/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2014/06/23/#xubuntu-devel.txt

Unit193https://code.launchpad.net/~unit193/+archive/xfce-daily better.00:09
Noskcaj-schoolPanel merge is up00:13
Noskcaj-schoolUnit193: Should dev-tools be synced from d/experimental?00:14
Noskcaj-schoolAnd i'll fix the homepage sometime soon00:14
Unit193Parole and xfpm should land in that daily.00:24
Unit193Noskcaj: Looked at the upstream changelog, not a lot changed so should be low risk.00:25
Unit193ochosi: Do you have commit access to xfce4-session, and is our delta supposed to be upstreamed?00:32
Unit193brainwash: freshplayerplugin script broke?00:46
ochosiUnit193: nope, don't have access to that one...01:18
ochosiguess as long as there's no real maintainer for that it's also hard to say where upstream is going (delta-wise)01:18
Unit193bluesabre: Will Law (williumbillium) seems to have done verification on LP: #1326740.02:43
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1326740 in xfce4-power-manager (Ubuntu Trusty) "[SRU] Please backport xfce4-power-manager 1.2.0-3ubuntu6 to trusty" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/132674002:43
Unit193ochosi: Oh, and did you have an opinion on icon size?  I'm firmly against 48. :P03:19
ochosiUnit193: icon size where again?07:48
Unit193ochosi: Desktop.10:13
bluesabreUnit193: oh?10:35
Unit193bluesabre: Don't agree?10:36
bluesabrethis is the first time I've interacted with the SRU process, not sure where he did verification10:37
Unit193OOoh, sorry, wasn't thinking of my last ping.  He seemed to state it fixes the problem without adding new ones.10:42
bluesabreah, where?10:43
Unit193https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/1326740/comments/14 not very much, but.10:48
ubottuUbuntu bug 1326740 in xfce4-power-manager (Ubuntu Trusty) "[SRU] Please backport xfce4-power-manager 1.2.0-3ubuntu6 to trusty" [Critical,Fix committed]10:48
bluesabreah, gotcha10:52
bluesabresomehow missed that one10:52
ochosiUnit193: ah, i guess i'm fine with 32 as well. but it used to be 36 which results in unsharp icons ->meh10:56
ochosiand 48px was chosen because it's the default in thunar as well10:56
ochosiUnit193: feel free to propose a MR against -default-settings11:45
Unit193Craap, I'm going to break something..  OK.11:45
ochosisuuuure, s/48/32/ is a dangerous action!11:46
Unit193Noo, the LP side. :D11:48
ochosielfy: i added the two specs by Unit193 to the meeting's agenda12:59
Unit193I saw, when I went to add them.13:00
ochosijust in case i can't make it to the meeting, i wanted to say that i wanna move those along. so i wanna give people a bit of time to raise concerns (during the meeting and for a few days on the ML), but generally the approach is to move in that direction13:00
ochosiif there are concerns, we can vote on them13:01
ochosibut if there aren't, i'd like to reduce the bureaucracy there13:01
ochosiUnit193: fwiw, i asked around in #u-desktop and i guess we'll have to wait for the sponsors to pick up thunar-dropbox. but i guess there's nothing else to do than wait13:10
Unit193You mean hexchat-indicator?13:11
elfyochosi: ack13:16
ochosiUnit193: err whatß13:29
ochosi?13:29
elfyis there a hexchat-indicator?13:30
ochosiyeah, there seemingly is13:30
ochosihaven't tried it, but it seems to be based on the xchat-indicator13:30
ochosii'm not sure we really *have* to have that to go for hexchat since we haven't had a messaging menu for quite a while now13:31
ochosihence also no xchat indicator...13:31
elfyindeed13:31
Unit193Yep, that's what I linked to, and since the desktop team packaged the other one.13:31
ochosibut there's no "needs-packaging" bug report for hexchat-indicator, is there?13:31
Unit193But, -indicator is installed, and that was my point.  Feature differrence.  Not that I know of.13:32
ochosiyou mean xchat-indicator?13:32
Unit193Yeah.13:35
ochosicould you test hexchat indicator and see if it works correctly?13:35
ochosiif so, i guess we do want it packaged so we can install it by default13:35
elfyI would if I can find it13:35
Unit193https://launchpad.net/hexchat-indicator13:37
elfymmm13:52
elfydeep antipathy to compiling elfy has13:55
Unit193https://launchpad.net/~unit193/+archive/staging/+build/6123909 should make you feel better. :P13:56
Unit193libnih, they have a lib for not invented here?13:56
elfymuch better elfy feels :p13:56
Unit193My money is on a big fat no. :D13:57
Unit193elfy: Didyou ry it?14:13
Unit193...That was painful.14:13
elfyno14:14
Unit193Amazingly, works in trusty.14:15
Unit193(Don't add the ppa, just snag the deb if anything.)14:15
elfyI did 14:15
elfyjust installed it14:16
elfywell it is in the indicator14:17
Unit1930.0.1-0ubuntu1.1~14.10 is the one that doesn't dep on xchat. :P14:17
elfywhether it does anything or not I don't know yet14:17
Unit193So, I do this just for a trial build, and I just had to convert it to multiarch. :P14:17
elfy:)14:18
ochosielfy: does it help if i ping you?14:18
elfyit might if I'm not actually in hexchat - give me a moment and try again :)14:19
Unit193ochosi: Ready?14:19
Unit193elfy: Ping.14:20
elfynada14:20
