=== henrix_ is now known as henrix === doko__ is now known as doko [10:44] 12.10 and 13.04 are still not on old-releases.ubuntu.com in spite of EOL announcements having been sent out. Is that intentional? [11:08] cjwatson: hey! Do you have a moment for a packaging ACK? There is a new binary package in a pending release in CITrain [11:09] cjwatson: the changes themselves seem to be ok, but I'm not entirely sure about those as well: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/landing-017-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_signon-ui_0.17+14.10.20140612-0ubuntu1.diff <- here's the new binary pkg added [11:09] cjwatson: and here's the related change in u-s-s-o-a: https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/landing-017-2-publish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/packaging_changes_ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts_0.4+14.10.20140612-0ubuntu1.diff [11:16] sil2100: Mostly looks OK, but I have two questions [11:16] * cjwatson checks before speaking [11:17] one question :) [11:18] ;) [11:18] sil2100: This seems to lose several files that are currently in signon-ui - or do those vanish as part of the move to oxide? [11:18] /usr/lib/$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)/signon-ui/browser-process, /usr/bin/tst_inactivity_timer, /usr/share/applications/signon-ui-browser-process.desktop [11:20] hmmm [11:21] Right, I suppose those are removed on purpose with the switch, as if it was not planned the packages wouldn't build [11:22] They might build but not work [11:22] Are those binaries still built/present-in-source? [11:22] cjwatson: well, we have --fail-missing so if they were originally 'built' from the source and not included, they would break package build [11:22] So if they're not generated, I guess it's intentional, hm [11:23] cjwatson: I can talk with the upstream guys if needed [11:23] To make sure [11:23] * cjwatson goes to look at the silo [11:24] browser-process was intentionally removed [11:26] and not installing a unit test probably isn't a problem [11:28] ah, probably [11:28] -include($${TOP_SRC_DIR}/common-installs-config.pri) [11:28] sil2100: ~ubuntu-core-dev / ~ubuntu-archive ack [11:29] Thanks! :) Yeah, I supposed it's intentional, that's usually why --fail-missing is our 'safe-keeper' here, as we make sure the upstream developers know what they want to ship [11:30] But it's still best to double check anyway [11:30] right, --fail-missing is normally the right thing [11:31] seb128: did you have a moment to do a NEW review of net-cpp by any chance? :) [11:32] sil2100, let me add that to my todolist, I can try having a look today [11:32] Thanks! === davmor2__ is now known as davmor2 === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === zequence_ is now known as zequence === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha [15:45] infinity, could you approve Trusty linux-firmware 1.127.3 ? I've got some server guys waiting on it, and just discovered https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1327908 as well. [15:47] nm about bug 1327908, thats bogus. === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha