=== psivaa-afk is now known as psivaa
=== zequence_ is now known as zequence
=== chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson
=== Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk
=== Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha
[14:38] <arges> hi. looking at libgphoto2 in trusty queue which fixes the broken -proposed version (2.5.3.1-1ubuntu2.1). Should the diff be against ubuntu2 or ubuntu2.1 with what I see in the queue? Anything I should watch out for there?
[14:39] <cjwatson> If the diff in the queue is wrong (possible) then just download the source and debdiff by hand against the versions in trusty/trusty-proposed
[14:42] <arges> cjwatson: sure, what I'm asking is should the debdiff i see with 'sru-review' show the diff against the -updates version or -proposed?
[14:44] <cjwatson> arges: And what I'm saying is that I don't remember but that if it doesn't it isn't fatal and you should just do the diff by hand
[14:44] <cjwatson> I mean if it doesn't do whichever of those you might want - I can imagine either being useful
[14:46] <arges> cjwatson: ok Ill do that, overall I just want to make sure if I accept it in the queue, i'm doing the right thing; esp since this is a case where the old -proposed is verficiation-failed
[14:48] <cjwatson> I would normally diff by hand in that situation anyway just to make sure
[14:49] <arges> cool, doing that now
[14:59] <zul> do i have to write a MIR for python3-tornado even though python-tornado is in main already?
[15:03] <cjwatson> No, it's from the same source package
[15:04] <cjwatson> zul: python3-sure also seems to be missing for python-httpretty though
[15:05] <zul> cjwatson: yeah im trying to trackdown python-htpretty in proposed
[15:05] <cjwatson> zul: could you write an MIR for python-rednose?
[15:05] <cjwatson> I think that's what's needed
[15:05] <zul> cjwatson: yeah im on it
[15:05] <cjwatson> Also python-termstyle
[15:06] <cjwatson> python3-tornado can be promoted without paperwork, but I'd rather hold off on it until the other things are done because otherwise it'll transiently show up for movement back to universe in c-m and somebody might do that
[15:07] <arges> zul: can keystone/ceilometer 1:2014.2~b1-0ubuntu1 be rejected from the queue since I see newer versions?
[15:08] <arges> (from the trusty queue that is)
[15:09] <zul> arges:  yes
[15:18]  * arges starts reviewing the rest of the openstack uploads.
[15:23] <jamespage> arges, can you hold on those for the moment
[15:23] <jamespage> arges, just waiting for nova to catchup
[15:23] <arges> jamespage: ok,. got neutron accepted. but will holdon the rest
[15:23] <arges> jamespage: sorry about that.
[15:24] <jamespage> arges, hey - no problem
[15:24] <jamespage> arges, I guess it does not hurt from them to enter proposed a little staggerred
=== Laney is now known as mrage
=== mrage is now known as Laney
[15:46] <Laney> is germinate-output from previous days stored anywhere?
[15:50] <cjwatson> Laney: sorry no
[15:51] <Laney> oh well
[15:51] <Laney> was wondering why removing no-follow-recommends from touch/desktop changed little
[16:32] <rbasak> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.utopic/all lists chkrootkit as coming from "Ubuntu.Utopic supported-sysadmin-common seed" and it's in component mismatches.
[16:32] <rbasak> This is from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chkrootkit/+bug/1324111 I guess.
[16:33] <rbasak> I'm confused though, as I see no mention of chkrootkit anywhere inside lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/ubuntu.utopic
[16:34] <rbasak> And the email to ubuntu-release said "[Reverse-Depends: Ubuntu.Utopic supported-misc-servers seed]"
[16:34] <cjwatson> ubuntu.utopic inherits from platform.utopic and the supported-sysadmin-common seed is in the latter.
[16:34] <rbasak> Ah
[16:35] <rbasak> I did not know about inheritance or about platform.*. That's what I was missing. Thanks.
[16:35] <cjwatson> The inheritance is defined in STRUCTURE.
[16:35] <cjwatson> It might be nice if germinate used the real seed collection name in its reasons rather than the starting collection though.
[16:36] <cjwatson> Bug report would be welcome.
[16:36] <rbasak> I'll happily file one for you, but I'm barely starting to understand this area. I can do some copy and pasting from here though :)
[16:36] <cjwatson> Copy and paste will be fine :)
[16:38] <rbasak> Done: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/germinate/+bug/1331072
[16:38] <rbasak> Ugh the copy and paste came out horrible. Sorry.
[16:39]  * rbasak fixes
[16:40] <rbasak> jdstrand: ^^ - so could you drop chkrootkit from platform.utopic/support-sysadmin-common also, please, for bug 1324111? I don't have commit rights.
[16:54] <jdstrand> rbasak: done
[18:27] <rbasak> jdstrand: thanks!