psusi | anyone know anything about g_udev_device_get_sysfs_attr? it seems to cache the attribute the first time it is read and never re-reads it | 02:48 |
---|---|---|
=== lisca is now known as but_why | ||
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
pitti | Good morning | 05:31 |
Logan_ | hey pitti | 05:32 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
Logan_ | quilt patches that delete files make me (and bar) sad | 05:37 |
Logan_ | *bzr | 05:37 |
mterry | stgraber, the lxc autopkgtests seem to be failing? | 05:39 |
stgraber | mterry: they sometimes do that but usually end up passing, if they're now all failing, that's because something somewhere regressed | 05:41 |
mterry | stgraber, I don't know about all failing. I just noticed it holding up a cgmanager update: http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html - looks like the unpriv tests failed? | 05:42 |
mterry | stgraber, if that's the sort of thing that might pass if retried, I can do tht | 05:42 |
stgraber | mterry: hmm, no, retrying won't help with that one, we apparently switched to 3.15 and we need some upstream fix for that. I'll cherry-pick and upload in a bit | 05:43 |
mterry | stgraber, oh cool, glad it's a known issue :) | 05:44 |
stgraber | mterry: yeah, the 3.15 kernel now prevents reading some files to non-root users... | 05:45 |
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
=== FJKong is now known as FJKong_afk | ||
infinity | @pilot in | 07:16 |
=== udevbot changed the topic of #ubuntu-devel to: Trusty Final released! | Archive: Open | Devel of Ubuntu (not support or app devel) | build failures -> http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/ftbfs/ | #ubuntu for support and discussion of lucid -> trusty | #ubuntu-app-devel for app development on Ubuntu http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment | See #ubuntu-bugs for http://bit.ly/lv8soi | Patch Pilots: infinity | ||
timchen119 | hi, I found lp:ubuntu/python-debian is not sync with lp:python-debian , anyone know how do I help? any wiki page describe this sync process? | 07:53 |
timchen119 | last commit in lp:python-debian is 2012-10-08, but it still not in Utopic. | 07:54 |
=== ted is now known as tedg | ||
zbenjamin | cjwatson: ping, is there any directory i can put a file that i can read from inside confinement? i get permission denied for /tmp | 08:27 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: hopefully this can help: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/Specifications/ApplicationConfinement/Manifest | 08:38 |
cjwatson | zbenjamin: yep, security team for confinement questions :) | 08:40 |
=== vrruiz_ is now known as rvr | ||
zbenjamin | sarnold: thx | 08:50 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: i'm working on debugging confined apps. What i need to do is run gdbserver inside a click package so i can connect to it | 08:56 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: I suspect the ptrace attach will fail; why not run gdb 'outside' the click package? | 08:58 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: how should i connect to the application running inside then? | 08:58 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: attaching is no option, it would make it impossible to debug the application startup | 08:58 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: that's a fine question. | 08:59 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: also we need a way to connect to the qmljs debugger which always runs inside the app and opens a port so the IDE can connect to it | 09:00 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: i guess we will need a debug policy that allows this stuff | 09:00 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: what kind of port? tcp would be currently unmediated, that ought to work fine today. | 09:01 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: i think its tcp | 09:02 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: thats basically the wrapper script that sets up the stuff inide the confinement : http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7519903/ | 09:02 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: ah, good. so