tvansteenburgh | bac: you around? | 00:08 |
---|---|---|
rick_h_ | tvansteenburgh: what's up? Anything I can help with? | 00:11 |
tvansteenburgh | nah, not really. i just discovered that he broke something in charm-tools :P | 00:13 |
rick_h_ | doh | 00:13 |
rick_h_ | :) | 00:13 |
tvansteenburgh | but i'm just gonna fix it since he's not around | 00:13 |
tvansteenburgh | no worries | 00:13 |
rick_h_ | cool thanks | 00:13 |
=== revagomes is now known as mGraf | ||
=== mGraf is now known as revagomes | ||
=== revagomes is now known as mGraf | ||
=== mGraf is now known as revagomes | ||
=== revagomes is now known as mGraf | ||
=== sebas5384 is now known as _sEBAs_ | ||
=== mGraf is now known as revagomes | ||
=== revagomes is now known as xauz | ||
=== xauz is now known as revagomes | ||
=== _sEBAs_ is now known as sebas5384 | ||
=== sebas5384 is now known as _sEBAs_ | ||
=== _sEBAs_ is now known as sebas5384 | ||
=== CyberJacob|Away is now known as CyberJacob | ||
=== vladk|offline is now known as vladk | ||
=== vladk is now known as vladk|offline | ||
=== CyberJacob is now known as CyberJacob|Away | ||
_mup_ | Bug #1320135 was filed: No way to configure the archive mirror <pyjuju:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1320135> | 08:21 |
=== ev_ is now known as ev | ||
=== vladk|offline is now known as vladk | ||
zchander | Anyone around who can help me a little with a local devel version of a charm which isn’t picked up by juju (??) | 09:16 |
davecheney | zchander: i can (try to ) help | 09:36 |
zchander | davecheney: The problem I got, is that any changes I make to my (devel) local config.yaml isn’t picked up when I deploy the charm (using the command juju deploy --repository=/home/madmin/charms/devel local:owncloud --to=6) | 09:55 |
zchander | I just got a reply through the list. Seems the problem was/is with the versions I got in my repo (both named owncloud in the metadata.yaml). I am testing this now | 10:02 |
zchander | It seems that was the problem…. | 10:02 |
zchander | But the test/deploy is still running | 10:02 |
marcoceppi | zchander: that is probably the problem. Juju should throw an ambiguous error when more than one version of the charm is loaded via metadata.yaml | 11:29 |
zchander | Got it working….. The reason I mentioned before (two different versions of the same charm, though different named (folder)) | 11:30 |
zchander | Also got the Ceph relation working again, including MySQL ;) | 11:30 |
* zchander is going to get some teachers happy | 11:30 | |
marcoceppi | \o/ | 11:36 |
zchander | marcoceppi: Is any information available to format e.g. metadata.yaml and config.yaml? I am trying to tidy the docs… | 12:06 |
marcoceppi | zchander: what do you mean to format? | 12:06 |
zchander | marcoceppi: I want to add some newlines, but it won’t render properly…. | 12:27 |
marcoceppi | zchander: can you paste what you've got? | 12:34 |
zchander | http://paste.ubuntu.com/7472808/ | 12:36 |
zchander | Also for the config.yaml, I would like to make proper formatted descriptions | 12:37 |
lazyPower | hmm... seems a bit over the top being placed in the description like that. | 12:41 |
zchander | lazyPower: I know…. ;) But it is for my own testing (and this way I get to know the proper way to create the documentation) | 12:46 |
lazyPower | zchander: something like that is better served in the README. The description is more for the front facing display in the charm store. | 12:46 |
zchander | I’ll put it in the README. | 12:54 |
zchander | What is a charm with a proper metadata I can refer to? | 12:54 |
lazyPower | zchander: Postgres | 13:03 |
lazyPower | its got a really well formed charm structure, metadata, etc. | 13:04 |
zchander | I’ll have a look at it, tonight | 13:07 |
jcastro | lazyPower, aws-specific things are ok in charms, we prefer they be labelled clearly | 13:17 |
