| rick_h_ | hatch: you around tomorrow? We can chat about this with kadadms | 00:14 |
|---|---|---|
| hatch | yeah, I'm getting the yard un-wintered :) | 00:14 |
| rick_h_ | cool | 00:14 |
| hatch | it sounds like it's on the right path though | 00:14 |
| rick_h_ | yea, I think we had a good conversation about a good path | 00:15 |
| rick_h_ | but I did want to make sure you were involved if you had feedback | 00:15 |
| hatch | I'll have to take a deeper look at it | 00:15 |
| hatch | but it seems good at face value | 00:16 |
| hatch | rick_h_ what time tomorrow do you want to have a chat? | 00:27 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: not sure, kadams seems to start around 10, but I've got a delivery 9-11 (eastern) | 00:28 |
| rick_h_ | after standup maybe? | 00:28 |
| hatch | sure that works for me | 00:28 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: coolio | 00:29 |
| hatch | how goes the battle with the NUC? | 00:31 |
| rick_h_ | good, have maas installed but have to figure out the network stuff | 00:31 |
| rick_h_ | ATT isn't going to get to my new network stuff until later in the month | 00:32 |
| rick_h_ | so might just sit on it until then when I can put them on the network and not have ot change it around | 00:32 |
| hatch | wth, how hard can it be for them to flick a switch? hah | 00:32 |
| rick_h_ | well, to get business class I've got to get on a different pipe that's not been run down my street | 00:32 |
| rick_h_ | so they've got to do that first, then schedule my install after that | 00:32 |
| hatch | oh haha | 00:33 |
| hatch | WELL THEN! | 00:33 |
| rick_h_ | redir: qa'd and commented. One small code change request | 12:12 |
| bac | rick_h_: did your qa work after blowing away the ES index manually? | 12:31 |
| kadams54 | jujugui: heading to Michigan's equivalent of the DMV to change the title on a car. Not sure when I'll be back at the keyboard, but it will definitely be before standup. | 12:35 |
| rick_h_ | bac: I did a full emptydb and and cleared the index manaully and then I forgot to run the app so proof would pass | 12:35 |
| rick_h_ | after doing all of that I did finally get it to ingest correcty lol, been too long since I worked on charmworld | 12:35 |
| rick_h_ | kadrgr | 12:35 |
| rick_h_ | bah, how dare he leave so I can't tab complete his name | 12:35 |
| bac | rick_h_: i'm looking for implications for deploy, things we may need to do in a migration. | 12:35 |
| rick_h_ | bac: well I can't say for sure what state my old lxc container was in and such | 12:36 |
| rick_h_ | I think it was a combo of bad things I did on my part | 12:36 |
| bac | rick_h_: ok. well, perhaps we'll just wait to see what happens when jenkins lands it on qa | 12:36 |
| rick_h_ | bac: rgr | 12:37 |
| bac | my mom called b/c the internet didn't work. took 20 minutes for her to admit she had a router and to find it. | 12:40 |
| rick_h_ | lol | 12:44 |
| rick_h_ | didn't know routers are secrets to be ashamed of | 12:45 |
| redir | code change related to: http://bit.ly/1lsXCfv | 13:00 |
| redir | rick_h_: ^^ | 13:00 |
| rick_h_ | redir: cool, that's a link to a bug? | 13:01 |
| rick_h_ | I understand that's the background of the change, but wouldn't a skip of the test do the same as commenting it out? | 13:01 |
| redir | I am going to a cafe for a an hour or two -- while someone works in our apt. Should be back for the stand up. | 13:01 |
| rick_h_ | redir: rgr, thanks for the heads up | 13:01 |
| redir | rick_h_: I recommended a skip in that bug and abentley said he didn't think so | 13:02 |
| rick_h_ | ok, so he's arguing the test should stand as is | 13:03 |
| redir | I haven't looked deeply at what test under test.ini does though. | 13:03 |
| rick_h_ | right now it's commented out | 13:03 |
| rick_h_ | I think a skip > commented out and a working test > skipped test | 13:04 |
