[00:14] <rick_h_> hatch: you around tomorrow? We can chat about this with kadadms
[00:14] <hatch> yeah, I'm getting the yard un-wintered :)
[00:14] <rick_h_> cool
[00:14] <hatch> it sounds like it's on the right path though
[00:15] <rick_h_> yea, I think we had a good conversation about a good path
[00:15] <rick_h_> but I did want to make sure you were involved if you had feedback
[00:15] <hatch> I'll have to take a deeper look at it
[00:16] <hatch> but it seems good at face value
[00:27] <hatch> rick_h_ what time tomorrow do you want to have a chat?
[00:28] <rick_h_> hatch: not sure, kadams seems to start around 10, but I've got a delivery 9-11 (eastern)
[00:28] <rick_h_> after standup maybe?
[00:28] <hatch> sure that works for me
[00:29] <rick_h_> hatch: coolio
[00:31] <hatch> how goes the battle with the NUC?
[00:31] <rick_h_> good, have maas installed but have to figure out the network stuff
[00:32] <rick_h_> ATT isn't going to get to my new network stuff until later in the month
[00:32] <rick_h_> so might just sit on it until then when I can put them on the network and not have ot change it around
[00:32] <hatch> wth, how hard can it be for them to flick a switch? hah
[00:32] <rick_h_> well, to get business class I've got to get on a different pipe that's not been run down my street
[00:32] <rick_h_> so they've got to do that first, then schedule my install after that
[00:33] <hatch> oh haha
[00:33] <hatch> WELL THEN!
[12:12] <rick_h_> redir: qa'd and commented. One small code change request
[12:31] <bac> rick_h_: did your qa work after blowing away the ES index manually?
[12:35] <kadams54> jujugui: heading to Michigan's equivalent of the DMV to change the title on a car. Not sure when I'll be back at the keyboard, but it will definitely be before standup.
[12:35] <rick_h_> bac: I did a full emptydb and and cleared the index manaully and then I forgot to run the app so proof would pass
[12:35] <rick_h_> after doing all of that I did finally get it to ingest correcty lol, been too long since I worked on charmworld
[12:35] <rick_h_> kadrgr
[12:35] <rick_h_> bah, how dare he leave so I can't tab complete his name
[12:35] <bac> rick_h_: i'm looking for implications for deploy, things we may need to do in a migration.
[12:36] <rick_h_> bac: well I can't say for sure what state my old lxc container was in and such
[12:36] <rick_h_> I think it was a combo of bad things I did on my part
[12:36] <bac> rick_h_: ok.  well, perhaps we'll just wait to see what happens when jenkins lands it on qa
[12:37] <rick_h_> bac: rgr
[12:40] <bac> my mom called b/c the internet didn't work.  took 20 minutes for her to admit she had a router and to find it.
[12:44] <rick_h_> lol
[12:45] <rick_h_> didn't know routers are secrets to be ashamed of
[13:00] <redir> code change related to: http://bit.ly/1lsXCfv
[13:00] <redir> rick_h_: ^^
[13:01] <rick_h_> redir: cool, that's a link to a bug?
[13:01] <rick_h_> I understand that's the background of the change, but wouldn't a skip of the test do the same as commenting it out?
[13:01] <redir> I am going to a cafe for a an hour or two -- while someone works in our apt. Should be back for the stand up.
[13:01] <rick_h_> redir: rgr, thanks for the heads up
[13:02] <redir> rick_h_: I recommended a skip in that bug and abentley said he didn't think so
[13:03] <rick_h_> ok, so he's arguing the test should stand as is
[13:03] <redir> I haven't looked deeply at what test under test.ini does though.
[13:03] <rick_h_> right now it's commented out
[13:04] <rick_h_> I think a skip > commented out and a working test > skipped test
[13:04] <redir> I don't really understand what he is saying
[13:04] <rick_h_> so for this branch, I'm ok with a skip. And a card in maintance to look at this bug
[13:04] <redir> I agree with you 
[13:04] <rick_h_> but honestly, the goal if you working on the store is to remove this so I'm +1 skip and carry on for now
[13:04] <rick_h_> there's a bug noting the issue, maybe put the bug number in the skip message
[13:05] <rick_h_> and call it a day 
[13:05] <redir> good idea
[13:05] <redir> will do
[13:05] <rick_h_> thanks
[13:05] <jcsackett> morning, all.
