[03:23] <Unit193> newvirus is 'clone1', wasn't that a fun one?
[10:42] <Unit193> DJones: Hit -devel too.
[10:42] <DJones> I don't have any access there
[10:42] <DJones> And -offtopic
[10:43] <ikonia> popey: is he known ?
[10:43] <Unit193> He was already removed from the former.
[10:43] <popey> yeah
[10:44] <ikonia> this may just be a happy co-incidence, but that last IP he used matched one of Bacta's
[10:45] <popey> ahhh! thats the name i was trying to remember last time i saw him
[10:45] <popey> pretty sure it is bacta
[10:45] <ikonia> oh, so it is bacta
[10:46] <ikonia> he's got a namespace wide ban, he's well know
[10:46] <ikonia> known
[10:46] <popey> also comes on as sm21
[10:46] <ikonia> ahh well, nice to see him back and active with his regular stupidity.
[10:46] <popey> "nice"
[10:47] <ikonia> well, his "bacta" nickname has been quite well behaved in other channels recently claiming to have turned over a new leaf
[10:47] <ikonia> it would appear it didn't last long
[10:57] <Unit193> ikonia: Heh, he liked your PalmOS idea (#ubuntu)
[11:02] <WombleWasaCattha> hello
[11:03] <popey> Please, just stop.
[11:04] <popey> boom
[11:08] <popey> back again
[11:08] <popey> 12:08:29 <Guest25683> Could I interest you in a chance to win a million dollars.
[11:08] <popey> 12:08:39 -!- Guest25683 [~MS4Life@118-92-162-58.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz]
[15:03] <DJones> !resolvconf
[15:03] <DJones> Can somebody with factoid change permissions change !resolvconf to replace /12.10/ with either /12.04/ or /14.04/ Probably /12.04/ would be better unless the rest of the factoid also gets rewritten
[15:05] <IdleOne> no resolvevconf is <reply>resolvconf is a set of scripts that's used to manage /etc/resolv.conf in 12.04 and later, for more information please see: http://www.stgraber.org/2012/02/24/dns-in-ubuntu-12-04/ and https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/network-configuration.html#name-resolution
[15:06] <IdleOne> !no resolvevconf is <reply>resolvconf is a set of scripts that's used to manage /etc/resolv.conf in 12.04 and later, for more information please see: http://www.stgraber.org/2012/02/24/dns-in-ubuntu-12-04/ and https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/network-configuration.html#name-resolution
[15:06] <IdleOne> DJones: good?
[15:06] <IdleOne> err
[15:06] <IdleOne> damn
[15:06] <genii> Extra "v"s there :)
[15:06] <DJones> !resolvconf
[15:06] <IdleOne> I gotta run, will fix later if nobody else does
[15:07] <DJones> Needs to be !resolvconf not !resolveconf (no "e" needed)
[15:07] <IdleOne> !no resolvconf is <reply>resolvconf is a set of scripts that's used to manage /etc/resolv.conf in 12.04 and later, for more information please see: http://www.stgraber.org/2012/02/24/dns-in-ubuntu-12-04/ and https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/network-configuration.html#name-resolution
[15:07] <IdleOne> done
[15:07] <IdleOne> going now
[15:07] <genii> ubottu: no resolvconf is <reply>resolvconf is a set of scripts that's used to manage /etc/resolv.conf in 12.04 and later, for more information please see: http://www.stgraber.org/2012/02/24/dns-in-ubuntu-12-04/ and https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/network-configuration.html#name-resolution
[15:07] <DJones> Ta
[15:07] <genii> Whups
[15:08] <tsimpson> I'd just replace /12.04/ with $curLTSNum
[15:08] <DJones> Looks like that works
[15:09] <DJones> tsimpson: I thought about that, but as the rest of the factoid refers to 12.04 and later, thought it would be better referring to 12.04 rather than whatever the current version is
[15:10] <DJones> Just on the offchance that a later release had a tweak or two that wouldn't be relevant to earlier versions
[15:10] <tsimpson> surely pointing to the latest information is better than pointing to possibly outdated information
[15:10] <genii> Is it just me or does thedoctor make no sense?
[15:11] <tsimpson> the only reason we need "since 12.04" is that 10.04 is still supported for servers
[15:12] <DJones> genii: Its not just you, no sense at all
[15:12] <DJones> tsimpson: True, I was forgetting about that
[15:14] <genii> OK. I'm bleary this morning so not quite sure at first.
[15:40] <Pricey> IdleOne: <reply> is only needed if you want it to start without the usual "$whatever is" bit.
[15:41] <Pici> It makes more sense to use though, otherwise aliases get a bit weird.
[15:49] <tsimpson> Pici: in what way?
[15:50] <Pici> tsimpson: err.. I guess I'm mistaken.
[15:51] <tsimpson> ok :)
[17:43] <phunyguy> hooray for nasty PMs
[17:43] <phunyguy> ><
[17:44] <genii> Heh!
[17:45] <ikonia> why was he kicked ?
[17:45] <phunyguy> being rude and then refusing to read the guidelines
[17:45] <ikonia> where was he rude and where did he reguse to read the guidelines ?
[17:46] <phunyguy> judging by the PMs, he is not the type we want chatting here.
[17:46] <ikonia> is he in another channelpm ?
[17:46] <ikonia> another channe/pm
[17:47] <phunyguy> "[11:41:04] <thedoctor> gay <<" about 4 times, then when I asked him to stop being rude and sent him the guidelines, he said "no thanks"
[17:47] <ikonia> oh, so there is more than what's currently on the screen ?
[17:48] <genii> Yes, they were acting up earlier a few times.
[17:48] <phunyguy> [10:38:13] <thedoctor> i have huge hardware - [10:38:26] <thedoctor> know what imj saying ? [10:38:37] <thedoctor> hi8nt hint
[17:48] <ikonia> I've not got a big last log,
[17:48] <ikonia> another delightful chap then
[17:48] <phunyguy> man he isn't stopping any time soon with the PMs either
[17:48] <ikonia> close the window and go about your day
[17:49] <phunyguy> yep.
[17:50] <phunyguy> also goes by andrew
[17:50] <phunyguy> and was just in +1
[17:51] <ikonia> and still in kubuntu
[17:51] <phunyguy> yeah may want to keep an eye
[17:52] <ikonia> already have been doing since you booted him out of offtopic
[17:52] <ikonia> that's why I wanted to know what happened, as he was in +1 and kubuntu seonds after you booted him
[17:52] <phunyguy> quite vulgar.
[17:52] <phunyguy> ><
[17:54] <genii> Didn't stay long in #k, and didn't go to #k-ot either.
[19:58] <phunyguy> If anyone wants to modify the !ops trigger for #ubuntu, I have updated the nick list to reflect what the chanserv access list has, but some can probably be removed if they aren't active anymore.  http://paste.ubuntu.com/7671018/
[20:00] <IdleOne> silly phunyguy should have checked it before you asked to edit
[20:01] <phunyguy> what?
[20:01] <IdleOne> it is already updated
[20:03] <phunyguy> ...
[20:03] <IdleOne> factoid updated
[20:03] <phunyguy> thank you :)