| === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti | ||
| === FourDollars_ is now known as FourDollars | ||
| === yp is now known as ypwong | ||
| === jhodapp is now known as 23LAAWVFO | ||
| === iulian is now known as Guest34605 | ||
| === ogra_ is now known as 21WAAGN94 | ||
| === rsalveti_ is now known as rsalveti | ||
| === infinity_ is now known as infinity | ||
| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| === lan3y is now known as Laney | ||
| === Adri2000_ is now known as Guest40026 | ||
| === michagogo_ is now known as michagogo | ||
| === Guest40026 is now known as Adri2000 | ||
| === michagogo_ is now known as Guest4849 | ||
| === Guest4849 is now known as michagogo | ||
| === fginther` is now known as fginther | ||
| saiarcot895 | Would adding multiarch support for a library qualify for a SRU? | 20:13 |
|---|---|---|
| cjwatson | That would normally be pretty dubious, because adding multiarch support to libraries has often been known to break things further up the stack (normally things that are misbehaving in some way, but even so). Unless it was quite an obscure library, I think we'd require a fairly high standard of proof. | 20:15 |
| saiarcot895 | cjwatson: True. Would the same thing apply if the maintainer thought he was adding multiarch support, but didn't really add support? | 20:16 |
| cjwatson | Err, SRUs should normally be cherry-picks of selected fixes, not wholesale backports of updated packaging. | 20:16 |
| cjwatson | If I saw an upload by that description, I'd probably reject it on the grounds that it clearly wasn't a minimal fix for whatever it was trying to fix. | 20:17 |
| saiarcot895 | And I wouldn't blame you. | 20:18 |
| === stokachu_ is now known as stokachu | ||
| === pjdc_ is now known as pjdc | ||
| === mbarnett` is now known as mbarnett | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!