| redir | I don't really understand what he is saying | 13:04 |
| rick_h_ | so for this branch, I'm ok with a skip. And a card in maintance to look at this bug | 13:04 |
| redir | I agree with you | 13:04 |
| rick_h_ | but honestly, the goal if you working on the store is to remove this so I'm +1 skip and carry on for now | 13:04 |
| rick_h_ | there's a bug noting the issue, maybe put the bug number in the skip message | 13:04 |
| rick_h_ | and call it a day | 13:05 |
| redir | good idea | 13:05 |
| redir | will do | 13:05 |
| rick_h_ | thanks | 13:05 |
| jcsackett | morning, all. | 13:05 |
| redir | morning jcsackett | 13:06 |
| redir | bbiab | 13:06 |
| rick_h_ | delivery man is here, biab | 13:29 |
| rick_h_ | back | 13:40 |
| jcsackett | rick_h_: got a sec to chat imp details on change summary? have a question with changing configs pre deploy, specifically. | 13:59 |
| rick_h_ | jcsackett: sure thing | 14:02 |
| jcsackett | rick_h_: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/gymhrqahxkwfy5tn6duz2v72yaa?authuser=2&hl=en | 14:03 |
| rick_h_ | morning hatch, when you get settled want to run an interview presentation question by you before emailing it | 14:32 |
| hatch | sounds good, ha ve it in a doc somewhere? | 14:35 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: yep | 14:35 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: shared with you | 14:36 |
| hatch | cool, looking | 14:36 |
| hatch | just as I get over my cold, I get allergies lol | 14:36 |
| rick_h_ | hah! welcome to spring! | 14:36 |
| redir | modified to run desctructive by default under the test make target or not under testdebug target. http://paste.ubuntu.com/7462988/ I could reverse the logic and make test nondestructive, then add a testci target that is. Then sinzui only needs to change that target on CI, IIUC. | 14:39 |
| redir | guihelp thoughts? | 14:39 |
| redir | I think I like the latter better. Then we only have to deal with thte booger once changing the ci config, rather than all developers needing to deal with it when running tests | 14:42 |
| rick_h_ | redir: looking and rereading the bug filed | 14:42 |
| redir | cool heading back to apt for call. hopefully they re done in my office. | 14:43 |
| redir | brb | 14:43 |
| Makyo | jujugui call in 10 | 14:50 |
| redir | back | 14:54 |
| rick_h_ | redir: cool, let's chat after the hangout. I think I better understand abentley's point and the issue now. | 14:55 |
| redir | k | 14:55 |
| abentley | redir: watch for stray pdbs :-) | 14:56 |
| redir | it isn't committed. still needs doc'ed etc. but thanks for the reminder. I have been known to dangle a pdb in a commit or two | 15:00 |
| rick_h_ | jujugui call now | 15:01 |
| bac | redir: but where did your Quickstart come from? probably the PPA. the card is for getting into main. | 15:06 |
| redir | OIC, tx bac | 15:07 |
| tvansteenburgh | hey guys, when doing and api search (e.g. http://manage.jujucharms.com/api/3/search?text=mongodb), is there a way to say "only give me charms" or "only give me bundles" ? | 15:14 |
| tvansteenburgh | s/and/an/ | 15:15 |
| hatch | tvansteenburgh at the moment you can only get 'all' bundles | 15:18 |
| hatch | fixes are in the works for enhancing the search though | 15:18 |
| tvansteenburgh | hatch: okay thanks | 15:19 |
| rick_h_ | tvansteenburgh: charm:mongodb | 15:19 |
| rick_h_ | tvansteenburgh: bundle:mongodb | 15:19 |
| hatch | rick_h_ so I think I'll trash the card that's on the board and create a series of them to 'hook up drop targets for unplaced units' | 15:20 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: jump in hangout to follow up? | 15:20 |
| hatch | sure | 15:20 |
| hatch | in the standup hangout | 15:20 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: rgr | 15:20 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: fyi ^ | 15:21 |