elfyso it works as well as the xchat one then :p14:20
ochosihehe14:21
Unit193Better than I expected.14:22
elfythe hexchat notification does it's thing14:22
ochosigood14:23
ochosiUnit193: i presume the hexchat indicator won't make it to debian, right?14:24
Unit193Why would it? xchat didn't.14:25
Unit193lp:~unit193/hexchat-indicator/packaging or something like that.14:27
Unit193bluesabre: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/menulibre/+bug/1323405 added sponsors, you had nothing there that'd make it show up on their radar.15:30
ubottuUbuntu bug 1323405 in menulibre (Ubuntu Trusty) "[SRU] Please backport menulibre-2.0.4 to trusty" [Undecided,New]15:30
Unit193elfy: So -indicator is of no use at all, right?19:15
elfyyou can use it to start hexchat and to start it in safe mode 19:16
elfybut other than that it does nothing at all 19:16
Unit193I'll take that as a no, I'd think.19:17
elfyso - unless it's going to make a miraculous leap into usefulness I'd say not19:17
Unit193OK, cool.  And, just FYI, I've setup the parole and xfpm daily builds, but as I'm not in -dev right now they're just going into one of mine.19:18
elfyand I'm not overenamoured with hexchat's current issues for me 19:18
elfyUnit193: ok 19:18
Unit193:/19:18
elfydid you see the screenshots of the resize thing?19:19
Unit193So yes, the goal is to get it in xubuntu-dev, but that'll be figured out later.  I don't suppose you'll be one playing with them though anyway.  Yes, not exactly sure what's going on, unless the image I saw wasn't clipped at all.19:19
elfyof course it looks like someone is on the ball with bugs - but the resize bug has been marked as an enhancement19:20
elfyI guess the change from a seperate search box - which worked well was as well19:20
elfyno clipping in the image - the screenshot encompasses the right edge of the monitor - if I had 2 monitors it would be on the next monitor19:21
elfyif you look at the channel names you can see what's been lost fairly easily19:22
Unit193Pulled it up, I see.19:24
bluesabreUnit193: d'oh22:33
ochosihey22:33
Unit193Howdy.  Well I'm here to help. :)22:33
ochosibluesabre: btw, if you need anything wrt uploader application let me know22:34
bluesabrehey ochosi/Unit19322:34
bluesabreochosi: sure, going to try to finish it tonight22:34
ochosigreat22:35
bluesabres/tonight/starting now22:35
Unit193Indeed, great.22:35
ochosiin other "news", can we get Unit193's recipes for xfpm and parole to the xubuntu-dev staging PPA for utopic?22:36
Unit193Would be handy if I could still have access to edit them though. :P22:36
bluesabre:)22:36
ochosioh, and i added support for controlling the x11 screensaver blanking to xfpm today (still in a branch)22:36
Unit193But, as long as I can push to the packaging branch, should be fine.22:37
bluesabresure, link to recipes?22:37
bluesabreor I can dig them up22:38
bluesabre:)22:38
bluesabregot them22:38
bluesabrethanks22:38
Unit193Should just be able to re-target it.22:39
bluesabreI think I'll have to copy them to ~xubuntu-dev so they have upload rights22:40
bluesabresame recipe, different home22:40
ochosihumm, i just got invited to slack: https://slack.com/is22:42
ochosiany of you know that or used that before?22:42
bluesabreirc++ ?22:42
bluesabrelooks interesting22:43
ochosiyeah, it does22:43
ochosii'm just afraid of tool overflow22:44
ochosialthough it seems to integrate stuff like github and trell22:44
ochosio22:44
bluesabrewhich ppa would you like me to target? xfce-4.12?22:45
ochosibut i guess as long as launchpad isn't one of them (and it'd surprise me if it ever would), it's not really a great option for us22:45
Unit193bluesabre: Bad idea. :P22:45
bluesabreoh right22:45
bluesabredaily22:45
bluesabre;22:45
bluesabre)22:45
ochosiwe have different ppas now, yeah :)22:45
bluesabrehttps://launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/+archive/ppa22:46
bluesabre?22:46
ochosii'd suggest https://launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/+archive/xubuntu-staging22:47
bluesabreok, works for me22:49
bluesabresetting up now22:49
bluesabrehttps://code.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/+recipe/parole-daily22:50
bluesabrehttps://code.launchpad.net/~xubuntu-dev/+recipe/xfpm-daily22:54
bluesabreochosi: want to continue my xubuntu-release membership?22:56
ochosioh sure22:57
ochosibluesabre: bumped23:00
bluesabreyayyyyyy23:00
ochosi:)23:00
ochosihttp://www.webupd8.org/2014/06/audacious-going-back-to-gtk2-starting.html23:09
ochosithis is fun news23:09
bluesabreinteresting at least23:10
bluesabredon't like gtk3, going back to gtk2, so I can go to QT23:10
ochosiyeah, i was being sarcastic23:11
bluesabre:)23:12
ochosigoing back to gtk2 doesn't really solve anything23:12
Unit193ochosi: Why not?  The goal is to move to Qt, updating your "stable" branch every 5 minutes due to upstream isn't really good.  GTK2 is stable enough they don't need to keep one eye on that and  one on Qt.23:13
ochosii dunno, i guess i'd just try to leap to qt directly, but everyone his/her own23:18
ochosinight everyone23:28

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!