[00:07] <cprov> wgrant: here I am
[00:07] <wgrant> cprov: Hi
[00:08] <wgrant> cprov: What's the status of https://code.launchpad.net/~cjohnston/launchpad/fix-word-break/+merge/219285? I think that can land, can't it?
[00:08] <cprov> wgrant: I've landed the working bits from it yesterday
[00:09] <wgrant> cprov: What about the pending publish_inline_comments default change?
[00:09] <cprov> wgrant: it will be better fixed by my WIP branch
[00:09] <wgrant> Great. Should that be Rejected?
[00:10] <cprov> yes
[00:39] <wgrant> cjohnston, cprov: I know it's getting late, but do you guys have time for a quick status call? If not, your tomorrow is fine.
[00:39] <cprov> wgrant: sure
[00:40] <cjohnston> sure.. give me 5 min
[00:41] <cjohnston> ok.. maybe only 2.. ready whenever
[00:43] <wgrant> cjohnston, cprov: https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/7acpjfd54idrcghi0or1q0ia4o
[00:44] <wgrant> (finally worked out how to create one)
[00:46] <cjohnston> https://code.launchpad.net/~cjohnston/launchpad/publish-ic-link
[00:51] <cjohnston> cprov: ^
[00:57] <cprov> https://oops.canonical.com/oops/?oopsid=OOPS-2585482ac97b2e5a570df8e24888e181
[12:38] <cjohnston> wgrant: are you good with marking bug #918284 as wontfix now?
[12:38] <_mup_> Bug #918284: Use Ubuntu Mono webfont so all users see it <css> <Launchpad itself:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/918284>
[12:39] <wgrant> cjohnston: Good point, done.
[12:40]  * cjwatson writes a somewhat hair-raising caching wrapper for various launchpadlib objects for cdimage
[12:41] <cjohnston> wgrant: https://code.launchpad.net/~cjohnston/launchpad/883258/+merge/215332 can also be rejected
[12:41] <cjohnston> since I don't have the ability
[12:42] <wgrant> cjohnston: Huh, you should be able to reject your own.
[12:42] <wgrant> But done.
[12:42] <cjohnston> All I see is WIP, Needs review, Merged..
[12:42] <cjohnston> I guess because I'm not a part of ~somelpteam
[12:50] <danilos> heya all, how do I get to see/use inline comments? I know I used to be a part of launchpad-beta-testers team, is that still what it takes?
[12:51] <cjohnston> danilos: it isn't available yet
[12:51] <wgrant> Hopefully some time next week for some internal teams that nag a lot :)
[12:51] <danilos> cjohnston, interesting, somebody seems to have used it yesterday and now I can't see their comments on the MP
[12:52] <danilos> wgrant, heh, can I nag a lot too? :)
[12:53] <wgrant> danilos: Bah, they weren't meant to use it outside the CI/LP projects, to avoid this :)
[12:56] <danilos> wgrant, well, I can read emails about it, so there is a work-around to get to the comments :)
[13:13] <cjohnston> wgrant: with the changes that are happening at a decent pace and the fact that we are doing the testing of IC, do you think we should release LP more frequently right now to allow more testing of the newer changes before next week?
[13:15] <wgrant> cjohnston: When we have relevant changes to deploy, sure.
[13:16] <cjohnston> wgrant: I was thinking that both the empty lines around IC and the FF issue were both something that would be nice to get out sooner rather than later
[13:16] <cjohnston> the first is a nice usability thing, the second could potentially just cause issues
[13:17] <wgrant> Oh, I'd forgotten about the linebreaking fix.
[13:19] <cjohnston> I just marked the monospace bug as qa-ok, were you wanting to QA it as well, or are you good with it
[13:19] <wgrant> I've seen it in action already :)
[13:20] <cjohnston> cool
[22:54] <wgrant> cprov: Hangout when you're around?