| hatch | oh that's interesting, is that new? | 15:21 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: we did that a few months ago, so newish? | 15:21 |
| hatch | yikes where have I been | 15:21 |
| tvansteenburgh | rick_h_: cool, thanks! | 15:22 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/canonical.com/daily-standup?authuser=1 | 15:22 |
| rick_h_ | tvansteenburgh: np, let me know if you hit any issues | 15:22 |
| tvansteenburgh | rick_h_: any suggestions on how to handle this: http://manage.jujucharms.com/api/3/search?type=approved&text=charm: | 15:41 |
| tvansteenburgh | i want "all approved charms" but this query returns bundles too | 15:42 |
| rick_h_ | tvansteenburgh: hmmm, thinking | 15:42 |
| rick_h_ | tvansteenburgh: http://manage.jujucharms.com/api/3/search?type=approved&text=&series=trusty and update for each series you want the data for. | 15:44 |
| rick_h_ | tvansteenburgh: bundles don't have series so you should get those filtered out? | 15:44 |
| tvansteenburgh | rich_h_: will bundles ever have series? | 15:45 |
| rick_h_ | tvansteenburgh: not that I'm aware of | 15:45 |
| rick_h_ | tvansteenburgh: what's this for? If it's something we need to support we can look into it perhaps | 15:45 |
| tvansteenburgh | charmworldlib is a python library on top of this api. i'm working on adding bundle support to the lib | 15:46 |
| hatch | annnnnd I'm working outside! | 15:46 |
| rick_h_ | what bundle feature of bundle support is this doing? | 15:46 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: :P | 15:46 |
| hatch | ok I needed a blanket, but damnit I'm outside! | 15:46 |
| tvansteenburgh | when i do Bundles.search() i want to make sure i only get bundle data back | 15:47 |
| rick_h_ | tvansteenburgh: ok, but doing bundle:term should work for that. | 15:47 |
| rick_h_ | tvansteenburgh: what's the recommended charm search part for? | 15:47 |
| rick_h_ | tvansteenburgh: chat? | 15:47 |
| tvansteenburgh | rick_h_: yeah, chat | 15:47 |
| rick_h_ | tvansteenburgh: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/gzypx4siy6biijpzjj4hq2ey6ma?authuser=1&hl=en | 15:48 |
| redir | that causes an error, so I skipped the test committed, will look at the test separately. | 15:53 |
| redir | so now I change status to approved? rick_h_ bac? | 15:53 |
| rick_h_ | redir: ok, yea skip and land and add a follow up kanban card for the test | 15:58 |
| rick_h_ | redir: make sure to put that bug number into the new card as the "card id" field | 15:58 |
| redir | having never landed before I am guessing I change the status to approved | 15:58 |
| redir | then magic happens, rick_h_ | 15:58 |
| rick_h_ | redir: yep | 15:59 |
| rick_h_ | then if all goes well CI will pick it up and try to land it. That CI tarmac stuff is still running the show right bac? | 15:59 |
| redir | and where would you like the card added | 15:59 |
| redir | maintenance? | 15:59 |
| rick_h_ | redir: might as well stick it in Maint. branch start | 15:59 |
| redir | tracking | 15:59 |
| redir | k | 15:59 |
| redir | tx | 15:59 |
| rick_h_ | redir: but time box it. Look at that test update for today, if there's no advancement let's move it back as a todo item and get you back onto the core store stuff please | 16:00 |
| redir | k. approved revision == 515 but the skip is in 516, does that matter? | 16:03 |
| rick_h_ | hmm, it might complain about revisions not approved. sec | 16:04 |
| rick_h_ | redir: ah, yea you need to fill out the commit field | 16:04 |
| rick_h_ | see the landing bot being all helpful like that | 16:04 |
| * redir likes robots. | 16:05 | |
| * rick_h_ goes to get lunchables | 16:07 | |
| * rick_h_ is back from lunchables | 16:24 | |
| hatch | mmmm lunchables | 16:25 |
| tvansteenburgh | rick_h_: after looking at the charmworld code i realized the error of my ways. http://manage.jujucharms.com/api/3/search?type=approved&text=charm works just fine | 16:35 |
| rick_h_ | tvansteenburgh: ooh, good call. I didn't think to ditch the : | 16:35 |