[13:06] <redir> morning jcsackett 
[13:06] <redir> bbiab
[13:29] <rick_h_> delivery man is here, biab
[13:40] <rick_h_> back
[13:59] <jcsackett> rick_h_: got a sec to chat imp details on change summary? have a question with changing configs pre deploy, specifically.
[14:02] <rick_h_> jcsackett: sure thing
[14:03] <jcsackett> rick_h_: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/gymhrqahxkwfy5tn6duz2v72yaa?authuser=2&hl=en
[14:32] <rick_h_> morning hatch, when you get settled want to run an interview presentation question by you before emailing it
[14:35] <hatch> sounds good, ha ve it in a doc somewhere?
[14:35] <rick_h_> hatch: yep
[14:36] <rick_h_> hatch: shared with you
[14:36] <hatch> cool, looking
[14:36] <hatch> just as I get over my cold, I get allergies lol
[14:36] <rick_h_> hah! welcome to spring!
[14:39] <redir> modified to run desctructive by default under the test make target or not under testdebug target. http://paste.ubuntu.com/7462988/ I could reverse the logic and make test nondestructive, then add a testci target that is. Then sinzui only needs to change that target on CI, IIUC.
[14:39] <redir> guihelp thoughts?
[14:42] <redir> I think I like the latter better. Then we only have to deal with thte booger once changing the ci config, rather than all developers needing to deal with it when running tests
[14:42] <rick_h_> redir: looking and rereading the bug filed
[14:43] <redir> cool heading back to apt for call. hopefully they re done in my office.
[14:43] <redir> brb
[14:50] <Makyo> jujugui call in 10
[14:54] <redir> back
[14:55] <rick_h_> redir: cool, let's chat after the hangout. I think I better understand abentley's point and the issue now. 
[14:55] <redir> k
[14:56] <abentley> redir: watch for stray pdbs :-)
[15:00] <redir> it isn't committed. still needs doc'ed etc. but thanks for the reminder. I have been known to dangle a pdb in a commit or two
[15:01] <rick_h_> jujugui call now
[15:06] <bac> redir: but where did your Quickstart come from?  probably the PPA.  the card is for getting into main.
[15:07] <redir> OIC, tx bac
[15:14] <tvansteenburgh> hey guys, when doing and api search (e.g. http://manage.jujucharms.com/api/3/search?text=mongodb), is there a way to say "only give me charms" or "only give me bundles" ?
[15:15] <tvansteenburgh> s/and/an/
[15:18] <hatch> tvansteenburgh at the moment you can only get 'all' bundles 
[15:18] <hatch> fixes are in the works for enhancing the search though
[15:19] <tvansteenburgh> hatch: okay thanks
[15:19] <rick_h_> tvansteenburgh: charm:mongodb
[15:19] <rick_h_> tvansteenburgh: bundle:mongodb
[15:20] <hatch> rick_h_ so I think I'll trash the card that's on the board and create a series of them to 'hook up drop targets for unplaced units' 
[15:20] <rick_h_> hatch: jump in hangout to follow up?
[15:20] <hatch> sure
[15:20] <hatch> in the standup hangout
[15:20] <rick_h_> hatch: rgr
[15:21] <rick_h_> hatch: fyi ^ 
[15:21] <hatch> oh that's interesting, is that new?
[15:21] <rick_h_> hatch: we did that a few months ago, so newish?
[15:21] <hatch> yikes where have I been
[15:22] <tvansteenburgh> rick_h_: cool, thanks!
[15:22] <rick_h_> hatch: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/canonical.com/daily-standup?authuser=1
[15:22] <rick_h_> tvansteenburgh: np, let me know if you hit any issues
[15:41] <tvansteenburgh> rick_h_: any suggestions on how to handle this: http://manage.jujucharms.com/api/3/search?type=approved&text=charm:
[15:42] <tvansteenburgh> i want "all approved charms" but this query returns bundles too
[15:42] <rick_h_> tvansteenburgh: hmmm, thinking
[15:44] <rick_h_> tvansteenburgh: http://manage.jujucharms.com/api/3/search?type=approved&text=&series=trusty and update for each series you want the data for. 
[15:44] <rick_h_> tvansteenburgh: bundles don't have series so you should get those filtered out?
[15:45] <tvansteenburgh> rich_h_: will bundles ever have series?
