=== therealnanotube is now known as nanotube [10:34] hi everyone [10:34] hello ochosi [10:34] how's things [10:34] okayish [10:35] what you working on now [10:35] at this moment, on nothing, have a lot of RL work ahead [10:36] is it school related? anything periodic or predictable? [10:36] work related [10:37] ah okay [11:07] maintaining things is hard -_- [11:07] especially when they change and people dont stay enough to troubleshoot properly [12:23] this is interesting/useful if we decide we'd like to apply for the community funds: http://mhall119.com/2014/05/community-donations-funding-report/ [12:25] hihi, i can't apply cause i'm not an ubuntu member [12:26] well apparently it's possible to lift ~$1k for travel expenses for one person for one event [12:27] and up to, like ~$2.7k for one person for all events in a year [12:27] though i'm pretty sure that if more applications start coming in, that'll not be possible [12:27] so you're saying i should apply for ubuntu membership? :p [12:28] i'm saying we could be able to pull out one event where most of the contributors could be [12:28] yup, that would be very nice indeed [12:28] say, apply for sponsorship to fosdem for sean and lyz [12:28] and then the europeans take one for the team :P [12:28] :) [12:29] bbiab [12:29] (or share the rest of the expenses with the team...) [17:20] someone should nudge me when the fosdem CFP comes up, might be able to go for work [17:21] :) [17:22] that'd be nice [17:32] hi guys, I'm testing proposed files for langpack and there aren't any updated files form Xfce language git :/ [17:34] ochosi: Were you actually interested, or just perhaps interested in that one package as an installable option for utopic? [17:34] knome: Why you no fix translations yet? [17:35] Unit193: not sure what you're referring to, i don't have any backlog [17:35] Unit193, i no resposible! [17:39] knome: But you're far better. [17:39] ochosi: xfda === brainwash_ is now known as brainwash [17:40] Unit193: ah i see, well i wanted it in the utopic repos, or at least in our extras PPA (i'd actually also be happy with the latter for now) [17:41] i still have to ask micahg to set up that PPA for us though [17:42] ochosi: Asked our friendly neighboorhood uploader, he was fine with the idea of uploading. [17:43] cool [17:43] there are also a few other things we might wanna consider [17:43] skippy-xd is one of them [17:45] Ubuntu doesn't like to carry packages Debian doesn't have. [17:46] i thought xdash also wasn't in debian [17:46] and corsac had no interest in adding it [17:46] Right, which thusly makes it more or less fine for Ubuntu to do so. [17:46] so what is different for skippy-xd? [17:46] Ah, do you want to update the description and short description? That was the worst part of packaging. [17:48] And no idea there, never used it. [17:48] there's no description for it? [17:49] http://paste.openstack.org/show/au60bXlCVnxS3GXUkV8j/ Kind of copy+paste. :P [17:52] ochosi: Have you asked Corsac if he's interested? [17:53] (ITP - #698065) http://bugs.debian.org/698065 skippy-xd [17:53] Debian bug 698065 in wnpp "ITP: skippy-xd -- A full screen Expose style standalone task switcher for X11." [Wishlist,Open] [17:56] no, haven't [17:56] i agree, the xfdash description is in bad english :) [17:58] this is the current location of skippy xd btw: https://github.com/richardgv/skippy-xd [17:58] same maintainer/developer as compton i think [17:59] Yep, know the name. [17:59] i think that one we could get in touch with [18:06] http://paste.openstack.org/show/ANWZxhK5zOx9xt9CoEJZ/ still bad, but slightly less so. [18:06] Logan_: Can you work with git+pristine-tar? Or do you need a dsc? [18:09] ochosi: can you change the status/importance of lp bug reports? [18:09] brainwash: nope, not part of the bugsquad [18:09] Unit193: that pastebin gets me a 500 internal server error [18:09] but you are the xpl :/ [18:09] ochosi: F5, openstack are getting issues. [18:12] Unit193: still no worky [18:13] brainwash: that doesn't mean i have to do everything. become a member of the bugsquad and get to work! :) [18:13] * knome approves [18:13] http://paste.progval.net/show/eKrSSH9wV4lYwCBiOmbU/ Hrm, annoying. :/ [18:14] Unit193: yup, that reads much better. thanks! [18:14] Also of course set Xubuntu Developers as the maintainer, not just myself. :P [18:15] I don't feel like I need to be in the bugsquad just to mark a report as wishlist once in a while [18:28] oh, and you need to be member of bugcontrol, bugsquad is not enough [18:29] brainwash, i think you're trying to sneak under the radar [18:37] am I? :) [18:38] yeah. [18:38] you're involved enough to actually "take one for the team" and actually get the bugsquad membership [18:39] He's at least interested in cleaning up bugs enough. [18:39] yeah, why make others do the actual status/importance changes? [18:39] (that way others need to work AND you don't get the attribution) [18:39] knome: Have any idea what broke the translations? [18:40] just seems