jcastro | so like "aws-loadbalancer" for example would be ok | 13:18 |
lazyPower | jcastro: thing is, its a voilation of the tenants of the charm store. so its not "ok" in the charm store's current guidelines. | 13:18 |
jcastro | what we don't want is something that claims to be generic to have cloud specific bits, so like "haproxy" | 13:18 |
=== ted is now known as tedg | ||
lazyPower | and this is very much cloud specific to aws, openstack - as it won't work on azure / maas | 13:18 |
jcastro | it's a should | 13:18 |
jcastro | not a must | 13:18 |
lazyPower | hmmm | 13:19 |
jcastro | charms "should make use of apparmor" too, but we don't reject if they don't | 13:19 |
lazyPower | marcoceppi: i followed your lead here, i need backup. am I being too picky? | 13:19 |
jcastro | we should certainly clear it up | 13:19 |
lazyPower | jcastro: i'm not opposed to the idea that i'm making a mistake, but i'd like clarification on if i'm nacking a charm that would otherwise be included but lower ratings because of it. | 13:20 |
jcastro | yeah | 13:21 |
marcoceppi | lazyPower: tldr? | 13:21 |
lazyPower | marcoceppi: charm uses aws/openstack metadata ip hard coded in teh charm | 13:21 |
jcastro | marcoceppi, cloud specific charm features | 13:21 |
lazyPower | i nacked it | 13:21 |
lazyPower | is it ok to ack with lowr rating, or nack it and say "fix it"? | 13:21 |
jcastro | https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1259630 | 13:22 |
_mup_ | Bug #1259630: add storage subordinate charm <landscape> <Juju Charms Collection:Incomplete by davidpbritton> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1259630> | 13:22 |
jcastro | I only noticed because I saw Kapil's comment scroll by | 13:22 |
lazyPower | jcastro: the problem I have with acking provider specific charms is its not really apparent that this charm would only work on those 2 substrates. so some guy deploys this on his private maas cloud, and assumes this setup will work | 13:23 |
marcoceppi | lazyPower: well, that fails charm proof | 13:23 |
lazyPower | marcoceppi: beg pardon? all i get is I fails stop/start hook | 13:23 |
jcastro | lazyPower, right, so in this case I think it's a naming issue | 13:24 |
lazyPower | which si safe to ignore, but it's also got this hoks.d thing | 13:24 |
lazyPower | er storageprovider.d | 13:24 |
jcastro | so like, this is really "s3-storage", not "storage" | 13:24 |
* marcoceppi remembers why he punted on this review now | 13:24 | |
marcoceppi | jcastro: not even, more like aws|openstack-block-storage | 13:25 |
lazyPower | jcastro: ^ | 13:25 |
jcastro | sure | 13:25 |
lazyPower | i was just typing that out. | 13:25 |
jcastro | either way, it's not generic "storage" at this time | 13:25 |
marcoceppi | jcastro: right, the only way to do that is in core | 13:25 |
marcoceppi | and that's, as Kapil mentioned, months away | 13:25 |
marcoceppi | lazyPower: well, charm testing will reveal that this doesn't work on X Y and Z cloud | 13:25 |
jcastro | right | 13:25 |
marcoceppi | if that was hooked up to the charm store | 13:25 |
jcastro | I think if we describe it properly, people will realize that | 13:26 |
marcoceppi | if the readme doesn't CLEARLY call out that it only works on X clouds, that's the only issue | 13:26 |
jcastro | right | 13:26 |
jcastro | Generic storage charm subordinate. Intended to aid in making charms | 13:26 |
jcastro | easier to interface with external storage solutions without having | 13:26 |
jcastro | to speak and understand each type. Presents a single mount point on | 13:26 |
jcastro | the unit, and communicates that back to your service through the data | 13:26 |
jcastro | relation. | 13:26 |
marcoceppi | I think "cloud-storage" might be a more apt name | 13:26 |
marcoceppi | as maas and local aren't a real cloud, though that does cut azure out | 13:26 |
