| === henrix_ is now known as henrix | ||
| === doko__ is now known as doko | ||
| soren | 12.10 and 13.04 are still not on old-releases.ubuntu.com in spite of EOL announcements having been sent out. Is that intentional? | 10:44 |
|---|---|---|
| sil2100 | cjwatson: hey! Do you have a moment for a packaging ACK? There is a new binary package in a pending release in CITrain | 11:08 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: the changes themselves seem to be ok, but I'm not entirely sure about those as well: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/landing-017-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_signon-ui_0.17+14.10.20140612-0ubuntu1.diff <- here's the new binary pkg added | 11:09 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: and here's the related change in u-s-s-o-a: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/landing-017-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts_0.4+14.10.20140612-0ubuntu1.diff | 11:09 |
| cjwatson | sil2100: Mostly looks OK, but I have two questions | 11:16 |
| * cjwatson checks before speaking | 11:16 | |
| cjwatson | one question :) | 11:17 |
| sil2100 | ;) | 11:18 |
| cjwatson | sil2100: This seems to lose several files that are currently in signon-ui - or do those vanish as part of the move to oxide? | 11:18 |
| cjwatson | /usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/signon-ui/browser-process, /usr/bin/tst_inactivity_timer, /usr/share/applications/signon-ui-browser-process.desktop | 11:18 |
| sil2100 | hmmm | 11:20 |
| sil2100 | Right, I suppose those are removed on purpose with the switch, as if it was not planned the packages wouldn't build | 11:21 |
| cjwatson | They might build but not work | 11:22 |
| cjwatson | Are those binaries still built/present-in-source? | 11:22 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: well, we have --fail-missing so if they were originally 'built' from the source and not included, they would break package build | 11:22 |
| sil2100 | So if they're not generated, I guess it's intentional, hm | 11:22 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: I can talk with the upstream guys if needed | 11:23 |
| sil2100 | To make sure | 11:23 |
| * cjwatson goes to look at the silo | 11:23 | |
| cjwatson | browser-process was intentionally removed | 11:24 |
| cjwatson | and not installing a unit test probably isn't a problem | 11:26 |
| cjwatson | ah, probably | 11:28 |
| cjwatson | -include($${TOP_SRC_DIR}/common-installs-config.pri) | 11:28 |
| cjwatson | sil2100: ~ubuntu-core-dev / ~ubuntu-archive ack | 11:28 |
| sil2100 | Thanks! :) Yeah, I supposed it's intentional, that's usually why --fail-missing is our 'safe-keeper' here, as we make sure the upstream developers know what they want to ship | 11:29 |
| sil2100 | But it's still best to double check anyway | 11:30 |
| cjwatson | right, --fail-missing is normally the right thing | 11:30 |
| sil2100 | seb128: did you have a moment to do a NEW review of net-cpp by any chance? :) | 11:31 |
| seb128 | sil2100, let me add that to my todolist, I can try having a look today | 11:32 |
| sil2100 | Thanks! | 11:32 |
| === davmor2__ is now known as davmor2 | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === zequence_ is now known as zequence | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| rtg | infinity, could you approve Trusty linux-firmware 1.127.3 ? I've got some server guys waiting on it, and just discovered https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1327908 as well. | 15:45 |
| rtg | nm about bug 1327908, thats bogus. | 15:47 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!