=== adam_g is now known as adam_gone
=== TheLordOfTime is now known as teward
[00:54] <BenC> I realize this is likely not the proper place and most people are out for the weekend, but for anyone in the Dallas/Fort Worth area looking for a job working on Ubuntu systems with a company that builds servers and solutions based on those servers, please email bcollins@ubuntu.com
[00:56] <BenC> Even if you’re not DAL/FTW, if you’re a top notch programmer (firmware/kernel/low-level app), looking telecommute, email me as well. We may consider remote for the right person/people
=== GridCube_ is now known as GridCube
[01:22] <psusi> infinity, it seems another week has slipped by ( and Ted Tso has poked again )... have you made any headway on util-linux?
[01:49] <dobey> slangasek: oh sorry. i hadn't seen that
=== _salem is now known as salem_
=== salem_ is now known as _salem
[05:08] <darkxst> arm builds of gnome-control-center failed, but there are not even buildlogs...
=== mbiebl_ is now known as mbiebl
[07:07]  * Laney retries them
[07:35] <Laney> looking good now, hopefully
=== dcmorton_ is now known as dcmorton
=== marga- is now known as marga
[07:44] <darkxst> Laney, thanks!
[09:09] <debfx> ScottK: could you please set up https://launchpad.net/trusty-backports
[11:31] <hjd> Hi all. :)
[11:31] <hjd> freefem++ is listed as ftbfs in Utopic with an error message about unmet dependencies (https://launchpadlibrarian.net/173942186/buildlog_ubuntu-utopic-i386.freefem%2B%2B_3.30-1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz). It built successful for me locally though (only tried i386). Could someone please schedule this package for a rebuild?
[11:46] <darkxst> hjd, "E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages." are one of those stuck in -proposed queue maybe?
[11:54] <hjd> darkxst: I don't think so. Did you get that now or from the report?
[11:55] <darkxst> hjd, just guessing based on your log!
[11:57] <hjd> Aha, that's the report from http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/. :) However, when I built it locally yesterday it worked fine without any problems. So it might have been some package stuck in -proposed or something else. It seems to have been resolved now though.
[11:59] <debfx> hjd: done
[11:59] <debfx> fwiw the builders have -proposed enabled
[12:00] <hjd> Oh, I didn't know that.
=== thegatta_ is now known as thegattaca
[14:44] <ScottK> debfx: Done.
[14:49] <ScottK> Did utopic too, while I was thinking about it.
[15:33] <debfx> ScottK: thanks
[17:27] <galgalesh> I submitted a merge request for the software center, but I'm not sure if I implemented it the right way. Is there a way to get feedback about it, or do I just wait until it gets approved/denied?
[17:27] <galgalesh> https://code.launchpad.net/~merlijn-sebrechts/software-center/software-center/+merge/219099
[17:28] <galgalesh> *it's a bugfix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/968974
[17:28] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 968974 in unity-lens-applications (Ubuntu) "Some free applications looks like paid applications with price 0.00 and with buy button" [High,Triaged]
[22:56] <Wanglethrop> Herro?