[05:55] is anyone around to hit this one? [05:55] 21:09 -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: duo-unix (precise-proposed/universe) [1.7-3 => 1.9.11-1~ubuntu0.12.04.1] (no packageset) [06:17] kees: Hit it in what sense? [06:19] kees: The bug doesn't seem to justify the backport? [06:19] kees: How does "changing certificates" lead to "need to backport all the new code"? [06:45] infinity: because their server is dropping connections based on versions. since the code changes are well tested and relatively small, it seems best to just catch up precise instead of doing a hacky cert-and-fake-version bump on the protocol. [06:45] infinity: and "hit" in the sense of no one appears to have looked at it from approve or reject === doko_ is now known as doko === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === rbasak_ is now known as rbasak === med_ is now known as Guest22673 === pitti_ is now known as pitti === pete-woods is now known as pete-woods-lunch === mbarnett` is now known as mbarnett === pete-woods-lunch is now known as pete-woods === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [23:20] stgraber, slangasek, cjwatson, RAOF, ScottK, any of you around? [23:21] infinity: yabbado [23:22] Slightly but mostly trying to do QA on the PPA publisher before going back to bed [23:22] slangasek: So. docker versus docker.io... There's an ongoing thread about docker.io taking over docker(1) and docker moving to wmdocker(1) [23:22] oh, is this still ongoing? [23:23] slangasek: paultag just uploaded a docker 1.5-1 that does the wmdocker(1) move, and I'm considering just syncing that to trusty. [23:23] slangasek: Any objections? [23:23] I would object in some such cases, but in this one it seems relatively unlikely that people will be invoking it by name? [23:23] slangasek: (The second half being a longer discussion about docker 1.0 in trusty, but I think that'll turn out to look like a Good Idea from a supportability standpoint) [23:23] syncing it to /trusty/? [23:23] slangasek: To trusty, yes. [23:24] I'd prefer a cherry-pick to a sync though [23:24] If possible [23:24] slangasek: Argument being that 1.5-1 has nearly zero changes relative to 1.4-5, except for the inclusion of the Ubuntu patch, the inclusion upstream of a Debian patch, and the binary move. [23:24] nearly zero is like nearly infinite [23:24] cjwatson: And the reason for the sync instead of the cherrypick would be to keep the Breaks/Replaces in sync with Debian as well. [23:24] Oh [23:24] I can see the argument there [23:25] We might want to build1 it in utopic in that case, dunno [23:25] cjwatson: We might. I'm not sure it matters much. The current version hasn't rebuilt since natty, it's not like this one gets a lot of attention. [23:25] bdmurray: precise and saucy micro updates for duo-unix have landed now. Waaaay easier delta to review. :) (debdiffs added to the LP bug) [23:31] cjwatson / slangasek: I can cherry-pick just the binary/manpage move, if you prefer, but I think in this weird case of a leaf package that likely almost no one uses with Ubuntu anyway (and in light of keeping b/r in sync), we're better off just taking the Debian package wholesale. YOMV. [23:32] infinity: I'm more intersted in knowing what else was is in the delta that we might consider risky [23:32] slangasek: http://paste.ubuntu.com/7631006/ <-- The entire diff between trusty and sid. [23:33] what the heck is debian/Dockerfile ? [23:33] slangasek: A joke, AFAICT. Allows one to build docker in docker. [23:34] slangasek: Harmless cruft, from the POV of the Debian packaging, mind. :P [23:35] very funny [23:39] infinity: no upstream changelog, bah; but the changes do seem fairly innocuous, either the thing works with these changes or it doesn't [23:39] I assume someone will test that it does actually work, before we publish to -updates :) [23:39] Yeah. [23:39] I'll make sure Paul's tested it before I sync, and then test on Ubuntu before releasing. [23:39] I miss WindowMaker. It'll be fun revisiting the past.