[07:54] <ogra_> there is a regression in libsoup that keeps network-manager from passing autopkgtests (via friends), could some archive admin please override that so that network-manager can go in ... we urgently wait for the included fix for touch images
[08:32] <cjwatson> ogra_: done
[08:33] <ogra_> yep, thanks, seen
[08:33] <cjwatson> well, you asked in multiple channels, so you get replies in multiple channels for the benefit of anyone else who might otherwise go to take action on it :)
[08:35] <ogra_> yeah, well, i asked generically here in case you are off today :)
[08:45] <Laney> I think I've fixed friends too
[08:45] <Laney> new libsoup added more annotations to some functions
[08:46] <ogra_> nice !
[08:49] <Laney> so vala could now infer the length and knows what type the array should have
[08:49] <Laney> (bytes)
[10:43] <darkxst> infinity, remember we demoted cinnamon a while ago?, well muffin probably needs the same treatment!
[17:26] <rtg> can I get some binaries for intel-gpu-tools NEW'ed ?
[19:28] <bdmurray> infinity had mentioned making quantal unsupported in LP (after something?) but it hasn't happened yet, is that something still holding it up?
[20:18] <slangasek> bdmurray: is this just about flipping the switch in LP?
[20:21] <slangasek> bdmurray: I don't know of any reason we couldn't mark it unsupported, but I see that I don't have access to do this in LP
[20:25] <bdmurray> slangasek: ah, infinity had mentioned flipping the switch after the last kernel goes in
[20:25] <slangasek> ah, right
[20:25] <bdmurray> is that done?
[20:25] <slangasek> I know there were some delays due to regressions being found
[20:25] <slangasek> and it looks like we still have a kernel in quantal-proposed
[20:26] <bdmurray> ah, okay its not a huge deal. someone had just nominated a bug for quantal.
[20:32] <ScottK> slangasek: I seem to recall infinity saying he wanted the kernel in updates as one final gesture before stuff got archived.
[20:32] <ScottK> oh.  bdmurray  said that already.
[21:32] <superm1> ScottK: you released one of the packages for bug  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1290460 but not the other
[21:32] <superm1> can you release the second one too?
[21:32] <ScottK> superm1: It wasn't marked verified.
[21:32] <ScottK> I can if it is.
[21:33] <superm1> i thought https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1290460/comments/18 indicated it was confirmed
[21:34] <superm1> but maybe i'm mistaken, tgm4883 ^
[21:35] <superm1> yeah between that and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1290460/comments/16 it sounds like both together positive test
[21:38] <ScottK> OK.
[21:40] <ScottK> superm1: Done.
[21:40] <superm1> thanks
[21:41] <superm1> can you copy binaries forward to utopic for both too?
[21:41] <superm1> or do we need to redo the upload for utopic?
[22:20] <ScottK> superm1: better to just upload. I'm away from my computer and can't do it now.
[23:47] <infinity> bdmurray: Yeah, we should be denying all Q SRUs.  It's just that kernel I'm waiting on, since the work's already been done anyway.
[23:49] <bdmurray> infinity: it was a bug task nomination not an SRU
[23:51] <infinity> bdmurray: Tomayto, tomahto.