that means qmljs ought to work .. | 09:02 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: thats how it fails: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7519911/ | 09:03 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: I think that script would work alright from outside confinement though | 09:04 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: yeah but i was told we want to debug our apps in confinement because we need to be as close as possible to the real environment a app gets | 09:05 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: yeah, I can understand that desire. I'm not sure how well it'll work though. | 09:06 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: so gdbserver will listen on a tcp port as well, the only thing that needs to be sorted out is the ptrace call you mentioned. Any idea how we can get there? | 09:07 |
zbenjamin | i'm actually not really sure if the failure i see is because of that, i get permission denied but the exception still happens in python. | 09:07 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: yeah, that's a simple denied for exec(gdbserver), they'll get worse and scarier once that execute is allowed. :) | 09:08 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: can i allow that call somehow? | 09:10 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: if you edit the generated apparmor policy (in /var/lib/apparmor/profiles/) and then install that updated policy, you can probably get there | 09:12 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: how about providing a debug policy ? The store would need to reject that of course | 09:13 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: you -might- get lucky if you add /usr/bin/gdbserver Ux, permissions to your policy | 09:13 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: yeah, that's a really good idea | 09:13 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: can you help me put one together? | 09:14 |
* zbenjamin <-- app armor noob | 09:14 | |
sarnold | zbenjamin: sure | 09:14 |
zbenjamin | for now we "only" need to execute gdbserver and be able to connect with tcp | 09:15 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: do you see a file in /var/lib/apparmor/profiles that cooresponds to your app? | 09:15 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: no the app is uninstalled after executing it :/ the adk-launcher script is doing that automatically but i can disable it for now | 09:15 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: oh nuts. well, okay... | 09:16 |
zbenjamin | now i have that file | 09:16 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: best would be if i could just add "debug" to my policy list | 09:18 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: sure, that's a nice end goal :) but won't happen today, hehe | 09:18 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: if you can stand a bit of hackery in the meantime, try adding "/usr/bin/gdbserver Ux," to the file and reload it with apparmor_parser --replace /path/to/file | 09:19 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: -- this step will need to re-executed after package install but before the application is started | 09:19 |
zbenjamin | the problem the script does not run as root since we connect with ssh | 09:20 |
zbenjamin | and we install to the local click database | 09:20 |
sarnold | ahhh. | 09:21 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: gdbserver starts now, the app does not seem to come up and the ide does not connect .. | 09:24 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: woo, nice, can you grep DENIED /var/log/syslog and pastebin those? (the pastebinit program can help here) | 09:26 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7520065/ | 09:27 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: but looking at the timestamps they are not related | 09:28 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: some of them, indeed -- we shold probably file a bug or two for that, too | 09:29 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: meh the time on the phone is not correct ;) | 09:31 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: so they are related | 09:31 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: the [ dddd ] bits ar enormally 'seconds after boot'.. | 09:32 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: i was able to connect from the gdb cli tool on the phone, but when i try to continue i get SIGTRAP'ed and then SIGABORT'ed | 09:32 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: did you get any new DENIED lines from that? | 09:32 |
