/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2014/06/06/#ubuntu-release.txt

=== plars-away is now known as plars
ogra_stgraber, "Daily rebuild quota reached for product." ... i got that for touch on the iso tracker ... thought you might want to know about it :) (i started a build directly on nusakan now)07:43
apwogra_, i wonder when the day starts, as it is pretty early relative to UTC08:56
ogra_apw, well, i never know if he is in switzerland or canada TZ :)08:58
apwogra_, well i was more thinking of the day for the quota system :)08:59
ogra_hah08:59
=== pete-woods is now known as pete-woods-away
=== doko_ is now known as doko
=== pete-woods-away is now known as pete-woods
Chipacaany MOTUs around?12:37
apwChipaca, there are bound to be, but they will likely be more responsive to a specific question12:49
Chipacaapw: asked more specifically in #ubuntu-motu12:49
Chipacanot getting any love there though :)12:49
rbasakChipaca: you need to give it more than a few minutes :) Looking.12:55
Chipacarbasak: I am nothing if not impatient12:55
=== ara is now known as Guest42533
infinityogra_: Daily quotas are intentional, so no one flavour decides they're so important that they can choke out all the infrastructure's resources.14:53
ogra_infinity, interesting ... its not like we did build more than two images a day14:53
ogra_3 at times ... but rarely14:54
infinityogra_: It's possible it's intentionally but also broken. :)14:54
ogra_hehe14:54
infinitys/intentionally/intentional/14:54
ogra_that is why i pinged stgraber about it14:54
infinityogra_: "Living in the past will be possible in the near future"... Hah!15:01
infinityogra_: Wow, and my brain decided to quote you backwards.  I might need to wake up.15:05
ogra_haha15:05
rtgstgraber, I've corrected the openipmi version that you objected to and have re-uploaded.15:54
robrucjwatson, ping about platform-api again. I hit publish on the silo but it doesn't seem to have made it into proposed, likely because of that version issue. any way to fix it?17:17
infinity"That version issue"?17:48
robruinfinity, yeah sorry, was talking with cjwatson about this yesterday17:54
robruinfinity, what happened is, platform-api was supposed to build v1.2.0 in a ppa, but because the ppa had an old, deleted v2.0.0 in it, citrain screwed up and built 2.0.0 anyway. then *I* screwed up and published that, but it got stuck in -proposed. cjwatson deleted it from -proposed already, so I then rebuilt 1.2.0 correctly and published that, but the upload to -proposed was rejected17:55
robruor at least i assume it was rejected, because it's not in proposed. i don't get rejection mails...17:55
robruinfinity, https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuDk72Lpx8U5dFVHQ3FuMDJGLUZCamJfSjYzbWh3Wnc&rm=full&pli=1#gid=37 here's the status showing platform-api not in proposed along with the rest of the silo17:56
infinityrobru: How do I determine what PPA that's in, so I can try a manual copy?17:58
infinityOh, it's at the top.17:58
robruinfinity, that link I gave has a link to the PPA, but also here: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/landing-019 yeah ;-)17:59
robruinfinity, silos are always https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/landing-0##, I have a saved search for that ;-)17:59
infinityrobru: Was accepted just fine on a manual copy.  So either your original attempt was before it was deleted, or something else went wrong.  Without the emails, it's hard to tell. :/18:01
infinityrobru: Copied now, though.18:01
robruinfinity, great, thanks.18:01
robruinfinity, yeah, I tried to subscribe to the team that gets the jenkins rejection emails but nobody approved me for that, not sure who to ping18:02
robruinfinity, i believe cjwatson did the deletion yesterday, so i doubt there was a race between his deletion and my upload (an hour ago). something else is wrong i guess, but at least this is an isolated case18:02
cjwatsonrobru: There's no sign of a copy attempt in the Launchpad logs before infinity did a manual copy18:55
cjwatsonrobru: So something must have been confused on the CI side, but I can't say I know what18:56
robrucjwatson, thanks for checking. here's the log, I guess it didn't copy: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/landing-019-2-publish/32/console18:57
cjwatsonrobru: Right, that's a citrain refusal18:57
cjwatsonrobru: It points to the "ignore version destination" option which sounds like it would have been plausible18:58
cjwatsonrobru: But if you were using that and it still didn't work then I guess it's a citrain bug18:58
robruit's funny how many individual things had to go wrong for us to get to this state. one landing was in one silo, but then got moved to a different one. the next landing in the first silo contained one of the same projects as the previous landing.  also this would not have been a problem if upstream hadn't bumped the upstream version number18:58
cjwatsonrobru: FWIW if it *had* been a Launchpad copy error then you would have got mail about it as the publisher18:58
robrucjwatson, yeah, i had that option checked18:59
robruah18:59
cjwatson(regardless of any team that gets jenkins rejection mails)18:59
=== ken_ is now known as kenvandine

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!