| roasted | Hello friends. I've been following the Unity 7.2.1 launchpad. I'm trying to understand the SRU process. I see that 7.2.1 14.04 SRU 1 was "released" 22 hours ago. Is that part of a review process? Just questioning it given that I'm not seeing it via updates, etc. | 03:28 |
|---|---|---|
| Pici | roasted: It looks like 7.2.1 is in trusty-proposed right now. | 03:46 |
| Pici | See step 6 here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure | 03:47 |
| roasted | Pici: yeah I just enabled that and pulled in 7.2.1. I'm good now. :) | 03:48 |
| roasted | Pici: I just took 'released' as in, it's RELEASED, like part of the regular update system. | 03:48 |
| roasted | not released as in, ahh just in pre-release for now, etc. | 03:48 |
| Pici | yeah, it is a little confusing | 03:49 |
| roasted | seems like the min 7 day wait period applies... now | 03:50 |
| roasted | There's one last thing that I'm unsure of. There's a bug targeted for 7.2.1 that is in progress right now. Given that SRU 1 is in trusty-proposed, is that to say that whenever that bug gets fixed, it effectively misses SRU 1 since SRU 1 is here now? Or is there always a chance to merge it later as part of regular updates once SRU 1 is in the regular update repo? | 03:51 |
| * Pici shrugs | 03:53 | |
| tarpman | roasted: Fix Released for the upstream project is separate from Fix | 03:55 |
| tarpman | argh | 03:55 |
| tarpman | Released for the Ubuntu packages | 03:55 |
| tarpman | roasted: you'll notice most of the bugs still say Fix Committed in trusty, ie. they're in trusty-proposed | 03:56 |
| roasted | So if I understand right, Fix Committed is proposed, Fix Released is "hey just open software updater" | 03:56 |
| tarpman | and wait for your local mirror to update | 03:57 |
| roasted | What does that mean for the SRU 1 being in proposed now for the bugs that are targeted for SRU 1, but not 'fixed' yet? | 03:57 |
| tarpman | that they missed the milestone. unfortunate, but happens | 03:57 |
| roasted | :( | 03:58 |
| tarpman | roasted, which bug in particular are you affected by? just curious | 03:59 |
| roasted | let me dig it up quick | 03:59 |
| roasted | it's the highlight offset one I'm curious about | 03:59 |
| roasted | minor, but an aesthetic annoyance | 03:59 |
| roasted | https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1309739 | 04:00 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1309739 in unity (Ubuntu) "Unity launcher icon edge illumination is offset" [Medium,In progress] | 04:00 |
| tarpman | yeah, see the merge proposal on that one? the reviewers approved it, but it hasn't actually been merged yet. I take that to mean it missed the cutoff, whenever that was | 04:01 |
| roasted | bummer | 04:01 |
| tarpman | there will be more SRUs. 12.04 has had 7 so far, and I don't think it's done yet | 04:01 |
| roasted | yeah, I believe it. It's just one of those things where it's the one thing I notice continuously that my OCD is ruffled by. :P | 04:02 |
| tarpman | oh, I know what you mean | 04:02 |
| roasted | mostly because I have a hard time figuring out exactly how I can identify when an application needs attention... | 04:03 |
| tarpman | you know the expo view, super-S? the yellow border makes room for the unity launcher on the left even when you're not running unity | 04:03 |
| tarpman | totally aesthetic thing, but bugs me every time ;) | 04:03 |
| roasted | so via tweak I just use set the icon backgrounds to no coloring so I can actually see the borders that get highlighted. | 04:03 |
| roasted | But when you adjust the icon sizes, that bug comes into play. | 04:03 |
| roasted | I mean the icons don't bounce every 30 seconds to remind me that I have an awaiting message, so the highlights are all I use. | 04:04 |
| roasted | hence my interest in it :P | 04:04 |
| === mythos_ is now known as mythos | ||
| === om26er_ is now known as om26er | ||
| === roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk | ||
| === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!