jcastro | right, with clear limitations described in the description and readme | 13:26 |
marcoceppi | storage, I agree, is too all encompasing, unless then plan on adding azure, joyent, etc in future releases of the charm | 13:27 |
jcastro | yep | 13:27 |
marcoceppi | actually, maybe storage is okay | 13:27 |
* marcoceppi reviews the charm | 13:27 | |
jcastro | if you read that description I just pasted it makes it sound all encompassing | 13:27 |
marcoceppi | jcastro: right, so it has this storagebroker.d directory in hooks, that allows you to select different broker methods | 13:28 |
jcastro | should be something like "This subordinate charm uses the AWS metadata server, which currently is supported by X, Y, and Z. Local and A,B,C are currently not support" | 13:28 |
marcoceppi | there's a block-storage-broker, which is the aws/openstaack stuff. then local and nfs | 13:28 |
marcoceppi | which would work in a cloud agnostic environment | 13:29 |
jcastro | what does it default to? | 13:29 |
marcoceppi | I'm inclined to recind some of what I said earlier, this is an interesting attempt at making a plugin based charm | 13:29 |
marcoceppi | local | 13:29 |
* marcoceppi goes to find what the heck that means | 13:30 | |
lazyPower | well thing is | 13:30 |
jcastro | hey so out of the box it'll work on every substrate? | 13:30 |
lazyPower | the storage broker is whats supposed to be doing the communication with the aws storage services | 13:30 |
marcoceppi | asciishrug.tiff | 13:30 |
lazyPower | teh rest of that data comes in over the wire | 13:30 |
lazyPower | i'm wondering if the storage sub didn't get the update | 13:30 |
marcoceppi | lazyPower jcastro I'd nack this soley on the fact they don't seem to document each of the providers | 13:30 |
marcoceppi | a charm this monumental in undertaking needs more than 53 lines of readme | 13:31 |
marcoceppi | I'm 5 mins in to poking and I still can't figure out what's going on | 13:31 |
jcastro | marcoceppi, I'm not forming an opinion on the charm itself, doing a normal review of that is fine | 13:31 |
jcastro | I think we should just clarify what we mean by cloud-specific features in policy | 13:31 |
marcoceppi | I thought this was a nack or ack | 13:31 |
marcoceppi | jcastro: ah | 13:31 |
marcoceppi | well, we currently don't have any cloud-specific charms in the store | 13:31 |
marcoceppi | all of Kapil's AWS specific stuff is still personal namespaced | 13:32 |
jcastro | sure | 13:32 |
marcoceppi | so there's not precedence for this yet | 13:32 |
jcastro | so like, I think they should be fine, as long as it's obvious | 13:32 |
marcoceppi | and we'd be potentially making one with this charm | 13:32 |
jcastro | so if I do "aws-blueshift-workload-thing", that should be fine | 13:32 |
marcoceppi | I'm inclined to agree, esp. with testing being the true revealer of "does this work on X substrate" | 13:32 |
jcastro | right | 13:32 |
marcoceppi | <cloud>-name works great when it's for one cloud | 13:33 |
marcoceppi | this is potentially n clouds where n is < substrates | 13:33 |
jcastro | ok, I'll propose to list. | 13:33 |
marcoceppi | jcastro: yeah, lets move the discussion there | 13:33 |
jcastro | the policy bullet is somewhat ambiguous | 13:33 |
lazyPower | i put it in the review | 13:34 |
jcastro | lazyPower, I'll also post the new trusty vagrant juju boxes | 13:34 |
lazyPower | teh verbatim bullet | 13:34 |
jcastro | but let's stick to precise for today | 13:34 |
lazyPower | jcastro: did those get pushed? | 13:34 |
lazyPower | awesome! | 13:34 |
jcastro | yeah yesterday | 13:35 |
lazyPower | i have the precise box up right now | 13:35 |
lazyPower | i'm going to release a github repo with the workflow items in it for people to clone and quickstart | 13:35 |
jcastro | lazyPower, link to my mailing list post for your review | 13:35 |
lazyPower | ack | 13:35 |