[15:45] <rick_h_> tvansteenburgh: not that I'm aware of
[15:45] <rick_h_> tvansteenburgh: what's this for? If it's something we need to support we can look into it perhaps
[15:46] <tvansteenburgh> charmworldlib is a python library on top of this api. i'm working on adding bundle support to the lib
[15:46] <hatch> annnnnd I'm working outside!
[15:46] <rick_h_> what bundle feature of bundle support is this doing?
[15:46] <rick_h_> hatch: :P
[15:46] <hatch> ok I needed a blanket, but damnit I'm outside!
[15:47] <tvansteenburgh> when i do Bundles.search() i want to make sure i only get bundle data back
[15:47] <rick_h_> tvansteenburgh: ok, but doing bundle:term should work for that. 
[15:47] <rick_h_> tvansteenburgh: what's the recommended charm search part for?
[15:47] <rick_h_> tvansteenburgh: chat? 
[15:47] <tvansteenburgh> rick_h_: yeah, chat
[15:48] <rick_h_> tvansteenburgh: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/gzypx4siy6biijpzjj4hq2ey6ma?authuser=1&hl=en
[15:53] <redir> that causes an error, so I skipped the test committed, will look at the test separately.
[15:53] <redir> so now I change status to approved? rick_h_ bac?
[15:58] <rick_h_> redir: ok, yea skip and land and add a follow up kanban card for the test
[15:58] <rick_h_> redir: make sure to put that bug number into the new card as the "card id" field
[15:58] <redir> having never landed before I am guessing I change the status to approved
[15:58] <redir> then magic happens, rick_h_ 
[15:59] <rick_h_> redir: yep
[15:59] <rick_h_> then if all goes well CI will pick it up and try to land it. That CI tarmac stuff is still running the show right bac?
[15:59] <redir> and where would you like the card added
[15:59] <redir> maintenance?
[15:59] <rick_h_> redir: might as well stick it in Maint. branch start 
[15:59] <redir> tracking
[15:59] <redir> k
[15:59] <redir> tx
[16:00] <rick_h_> redir: but time box it. Look at that test update for today, if there's no advancement let's move it back as a todo item and get you back onto the core store stuff please
[16:03] <redir> k. approved revision == 515 but the skip is in 516, does that matter?
[16:04] <rick_h_> hmm, it might complain about revisions not approved. sec
[16:04] <rick_h_> redir: ah, yea you need to fill out the commit field
[16:04] <rick_h_> see the landing bot being all helpful like that
[16:05]  * redir likes robots.
[16:07]  * rick_h_ goes to get lunchables
[16:24]  * rick_h_ is back from lunchables
[16:25] <hatch> mmmm lunchables
[16:35] <tvansteenburgh> rick_h_: after looking at the charmworld code i realized the error of my ways. http://manage.jujucharms.com/api/3/search?type=approved&text=charm works just fine
[16:35] <rick_h_> tvansteenburgh: ooh, good call. I didn't think to ditch the :
[16:35] <rick_h_> the source always wins
[16:35] <tvansteenburgh> +1, thanks for your help
[16:47] <hatch> chickadees are out :-)
[16:55] <kadams54> In the saddle for the afternoon
[16:55] <kadams54> guihelp: looking for eyeballs on https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/320
[16:56] <rick_h_> kadams54: can help look shortly
[17:12] <bac> oh no, leankit has hired all of those little bastards from vegas: http://leankit.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/8-WIP-Personas1-570x1024.jpg
[17:15] <kadams54> Minions. They're called minions. ;-)
[17:18] <hatch> haha minions rock
[17:20] <rick_h_> lol
[17:26] <hatch> kadams54 I think it was you who said the container tokens get the data-id attribute set somewhere so it didn't need to be in the template
[17:26] <hatch> do you remember where it is set?
[17:27] <kadams54> If I had a time machine I'd go back and punch past-me in the mouth for saying that.
[17:27] <kadams54> Oh, yeah, that's right
[17:28] <rick_h_> kadams54: I've put some feedback in that I think drives this a bit deeper. Can you give it a read through and we can try to figure out if it makes sense and break the work. Maybe some this branch and some as a follow up?
[17:28] <kadams54> hatch: here: https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/blob/develop/app/widgets/machine-token.js#L129
[17:29] <kadams54> Will look through
[17:29] <kadams54> Thanks rick_h_ 
[17:29] <rick_h_> kadams54: thank you, it's a good start on the work we need.
