[09:20] <jakubo> hi, can someone help me with this kind of bug:
[09:20] <jakubo> insserv: warning: script is corrupt or invalid: /etc/init.d/../rc6.d/K09reboot
[09:21] <jakubo> also:
[09:21] <jakubo> Fehler traten auf beim Bearbeiten von:
[09:21] <jakubo>  python-httplib2
[09:21] <jakubo>  python-ubuntu-sso-client
[09:21] <jakubo>  oneconf-common
[09:21] <jakubo>  python-oneconf
[09:21] <jakubo>  software-center
[09:21] <jakubo>  ubuntu-sso-client-qt
[09:21] <jakubo>  ubuntu-sso-client
[09:21] <jakubo>  python3-oneconf
[09:21] <jakubo>  ubuntu-desktop
[09:21] <jakubo>  oneconf
[09:21] <jakubo>  python-piston-mini-client
[09:21] <jakubo>  software-center-aptdaemon-plugins
[09:21] <lordievader> !paste | jakubo
[09:21] <jakubo> sry
[09:23] <jakubo> what triggered the recent breakage? did they sync with debian without testing?
[09:28] <ikonia> which breakage ?
[09:28] <ikonia> there are many at themoment
[09:29] <jakubo> oh ok...
[09:29] <jakubo> can you name them?
[09:30] <ikonia> no
[09:30] <ikonia> which one are you talking about
[09:31] <jakubo> im not sure. soemthing broke my system, and my guess now would be that the reboot script is broke, leaving nasty faults in the FS
[09:31] <ikonia> the reboot script ?
[09:31] <ikonia> nasty faults on the file system ???
[09:31] <ikonia> what are you on about ???
[09:32] <jakubo> well i can only name you the symptoms
[09:32] <jakubo> the fs faults are gone, not sure what repaired them
[09:33] <jakubo> and i can use one of 3 setups that were broken before
[09:33] <ikonia> do you understand how very very early in the development cycle 14.10 is ?
[09:33] <jakubo> yes
[09:34] <jakubo> i have done it for years now. and there were times when it was like this so i am prepared
[09:34] <jakubo> ok... actually never this bad that it wouldnt at least boot into console...
[09:34] <ikonia> if you understand this why do you appear to have no idea what's going on with your system
[09:35] <jakubo> cant follow you
[09:36] <ikonia> you're saying things like "non-tested syncs from debians" and "problems with reboot script"
[09:36] <jakubo> ok. well, it just that it didnt happen to me for the last umm.. 3 or 4 years
[09:36] <jakubo> so i was wondering if something has changed
[09:37] <ikonia> ??? it's not been out for 3 - 4 years
[09:37] <ikonia> it's been in development for a few months
[09:37] <ikonia> if that
[09:37] <jakubo> and i apparently falsely assumed that there would be some kind of prevention
[09:37] <jakubo> i know -.-
[09:37] <ikonia> prevention ??? against what
[09:37] <ikonia> what are you actually talking about ?
[09:38] <ikonia> this is a development version - it WILL break, a lot
[09:38] <ikonia> your system will fail,
[09:38] <jakubo> i mean that i switched to pre alpha versions for 3 or 4 years
[09:38] <ikonia> you need to be aware of your system and how to deal with the issues
[09:39] <jakubo> take this as my kind of "getting to know" ubuntu as an OS
[09:39] <ikonia> ???
[09:39] <ikonia> you've just said you've used pre-alpha versions for years ??
[09:39] <ikonia> you should have a basic idea of how it works by now
[09:40] <jakubo> well there were a couple of problems in the past: like stripped compatibility with raid on boot (grub)
[09:40] <jakubo> used - not developed
[09:41] <ikonia> you're not developing it now
[09:41] <jakubo> no
[09:41] <ikonia> so why are you talking about developing it ???
[09:41] <ikonia> I don't understand what you are saying
[09:41] <jakubo> i never have
[09:41] <lordievader> jakubo: Maybe it is an idea to switch to a non-development release, like Trusty.
[09:41] <ikonia> if you are using software at this stage, you need to have a solid understanding of the OS and expect thigns to break a lot
[09:41] <jakubo> you people get me wrong. im not compliaining. im simply asking because im curious
[09:42] <ikonia> expecting to use it on a day to day basis and people to fix things to help you get a stable system isn't really realistic
[09:42] <jakubo> i dont rely on these PCs, and if i did i can always install trusty on them
[09:42] <jakubo> its simply out of curiosity
[09:43] <ikonia> I don't understand.....
[09:43] <ikonia>  jakubo> hi, can someone help me with this kind of bug:
[09:43] <ikonia> that suggests you want someone to fix it
[09:43] <ikonia> or help you get it working
[09:43] <jakubo> is there something wrong with it?
[09:43] <jakubo> can i not ask?
[09:44] <jakubo> is this not a chatroom to ask
[09:44] <ikonia> sure sure
[09:44] <jakubo> so?
[09:44] <ikonia> but you don't appear to know what you're asking
[09:44] <ikonia> apart from "please fix this for me"
[09:44] <jakubo> i have not asked that
[09:44] <jakubo> you assumed it
[09:45] <ikonia> that's how it read
[09:45] <ikonia> what where you asking then ?
[09:45] <jakubo> thats waht YOU read
[09:45] <jakubo> i want to know where it came from. how it got there and how or IF it affects my machine
[09:46] <ikonia> it came from the development package
[09:46] <jakubo> not all warnings do have consequences (i think)
[09:46] <ikonia> that specific error will effect the execution of the reboot run level script, you need to validate that script and see how that will impact you
[09:47] <ikonia> validate if it's repeatable as a problem, or a corruption due to that moment in time install
[09:47] <ikonia> log a bug if it's repeatable
[09:47] <ikonia> if possible apply a patch file to fix it
[09:48] <jakubo> ok. or maybe asked more stupidly: what package will i have to wait for that fixes it (i mean the name)
[09:48] <jakubo> what package carries these scripts?
[09:48] <ikonia> why ?
[09:48] <ikonia> what does that matter ?
[09:48] <jakubo> curious
[09:48] <ikonia> then research it
[09:48] <jakubo> ok thanks
[11:08] <BluesKaj> Howdy folks
[16:03] <jack> +1 is still trusty, right?
[16:04] <jack> oh no, UU
[16:04] <jack> never mind