lazyPower | oh nice you mailed the list about it yesterday. hi5 jcastro | 13:38 |
sebas5384 | good morning :) | 13:43 |
jcastro | hmm | 13:43 |
lazyPower | Morning sebas5384 | 13:43 |
jcastro | marcoceppi, any idea why https://code.launchpad.net/~jose/charms/precise/owncloud/port-change+repo+ssl-support/+merge/215527 is not in the review queue? | 13:43 |
sebas5384 | ben is working in the vagrant box for juju with trusty | 13:44 |
lazyPower | jcastro: its listed as needs fixing by mbruzek | 13:44 |
marcoceppi | jcastro: it's not assigned to charmers | 13:44 |
lazyPower | if it needs to be in the rev q, it needs the "request a review" button clicked | 13:44 |
sebas5384 | someone knows if there is a repository of the vagrantfile? | 13:44 |
jcastro | marcoceppi, oh I see, charmers is merely subscribed | 13:44 |
jcastro | that kind of sucks doesn't it? | 13:44 |
marcoceppi | jcastro: mbruzek gave the wrong canned message for the re-review | 13:44 |
sebas5384 | because I have one, and i would like to help :) | 13:44 |
marcoceppi | jcastro: yes | 13:44 |
jcastro | sebas5384, you want to talk to lazyPower | 13:45 |
sebas5384 | nice! | 13:45 |
jcastro | sebas5384, I was just about to post the address to the trusty boxes | 13:45 |
lazyPower | sebas5384: the vagrantfile is very barebones. the vagrant image itself has a cloudinit package that sets up the environment. | 13:45 |
mbruzek | marcoceppi, Did I? we talking about the owncloud charm? | 13:45 |
jcastro | yeah owncloud ssl | 13:45 |
mbruzek | marcoceppi, I see now, sorry about that | 13:46 |
mbruzek | marcoceppi, So if a MP has tests and they don't pass it is OK to ack it? | 13:47 |
jcastro | we should shove them in juju/vagrant on github or something | 13:47 |
sebas5384 | lazyPower: today the box use an externals python scripts | 13:47 |
sebas5384 | having to install bzr and cloning some scripts | 13:47 |
marcoceppi | mbruzek: only if the tests failed before the mp | 13:48 |
jcastro | mbruzek, he updated the branches after from what I can see | 13:48 |
mbruzek | ack | 13:48 |
jcastro | no idea if it passes tests now though | 13:48 |
jcastro | because marco hasn't fixed the world yet. | 13:48 |
jcastro | come on marco, I want test results on the internet! | 13:48 |
sebas5384 | lazyPower: so that means there is code from other places being used into the box, and that difficult the collaboration :) | 13:49 |
lazyPower | sebas5384: you're hitting me at literally the first corner i've turned with this process. up until now, the vagrant building process has lived witho ur cpc team | 13:49 |
sebas5384 | lazyPower: but hey, it's just an ideia | 13:49 |
lazyPower | sebas5384: so i dont have an answer for you yet | 13:49 |
lazyPower | i'm gonna need you to calm down :P | 13:49 |
lazyPower | CURB YOUR ENTHUSIASM SEBAS!! | 13:49 |
lazyPower | and i'll follow up with you when i have a better picture of whats where and how i can expose this to community contributors | 13:50 |
marcoceppi | sebas5384: DON'T LISTEN TO LAZYPOWER, UNCURB THE ENTHUSIASM | 13:50 |
marcoceppi | :D | 13:50 |
lazyPower | marcoceppi: i'll push you :| | 13:50 |
sebas5384 | lazyPower: i don't understand what you mean, i'm not hiting you at all hehe | 13:50 |
jcastro | just push it somewhere dude | 13:50 |
jcastro | actually | 13:50 |
jcastro | let's do this | 13:50 |
lazyPower | i think you guys are missing what i'm saying | 13:50 |
jcastro | let's do that after the charm school | 13:50 |
lazyPower | and a) i'm already working on a github repo to go WITH the charm school today | 13:51 |
sebas5384 | lazyPower: calm down :) take a big breath :) | 13:51 |
lazyPower | b) the vagrant file doesn't control much at present, just which box to use | 13:51 |
jcastro | sebas5384, http://cloud-images.ubuntu.com/vagrant/trusty/current/ | 13:52 |
sebas5384 | jcastro: nice! | 13:52 |