zbenjamin | there are a few more http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7520085/ | 09:33 |
sarnold | jjohansen: is this one of those LSM calls that happens before the usual kernel security mechanisms? apparmor="DENIED" operation="mknod" ... name="/usr/lib/python3.4/__pycache__/shlex.cpython-34.pyc.3063768112" pid=5862 comm="qtc_device_debu" requested_mask="c" denied_mask="c" fsuid=32011 ouid=32011 | 09:37 |
jjohansen | sarnold: yes | 09:42 |
Laney | bdmurray: could you upload ubuntu-release-upgrader? | 09:48 |
Laney | release upgrades are crashing with the bug you fixed in https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-release-upgrader/trunk/revision/2808 | 09:49 |
bdmurray | Laney: will do | 09:50 |
Laney | thanks! | 09:50 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/click-apparmor/+bug/1323233 | 09:53 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1323233 in click-apparmor (Ubuntu) "debug policy group" [Undecided,New] | 09:53 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: fyi this is the debug script for the official ubuntu sdk ;) | 09:53 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: i'm part of the SDK team | 09:54 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: and this is part of RTM so we really need that | 09:54 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: because currently we use a bunch of hacks to provide debugging mechanism which fall apart every other day. We really need to replace this with something sane | 09:55 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: ah, I hadn't realized that was 'more official' :) | 09:55 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: yeah sorry i should have mentioned that ;) | 09:55 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: I just thought it was a nice script that'd been hacked together in desperation, hehe | 09:56 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: basically it is ;). I wrote it at the last week on the sprint. There is also the sdk launcher now that takes a click package as a argument and installs , executes and uninstalls after the application finishes running | 10:01 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: very nice | 10:02 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: i can confirm tcp connect works at least for the qmldebugger. Now we "just" need the c++ side ;) | 10:05 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: did you have to add anything to the apparmor policy to get the qmldebugger to work? | 10:06 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: i just added your gdbserver line | 10:07 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: was that necessary for the qmldebugger? | 10:08 |
zbenjamin | i can try to remove it | 10:08 |
bdmurray | pitti: libc6-dbg did not improve the crash files | 10:08 |
pitti | bdmurray: ah, too bad; so the badness is in gdb itself then :/ | 10:09 |
pitti | xnox: lp:~upstart-devel/upstart/upstart-jobs doesn't yet have the init scripts from your unreviewed branch, but I guess that's expected | 10:10 |
slangasek | bdmurray, pitti: are we sure about the integrity of the core files themselves? | 10:11 |
pitti | slangasek: certainly not "sure", but I can't believe that we really get stack corruption on pretty much all the crashes, while they mostly work on x86 | 10:12 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: ok the line is not required. But the connection is slow, but that comes from qtc its waiting for some output from the app which it can not get of course | 10:12 |
pitti | many that we looked at have two frames in libc (I suppose the usual "pass NULL pointer to string comparison" etc.), and then nothing else, just the "corrupted stack" error | 10:13 |
