[09:19] <tseliot> apw: hey, apparently c6b406919288a617815f710175da20f3fca72065 (which fglrx includes) makes fpu-internal.h use static_cpu_has_safe() which is gpl only -> fglrx fails to build... Any ideas?
[09:22] <apw> tseliot, use static_cpu_has directly ?
[09:24] <apw> and cross your fingers
[09:26] <tseliot> apw: I wish it were that simple... it probably comes from a call to __save_init_fpu(), and maybe  static_cpu_has_safe() is called somehow by it
[09:28] <apw> i am not sure what to think at that point
[09:28] <tseliot> it must be use_xsave
[09:29] <tseliot> apw: so __save_init_fpu-> save_init_fpu -> use_xsave -> static_cpu_has_safe -> BOOM
[10:14] <tseliot> apw, jibel: fglrx (i386) seems to fail too but it's misreported as successful
[10:18] <jibel> tseliot, I'll restart it, it's probably the bug with ssh I fixed 2 days ago
[10:21] <tseliot> jibel: thanks
[10:23] <jibel> tseliot, now it fails
[10:24] <tseliot> jibel: perfect
[13:17] <tyhicks> rtg: hey - I saw you just applied jj's patches to the touch kernels
[13:17] <tyhicks> rtg: I wanted to let you know that I have a few more config changes coming your way in a couple hours
[13:17] <rtg> tyhicks, yup.
[13:17] <rtg> k
[13:18] <rtg> no rush, I won't upload this pile until next week
[13:18] <tyhicks> ok
[15:10] <tseliot> rtg: I think I've fixed nvidia-304-updates, fglrx, fglrx-updates, so now nvidia-173 is the only package left for me to port (which I'll do next week)
[15:10] <rtg> tsok, I'm gonna wait on -rc3 anyways and test some more. I've had somestrange FS corruption on 2 machines with -rc2
[15:11] <rtg> tseliot, ^^
[15:11] <tseliot> rtg: ok, even better then
[15:57] <tseliot> jibel: please make sure that nvidia-304-updates, fglrx, fglrx-updates are tested
[16:00] <rtg> apw, wasn't this your fix ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-quantal/+bug/1269053/comments/26
[16:13] <jibel> tseliot, ok, I'll check that.
[16:13] <tseliot> thanks
[17:09] <apw> rtg it cirtainly rings a bell
[17:09] <rtg> apw, kinda hate to see that regress after you worked so hard to fix it
[17:10] <apw> rtg, no that was fixed upstream in fact ... hmmm
[17:10] <apw> rtg, i'll have a look at it