jcastro | mbruzek, tedg is being a squeaky wheel wrt to ssl support, so if you've got time to review that that would be <3 | 13:53 |
* tedg squeaks | 13:53 | |
mbruzek | on it. | 13:53 |
tedg | mbruzek, Thank you! | 13:54 |
lazyPower | mbruzek: i rereleased tests, its close but still doesnt pass when being run through the test harness. | 13:54 |
lazyPower | and they have not been merged yet afaik | 13:54 |
mbruzek | lazyPower, They were your tests? | 13:55 |
lazyPower | mbruzek: according to the bzr history yes - and they passed at one point. | 13:56 |
lazyPower | which is why i started refactoring, because they do not pass now | 13:58 |
lazyPower | either the test infrastructure has changed, or we encountered a 'this shouldnt work but does' situation. | 13:58 |
jcastro | Incoming! https://github.com/juju/docs/pull/102 | 14:27 |
lazyPower | jcastro: 1 comment, otherwise LGTM | 14:29 |
jcastro | fixed and pushed | 14:29 |
mbruzek | jose are you out there | 14:30 |
marcoceppi | lazyPower: sorry man, sniped that merge | 14:30 |
=== vladk is now known as vladk|offline | ||
roadmr | you sniper, you | 14:39 |
dpb1 | lazyPower: hey, updated the storage readme. thanks for the review, let me know what you think. | 14:44 |
lazyPower | dpb1: pulling it up now, thanks for the quick turn around | 14:45 |
dpb1 | lazyPower: np! write back on the review, if you have more feedback. I'll be AFK for today. | 14:48 |
lazyPower | dpb1: ack. Should be good though. The hooks looked good when i looked through it, the big thing was the conversation that started with the metadata url | 14:48 |
lazyPower | dpb1: perfect. | 14:59 |
=== vladk|offline is now known as vladk | ||
=== vladk is now known as vladk|offline | ||
=== tedg is now known as ted | ||
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk | ||
sebas5384 | someone haves a guide of how to use ansible into a juju charm? | 17:18 |
sebas5384 | i sow that I need to download some tools for the charm to work | 17:19 |
sebas5384 | https://github.com/absoludity/charm-bootstrap-ansible | 17:19 |
whit | sebas5384, I used this charm as an example w/ ansible | 17:20 |
sebas5384 | whit: didn't know! what charm? | 17:20 |
whit | woops -> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~michael.nelson/charms/precise/elasticsearch/trunk/view/head:/hooks/hooks.py | 17:21 |
whit | sebas5384, charmhelpers grabs ansible and installs it on the remote machine | 17:21 |
whit | ala charmhelpers.contrib.ansible.install_ansible_support | 17:22 |
sebas5384 | whit: exactly! | 17:22 |
sebas5384 | so i have to install charm-tools before | 17:22 |
marcoceppi | sebas5384: charm-helpers needs to be embeded in the charm | 17:23 |
sebas5384 | whit: elasticsearch, sweet! | 17:23 |
marcoceppi | helpers and tools are two distinctly different things | 17:23 |
sebas5384 | gotcha marcoceppi, because helpers is things that helps the charm, and tools are for the charmer | 17:24 |
sebas5384 | or something like that hehe | 17:25 |
marcoceppi | sebas5384: exactly that | 17:25 |
marcoceppi | :D | 17:25 |
sebas5384 | :D | 17:25 |
sebas5384 | i'm starting to develop the drupal charm in ansible :) | 17:25 |
whit | ah nice | 17:25 |
sebas5384 | yeah! I loved ansible | 17:26 |
sebas5384 | and that would be to help me to prove a concept | 17:26 |
sebas5384 | then start develop the charm factory :) | 17:26 |
whit | sebas5384, ansible great for this sort of stuff because it's fairly conscise and makes idempotency easy | 17:27 |
sebas5384 | whit: exactly!! | 17:27 |
sebas5384 | and reusable role are great to extend a charm | 17:28 |
sebas5384 | but something I was thinking about | 17:28 |
sebas5384 | ops, im back :P | 17:47 |
sebas5384 | let say i have a drupal charm, and for now attends what the project needs | 17:47 |
sebas5384 | but | 17:47 |
sebas5384 | now we have a new library dependency, and other things like that | 17:47 |