[17:29] <hatch> kadams54 ohh it was the machine token, not the container token
[17:29] <hatch> ok the container token maybe didn't ever have an id set
[17:31] <kadams54> Yeah, container token doesn't right now, but machine and unplaced unit do
[17:31] <hatch> got it
[17:31] <kadams54> Both of those work the same way now
[17:31] <kadams54> Used to be machine had it in the template and unplaced unit didn't… or the other way around
[17:33] <rick_h_> redir: what's the card in tracking you've got there?
[17:33] <redir> in which?
[17:33] <redir> in Proj A
[17:33] <redir> one of the store bugs I started on
[17:33] <redir> rick_h_: 
[17:34] <rick_h_> redir: ok, I'm going to move it back, tracking is for stuff outside of our control we're monitoring
[17:34]  * redir looks to see where it should be
[17:34] <rick_h_> redir: like getting quickstart updated in trusty. We've handed off the work and are watching others who do the final landing bits. So we're tracking their progress towards our goal
[17:34] <rick_h_> redir: I'm just moving it back into ready to code
[17:35] <rick_h_> and tomorrow then just move it to 'branch start check list"
[17:35] <redir> or later today!
[17:35] <rick_h_> redir: or later today :)
[17:35] <redir> can't reproduce anyhow
[17:35] <redir> but more on that later
[17:35] <rick_h_> ok
[17:37] <redir> rick_h_: are you rharding on lp?
[17:37] <rick_h_> redir: yes
[17:38] <hatch> so....containers don't have unique id's?
[17:39] <rick_h_> hatch: machine containers? They should. 
[17:40] <hatch> the object passed into the container token doesn't have anything resembling an id
[17:40] <hatch> containers = this.get('db').machines.filterByParent(parentId);
[17:40] <rick_h_> ok, well a container is just a machine and machine's have ids
[17:40] <hatch> ok I'll look into this filterByParent method then
[17:40] <rick_h_> so the machine id of the containers should be their id
[17:40] <rick_h_> it might not be passing back all the data you need
[17:40] <rick_h_> right
[17:41] <hatch> so my neighbour just asked me if I have the day off...I said no....this is work
[17:41] <hatch> kehehe
[17:41] <rick_h_> hah
[17:42] <hatch> would like this screen to be a little brighter though
[17:43] <hatch> this is pretty darn cool https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/octotree/bkhaagjahfmjljalopjnoealnfndnagc
[17:43] <hatch> ^ shows the github repo in a tree format
[17:43] <rick_h_> nice
[17:47] <redir> guihelp easy review -> https://code.launchpad.net/~reedobrien/charmworld/reindex_test/+merge/219569
[17:47] <bac> redir: on it
[17:47] <hatch> zomg that's HUGE
[17:47] <redir> merci
[17:47] <hatch> ;)
[17:48] <bac> redir: would you like your branch to the bug?
[17:49] <bac> redir: recall the --fixes=lp: thing on commit will do it for you...
[17:49] <redir> ?
[17:49] <redir> link branch to bug
[17:49] <redir> oh
[17:49] <redir> I put it in the commit message
[17:50] <redir> didn't realize it was cli time req't
[17:51] <hatch> rick_h_ oh I think I found the issue - if the filter returns an empty array it renders the token as bare metal
[17:51] <hatch> so no id
[17:51] <hatch> hmmm
[17:51] <rick_h_> hatch: ah, right well that's true
[17:52] <hatch> well NOW you tell me!
[17:52] <hatch> :P
[17:52] <rick_h_> well you said a container, bare metal isn't a container :P
[17:52] <hatch> okI'll let it slide......this time!
[17:53] <bac> redir: sorry, if i confused you.  if you do 'bzr ci -m "my wonderful changes" --fixes=lp:123456' the branch will be linked to the bug on LP the next time you push.
[17:53] <redir> bac how do I link them after the fact?
[17:53] <redir> just stick it in a comment/
[17:53] <bac> no
[17:53] <redir> ?