| rick_h_ | the source always wins | 16:35 |
| tvansteenburgh | +1, thanks for your help | 16:35 |
| hatch | chickadees are out :-) | 16:47 |
| kadams54 | In the saddle for the afternoon | 16:55 |
| kadams54 | guihelp: looking for eyeballs on https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/320 | 16:55 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: can help look shortly | 16:56 |
| bac | oh no, leankit has hired all of those little bastards from vegas: http://leankit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/8-WIP-Personas1-570x1024.jpg | 17:12 |
| kadams54 | Minions. They're called minions. ;-) | 17:15 |
| hatch | haha minions rock | 17:18 |
| rick_h_ | lol | 17:20 |
| hatch | kadams54 I think it was you who said the container tokens get the data-id attribute set somewhere so it didn't need to be in the template | 17:26 |
| hatch | do you remember where it is set? | 17:26 |
| kadams54 | If I had a time machine I'd go back and punch past-me in the mouth for saying that. | 17:27 |
| kadams54 | Oh, yeah, that's right | 17:27 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: I've put some feedback in that I think drives this a bit deeper. Can you give it a read through and we can try to figure out if it makes sense and break the work. Maybe some this branch and some as a follow up? | 17:28 |
| kadams54 | hatch: here: https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/blob/develop/app/widgets/machine-token.js#L129 | 17:28 |
| kadams54 | Will look through | 17:29 |
| kadams54 | Thanks rick_h_ | 17:29 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: thank you, it's a good start on the work we need. | 17:29 |
| hatch | kadams54 ohh it was the machine token, not the container token | 17:29 |
| hatch | ok the container token maybe didn't ever have an id set | 17:29 |
| kadams54 | Yeah, container token doesn't right now, but machine and unplaced unit do | 17:31 |
| hatch | got it | 17:31 |
| kadams54 | Both of those work the same way now | 17:31 |
| kadams54 | Used to be machine had it in the template and unplaced unit didn't… or the other way around | 17:31 |
| rick_h_ | redir: what's the card in tracking you've got there? | 17:33 |
| redir | in which? | 17:33 |
| redir | in Proj A | 17:33 |
| redir | one of the store bugs I started on | 17:33 |
| redir | rick_h_: | 17:33 |
| rick_h_ | redir: ok, I'm going to move it back, tracking is for stuff outside of our control we're monitoring | 17:34 |
| * redir looks to see where it should be | 17:34 | |
| rick_h_ | redir: like getting quickstart updated in trusty. We've handed off the work and are watching others who do the final landing bits. So we're tracking their progress towards our goal | 17:34 |
| rick_h_ | redir: I'm just moving it back into ready to code | 17:34 |
| rick_h_ | and tomorrow then just move it to 'branch start check list" | 17:35 |
| redir | or later today! | 17:35 |
| rick_h_ | redir: or later today :) | 17:35 |
| redir | can't reproduce anyhow | 17:35 |
| redir | but more on that later | 17:35 |
| rick_h_ | ok | 17:35 |
| redir | rick_h_: are you rharding on lp? | 17:37 |
| rick_h_ | redir: yes | 17:37 |
| hatch | so....containers don't have unique id's? | 17:38 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: machine containers? They should. | 17:39 |
| hatch | the object passed into the container token doesn't have anything resembling an id | 17:40 |
| hatch | containers = this.get('db').machines.filterByParent(parentId); | 17:40 |
| rick_h_ | ok, well a container is just a machine and machine's have ids | 17:40 |
| hatch | ok I'll look into this filterByParent method then | 17:40 |
| rick_h_ | so the machine id of the containers should be their id | 17:40 |
| rick_h_ | it might not be passing back all the data you need | 17:40 |
| rick_h_ | right | 17:40 |