sebas5384 | so now, i have to "clone" the charm and called "nameOfTheProject" | 17:48 |
sebas5384 | but thats not nice, because now i have duplicated code, etc... | 17:49 |
sebas5384 | and now i have to maintain 2 codes | 17:49 |
sebas5384 | so, thats why i'm going forward to the ansible, so then, i can just update the ansible role | 17:50 |
sebas5384 | marcoceppi: what do you say, whats your advice to that case? | 17:52 |
sebas5384 | when i need to "extend" a charm, to attend the project needs | 17:52 |
sebas5384 | :) | 17:52 |
marcoceppi | sebas5384: you can use a subordinate charm | 17:53 |
sebas5384 | marcoceppi: so i would have a subordinate charm called with the name of the project, something like that? | 17:55 |
marcoceppi | sebas5384: well you can have a "drupal-project" subordinate, that would just install the themes, plugins, files, etc in the right place, create it's own apache configuration, etc | 17:55 |
sebas5384 | hummm | 17:56 |
sebas5384 | marcoceppi: interesting | 17:56 |
sebas5384 | but I have to deploy it --to the same machine, or subordinated charms executes all into the related charm? | 17:57 |
sebas5384 | https://juju.ubuntu.com/docs/authors-subordinate-services.html reading... | 17:58 |
marcoceppi | sebas5384: subordinates don't use --to, they only exist to co-exist on a service | 17:59 |
sebas5384 | oohhh | 18:00 |
sebas5384 | marcoceppi: gotcha | 18:00 |
sebas5384 | marcoceppi: thanks! I will look at it :) | 18:01 |
=== CyberJacob|Away is now known as CyberJacob | ||
=== roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr | ||
=== vladk|offline is now known as vladk | ||
cff | "Juju Charm School Vagrant Workflow" starting in 10 minutes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLNPn2rQynM | 18:49 |
=== cff is now known as CodePulsar | ||
jcastro | jose, ping | 18:51 |
=== revagomes is now known as mGraf | ||
=== mGraf is now known as revagomes | ||
sebas5384 | yeahh!! \o/ | 18:56 |
jcastro | 3 minute warning! | 18:57 |
jcastro | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLNPn2rQynM | 18:57 |
marcoceppi | CHARM SCHOOL! TUBULAR! | 19:03 |
jose | jcastro what's up | 19:04 |
jcastro | nm I figured it out! | 19:05 |
jose | np | 19:05 |
cory_fu | Did the video stop for anyone else? | 19:05 |
tvansteenburgh | no | 19:05 |
marcoceppi | cory_fu: not i | 19:05 |
cory_fu | nm, back | 19:05 |
sysdrum | seems fine for me | 19:05 |
tvansteenburgh | i called youtube and asked them to stop it for cory_fu only | 19:05 |
cory_fu | Also, is there any way in ubuntu to keep a video full screen on one monitor while typing in the second monitor? | 19:05 |
CodePulsar | :-) | 19:06 |
cory_fu | tvansteenburgh: Jerk. :) | 19:06 |
CodePulsar | cory_fu: yes, there should be a way | 19:06 |
jose | sorry I couldnt help, I'm still trapped at university | 19:06 |
marcoceppi | lazyPower: it'd be cool if vagrant init just did that for you, re box_url | 19:07 |
sysdrum | is it working like docker? | 19:09 |
marcoceppi | sysdrum: similar, vagrant uses different backends (VirtualBox, kvm, vmware) so it's not limited to just linux since docker seems to be only LXC | 19:10 |
jcastro | https://github.com/chuckbutler/juju-vagrant-charmschool | 19:11 |
sebas5384 | yeah i'm waiting, default: Warning: Connection timeout. Retrying... | 19:11 |
tvansteenburgh | jcastro: question: does it take this long to boot the vm everytime I do 'vagrant up' or just the first time it's provisioned? | 19:12 |
sebas5384 | tvansteenburgh: no, thats only the first time | 19:13 |
sebas5384 | tvansteenburgh: after that you can use just 'vagrant suspend' for example | 19:14 |
sebas5384 | but, here, gives me a timeout exceeded to boot | 19:14 |
sebas5384 | so im going to try again | 19:14 |
jcastro | mine took a bit Retrying with the remote connection | 19:16 |
jcastro | but eventually continued | 19:16 |