[17:53] <rick_h_> redir: in the UI in the upper right there's a link for it
[17:53] <rick_h_> On the bug page there's a "Link branch" and in the branch there's a "Link to bug" or something like that
[17:54] <hatch> You need to do it from the bug page
[17:54] <bac> go to the branch page and click 'link to bug report'
[17:54] <hatch> yeah what rick said
[17:54] <bac> hatch: or the branch page
[17:54] <hatch> or that
[17:54] <hatch> :)
[17:54] <hatch> LP is a little confusing sometimes
[17:54] <bac> they are ambidextrous
[17:54] <hatch> hah
[17:54] <bac> hatch: how would you suggest rewording "Link to bug report" to be clearer?
[17:55] <hatch> bac I don't think it could be clearer
[17:55] <hatch> I mean, it's confusing because you can't do it from the merge proposal 
[17:55] <bac> when did LP merge proposals get in-line comments???
[17:56] <hatch> I don't see said comments
[17:56] <bac> hatch: on https://code.launchpad.net/~reedobrien/charmworld/reindex_test/+merge/219569 do you not see several places that reference "inline comments"?
[17:57] <bac> hatch: it could be that it is a feature only enabled for beta testers or LP devs or something
[17:57] <redir> I see link in bug -> branch, but not in branch -> bug
[17:57] <hatch> I see your comment which references the inline comments but there are no inline comments
[17:57] <bac> redir: did you make the change i requested?
[17:58] <bac> there should be an in-line comment below line 21
[17:58] <redir> I didn't se a requested change
[17:58] <redir> but yes I just saw that
[17:58] <bac> redir: so maybe in-line comments don't work so well
[17:58] <redir> comment
[17:58] <hatch> haha
[18:00] <redir> looks like it is there now
[18:01] <redir> you prolly  need to reapprove for the new commit
[18:01] <bac> redir: and you must put the commit message into the merge proposal before sending it on
[18:01] <redir> yeah.
[18:01] <redir> :(
[18:01] <redir> I did but didn't save before clicking see inline comments
[18:02] <bac> redir: done.  you can toggle the approve now and it should be happy
[18:02] <kadams54> rick_h_: had a chance to read through your comments and digest. Let me know when you've got a few minutes to chat about it.
[18:03] <rick_h_> kadams54: k, otp atm and will get back
[18:03] <redir> guibot doesn't miss a beat
[18:03] <redir> thanks bac
[18:16] <rick_h_> kadams54: got time?
[18:16] <kadams54> Yup
[18:16] <rick_h_> kadams54: join me in the standup hangout?
[18:17] <kadams54> k
[18:22] <hatch> rick_h_ do you use google play music?
[18:23] <rick_h_> hatch: yep
[18:23] <hatch> it's suggesting me songs from you hah
[18:23] <rick_h_> lol
[18:23] <hatch> I just started using it and man I'm confused
[18:23] <rick_h_> sorry about that, I listen to a lot of kids stuff and a lot of soundtracks on there
[18:23] <rick_h_> yea, it can be confusing. 
[18:23] <rick_h_> it's nice though, if you subscribe, to just get to anything. I almost always live in "listen now" area
[18:24] <hatch> well apparently I can upload my music to it? But I have to pay to do so?
[18:24] <hatch> maybe not?
[18:24] <hatch> I can only download a song twice
[18:24] <hatch> .....It's just confusing when it's not a streaming service
[18:27] <rick_h_> hatch: yea, there's the music manager app you can get
[18:27] <rick_h_> I used that to do my uploads
[18:27] <rick_h_> I think you only have to pay over 20k songs
[18:27] <rick_h_> and OMG yay my tablet is back from Delta!
[18:27] <hatch> I think it needs some better onboarding
[18:27] <bac> redir: hey, guess what i found.  bin/sync-index
[18:27] <hatch> haha it was actually your tablet??
[18:28] <bac> rick_h_: you left it in the seatback pocket/
[18:28] <bac> s///?/
[18:28] <rick_h_> bac: heh, no I pulled it out of that pocket and put it on my seat so I wouldn't forget it
[18:28] <bac> wow
[18:28] <rick_h_> then I pulled my bag down from the storage above and left it
[18:28] <bac> rick_h_: i was thankful to get back my stainless water bottle
[18:28] <rick_h_> so I was just stupid, while being thoughtful to make sure I didn't forget it
[18:29] <rick_h_> but yay, because there's not a good tablet I'd buy and don't want to pay full price for another N10
[18:29] <redir> bac does it do what you think?
[18:29] <redir> or work?
[18:29] <bac> redir: it seems to!  miracles.