pitti | slangasek: ^ | 10:13 |
slangasek | pitti: have we tried native backtracing with gdb on armhf? | 10:13 |
slangasek | (to rule out whether it's a gdb vs. gdb-multiarch problem) | 10:14 |
pitti | slangasek: that already was native, AFAIUI | 10:15 |
pitti | slangasek: i. e. it's gdb running *on* the phone at the time of the crash | 10:15 |
slangasek | mmm | 10:15 |
pitti | slangasek: so we ruled out foreign arch problems | 10:15 |
slangasek | does gdb get a useful backtrace if you attach it to a running process on armhf? | 10:16 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: would be nice if you could change the bug report so its clear that this is more official ;) | 10:16 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: or should i just comment on it | 10:17 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: I can fix it up some :) | 10:17 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: awesome | 10:17 |
pitti | slangasek: I don't know right now, that's an interesting test; although it needs to happen on something which is actually busy, otherwise we'll just catch some poll()/select(); bdmurray, did you happen to try that already? | 10:17 |
GunnarHj | Hi pitti! | 10:18 |
pitti | hey GunnarHj | 10:19 |
GunnarHj | pitti: People are asking for langpack updates. Any chance that you can press the button? | 10:19 |
GunnarHj | https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-translators/2014-May/006507.html | 10:19 |
pitti | GunnarHj: for trusty? | 10:20 |
pitti | GunnarHj: I can copy the current PPA to -proposed, yes | 10:20 |
GunnarHj | pitti: Yes. | 10:20 |
GunnarHj | pitti: Would that be an SRU? | 10:20 |
pitti | GunnarHj: yes, they've always been | 10:20 |
GunnarHj | pitti: Ok, I keep learning. :) | 10:21 |
pitti | GunnarHj: meh, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/+archive/ppa times out | 10:22 |
pitti | GunnarHj: does this actually have recent trusty updates? | 10:22 |
GunnarHj | pitti: Actually I haven't checked... Just saw the postings. | 10:23 |
seb128 | pitti, language-pack-de 1:14.04+20140522 | 10:23 |
seb128 | one example | 10:23 |
seb128 | you can try reloading, it didn't timeout here | 10:24 |
pitti | https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/+archive/ppa?field.series_filter=trusty | 10:24 |
pitti | ah, that looks fine | 10:24 |
pitti | yeah, I'm fine with uploading that | 10:24 |
bdmurray | pitti: no, I have not | 10:24 |
pitti | GunnarHj: we need a wiki page where testers mark the tested languages; would you mind setting that up? | 10:25 |
pitti | GunnarHj: I think we haven't actually done that (updates) for a long time :/ | 10:25 |
pitti | GunnarHj: ah, on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Translations/LanguagePackUpdatesQA | 10:25 |
GunnarHj | pitti: Hmm.. I may take a look, but it will have to take a while. | 10:27 |
pitti | GunnarHj: so it's just a new entry on above wiki page and sending a call for testing AFAICS | 10:27 |
GunnarHj | pitti: Is the purpose of that page to document tests before SRUing translations? | 10:28 |
pitti | GunnarHj: the purpose is that people run these standard tests (desktop comes up, you can run updat-emanager, etc.) for a particular language | 10:29 |
pitti | GunnarHj: and after the timeout we release the languages which got tested | 10:29 |
GunnarHj | pitti: I see. Have to quit now. Talk to you later. | 10:30 |
zbenjamin | sarnold: any chance we can get that in in the next days? | 10:31 |
sarnold | zbenjamin: could be, depends how much of jamie's time I can get :) | 10:31 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
shadeslayer | ev: can usb-creator 0.2.57 be released for trusty too? | 10:54 |
=== but_why is now known as lisca | ||
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
xnox | pitti: correct. Cause it's not in the archive yet. | 11:34 |
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
pitti | xnox: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7520913/ | 11:58 |
xnox | pitti: ^ | 12:06 |
slangasek | seb128, pitti: is bug #1289031 assigned to the right component? | 12:07 |
ubottu | bug 1289031 in gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) "touchpad re-enables itself after suspend/resume" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1289031 | 12:07 |