| hatch | so my neighbour just asked me if I have the day off...I said no....this is work | 17:41 |
| hatch | kehehe | 17:41 |
| rick_h_ | hah | 17:41 |
| hatch | would like this screen to be a little brighter though | 17:42 |
| hatch | this is pretty darn cool https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/octotree/bkhaagjahfmjljalopjnoealnfndnagc | 17:43 |
| hatch | ^ shows the github repo in a tree format | 17:43 |
| rick_h_ | nice | 17:43 |
| redir | guihelp easy review -> https://code.launchpad.net/~reedobrien/charmworld/reindex_test/+merge/219569 | 17:47 |
| bac | redir: on it | 17:47 |
| hatch | zomg that's HUGE | 17:47 |
| redir | merci | 17:47 |
| hatch | ;) | 17:47 |
| bac | redir: would you like your branch to the bug? | 17:48 |
| bac | redir: recall the --fixes=lp: thing on commit will do it for you... | 17:49 |
| redir | ? | 17:49 |
| redir | link branch to bug | 17:49 |
| redir | oh | 17:49 |
| redir | I put it in the commit message | 17:49 |
| redir | didn't realize it was cli time req't | 17:50 |
| hatch | rick_h_ oh I think I found the issue - if the filter returns an empty array it renders the token as bare metal | 17:51 |
| hatch | so no id | 17:51 |
| hatch | hmmm | 17:51 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: ah, right well that's true | 17:51 |
| hatch | well NOW you tell me! | 17:52 |
| hatch | :P | 17:52 |
| rick_h_ | well you said a container, bare metal isn't a container :P | 17:52 |
| hatch | okI'll let it slide......this time! | 17:52 |
| bac | redir: sorry, if i confused you. if you do 'bzr ci -m "my wonderful changes" --fixes=lp:123456' the branch will be linked to the bug on LP the next time you push. | 17:53 |
| redir | bac how do I link them after the fact? | 17:53 |
| redir | just stick it in a comment/ | 17:53 |
| bac | no | 17:53 |
| redir | ? | 17:53 |
| rick_h_ | redir: in the UI in the upper right there's a link for it | 17:53 |
| rick_h_ | On the bug page there's a "Link branch" and in the branch there's a "Link to bug" or something like that | 17:53 |
| hatch | You need to do it from the bug page | 17:54 |
| bac | go to the branch page and click 'link to bug report' | 17:54 |
| hatch | yeah what rick said | 17:54 |
| bac | hatch: or the branch page | 17:54 |
| hatch | or that | 17:54 |
| hatch | :) | 17:54 |
| hatch | LP is a little confusing sometimes | 17:54 |
| bac | they are ambidextrous | 17:54 |
| hatch | hah | 17:54 |
| bac | hatch: how would you suggest rewording "Link to bug report" to be clearer? | 17:54 |
| hatch | bac I don't think it could be clearer | 17:55 |
| hatch | I mean, it's confusing because you can't do it from the merge proposal | 17:55 |
| bac | when did LP merge proposals get in-line comments??? | 17:55 |
| hatch | I don't see said comments | 17:56 |
| bac | hatch: on https://code.launchpad.net/~reedobrien/charmworld/reindex_test/+merge/219569 do you not see several places that reference "inline comments"? | 17:56 |
| bac | hatch: it could be that it is a feature only enabled for beta testers or LP devs or something | 17:57 |
| redir | I see link in bug -> branch, but not in branch -> bug | 17:57 |
| hatch | I see your comment which references the inline comments but there are no inline comments | 17:57 |
| bac | redir: did you make the change i requested? | 17:57 |
| bac | there should be an in-line comment below line 21 | 17:58 |
| redir | I didn't se a requested change | 17:58 |
| redir | but yes I just saw that | 17:58 |
| bac | redir: so maybe in-line comments don't work so well | 17:58 |
| redir | comment | 17:58 |
| hatch | haha | 17:58 |
| redir | looks like it is there now | 18:00 |
| redir | you prolly need to reapprove for the new commit | 18:01 |
| bac | redir: and you must put the commit message into the merge proposal before sending it on | 18:01 |
| redir | yeah. | 18:01 |
| redir | :( | 18:01 |
| redir | I did but didn't save before clicking see inline comments | 18:01 |
