bigjools | mwhudson: did you manage to check my fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1307779 | 01:09 |
---|---|---|
bigjools | ? | 01:09 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1307779 in MAAS "fallback from specific to generic subarch broken" [Critical,Fix committed] | 01:09 |
mwhudson | bigjools: no | 01:09 |
mwhudson | i've more or less given up on armv7 :/ | 01:10 |
bigjools | mwhudson: well hopefully if it doesn't work now I can blame the simplestreams data :) | 01:10 |
bigjools | ah | 01:10 |
mwhudson | bigjools: do you want me to try? i can probably dig up the relevant details | 01:10 |
bigjools | well if it's important to you, sure | 01:10 |
bigjools | but not a big deal, I already checked the use case I was fixing | 01:10 |
mwhudson | ok | 01:11 |
mwhudson | i'll leave it for now then :) | 01:11 |
bigjools | no worries | 01:16 |
=== vladk|offline is now known as vladk | ||
=== CyberJacob|Away is now known as CyberJacob | ||
=== CyberJacob is now known as CyberJacob|Away | ||
rvba | allenap: arg, your new lease parser didn't make it into 1.5.1 :/ | 08:11 |
rvba | allenap: I think it would have made the DHCP bug less severe. | 08:12 |
allenap | rvba: How very annoying :-/ | 08:23 |
rvba | allenap: If we get good feedback from the field about that fix, I think it's worth pushing for a 1.5.2 release. The proper fix for the DHCP problem is going to take time and if the new parser alleviates the problem (and I think it does), it's worth releasing it. | 08:26 |
allenap | rvba: Is that something we talk to lutostag about? | 08:53 |
rvba | allenap: yeah, probably. | 08:54 |
rvba | Anyone up for a tiny review? https://code.launchpad.net/~rvb/maas/packaging.trusty-upstream-rev/+merge/220765 | 08:54 |
jtv | I'll take it. | 08:59 |
jtv | Being nasty to someone might cheer me up. | 08:59 |
gmb | Aah, to https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1322336 is basically because we do the keyring writing in the wrong place… damn. I’ll get on that now. | 09:04 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1322336 in MAAS "import_boot_images crashes with KeyError on 'keyring'" [Critical,In progress] | 09:04 |
jtv | allenap, remember that occasional lock-related startup failure? Any opinions on my guess as to the cause, i.e. ordering of decorators? | 09:06 |
allenap | jtv: I need to reread your analysis. Sorry I haven’t replied sooner. | 09:07 |
jtv | allenap: I can sum it up very briefly right now if that makes it easier to digest. | 09:12 |
allenap | jtv: Sure :) | 09:13 |
jtv | "One decorator makes the function synchronous, another makes it grab a lock; but the ordering suggests that this means 1. grab lock, then 2. run synchronously." | 09:13 |
jtv | And so maybe the reactor goes on to run other tests during 1. | 09:13 |
jtv | Or wait, I mis-stated that. | 09:14 |
jtv | Maybe the reactor _already was_ running another test. | 09:14 |
jtv | Or maybe it just arbitrarily chooses to yield sometimes even though the lock is available. | 09:14 |
jtv | And so the test continues without actually having run that 'synchronous' function. | 09:15 |
allenap | jtv: I think the already-running-another-test hypothesis is the most likely of those. | 09:17 |
jtv | Either way, I guess we just can't expect the _call to_ that function to run synchronously even if we do have a right to expect _the function_ to run synchronously. | 09:17 |
=== vladk is now known as vladk|offline | ||
rvba | jtv: thanks for the review. Sorry that branch was so tiny; you didn't have much room to unleash your reviewing wrath ;). | 10:25 |
jtv | Yeah. I'm all pent-up now. | 10:26 |
rvba | gmb: meanwhile, if you put your branch up for review, I'm happy to have a look at it while the test is running in the lab. | 10:32 |
gmb | rvba: Thanks. I’ll have the MP up presently. | 10:32 |
rvba | Cool. | 10:32 |
gmb | rvba: https://code.launchpad.net/~gmb/maas/bug-1322336/+merge/220783 | 10:35 |
rvba | gmb: on it | 10:35 |
gmb | Thanks. | 10:35 |
gmb | jtv: Did you get a response from Alexis re: LXC? | 10:39 |
jtv | gmb: she forwarded, and there was one reply saying "that's easy innit," and I said I'd like to know from a real-life example of a problematic setup. Nothing more. | 10:40 |
gmb | Ha. | 10:42 |
rvba | jtv: what's stopping us from deploying stuff on canonistack (with LXC) and testing the firewall ourselves? | 10:42 |
jtv | rvba: only the risk of not reproducing the real problem setup, as far as I know. | 10:43 |
=== vladk|offline is now known as vladk | ||
gmb | rvba: Thanks for the review. | 10:57 |
rvba | np | 10:57 |
* gmb -> out for an early lunch. | 10:57 | |
=== vladk is now known as vladk|offline | ||
=== vladk|offline is now known as vladk | ||
=== marlinc_ is now known as marlinc | ||
gmb | jtv, allenap, rvba: A review for someone, if you have a sec… all code-removal: https://code.launchpad.net/~gmb/maas/bug-1322606/+merge/220800 | 13:01 |
jtv | I'll take it. | 13:01 |
jtv | Ah, lovely conflicts coming. | 13:02 |
jtv | But I'll manage. | 13:02 |
jtv | Done. | 13:03 |
=== melmoth_ is now known as melmoth | ||
rvba | gmb: did you figure out what the problem was? With the import task I mean. | 14:01 |
=== vladk is now known as vladk|offline | ||
=== roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk | ||
=== roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr | ||
=== vladk|offline is now known as vladk | ||
=== CyberJacob|Away is now known as CyberJacob | ||
=== vladk is now known as vladk|offline | ||
designated | does MAAS support aggregating NICs for using LACP, and VLAN tagging yet? | 19:49 |
designated | i remember reading it in the blueprint last year sometime | 19:49 |
AskUbuntu | How we can define more than 2 DNS server (IP) in MAAS? | http://askubuntu.com/q/471302 | 23:44 |
=== CyberJacob is now known as CyberJacob|Away |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!