marcoceppi | lazyPower: mediawiki is spelled wrong | 19:17 |
sysdrum | QUESTION: Would I be able to manage it from a remote windows clients if I spin it up on another windows host? | 19:20 |
jcastro | http://www.vagrantup.com/blog/feature-preview-vagrant-1-5-share.html | 19:29 |
sysdrum | Do I have the ability to bridge the network? under VBox? | 19:30 |
marcoceppi | \o/ thanks jcastro and lazyPower! | 19:33 |
=== roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk | ||
sysdrum | was about to ask that. | 19:36 |
sebas538_ | sweet!! jcastro and lazyPower :) | 19:38 |
sebas538_ | jcastro: i remember that before these new vbox they where failing to connect after halting the vbox | 19:41 |
sebas538_ | so i assume this was fixed? | 19:41 |
=== sebas538_ is now known as sebas5384 | ||
sebas5384 | thanks!! \o/ | 19:42 |
sysdrum | Thanks for answering my questions. | 19:43 |
lazyPower | sebas5384: yeah that's fixed last i checked. | 19:43 |
lazyPower | sebas5384: if you have any further issues with it make sure you open a bug against it or ping me and i'll do the due dilligence | 19:43 |
sebas5384 | lazyPower: ohh great! nice work men :) | 19:43 |
sebas5384 | *man | 19:43 |
lazyPower | o/ | 19:44 |
sebas5384 | thanks! | 19:44 |
tvansteenburgh | lazyPower, jacstro: good stuff, thanks guys! | 19:46 |
tvansteenburgh | jcastro even | 19:46 |
jcastro | omg | 19:46 |
jcastro | hey guys | 19:46 |
jcastro | http://itty-bitty-cat-4232.vagrantshare.com/ | 19:46 |
jcastro | `vagrant share` is totally awesome | 19:47 |
jcastro | I did that, logged into vagrantcloud via the CLI | 19:47 |
jcastro | and then it generated that URL | 19:47 |
sebas5384 | yeah! was introduced in the new version | 19:48 |
sebas5384 | its awesome! | 19:49 |
lazyPower | sebas5384: So wrt your questions this morning about the Vagrantfile and what not | 20:15 |
lazyPower | did that github repository give you what you were looking for? or was there more to that statement that we haven't covered? | 20:15 |
jose | mbruzek: lazypower is working on the tests | 20:24 |
mbruzek | jose yeah I talked with him on that. | 20:25 |
jose | cool :) | 20:25 |
jose | also, I meant to set 443, 443 is https | 20:25 |
lazyPower | jose: what i've pushed is where the tests are. | 20:25 |
lazyPower | i dont have any additional cycles to devote to those atm | 20:25 |
jose | lazyPower: so tests are done for now? | 20:26 |
lazyPower | jose: whats there is what i got mang. :| they work when being run direct but fail when run via charm test | 20:26 |
mbruzek | jose, lazyPower: Since the tests did not run before the MP I can't nack it for that. | 20:26 |
jose | mbruzek: so we need my branch merged and subsequently Charles' branch | 20:26 |
mbruzek | The owncloud needs a small fix that I found, I did not rejet on the tests. | 20:26 |
jose | it's stacked on mine afaik | 20:27 |
mbruzek | jose, did you fix the 80 problem? | 20:27 |
jose | I am branching to fix it now | 20:27 |
jose | literally *just* turned on my PC :) | 20:27 |
lazyPower | mbruzek: jose - https://code.launchpad.net/~lazypower/charms/precise/owncloud/refactor_amulet_tests | 20:28 |
lazyPower | jose: i can propose this for merging into your branch and you can pick up teh torch from there | 20:28 |
lazyPower | sound good? | 20:28 |
jose | lazyPower: sounds good to me, thank you | 20:28 |
lazyPower | np - sorry i dont have a 100% golden package for you, my week kind of blew up, and next week is looking just as hectic | 20:29 |
jose | it's good :) | 20:29 |
lazyPower | https://code.launchpad.net/~lazypower/charms/precise/owncloud/refactor_amulet_tests/+merge/219903 | 20:30 |
jose | ack, thanks! | 20:32 |
=== roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr | ||
=== vladk is now known as vladk|offline | ||
=== CyberJacob is now known as CyberJacob|Away |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!