| bac | redir: done. you can toggle the approve now and it should be happy | 18:02 |
| kadams54 | rick_h_: had a chance to read through your comments and digest. Let me know when you've got a few minutes to chat about it. | 18:02 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: k, otp atm and will get back | 18:03 |
| redir | guibot doesn't miss a beat | 18:03 |
| redir | thanks bac | 18:03 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: got time? | 18:16 |
| kadams54 | Yup | 18:16 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: join me in the standup hangout? | 18:16 |
| kadams54 | k | 18:17 |
| hatch | rick_h_ do you use google play music? | 18:22 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: yep | 18:23 |
| hatch | it's suggesting me songs from you hah | 18:23 |
| rick_h_ | lol | 18:23 |
| hatch | I just started using it and man I'm confused | 18:23 |
| rick_h_ | sorry about that, I listen to a lot of kids stuff and a lot of soundtracks on there | 18:23 |
| rick_h_ | yea, it can be confusing. | 18:23 |
| rick_h_ | it's nice though, if you subscribe, to just get to anything. I almost always live in "listen now" area | 18:23 |
| hatch | well apparently I can upload my music to it? But I have to pay to do so? | 18:24 |
| hatch | maybe not? | 18:24 |
| hatch | I can only download a song twice | 18:24 |
| hatch | .....It's just confusing when it's not a streaming service | 18:24 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: yea, there's the music manager app you can get | 18:27 |
| rick_h_ | I used that to do my uploads | 18:27 |
| rick_h_ | I think you only have to pay over 20k songs | 18:27 |
| rick_h_ | and OMG yay my tablet is back from Delta! | 18:27 |
| hatch | I think it needs some better onboarding | 18:27 |
| bac | redir: hey, guess what i found. bin/sync-index | 18:27 |
| hatch | haha it was actually your tablet?? | 18:27 |
| bac | rick_h_: you left it in the seatback pocket/ | 18:28 |
| bac | s///?/ | 18:28 |
| rick_h_ | bac: heh, no I pulled it out of that pocket and put it on my seat so I wouldn't forget it | 18:28 |
| bac | wow | 18:28 |
| rick_h_ | then I pulled my bag down from the storage above and left it | 18:28 |
| bac | rick_h_: i was thankful to get back my stainless water bottle | 18:28 |
| rick_h_ | so I was just stupid, while being thoughtful to make sure I didn't forget it | 18:28 |
| rick_h_ | but yay, because there's not a good tablet I'd buy and don't want to pay full price for another N10 | 18:29 |
| redir | bac does it do what you think? | 18:29 |
| redir | or work? | 18:29 |
| bac | redir: it seems to! miracles. | 18:29 |
| redir | I saw it and think it wasn't doing what I wanted | 18:29 |
| redir | but that could have been me breaking shit | 18:29 |
| * redir likes miracles nearly as much as robots | 18:30 | |
| bac | redir: it seems to just put the charms in mongo into ES. perhaps it doesn't index bundles...i haven't looked | 18:30 |
| redir | trumpets blare, angles sing:) | 18:30 |
| redir | angels even | 18:30 |
| redir | me runs car^H^H^Hbike to shop | 18:31 |
| bac | redir: yes, it does not know about bundles | 18:31 |
| redir | grrr flamingo double charged me | 19:15 |
| hatch | hmm, I should take a look | 19:16 |
| hatch | thx for mentioning that | 19:16 |
| rick_h_ | redir: :( | 19:16 |
| hatch | looks like they charged me for the internet | 19:17 |
| hatch | jujugui ^ did they charge anyone else for their room internet? | 19:18 |
| kadams54 | hatch: No | 19:18 |
| hatch | ugh that place is such a bess | 19:18 |
| hatch | mess* | 19:18 |
| * bac looks | 19:18 | |
| kadams54 | hatch: Though I should re-check my credit card just to verify - is this a charge you just noticed show up? | 19:18 |
| bac | hatch: did you check out at the desk? | 19:18 |
| hatch | kadams54 it went through on saturday | 19:18 |
