as we need to make sure our bundles, quickstart, etc work well | 19:58 |
| hatch | coolio | 19:58 |
| dimitern | rick_h_, ... they are the ones supporting amt (more expensive), and the switch is some 8-port d-link with vlans support, but don't have the model | 19:58 |
| hatch | oh that would be sollllid | 19:58 |
| rick_h_ | dimitern: yea, the switch I'm less worried about. I've got a dell that does vlans currently that's cool and not bad. It's more trying to find the right nuc model | 19:58 |
| rick_h_ | robbiew: howdy, I notice your bug. Can you verify that 1.3.2 fixes it? We hit a Juju regression I believe and we've patched and are looking to get an update into trusty this week | 20:08 |
| robbiew | huh? | 20:09 |
| robbiew | rick_h_: | 20:09 |
| robbiew | what bug? | 20:09 |
| rick_h_ | robbiew: http://jujugui.wordpress.com/2014/04/30/juju-quickstart-1-3-2-released/ | 20:09 |
| rick_h_ | robbiew: looking for the number | 20:09 |
| rick_h_ | https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-quickstart/+bug/1309455 robbiew | 20:10 |
| _mup_ | Bug #1309455: The auto-generated local env does not work in trusty <juju-quickstart:Fix Released> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1309455> | 20:10 |
| robbiew | ooohhhhh | 20:10 |
| rick_h_ | robbiew: we just fixed quickstart during the sprint and just got back | 20:10 |
| rick_h_ | we were going to ping soon to work on seeing about 1.3.2 into trusty as a bugfix update | 20:10 |
| rick_h_ | frankban is out today as swap but should be back tomorrow. We fixed a couple of bugs | 20:11 |
| rick_h_ | robbiew: unless 1.3.2 does not in fact fix your issue. In which case we need to look at the issue asap | 20:11 |
| robbiew | rick_h_: sorry...this isn't my bug | 20:11 |
| robbiew | oh...nevermind | 20:12 |
| robbiew | now I remember | 20:12 |
| rick_h_ | robbiew: it's a mix of juju and quickstart bugs. We're working with QA team to get quickstart into the Juju CI runs | 20:13 |
| robbiew | sounds good | 20:13 |
| rick_h_ | robbiew: https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-quickstart/+bug/1306537 is the other one I think | 20:14 |
| _mup_ | Bug #1306537: LXC local provider fails to provision precise instances from a trusty host <deploy> <local-provider> <lxc> <juju-core:Fix Released by wallyworld> <juju-core 1.18:In Progress by jameinel> <juju-quickstart:Fix Released by frankban> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1306537> | 20:14 |
| robbiew | ack | 20:14 |
| rick_h_ | robbiew: to be able to get an update to quickstart in trusty should I file a bug on the package? Is there a format to make sure I meet? | 20:15 |
| robbiew | I have no idea | 20:17 |
| robbiew | rick_h_: lol | 20:17 |
| rick_h_ | robbiew: oh :) nvm then. | 20:17 |
| robbiew | rick_h_: just ask marco | 20:17 |
| rick_h_ | lol wrong robbie my bad | 20:17 |
| robbiew | yeah...that's what I quickly figured | 20:18 |
| * rick_h_ remembers robie has one b | 20:18 | |
| rick_h_ | sorry about the confusion | 20:18 |
| rick_h_ | so yea, use 1.3.2 for the moment and we'll work with rbasak to get trusty updated asap | 20:18 |
| robbiew | it's cool...I knew of the bug just because I had used juju from some demoes awhile back...but when you asked me how to file the bug...figured it out | 20:18 |
| rick_h_ | I'll mark the bug as a dupe for now. If 1.3.2 doesn't fix it let me know as it's something else we're not aware of | 20:19 |
| robbiew | ack | 20:19 |
| hatch | jujugui who wrote the machine-token.js file? | 20:20 |
| hatch | originally that is | 20:20 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: huw maybe | 20:20 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: either huw or kadams, I can't recall atm | 20:20 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: any reason you're hunting? | 20:21 |
| hatch | it's expecting a hardware object in the render cycle and it fails if that's not provided | 20:21 |
| hatch | I was wondering if that was intentional or if it's a bug | 20:21 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: probably a bug in that it was written aroud current data | 20:22 |
| hatch | well, either way it's a bug, I'm just trying to figure out if it's the machine-token or the database | 20:22 |
| rick_h_ | so it was probably just a way to get it working and viewable vs thorough | 20:22 |
| hatch | ok I'll put in a || for now | 20:22 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: yea, I mean the tokens are just UI starts to build on, all of them | 20:22 |
| hatch | ok sounds good | 20:22 |
| rick_h_ | woot, nuc, drives, and ram ordered with gigabit vlan switch | 20:39 |
| hatch | haha nice | 20:40 |
| * rick_h_ wonders if he can get a second IP from ATT Uverse | 20:41 | |
| hatch | it'll probably be $100/mo | 20:43 |
| hatch | lol | 20:43 |
| rick_h_ | doh, bit by CC thinking it's fraud | 20:48 |
| hatch | you're such a criminal | 20:49 |
| hatch | kehehe | 20:49 |
| hatch | yay jcsackett 's branch finally landed heh | 20:54 |
| hatch | poor CI | 20:54 |
| hatch | I'm going to go lie down for a bit, I'll finish up the day later | 21:01 |
| Makyo | I should get a few NUCs too. Kind of weird to think about, since James just got a nuc (as in nucleus colony of bees) this weekend. | 21:22 |
| Makyo | rick_h_, what NUC did you get? | 21:30 |
| rick_h_ | Makyo: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16856102052 | 21:44 |
| rick_h_ | Makyo: right now working with ATT to get multiple IP addresses on my account | 21:44 |
| rick_h_ | goal is to setup the 3 nuc and switch on their own network for folks to use | 21:45 |
| Makyo | Oh, rock on | 21:45 |
| rick_h_ | so yea, will take a bit to get the bits in order but should help with bundle/quickstart/network testing in the future | 21:46 |
| rick_h_ | as maas is the first network target especially | 21:46 |
| Makyo | Yeah, for sure | 21:48 |
| Makyo | Ducking out to get the dog to the vet. She cut her paw on something. | 22:05 |
| rick_h_ | ruh roh, good luck! | 22:08 |
| huwshimi | Morning | 23:08 |
| hatch | morning huw | 23:14 |
| hatch | I see you're still alive :) | 23:14 |
| hatch | I made a comment on your branch, let me know if you have any questions about it | 23:15 |
| huwshimi | hatch: Thanks! Makes sense :) | 23:17 |
| hatch | excellent | 23:17 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!