duplication of efforts [18:40] hmpf [18:40] nope :) [18:40] Unit193, ^ [18:40] Welp. [18:40] dinner time [18:41] Unit193, well i also didn't look very deeply into it [18:42] Noskcaj: xfpm 1.3.0 released [18:45] Wow. [19:21] some1 know, when xfce4-power-manager 1.3 will be available here: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-power-manager [20:42] could some1 send me screenshots of the xfce4-power-manager 1.3, from all tabs? [20:46] olbi, please do that yourself... [21:29] olbi: what for? [21:34] for translations :) [21:34] i'm compiling it now :) [21:34] olbi: http://imgur.com/a/5uK6f#0 [21:35] ochosi: thank you very much [21:35] np, i'm in a good mood because of the release, that's all ;) [21:36] already miss the fancy sidebar [21:36] you can always keep using 1.2.0 [21:37] mmh, right [21:37] especially for the tray icon [21:37] sure, if you prefer it [21:38] brainwash: Something bad about the new one? [21:39] it requires xfce4-panel I think [21:39] panel plugin [21:40] Well, if it's still just a small space to take up, and has the same mouseover information... [21:40] http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-power-manager, should this site be upgrade for newest version? :-) [21:41] olbi: no, it will be removed as soon as i have time or we approach the stable release [21:41] it'll all be on docs.xfce [21:42] oh, ok :) [21:42] forgot it :] [21:42] bluesabre, ping [21:42] Your latest power manager upload is broken [21:43] You didn't add the patch to d/patches/series [21:43] oh, bad [21:43] Noskcaj: i guess we need to fix that first in utopic then, then do the SRU [21:43] and after that upload 1.3 [21:43] can't upload 1.3 yet [21:45] doesn't it need upower 0.99 [21:45] it's optional [21:46] i'm using it just fine in trusty btw [21:46] oh [21:46] i'll upload sometime today then [21:46] But if you upload now, it'll have to be rebuilt for .99. [21:47] yeah, better to get the fixed version of xfpm 1.2 first [21:47] also for the SRU [21:47] ok [21:47] would be nice if you could look into that though [21:47] as it's our worst 14.04 bug [21:48] will do. I've got to finish the upower transition first though, which is a real pain [21:48] hmm, yeah, it breaks lots of things [21:48] e.g. xfce4-session [21:48] in case you were wondering [21:48] hmm.. xfce4-power-manager's battery/brightness plugins do not support multiple row panel layouts. [21:48] i knew that one, but at least it's an active upstream [21:49] andrzejr: yeah, the panel-plugin isn't finished yet, there are still a few rough edges [21:49] unlike razorqt and wmbattery [21:49] andrzejr: also, we didn't have much experience with panel plugins [21:49] andrzejr: patches welcome! :p [21:50] ochosi, brightness plugin displays a slider right-to-left (+ on the left, - on the right) [21:50] Noskcaj: Razor basically moved to LXQt, so you're likely looking at the wrong source. [21:51] Unit193, I've not looked in lxqt for a patch yet, but it's annoying that it's there [21:51] andrzejr: yeah, that plugin will be redone to use a menu, it currently does a popup that only works in a horizontal panel. that was like that before, so "not our fault"(tm) [21:52] ochosi, are you ok with dependency on libxfce4panel >= 4.10 or do you want ifdefs for older versions? [21:53] andrzejr: i think we're ok with that. older than 4.10 is just... oooooold :) [21:56] ochosi, configure.ac.in is missing libxfce4panel dep anyway [21:56] ochosi, sorry, wrong. [21:57] it already depends on 4.10 [21:57] andrzejr: well generally speaking, it's the first dev-release after 2 years, there is still a lot broken so be gentle with us ;) [22:01] hey sergio-br2 [22:01] thanks for merging the branch [22:01] :) [22:01] there's still something odd in the 32px version of calendar: http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-2014-06-02-000127.php [22:01] well, after that i realized that is missing more webicons yet... [22:02] yeah, but no worries [22:02] we can still do a release imo [22:02] let me see [22:03] what exactly wrong with it? [22:03] in icon preview of inkscape it's seem ok [22:04] well if you look at the screenshot, 1) the number is not centered and 2) the shadow of the "1" is off to the right [22:05] try export to png, it's right i think [22:07] will do tomorrow, gotta go now [22:08] take a look http://en.zimagez.com/zimage/google-calendar.php [22:08] not sure what's wrong there, i'm testing the icons from the daily PPA [22:08] yeah, that looks like it shou [22:08] ld [22:08] odd [22:12] andrzejr: when I was compiling, I needed xfce4-panel-dev, so maybe You should fix this in README [22:16] yeah ochosi, i can confirm calendar problem here [22:17] maybe imagemagick implementation is different from inkscape? [22:17] (it uses imagemagick right?) [22:39] ochosi, https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10928 [22:39] bugzilla.xfce.org bug 10928 in General "Panel plugin size/orientation" [Normal,New] [22:40] yay, notification works [22:40] :-) (wrong window)