| hatch | bac no.....you still have to do that? I didn't know it was 1990 still :P | 19:19 |
| hatch | the saturday we left that is | 19:19 |
| bac | hatch: i did it so that i'd know if there were outstanding charges | 19:20 |
| hatch | Makyo how about you? Did they charge you for your internet in the room? | 19:20 |
| kadams54 | hatch: Verified. No charges for internet. | 19:21 |
| kadams54 | rick_h_: https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/320 is ready for another round of review + QA. | 19:22 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: rgr, thanks. | 19:22 |
| hatch | ok I'll check with sarah to make sure we aren't being double charged thx | 19:22 |
| redir | They tried to bill me for the internet service, but I refused to pay it before I left. I had them remove that and a call to hotel tech support. So they agreed, then billed me. And then billed me again a week later for roomservice a second time. | 19:23 |
| hatch | lol | 19:24 |
| hatch | I hope that place is stricken from the sprint list | 19:24 |
| hatch | stricken with prejudice | 19:24 |
| Makyo | hatch, checking. | 19:26 |
| bac | hatch: by 'that place' i hope you mean 'nevada' | 19:27 |
| hatch | bac lol, there are some really nice places in Nevada | 19:27 |
| bac | i can't see us sprinting at any of them | 19:27 |
| bac | bandwidth at the bottom of the canyon is miserable | 19:28 |
| hatch | haha....well that may be valid | 19:28 |
| Makyo | hatch, no, because they used your card for incidentals/ | 19:28 |
| hatch | rofl | 19:28 |
| kadams54 | rick_h_: just submitted my expenses. Should I send you the receipts for when you approve, or should I just send them along to expenses@canonical.com? Is there any other info I need to include in that e-mail so that they can connect my receipts to my expense report? | 19:44 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: you can just send them along. | 19:45 |
| * redir redoes math and they only overbilled me by a dollar. Amazingly, the receipt is pretty inscrutable. | 19:46 | |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: please make sure to rebase down the 3 commits. | 19:46 |
| kadams54 | rick_h_: I'd rather not… they're not related commits | 19:46 |
| kadams54 | Or rather, they're distinct units of work within themselves | 19:47 |
| kadams54 | "Logical commits" per hatch :-) | 19:47 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: ah, I just saw the dupe tests and assumed it was gardening | 19:47 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: all good then, nvm | 19:47 |
| kadams54 | That was drive by | 19:47 |
| hatch | :D | 19:47 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: reviewed | 19:48 |
| kadams54 | Thanks! I'll make the comments changes and then land it | 19:50 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: ty much | 19:50 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: and you're in a good place for the follow up then? | 19:50 |
| kadams54 | yeah | 19:50 |
| rick_h_ | cool | 19:50 |
| kadams54 | Follow up being to setup the array of machine token and improve rendering logic to only redo the changed bits | 19:51 |
| kadams54 | s/token/tokens/ | 19:51 |
| rick_h_ | kadams54: rgr | 19:51 |
| kadams54 | I'll setup a card for that shortly. | 19:51 |
| rick_h_ | k | 19:51 |
| redir | erm should expenses show up in canonical admin under my expenses after submitting, but before approving? | 20:06 |
| kadams54 | redir: yeah. Did you hit the Update link at the bottom before sumitting? | 20:06 |
| redir | I thought I hit update | 20:06 |
| redir | but I see nothging in the anywhere | 20:07 |
| redir | I hope I am not submitting 20 copies of this:) | 20:07 |
| kadams54 | Hmm… I had that happen once when I tried to save a draft, but I think I forgot to hit update. | 20:07 |
| kadams54 | Fortunately it took when I re-entered everything, hit update, and then submitted | 20:07 |