[18:29] <redir> I saw it and think it wasn't doing what I wanted
[18:29] <redir> but that could have been me breaking shit
[18:30]  * redir likes miracles nearly as much as robots
[18:30] <bac> redir: it seems to just put the charms in mongo into ES.  perhaps it doesn't index bundles...i haven't looked
[18:30] <redir> trumpets blare, angles sing:)
[18:30] <redir> angels even
[18:31] <redir> me runs car^H^H^Hbike to shop
[18:31] <bac> redir: yes, it does not know about bundles
[19:15] <redir> grrr flamingo double charged me
[19:16] <hatch> hmm, I should take a look
[19:16] <hatch> thx for mentioning that
[19:16] <rick_h_> redir: :(
[19:17] <hatch> looks like they charged me for  the internet
[19:18] <hatch> jujugui ^ did they charge anyone else for their room internet?
[19:18] <kadams54> hatch: No
[19:18] <hatch> ugh that place is such a bess
[19:18] <hatch> mess*
[19:18]  * bac looks
[19:18] <kadams54> hatch: Though I should re-check my credit card just to verify - is this a charge you just noticed show up?
[19:18] <bac> hatch: did you check out at the desk?
[19:18] <hatch> kadams54 it went through on saturday
[19:19] <hatch> bac no.....you still have to do that? I didn't know it was 1990 still :P
[19:19] <hatch> the saturday we left that is
[19:20] <bac> hatch: i did it so that i'd know if there were outstanding charges
[19:20] <hatch> Makyo how about you? Did they charge you for your internet in the room?
[19:21] <kadams54> hatch: Verified. No charges for internet.
[19:22] <kadams54> rick_h_: https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/320 is ready for another round of review + QA.
[19:22] <rick_h_> kadams54: rgr, thanks. 
[19:22] <hatch> ok I'll check with sarah to make sure we aren't being double charged thx
[19:23] <redir> They tried to bill me for the internet service, but I refused to pay it before I left. I had them remove that and a call to hotel tech support. So they agreed, then billed me. And then billed me again a week later for roomservice a second time.
[19:24] <hatch> lol 
[19:24] <hatch> I hope that place is stricken from the sprint list 
[19:24] <hatch> stricken with prejudice 
[19:26] <Makyo> hatch, checking.
[19:27] <bac> hatch: by 'that place' i hope you mean 'nevada'
[19:27] <hatch> bac lol, there are some really nice places in Nevada 
[19:27] <bac> i can't see us sprinting at any of them
[19:28] <bac> bandwidth at the bottom of the canyon is miserable
[19:28] <hatch> haha....well that may be valid
[19:28] <Makyo> hatch, no, because they used your card for incidentals/
[19:28] <hatch> rofl
[19:44] <kadams54> rick_h_: just submitted my expenses. Should I send you the receipts for when you approve, or should I just send them along to expenses@canonical.com? Is there any other info I need to include in that e-mail so that they can connect my receipts to my expense report?
[19:45] <rick_h_> kadams54: you can just send them along. 
[19:46]  * redir redoes math and they only overbilled me by a dollar. Amazingly, the receipt is pretty inscrutable.
[19:46] <rick_h_> kadams54: please make sure to rebase down the 3 commits. 
[19:46] <kadams54> rick_h_: I'd rather not… they're not related commits
[19:47] <kadams54> Or rather, they're distinct units of work within themselves
[19:47] <kadams54> "Logical commits" per hatch :-)
[19:47] <rick_h_> kadams54: ah, I just saw the dupe tests and assumed it was gardening
[19:47] <rick_h_> kadams54: all good then, nvm
[19:47] <kadams54> That was drive by
[19:47] <hatch> :D
[19:48] <rick_h_> kadams54: reviewed
[19:50] <kadams54> Thanks! I'll make the comments changes and then land it
[19:50] <rick_h_> kadams54: ty much
[19:50] <rick_h_> kadams54: and you're in a good place for the follow up then?
[19:50] <kadams54> yeah
[19:50] <rick_h_> cool
[19:51] <kadams54> Follow up being to setup the array of machine token and improve rendering logic to only redo the changed bits
[19:51] <kadams54> s/token/tokens/
[19:51] <rick_h_> kadams54: rgr
[19:51] <kadams54> I'll setup a card for that shortly.
[19:51] <rick_h_> k
[20:06] <redir> erm should expenses show up in canonical admin under my expenses after submitting, but before approving?
