| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === wgrant_ is now known as wgrant | ||
| === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr | ||
| === roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk | ||
| === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr | ||
| === roadmr is now known as roadmr_afk | ||
| rubund | Hello, I'm trying again. Can someone please nominate https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/osm-gps-map/+bug/1320359 for trusty? (or tell me what I'm doing wrong since this request seems to be ignored here) | 17:00 |
|---|---|---|
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1320359 in osm-gps-map (Ubuntu) "Tiles not showing for libosmgpsmap 0.7.3" [Undecided,Fix released] | 17:00 |
| === roadmr_afk is now known as roadmr | ||
| rbasak | rubund: done. | 17:14 |
| rbasak | rubund: you did everything right. I see that you were in the sponsorship queue at http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/sponsoring/index.html already, since ~ubuntu-sponsors was subscribed to the bug. | 17:15 |
| rbasak | rubund: sorry it's taking a while. As you can see the sponsorship queue is quite big at the moment. | 17:15 |
| rbasak | rubund: thank you for your patience, and for taking care of the package in Ubuntu. If you don't hear anything in the next week or two, ping me and I'll take a look at it when I can. | 17:16 |
| rbasak | (if I don't get to it in my next patch pilot shift) | 17:16 |
| rbasak | rubund: and I hope you can stick with it and hopefully get upload rights to this package soon. That would help reduce sponsorship requests and everyone wins :) | 17:18 |
| rubund | hi rbasak! thanks a lot | 17:20 |
| rubund | ! | 17:20 |
| rubund | It's just that since I'm completely new to this, I get quite uncertain when I don't hear anything. | 17:21 |
| rubund | But this is great. I did actually not know that it was already in the sponsorship queue. | 17:21 |
| rbasak | rubund: yes, that is unfortunate. The process could be more transparent, especially when delays are involved. | 17:23 |
| rbasak | This is the right channel to ask for bug status changes. | 17:23 |
| rbasak | For other development process changes, #ubuntu-motu is the right channel as this is a universe package. | 17:23 |
| rbasak | If you have difficulty getting an answer because people appear to be busy, watch the channel topic in #ubuntu-devel. When a patch pilot appears listed there, that's the person to ask, since he's nominated himself for that role. | 17:24 |
| rbasak | HTH. | 17:24 |
| rbasak | (also the ubuntu-motu mailing list usually gets responses to questions) | 17:25 |
| rbasak | We really appreciate the efforts of developers actually trying to land patches (rather than users complaining but not volunteering to help) | 17:25 |
| rbasak | If this describes you and you can't get an answer from any of these channels, ping me. | 17:26 |
| rbasak | (and I'll point you in the right direction at least) | 17:26 |
| rubund | Thanks a lot for explaining this to me | 17:28 |
| rbasak | np | 17:35 |
| rubund | rbasak: just one other question. I believe that the SRU can (should?) also be applied to saucy. The debian/changelog file in the patch only contains trusty though. Could it still be nominated here? (it is not so important since saucy is not LTS) | 18:48 |
| rbasak | rubund: yes - you'd need a separate MP or debdiff for Saucy though. Is it really worth it though? Saucy is EOL in just a few weeks now. | 19:03 |
| rbasak | rubund: so all users will need to upgrade to Trusty anyway. By the time the SRU is sponsored, reviewed by the SRU team, and verified for a week in proposed, I don't think there's any point. | 19:04 |
| rbasak | rubund: EOL dates here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases | 19:05 |
| rubund | rbasak: you're right. It's not worth it. I believed the EOL for saucy came later (had not checked in a while). Thanks for explaining! | 19:11 |
| === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti | ||
| === kees_ is now known as kees | ||
| === Richard is now known as Guest69772 | ||
| Guest69772 | Can someone tell me if I named the right package for this bug report: | 20:45 |
| Guest69772 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/1335289 | 20:45 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1335289 in gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) "Shutdown timer regression" [Undecided,New] | 20:45 |
| Guest69772 | Can someone tell me if I named the right package for this bug report: | 22:46 |
| Guest69772 | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/1335289 | 22:46 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1335289 in gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) "Shutdown timer regression" [Undecided,New] | 22:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!