| redir | oic | 20:08 |
| rick_h_ | redir: have to check with mramm, I think your stuff goes to him atm | 20:08 |
| redir | you update then save | 20:08 |
| redir | rick_h_: it does according to this | 20:08 |
| redir | just want to put some receipts away... | 20:08 |
| * rick_h_ thinks that's a nice way of saying...not my problem! :P | 20:09 | |
| redir | rick_h_: noted | 20:09 |
| * redir prepares to bother the ramm | 20:09 | |
| rick_h_ | and with that, I think I'm going to run away for the day | 20:11 |
| rick_h_ | have a good night all | 20:11 |
| * rick_h_ runs fast as fast can be...trips over the dog...doh | 20:11 | |
| hatch | woah....apparently the ecs can brick chrome | 20:18 |
| hatch | lol | 20:18 |
| redir | night | 20:19 |
| kadams54 | Ah yes, I did that a few times. | 20:20 |
| hatch | I filed a bug on it | 20:33 |
| hatch | that definitely shouldn't happen | 20:33 |
| hatch | :) | 20:33 |
| redir | what's the ecs? | 20:39 |
| hatch | environment change system | 20:42 |
| rick_h_ | environment change sets | 20:42 |
| bac | rick_h_: how did DL know it was yours? just from the seat, label, constant phone calls? | 20:47 |
| hatch | lol oh right I forgot it was renamed to sets from system | 20:48 |
| rick_h_ | bac: so I filled out the form, told them my seat, described the item, listed the movies and such on it, and they just replied "we think we found your item" | 20:48 |
| rick_h_ | so not sure which item made my case | 20:48 |
| * Makyo dogwalks | 20:49 | |
| hatch | I'm surprised someone didn't steal it | 20:49 |
| hatch | like the clean-up crew or something | 20:49 |
| hatch | maybe there is still SOME good in the world lol | 20:49 |
| bac | hatch: they thought about it, but stole the lost iPad instead. | 20:49 |
| hatch | haha | 20:49 |
| hatch | probably the truth | 20:50 |
| hatch | Makyo does the 'ghost' machine need an id that is representative of it's end position..... ie) container vs machine style id's? | 21:03 |
| Makyo | hatch, no, I don't think so. Just something that can be deleted later/ | 21:35 |
| hatch | ok - I'm just trying to track down a bug and trying to narrow down the issues | 21:35 |
| hatch | how hard is it to run charmworld locally? | 22:26 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: in an lxc not bad. Just make sure it's a sauce or precise lxc | 22:28 |
| rick_h_ | hatch: just takes a while, why, what's up? | 22:28 |
| hatch | doing this machine view stuff requires a lot of refreshing | 22:29 |
| hatch | so I'm hammering on CW and it's slowing me down | 22:29 |
| hatch | heh | 22:29 |
| rick_h_ | how would charmworld help? | 22:29 |
| rick_h_ | oic | 22:29 |
| rick_h_ | try setting the url to http://qa.manage.jujucharms.com/ ? | 22:30 |
| rick_h_ | it's non ssl at least | 22:30 |
| hatch | ahh that's a good idea | 22:32 |
| hatch | I have everything working but placing onto an already created container | 22:32 |
| hatch | I'm very close to calling it a placeUnit bug | 22:32 |
| hatch | yep placeUnit bug | 22:33 |
| hatch | this ecs + mv stuff is a house of cards right now | 22:35 |
| hatch | ok adding to an already existing container is broken | 22:43 |
| hatch | I'm guessing in the add_unit stuff | 22:44 |
| hatch | but I'm pushing that to another branch | 22:44 |
| hatch | jujugui anyone able to take a peek at my branch before I write the tests? https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/321 | 23:00 |
| kadams54 | Sure | 23:00 |
| hatch | thank yas | 23:01 |
| kadams54 | Nothing jumps out at first glance. Unfortunately I just got a phone call and gotta make an emergency jacket delivery, but I'll look at it more when I get back. | 23:04 |
| Makyo | I'll take a quick look too. | 23:04 |
| Makyo | hatch, yeah, that looks like a good path to move forward with. | 23:07 |
| hatch | eggcelent thx for looking | 23:08 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