[20:06] <kadams54> redir: yeah. Did you hit the Update link at the bottom before sumitting?
[20:06] <redir> I thought I hit update
[20:07] <redir> but I see nothging in the anywhere
[20:07] <redir> I hope I am not submitting 20 copies of this:)
[20:07] <kadams54> Hmm… I had that happen once when I tried to save a draft, but I think I forgot to hit update.
[20:07] <kadams54> Fortunately it took when I re-entered everything, hit update, and then submitted
[20:08] <redir> oic
[20:08] <rick_h_> redir: have to check with mramm, I think your stuff goes to him atm
[20:08] <redir> you update then save
[20:08] <redir> rick_h_: it does according to this
[20:08] <redir> just want to put some receipts away...
[20:09]  * rick_h_ thinks that's a nice way of saying...not my problem! :P
[20:09] <redir> rick_h_: noted
[20:09]  * redir prepares to bother the ramm
[20:11] <rick_h_> and with that, I think I'm going to run away for the day
[20:11] <rick_h_> have a good night all
[20:11]  * rick_h_ runs fast as fast can be...trips over the dog...doh
[20:18] <hatch> woah....apparently the ecs can brick chrome
[20:18] <hatch> lol
[20:19] <redir> night
[20:20] <kadams54> Ah yes, I did that a few times.
[20:33] <hatch> I filed a bug on it
[20:33] <hatch> that definitely shouldn't happen
[20:33] <hatch> :)
[20:39] <redir> what's the ecs?
[20:42] <hatch> environment change system
[20:42] <rick_h_> environment change sets
[20:47] <bac> rick_h_: how did DL know it was yours?  just from the seat, label, constant phone calls?
[20:48] <hatch> lol oh right I forgot it was renamed to sets from system
[20:48] <rick_h_> bac: so I filled out the form, told them my seat, described the item, listed the movies and such on it, and they just replied "we think we found your item"
[20:48] <rick_h_> so not sure which item made my case
[20:49]  * Makyo dogwalks
[20:49] <hatch> I'm surprised someone didn't steal it
[20:49] <hatch> like the clean-up crew or something
[20:49] <hatch> maybe there is still SOME good in the world lol
[20:49] <bac> hatch: they thought about it, but stole the lost iPad instead.
[20:49] <hatch> haha
[20:50] <hatch> probably the truth
[21:03] <hatch> Makyo does the 'ghost' machine need an id that is representative of it's end position..... ie) container vs machine style id's?
[21:35] <Makyo> hatch, no, I don't think so. Just something that can be deleted later/
[21:35] <hatch> ok - I'm just trying to track down a bug and trying to narrow down the issues
[22:26] <hatch> how hard is it to run charmworld locally? 
[22:28] <rick_h_> hatch: in an lxc not bad. Just make sure it's a sauce or precise lxc
[22:28] <rick_h_> hatch: just takes a while, why, what's up?
[22:29] <hatch> doing this machine view stuff requires a lot of refreshing
[22:29] <hatch> so I'm hammering on CW and it's slowing me down
[22:29] <hatch> heh
[22:29] <rick_h_> how would charmworld help?
[22:29] <rick_h_> oic
[22:30] <rick_h_> try setting the url to http://qa.manage.jujucharms.com/ ? 
[22:30] <rick_h_> it's non ssl at least
[22:32] <hatch> ahh that's a good idea
[22:32] <hatch> I have everything working but placing onto an already created container
[22:32] <hatch> I'm very close to calling it a placeUnit bug
[22:33] <hatch> yep placeUnit bug
[22:35] <hatch> this ecs + mv stuff is a house of cards right now
[22:43] <hatch> ok adding to an already existing container is broken
[22:44] <hatch> I'm guessing in the add_unit stuff
[22:44] <hatch> but I'm pushing that to another branch
[23:00] <hatch> jujugui anyone able to take a peek at my branch before I write the tests? https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/321
[23:00] <kadams54> Sure
[23:01] <hatch> thank yas
[23:04] <kadams54> Nothing jumps out at first glance. Unfortunately I just got a phone call and gotta make an emergency jacket delivery, but I'll look at it more when I get back.
[23:04] <Makyo> I'll take a quick look too.
[23:07] <Makyo> hatch, yeah, that looks like a good path to move forward with.
[23:08] <hatch> eggcelent thx for looking