seb128 | slangasek, could be bug #1283863 | 12:08 |
ubottu | bug 1283863 in unity-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) "disabling touchpad is not persistent" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1283863 | 12:08 |
seb128 | but if you run unity, unity-settings-daemon is the right component | 12:08 |
seb128 | (well, assuming the issue is with the settings daemon, and not xorg/synaptic driver) | 12:08 |
slangasek | right; I think I filed that bug before u-s-d was a separate thing | 12:08 |
seb128 | slangasek, if you can reproduce, it would be interesting to see if that happens as well when unity-settings-daemon is not running | 12:10 |
slangasek | ok | 12:10 |
slangasek | it's intermittently reproducible | 12:10 |
seb128 | :-/ | 12:10 |
slangasek | if I killall unity-settings-daemon, does it stay dead? | 12:11 |
seb128 | it's an upstart job, just stop it | 12:11 |
* slangasek nods | 12:11 | |
dobey | seb128: hey, can you approve or whatever needs to be done to unity-scope-click to get it from u-proposed into the archive? seems it's held for migration as it added a dependency on ubuntu-sdk-libs | 12:13 |
seb128 | dobey, "unity-scope-click/arm64 unsatisfiable Depends: ubuntu-sdk-libs " | 12:18 |
seb128 | dobey, you need to make ubuntu-sdk-libs available on arm64, or to make unity-scope-click not build there (or not depends on the libs) | 12:19 |
pitti | xnox: bug 1323274 | 12:19 |
ubottu | bug 1323274 in dovecot (Ubuntu) "Restore Debian's init.d script for insserv compatibility" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1323274 | 12:19 |
dobey | seb128: oh, ugh | 12:20 |
tseliot | seb128: what are the plans on unity-settings-daemon? Are we going to rebase our changes on topo of the latest g-s-d? Also, where's the RCS? | 12:25 |
tseliot | *top | 12:25 |
seb128 | tseliot, what is "RCS"? | 12:25 |
pitti | revision control system? | 12:25 |
tseliot | seb128: revision control system | 12:25 |
seb128 | oh, VCS? | 12:25 |
seb128 | lp:unity-settings-daemon | 12:26 |
tseliot | yes | 12:26 |
tseliot | sorry | 12:26 |
tseliot | seb128: or is it a permanent fork that we should develop separately? | 12:26 |
seb128 | rebase ... we might, depends of how much work it is/the benefits/who has slots to work on that | 12:26 |
seb128 | it's a fork | 12:26 |
seb128 | but it doesn't mean we should backport commits that benefit us | 12:27 |
seb128 | or rebase on newer versions if it makes sense | 12:27 |
tseliot | they fixed a lot of use cases for wacom tablets and touch screens | 12:27 |
tseliot | that is why I'm asking | 12:27 |
seb128 | we are likely to update e.g the wacom code, not sure about the other plugins there | 12:27 |
xnox | pitti: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7521117/ | 12:27 |
seb128 | wacom needs to be updated in sync with the control center I think | 12:27 |
tseliot | seb128: they introduced a new device mapper that requires a fair amount of work to backport and to hook into the plugins | 12:28 |
seb128 | in what cycle? | 12:28 |
tseliot | I had a look at git master | 12:28 |
tseliot | those are changes from 2013-2014 | 12:29 |
tseliot | seb128: g-s-d 3.12 includes all the fixes, except for one | 12:32 |
dobey | seb128: can i make a binary dep be used on all archs except for arm64? | 12:35 |
seb128 | tseliot, I'm not sure we are going to update that this cycle, somebody owning wacom hardware and having slots to work on that working on updating that code would be nice | 12:35 |
seb128 | dobey, you need to list the archs manually | 12:36 |
dobey | ogra_: hi. what's keeping ubuntu-touch-meta from being built on arm64? | 12:36 |
dobey | seb128: but i can't do [!arm64] for binary deps? | 12:36 |
ogra_ | no idea, doesnt it build ? | 12:36 |
seb128 | dobey, I don't think so | 12:37 |
dobey | ogra_: i guess ubuntu-touch-meta has explicit archs listed. it's only built on i386, amd64, and armhf | 12:37 |
dobey | ogra_: i'd expect it will build fine, but maybe all the binary deps don't build fine on arm64? | 12:38 |
ogra_ | ogra@styx:~/Devel/packages/ubuntu-touch-meta-1.141$ grep amd64 update.cfg | 12:38 |
ogra_ | architectures: i386 amd64 armhf | 12:38 |
