OvenWerks | zequence_: looking into /etc/xdg/autostart/ for maybe starting jackd at session start and I notice that most of the autostarts are in the directory already listed. | 05:01 |
---|---|---|
OvenWerks | but there is one file in /etc/xdg/xdg-ubuntustudio/autostart/ | 05:01 |
OvenWerks | xfce4-tips-autostart.desktop | 05:02 |
OvenWerks | Is there a reason this is not with the others? does it actually do something unique to studio? | 05:03 |
OvenWerks | I am thinking it could be moved in with the rest for easier maint. | 05:04 |
OvenWerks | It looks like it is a remnant from basing studio on xubuntu in 11.10 | 05:05 |
OvenWerks | good night | 05:05 |
zequence_ | OvenWerks: Yes, it must have been there since the start. | 06:02 |
zequence_ | OvenWerks: I don't think autostarting jack should be done in a permanent fashion. It needs to be settable. -controls would have a autostart script, which would read through the user settings file to look for certain things, like: 1. is -controls set to autostart? 2. is jack set to autostart?, etc.. | 06:04 |
ttoine | zequence_, hello | 12:34 |
ttoine | are you hre ? | 12:34 |
ttoine | here | 12:34 |
zequence_ | ttoine: Hi | 12:47 |
=== zequence_ is now known as zequence | ||
zequence | ttoine: I'll be away for a moment, but I'm logging, so I can read later. | 12:56 |
ttoine | zequence, ok | 13:10 |
zequence | ttoine: I'm back | 13:20 |
ttoine | zequence, great | 13:27 |
ttoine | just a word about the footer of the ubuntustudio.org | 13:27 |
ttoine | I get another inquiry of Canonical legal staff: they would like us to add the same modification that I add to do for the merchandise | 13:28 |
ttoine | it means telling that we are not affiliated with Canoncial | 13:28 |
ttoine | I think they are gonna unsupport us in a very few time | 13:28 |
zequence | ttoine: You mean, for the website, or just for the merchandise page? | 13:30 |
ttoine | for the merchandise I already did it, both at the bottom the merchandise page of ubuntustudio.org, and the spreadshirt shop | 13:31 |
ttoine | however they want us to edit the footer | 13:31 |
ttoine | I can't do that with my account... | 13:31 |
zequence | ttoine: Ah, that needs to be done for the wp theme | 13:32 |
ttoine | yes, sure | 13:33 |
zequence | ttoine: Let me do that tomorrow. We can't upload changes ourselves. Done by Canonical sysadmins | 13:33 |
ttoine | ok | 13:33 |
ttoine | there is no urgency | 13:33 |
ttoine | you can use the same modification that I did | 13:34 |
cub | hi ttoine | 14:53 |
cub | I read the logs and you wrote earlier "I think they are gonna unsupport us in a very few time" about the footer and "not affiliated with Canonical" | 14:53 |
cub | Could you elaborate a bit? You think Canonical will stop providing like web hosting or you think Ubuntu Studio might be excluded as a official distribution of the Ubuntu family? | 14:54 |
ttoine | cub hi | 14:55 |
ttoine | I think, yes | 14:55 |
ttoine | because for a few weeks, they are asking me to mark more on our websites that we are not affiliated with Ubuntu and Canonical | 14:56 |
cub | yes on both questions or? :D | 14:56 |
cub | aha even with Ubuntu? | 14:56 |
ttoine | we might be excluded of the official distribution | 14:56 |
ttoine | for the rest, I don"t know | 14:56 |
ttoine | or maybe this is just a new legal guy at Canonical that wants to make stuff clear | 14:56 |
ttoine | strange | 14:56 |
elfy | I would have thought that they'd need to talk to 'you' before they did that | 14:57 |
cub | because the footer on spreadshirt only say Canonical | 14:57 |
elfy | and I would double check with this legal - wouldn't be the first hiccup from someone new in 'legal' | 14:57 |
cub | Otherwise I would reach out to Jono quick before he leaves. :P | 14:59 |
cub | I understand if they want to say Ubuntu Studio is not affiliated with Canonical, that makes sense. But not affiliated with Ubuntu, that would propose some questions | 15:00 |
zequence | I don't believe for a second they would stop letting us be an official distro | 15:01 |
zequence | Makes sense that they want to make clear that we are not affiliated with Canonical | 15:02 |
zequence | We should probably make that even clearer in our info pages | 15:02 |
elfy | zequence: I'd agree - I'm sure this is a hiccup in legal - I would really get some clarification on this | 15:02 |
elfy | ^^ said with my other hat on | 15:02 |
zequence | elfy: I added you to the ubuntustudio-release team just now | 15:03 |
elfy | aah okey doke - I'll see if I can poke about in the innards of the trackers then | 15:03 |
zequence | Time for a beer in the sun with my lady :) | 15:04 |
cub | nice | 15:04 |
cub | summer in Gothenburg as well? | 15:04 |
zequence | yep | 15:04 |
cub | Stockholm too, but I'm stuck inside the office. :P | 15:05 |
zequence | Actually, I need to wait another hour :( | 15:05 |
cub | Gotta go back to the work stuff. :/ | 15:07 |
elfy | zequence: don't drink too much alone :p | 15:07 |
elfy | ttoine: not sure if you read my comment above about double checking what they're after you doing and why | 15:07 |
zequence | elfy: It's too for that. But, I might go a little realier | 15:18 |
zequence | earlier* | 15:18 |
elfy | I guessed :) | 15:19 |
ttoine | hum | 15:19 |
zequence | I meant to say too hot. | 15:20 |
ttoine | zequence, kubuntu developers are not anymore supported by Canonical | 15:20 |
ttoine | and if you look at their website, they are highlighting Server and Cloud edition | 15:20 |
ttoine | Desktop edition come third | 15:20 |
zequence | That doesn't mean they are shutting down the whole community | 15:21 |
elfy | kubuntu is a different situation | 15:22 |
zequence | I suppose Kubuntu has another history, back in the time when Gnome and KDE were the main competitors. Canonical maintained Gnome, while Kubuntu maintained KDE. | 15:23 |
zequence | With Unity, things have changed. And Canonical is also relying less on the community. | 15:24 |
zequence | Well, at least not in the same old way | 15:24 |
ttoine | wait and see | 16:08 |
OvenWerks | Any idea why our "make Startup Disk" App won't see mini.iso? | 21:17 |
zequence | OvenWerks: No idea. If you like, use dd: dd if=/path/to/iso of=/dev/sd* | 22:24 |
zequence | replace | 22:24 |
zequence | replace * with a letter, but not with the additional partition number | 22:25 |
zequence | It will wipe the whole usb device, but the ISO will only take the amount of space in one partition as it is big | 22:25 |
zequence | So, you end up with some additional space | 22:25 |
zequence | free space, that is | 22:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!