[11:26] <cjwatson> cprov: Should bug 1319124 be qa-ok again (since it was previously, but you set that before qastaging caught up) so that we can deploy?
[11:26] <_mup_> Bug #1319124: UnicodeDecodeError mailing an inline code review comment <code-review> <fallout> <oops> <qa-needstesting> <Launchpad itself:Fix Committed by wgrant> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1319124>
[11:34] <wgrant> It's not currently possible to QA due to the incomplete staging move, so we might just have to skip it.
[11:35] <cjwatson> wgrant: cprov QAed it some other way before it hit qastaging, I think, maybe on DF
[11:36] <wgrant> DF doesn't have codehosting
[11:37] <cjwatson> Hm, don't know then
[12:45] <cprov> cjwatson: I was cheating the system in search for sense on the QA page. Haven't really QAed it.
[12:46] <cprov> wgrant: uhm, you say our only chance to deploy today is to skip QA ? What about staging ?
[13:01] <wgrant> cprov: staging might work, I forget how broken it all is.
[13:01] <wgrant> I just restarted all the firewall rules pretty much from scratch, but they won't land until at least tomorrow.
[13:08] <cprov> wgrant: can we wait or shall we deploy it, and since the audience is limited, do QA in production (if it makes any sense) ?
[13:12] <wgrant> cprov: How about we deploy up to the rev before that, and I'll try to get the firewalls properly fixed in the morning?
[13:14] <cprov> wgrant: 17009 to be qaed in prod. It works for me.
[13:15] <cprov> if there is something broken, we will be blocked again on qastaging
[13:15] <cprov> but that's fine.
[13:15] <wgrant> Yeah
[13:15] <wgrant> I've vaguely tested it locally, at leas.t
[13:15] <wgrant> And it seems pretty safe.
[13:15] <wgrant> qa-untestable and deploy away, I guess.
[13:18] <wgrant> cprov: Can you arrange that?
[13:20] <cprov> sure, will update the RT
[13:57] <wgrant__> cprov, cjohnston: i have no Internet now, apparently, so i guess I'll see if we can talk in my morning.
[13:58] <cjohnston> wgrant__: sounds good..
[13:58] <cprov> wgrant__: np
[13:58] <wgrant__> Could one of you possibly have a look at the remaining CSS issues in my latest branch? I had other things to do today
[13:58] <cjohnston> ack
[13:59] <wgrant__> Apart from being generally bad, i think the main issue is the width problem when the inline editor is open
[13:59] <wgrant__> If not, I'll investigate tomorrow
[14:01] <wgrant__> Otherwise, if you could just take some of the remaining inline comments tasks and try to sort them out
[14:01] <wgrant__> cprov: did you request a deployment?
[14:01] <cprov> wgrant__: updated the ticket, https://rt.admin.canonical.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=70321
[14:01] <cprov> wgrant__: let me point a vanguard on it
[14:02] <wgrant__> Thanks
[14:03] <wgrant__> I'll prefer not to deploy tomorrow, as we're upgrading to postgres 9.3 at 06:00, and i want to be able to isolate any fallout from that
[14:14] <wgrant__> I'm heading off now, Hangout or SMS me if something comes up.
[21:58] <wgrant> cprov, cjohnston: I apparently have Internet now. Can we have a call at some point in the next few hours? If not, normal time tomorrow?
[21:59] <cjohnston> I'm good whenever
[21:59] <cprov> wgrant: now(ish) would be a great time, after dinner I have a babysitting shift :-/
[22:01] <wgrant> cjohnston: I'm in a meeting atm
[22:01] <wgrant> But in half an hour, I guess?
[22:01] <cjohnston> works for me.. cprov ^
[22:02] <cprov> I can try, will grab a quick dinner meanwhile
[22:02] <cprov> any minute counts here ;-)
[22:06]  * cjohnston did his first MP review today ;-) heh
[22:11] <cjohnston> wgrant: need some wordsmithing...
[22:12] <cjohnston> The link below the diff.. what should the text read
[22:32] <wgrant> cprov, cjohnston: I'm in the normal hangout, when you're ready
[22:40] <cjohnston> wgrant: https://code.launchpad.net/~cjohnston/launchpad/publish-ic-link/+merge/220103