ogra_ | right | 12:38 |
tseliot | bdmurray: hi, can you have a look at LP: #1322212 please? | 12:38 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1322212 in xorg-server-lts-saucy (Ubuntu) "Switching to the Guest session results in a black screen" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1322212 | 12:38 |
ogra_ | it is explicitly disabled atm ... | 12:38 |
tseliot | seb128: ok, I'll see what I can do... | 12:39 |
ogra_ | dobey, why do you need it on arm64 ? and 64 bit phones in sight = | 12:39 |
ogra_ | ? | 12:39 |
seb128 | thanks | 12:39 |
dobey | ogra_: is there a list of what's keeping it from being built elsewehre? | 12:39 |
ogra_ | dobey, it was never enabled on anything else but the three arches my grep above lists | 12:40 |
sarnold | ogra_: apple sells one :) | 12:40 |
ogra_ | and i assume the seeds are set up similar | 12:40 |
dobey | ogra_: because unity-scope-click is architectue: any in the control file, and we just added a binary dep on ubuntu-sdk-libs, because it is what provides the list of frameworks | 12:40 |
ogra_ | sarnold, oh, you are planning to purt ubuntu-touch to an iphone ? | 12:40 |
ogra_ | :P | 12:40 |
ogra_ | *port | 12:40 |
sarnold | ogra_: wouldn't that be a fun target? :) | 12:41 |
ogra_ | doanac, hrm | 12:41 |
ogra_ | err | 12:41 |
ogra_ | dobey, | 12:41 |
dobey | so right now this makes the scope uninstallable on arm64, though otherwise it builds and installs fine there | 12:41 |
sarnold | it'd actually make more sense for us; apple sells content consuming devices. we've aiming for a converged computing device, and I haven't had < 4 gigs of memory on my computer in a very long time.. | 12:42 |
ogra_ | dobey, hmm, i would actually prefer to have an override for the autopkgtest stuff in that case ... i suspect blindly enabling arm64 in the seeds and metapackages will open a big can of worms and cause a lot of extra work | 12:44 |
ogra_ | dobey, did you ask infinity or cjwatson if we could jet override it for now ? | 12:44 |
bdmurray | tseliot: is that supposed to superceed the existing package in precise-proposed? | 12:44 |
ogra_ | s/jet/just/ | 12:44 |
dobey | ogra_: and just have an uninstallable unity-scope-click on arm64? | 12:45 |
ogra_ | dobey, right | 12:45 |
ogra_ | until we have actually seeds for that arch | 12:45 |
dobey | i haven't asked, no. | 12:45 |
tseliot | bdmurray: yes. I also included the previous changes in the diff | 12:46 |
ogra_ | switching the seeds on on this arch will likely mean we need to make the whole of ubuntu-touch ... or at least the whole of the sdk-libs installable in the end | 12:46 |
ogra_ | (or alternatively make the scope use [!arm64] but thats more ugly imho | 12:47 |
dobey | ogra_: a good thing i think, but i do agree it might mean a lot of work. i wonder if there's an easy way we can test it | 12:47 |
ogra_ | ) | 12:47 |
dobey | well, it's ugly, but probably less ugly than a built package that can't be installed :) | 12:47 |
bdmurray | tseliot: okay, could you add saucy tasks? | 12:48 |
bdmurray | tseliot: I mean precise | 12:48 |
tseliot | bdmurray: I think xorg-server-lts-saucy is only available in precise, isn't it? | 12:49 |
cjwatson | ogra_: that's not autopkgtest | 12:49 |
cjwatson | dobey: you can do [!arm64] in debian/control as long as it's not for an Architecture: all package | 12:50 |
cjwatson | dobey: though in this context it would be more correct to do [amd64 armhf i386] | 12:50 |
bdmurray | tseliot: While that may be true I'm pretty all the sru tools / reports want a task for the relevant release. | 12:51 |
dobey | cjwatson: might be better to just not build on arm64 i guess, since unity8 isn't building there currently | 12:51 |
cjwatson | well | 12:51 |
cjwatson | let me check what rdeps are already there | 12:51 |
dobey | well, it's depwait | 12:52 |
cjwatson | but it built before? | 12:52 |
dobey | i don't know | 12:52 |
cjwatson | must've done | 12:52 |
cjwatson | otherwise it wouldn't be a proble | 12:52 |
cjwatson | m | 12:52 |
cjwatson | ok, there are no reverse-dependencies of unity-scope-click/arm64 | 12:52 |
dobey | it shows depwait on trusty and saucy too | 12:52 |
dobey | so i guess it's always been that way | 12:52 |
cjwatson | no it doesn't | 12:53 |
