[07:43] <ogra_> stgraber, "Daily rebuild quota reached for product." ... i got that for touch on the iso tracker ... thought you might want to know about it :) (i started a build directly on nusakan now)
[08:56] <apw> ogra_, i wonder when the day starts, as it is pretty early relative to UTC
[08:58] <ogra_> apw, well, i never know if he is in switzerland or canada TZ :)
[08:59] <apw> ogra_, well i was more thinking of the day for the quota system :)
[08:59] <ogra_> hah
[12:37] <Chipaca> any MOTUs around?
[12:49] <apw> Chipaca, there are bound to be, but they will likely be more responsive to a specific question
[12:49] <Chipaca> apw: asked more specifically in #ubuntu-motu
[12:49] <Chipaca> not getting any love there though :)
[12:55] <rbasak> Chipaca: you need to give it more than a few minutes :) Looking.
[12:55] <Chipaca> rbasak: I am nothing if not impatient
[14:53] <infinity> ogra_: Daily quotas are intentional, so no one flavour decides they're so important that they can choke out all the infrastructure's resources.
[14:53] <ogra_> infinity, interesting ... its not like we did build more than two images a day
[14:54] <ogra_> 3 at times ... but rarely
[14:54] <infinity> ogra_: It's possible it's intentionally but also broken. :)
[14:54] <ogra_> hehe
[14:54] <infinity> s/intentionally/intentional/
[14:54] <ogra_> that is why i pinged stgraber about it
[15:01] <infinity> ogra_: "Living in the past will be possible in the near future"... Hah!
[15:05] <infinity> ogra_: Wow, and my brain decided to quote you backwards.  I might need to wake up.
[15:05] <ogra_> haha
[15:54] <rtg> stgraber, I've corrected the openipmi version that you objected to and have re-uploaded.
[17:17] <robru> cjwatson, ping about platform-api again. I hit publish on the silo but it doesn't seem to have made it into proposed, likely because of that version issue. any way to fix it?
[17:48] <infinity> "That version issue"?
[17:54] <robru> infinity, yeah sorry, was talking with cjwatson about this yesterday
[17:55] <robru> infinity, what happened is, platform-api was supposed to build v1.2.0 in a ppa, but because the ppa had an old, deleted v2.0.0 in it, citrain screwed up and built 2.0.0 anyway. then *I* screwed up and published that, but it got stuck in -proposed. cjwatson deleted it from -proposed already, so I then rebuilt 1.2.0 correctly and published that, but the upload to -proposed was rejected
[17:55] <robru> or at least i assume it was rejected, because it's not in proposed. i don't get rejection mails...
[17:56] <robru> infinity, https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AuDk72Lpx8U5dFVHQ3FuMDJGLUZCamJfSjYzbWh3Wnc&rm=full&pli=1#gid=37 here's the status showing platform-api not in proposed along with the rest of the silo
[17:58] <infinity> robru: How do I determine what PPA that's in, so I can try a manual copy?
[17:58] <infinity> Oh, it's at the top.
[17:59] <robru> infinity, that link I gave has a link to the PPA, but also here: https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/landing-019 yeah ;-)
[17:59] <robru> infinity, silos are always https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/landing-0##, I have a saved search for that ;-)
[18:01] <infinity> robru: Was accepted just fine on a manual copy.  So either your original attempt was before it was deleted, or something else went wrong.  Without the emails, it's hard to tell. :/
[18:01] <infinity> robru: Copied now, though.
[18:01] <robru> infinity, great, thanks.
[18:02] <robru> infinity, yeah, I tried to subscribe to the team that gets the jenkins rejection emails but nobody approved me for that, not sure who to ping
[18:02] <robru> infinity, i believe cjwatson did the deletion yesterday, so i doubt there was a race between his deletion and my upload (an hour ago). something else is wrong i guess, but at least this is an isolated case
[18:55] <cjwatson> robru: There's no sign of a copy attempt in the Launchpad logs before infinity did a manual copy
[18:56] <cjwatson> robru: So something must have been confused on the CI side, but I can't say I know what
[18:57] <robru> cjwatson, thanks for checking. here's the log, I guess it didn't copy: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/landing-019-2-publish/32/console
[18:57] <cjwatson> robru: Right, that's a citrain refusal
[18:58] <cjwatson> robru: It points to the "ignore version destination" option which sounds like it would have been plausible
[18:58] <cjwatson> robru: But if you were using that and it still didn't work then I guess it's a citrain bug
[18:58] <robru> it's funny how many individual things had to go wrong for us to get to this state. one landing was in one silo, but then got moved to a different one. the next landing in the first silo contained one of the same projects as the previous landing.  also this would not have been a problem if upstream hadn't bumped the upstream version number
[18:58] <cjwatson> robru: FWIW if it *had* been a Launchpad copy error then you would have got mail about it as the publisher
[18:59] <robru> cjwatson, yeah, i had that option checked
[18:59] <robru> ah
[18:59] <cjwatson> (regardless of any team that gets jenkins rejection mails)