[13:53] <jrwren> good morning openssl
[14:15] <rick_h_> party
[15:15] <cmaloney> Good morning
[15:35] <mrgoodcat> hey
[15:35] <mrgoodcat> jrwren: what about ssl?
[15:35] <jrwren> moar vulns
[15:52] <cmaloney> Yeah, now that people are looking at openssl and not taking it for granted we're getting more vuln reports.
[15:53] <cmaloney> Though are these in the "regen your certs" category?
[15:53] <cmaloney> I didn't think so
[16:00] <jrwren> not sure. one is a MITM vuln, but not sure if that leaks a private key or not
[16:04] <mrgoodcat> http://shrturl.co/MhCOZ
[16:04] <bookiebot> http://goo.gl/v9V3OP - Apple to Open Source OS X Mavericks After The Release of Yosemite
[16:05] <cmaloney> Um, where in that article does it even mention Open source, releasing source, or anything source?
[16:06] <mrgoodcat> lol
[16:06] <mrgoodcat> http://shrturl.co/
[16:06] <bookiebot> http://goo.gl/imfmzq - SHRTURL - Faking the web since 1942
[16:06] <cmaloney> Or has TechCrunch hit a new way to drive clicks to their site
[16:06] <cmaloney> Lovely.
[16:06] <cmaloney> Remind me to smack you in the near future.
[16:07] <mrgoodcat> saw it on hacker news and i had to
[16:07] <mrgoodcat> :)
[16:07] <cmaloney> No, no you didn't.
[16:08] <jrwren> its linkbate.
[16:08] <jrwren> bait
[16:08] <mrgoodcat> i could have changed the picture and the article
[16:08] <jrwren> its fail.
[16:08] <jrwren> we need a bot to warn us of the link is gigaom or techcrunch
[16:08] <mrgoodcat> jrwren: http://shrturl.co/
[16:08] <bookiebot> http://goo.gl/imfmzq - SHRTURL - Faking the web since 1942
[16:08] <cmaloney> gigaom doesn't irritate nearly as much as techCrunch
[16:09] <cmaloney> At least gigaom makes long-term bullshit predictions
[16:09] <cmaloney> TechCrunch makes short-term bullshit-stirring bullshit.
[16:09] <mrgoodcat> jrwren: were you referring to the CCS vuln?
[16:09] <jrwren> mrgoodcat: no
[16:10] <jrwren> mrgoodcat: https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20140605.txt
[16:10] <bookiebot> http://goo.gl/g7yIRU - text/plain; charset=UTF-8
[16:10] <mrgoodcat> yea thats the same one
[16:11] <mrgoodcat> here's a good article about it http://ccsinjection.lepidum.co.jp/blog/2014-06-05/CCS-Injection-en/index.html
[16:11] <bookiebot> http://goo.gl/Me0eFx - How I discovered CCS Injection Vulnerability (CVE-2014-0224) - CCS Injection
[16:12] <mrgoodcat> just..... why?...... http://opalrb.org/
[16:12] <bookiebot> http://goo.gl/sdRqk - Opal: Ruby to Javascript Compiler
[16:19] <cmaloney> I love when folks come over to my cube and look at my screens and say that this is "old school" development. :)
[16:20] <mrgoodcat> what, vim?
[16:20] <cmaloney> Just in general
[16:20] <cmaloney> Not sure what they expected
[16:20] <cmaloney> Some Geoerge Jetson setup or something
[16:21] <cmaloney> Though they didn't know what a Timex Sinclair 1000 was
[16:21]  * cmaloney has one at his desk
[16:22] <mrgoodcat> lol
[16:22] <mrgoodcat> does it still work?
[16:22] <mrgoodcat> they only made those for like one year
[16:25] <cmaloney> Huh? I think you're thinking of the ZX80
[16:25] <cmaloney> That was pretty short-lived until the ZX81 came out
[16:25] <cmaloney> and those lasted for quite some time
[16:25] <cmaloney> 'bout 3-5 years iirc.
[16:26] <cmaloney> And yeah, it still works. Thing was built like a tank.
[16:26] <mrgoodcat> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timex_Sinclair_1000
[16:26] <bookiebot> http://goo.gl/F5U5 - Timex Sinclair 1000 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[16:26] <mrgoodcat> released in 82
[16:26] <mrgoodcat> discontinued in 83
[16:27] <cmaloney> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZX81
[16:27] <bookiebot> http://goo.gl/fpTTs - ZX81 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[16:27] <cmaloney> 1981 - 1984
[16:27] <cmaloney> Had a shorter run in the states
[17:31] <cmaloney> .np squeekyhoho
[17:31] <bookiebot> squeekyhoho's current track - I've Sold Your Organs On the Black Market to Finance the Purchase of a Used Minivan by Everything Goes Cold on Vs. General Failure
[17:36] <greg-g> good title
[17:37] <cmaloney> Good song.
[17:37] <cmaloney> Also a reminder why I have never enabled "show what I'm currently playing" at work. :)
[17:38] <cmaloney> 47 songs with the F-bomb in the title alone.
[17:40] <greg-g> "at work" as in "on my work IM account"?
[17:59] <cmaloney> Yeah
[17:59] <jrwren> hahaha.
[20:25] <mrgoodcat> why is java so suck?
[20:25] <mrgoodcat> i keep typing python methods
[20:25] <mrgoodcat> and it doesn't compile
[20:25] <mrgoodcat> and i'm all FUUUUUUU
[20:25] <mrgoodcat> simply reading a file line by line should be simpler than this
[20:25] <mrgoodcat> but NOOOOO
[20:26] <mrgoodcat> you have to make a FactoryFactory to make a FileReaderFactory to make a FileReader to pass into a BufferedReader that you got from your BufferedReaderFactory
[20:26] <mrgoodcat> who seriously fucking thinks of this shit?
[20:31] <brousch__> factory workers
[20:32] <mrgoodcat> lol
[20:32] <mrgoodcat> java must be a union job
[20:38] <waf> didn't java just release a much better file api?
[20:39] <brousch__> waf: Don't try to quell the Java rage
[20:41] <waf> ah yeah, Files.readAllLines to get a list of lines, and if line-by-line is important, use Scanner.nextLine
[20:47] <waf> the trick with java is to ignore every search result from 2011 or so and before.
[20:48] <waf> another trick is not to use it.