cjwatson | unity-scope-click | 0.1+14.04.20140410.1-0ubuntu1 | trusty/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386 | 12:53 |
cjwatson | dobey: so, I can remove this, but you'll have to actually stop it building | 12:53 |
ogra_ | great :) | 12:54 |
=== charles is now known as Guest9722 | ||
dobey | cjwatson: ok, that's great. i'll make a branch to stop it building on arm64. and you'll override it for now to get the current package migrated? | 12:56 |
cjwatson | not override, but remove | 12:56 |
cjwatson | (done) | 12:56 |
cjwatson | I wouldn't just override this because adding uninstallable packages can make proposed-migration take bad decisions | 12:58 |
ogra_ | ah, i didnt know that | 12:58 |
cjwatson | dobey: to be clear, if your branch doesn't land, the next upload will have the same problem :) | 13:00 |
dobey | oh ok | 13:00 |
dobey | cjwatson: yeah, i will make a branch now(-ish) | 13:00 |
cjwatson | ta | 13:01 |
tseliot | bdmurray: ok, let me fix that then | 13:27 |
tseliot | yay, launchpad failed... | 13:28 |
bdmurray | tseliot: hmm it oops'ed for me too. I'll just accept it then. | 13:35 |
tseliot | bdmurray: good. I think we can add a task later | 13:40 |
mterry_ | stgraber, is there a bug for the lxc/kernel issue so I can subscribe? | 13:46 |
mterry_ | stgraber, ah I see you uploaded a fix. But it still fails autopkgtest? | 13:53 |
mterry_ | But only two failures rather than three this time! :) | 13:56 |
tseliot | bdmurray: thanks | 13:59 |
stgraber | mterry_: yeah, there's another kernel bug, jjohansen is on it | 14:04 |
jjohansen | mterry_: if you revert to the 3.13 kernel from earlier, that should work until the 3.15 kernel with the fix lands | 14:05 |
mterry_ | jjohansen, I'm not concerned with testing it myself so much, it's just blocking a cgmanager update in utopic | 14:07 |
jjohansen | mterry_: ah okay | 14:07 |
Laney | woah | 14:11 |
Laney | I've never noticed that quilt series colours patches based on applied/top/unapplied | 14:11 |
Laney | is that new? | 14:11 |
GunnarHj | pitti: still there? | 14:12 |
ev | shadeslayer: if you want to go through the paperwork for an SRU, I'm happy to sponsor the upload | 14:22 |
shadeslayer | ev: heh | 14:22 |
shadeslayer | that's like the most annoying part of it :P | 14:22 |
shadeslayer | ev: anyway, I'll file the paperwork | 14:22 |
ev | :-P | 14:23 |
ev | thanks! | 14:23 |
shadeslayer | np | 14:23 |
ev | I've got the branch queued up and ready for a bug number to inject | 14:23 |
shadeslayer | ev: 1289026 | 14:25 |
ev | cheers | 14:25 |
ev | shadeslayer: is that right? It's a regular bug not following the SRU format: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template | 14:26 |
shadeslayer | ev: yes, I'm fixing that | 14:26 |
ev | ah right | 14:26 |
ev | I'll feed that into the branch | 14:26 |
shadeslayer | ev: done | 14:27 |
shadeslayer | ev: it's the bug that errors.ubuntu.com had linked to all the error reports | 14:28 |
shadeslayer | thought I'd just repurpose it | 14:28 |
ev | uploaded | 14:29 |
shadeslayer | cheers | 14:29 |
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
n4uah | hello.. | 19:32 |
n4uah | is anyone can help with the ubuntu touch? | 19:32 |
rww | tried #ubuntu-touch? | 19:33 |
n4uah | i think some of them works at canonical. | 19:35 |
rww | Yep, and they also tend to hang out in #ubuntu-touch, hence me pointing you there. Have you tried it? :) | 19:35 |
n4uah | no.. | 19:36 |
n4uah | now at their.. | 19:36 |
n4uah | :) | 19:36 |
LLKCKfan | Hello | 21:02 |
LLKCKfan | How can someone who is almost 30 and never had a job get one? I have been applying just to be told I am not what they are looking for or they are not hiring. | 21:02 |
Noskcaj_ | LLKCKfan, I think you're asking in the wrong place | 21:08 |
LLKCKfan | then what is the right place | 21:08 |
genii | Probably some channel to do with employment | 21:09 |
Noskcaj_ | pitti, Is it ok if i merge flashplugin-nonfree-extrasound? | 21:36 |
LLKCKfan | There are none | 21:37 |
=== salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
=== _salem is now known as salem_ | ||
=== salem_ is now known as _salem | ||
=== _salem is now known as salem_ |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!