[01:54] <sarnold> user Ucker in #ubuntu-server is being annoying, please banhammer :)
[01:57] <sarnold> rww: yano banned him :)
[01:57] <sarnold> rww: thanks
[01:57] <rww> sarnold: ah, was about to ask
[07:23] <ikonia> hello kenny18
[07:51] <ikonia> hello andrewjs18
[07:57] <Unit193> Ban against *18!*@*$#ubuntu-ops matches andrewjs18!~andrewjs1@pool-173-62-176-112.phlapa.fios.verizon.net
[08:01] <rww> IdleOne: see ^
[08:02] <elky> yeah lift that one, surely they got bored by now
[08:02] <rww> doubt it
[08:02] <rww> though i agree with the first half of the sentence
[08:02] <elky> i figure they might have aged a year or so
[08:03] <rww> in robot or human years?
[10:20] <IdleOne> so that is 1 out of how many?
[10:27] <IdleOne> strange that you agree the ban should be lifted, when you're the one who suggested I make it a forward so we can keep an eye on how many false positives we get. first incident and you're ready to remove the ban.
[10:27] <IdleOne> Do whatever you like.
[10:28] <elky> yes, because bans are not usually a permanent thing, especially not with botnets
[10:30] <IdleOne> I don't own the ban. Feel free to act in the best interest of the channel.
[13:09] <ikonia> gone
[13:36] <DJones>  student> I'm currently using arch linux, but ubuntu is just waay too difficult!
[13:36] <DJones> Please, no trolling
[14:15] <User272> stu "d!ckless" lantz betrays all; trannys & queers(chaste Homos/a$$holes), rule; hubert andrews jenkins aka andrea hylton/tranny
[14:16] <k1l> i really wonder why people do such things.
 your offtopic room is banning me for fun
[18:54] <bazhang> !fun
[18:55] <chu> rww: Not sure if you want to deal with this ...
[18:55] <chu> For what it's worth, it wasn't fun. He was told what was gonna happen if he kept it up.
[18:55] <bazhang> wrong answers for $500 alex
[19:00] <rww> shockingly, they aren't talking in ##hardware
[19:02] <IdleOne> I think maybe you're a little too stern about the support questions in -ot but I understand why so...
[19:02] <IdleOne> forget I mentioned it :)
[19:02] <rww> in general, I'm not that stern. they were being particularly obnoxious
[19:02] <IdleOne> true
[19:02] <IdleOne> the immediately thing bothered me too
[19:03] <rww> the support directive is one of those nebulous things that isn't in !guidelines but is a community norm, so I don't usually kick people out for it
[19:03] <rww> but if you start acting entitled about it, it's a different story
[19:03] <rww> anyways, back to work
[19:06] <chu> Yeah, I only got annoyed at the demand.
[19:08] <genii> "Help me RIGHT NOW, or else, dammit!"   etc etc
[19:09] <bazhang> same thing in #freenode , I directed him there twice
[19:09] <IdleOne> ask in ##rww-support-4-non-support-qs
[20:13] <genii> Hm. "Status as at December 2010" https://wiki.ubuntu.com/systemd
[21:16] <tsimpson> genii: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/core-1403-systemd-transition is newer
[21:36] <genii> tsimpson: Cool, thanks. They also pointed me to the Debian official docs
[21:37] <genii> ( in #ubuntu-devel )
[23:31] <phunyguy> lol my wife is passed out with the laptop on her lap
[23:32] <phunyguy> oops wrong chan!  See #ubuntu-offtopic for more!