| rick_h__ | evening | 00:40 |
|---|---|---|
| cmaloney | Howdy | 00:51 |
| rick_h__ | we having fun yet? | 01:01 |
| cmaloney | Um, sure. :) | 01:08 |
| jrwren | ugh. | 01:33 |
| jrwren | today was the best day of my life. Tomorrow will be even better. I just keep telling myself this. | 01:33 |
| rick_h__ | lol | 01:36 |
| rick_h__ | almost done bringing back CI :) | 01:36 |
| rick_h__ | but done working on it for tonight | 01:37 |
| rick_h__ | jrwren: how went the juju tasks? | 01:49 |
| jrwren | nothing works. | 02:09 |
| jrwren | i'm guessing it is what I get for picking azure and joyent. I wanted to use providers I'd not used before. | 02:09 |
| rick_h__ | heh, yea. There's known bugs with azure, we were hitting them today. | 02:12 |
| rick_h__ | I've not tried to use joyent before | 02:12 |
| rick_h__ | jrwren: tomorrow remind me and will check on the azure bugs. I know brad hit them and had links and work arounds | 02:12 |
| greg-g | rick_h__: you have no CI right now? | 02:53 |
| jrwren | mornin | 12:23 |
| rick_h__ | morning | 12:24 |
| dickweed | morning | 12:32 |
| dickweed | server went down it seems... | 12:32 |
| === dickweed is now known as mrgoodcat | ||
| mrgoodcat | i really need to change my default nick | 12:33 |
| brousch | Hm, we just got a call from Dick's Lawn Service. The called ID is "Dicks Weed" | 12:36 |
| mrgoodcat | lol | 12:37 |
| cmaloney | Morning and all that. | 13:19 |
| rick_h__ | wheee | 13:19 |
| cmaloney | Yeah,no kidding | 13:20 |
| cmaloney | last night was fun with the weather radio going off | 13:20 |
| rick_h__ | hah | 13:20 |
| rick_h__ | yea my wife woke up and asked me why my face was flashing | 13:20 |
| rick_h__ | I told her that's lightning dear | 13:20 |
| cmaloney | Sure you didn't lose power and had your internal clock flashing 12:00? :) | 13:21 |
| mrgoodcat | taco.io expires tomorrow | 18:04 |
| mrgoodcat | someone should buy | 18:04 |
| rick_h__ | woot | 18:05 |
| brousch | rick_h__: Is there a rick_h__-approved rear automobile bike rack? | 18:20 |
| rick_h__ | brousch: <3 my new yakima one | 18:21 |
| brousch | I just realized you are our Ron Swanson | 18:21 |
| rick_h__ | hmm, or maybe thule, at the coffee shop and bought it local so don't have it in my amz history | 18:21 |
| brousch | It's likely that I will be getting rid of my old minivan and getting a used prius this month | 18:22 |
| brousch | I used to put 3 bikes and all camping gear in my van | 18:23 |
| rick_h__ | brousch: best thing evar! http://www.amazon.com/Yakima-RidgeBack-4-Bike-Hitch-Rack/dp/B00FUHDNRU/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1404238975&sr=8-6&keywords=trailer+hitch+bike+rack | 18:23 |
| bookiebot | http://goo.gl/awhdEa - Amazon.com : Yakima RidgeBack 4-Bike Hitch Rack : Automotive Bike Racks : Sports & Outdoors | 18:23 |
| rick_h__ | brousch: the red handle on the bottom makes it nice and easy to get on and off | 18:23 |
| rick_h__ | brousch: the clips are fast/easy | 18:23 |
| brousch | oooh, i like | 18:25 |
| rick_h__ | brousch: yea, it's $$ but man it's so nice to be able to put it on and off in 5min without a wrench and such. And it's still lockable | 18:26 |
| rick_h__ | and the rubber clips to lock bikes down are so fast and easy | 18:26 |
| rick_h__ | and there's another one of me out there? I'm officially scared :) (re: a Ron Swanson) | 18:27 |
| cmaloney | I still have a bike rack in the box that I haven't even pulled out. | 18:28 |
| cmaloney | Damn thing scares me. | 18:28 |
| cmaloney | I don't know why. | 18:28 |
| rick_h__ | lol | 18:28 |
| cmaloney | I think it was because I wanted to get an actual hitch for the caliber and use that but never made it past the Google search | 18:28 |
| rick_h__ | yea, I had an old car I just went the uhaul route and they welded something on that got me by | 18:29 |
| mrgoodcat | I have a thule bike rack that i like just fine | 18:29 |
| mrgoodcat | make sure you get one that goes on your hitch though and doesn't touch your paint | 18:29 |
| cmaloney | mrgoodcat: Yeah, this one is all straps and what-not. | 18:30 |
| mrgoodcat | also you want one that can fold away from the car so you can open the tailgate | 18:31 |
| mrgoodcat | can't find my exact one on amazon but this one is pretty close http://www.amazon.com/Thule-956-Parkway-4-Bike-Receiver/dp/B000CQ47GU/ref=sr_1_5?s=sporting-goods&ie=UTF8&qid=1404239527&sr=1-5 | 18:33 |
| bookiebot | http://goo.gl/bqF8wA - Amazon.com : Thule 956 Parkway 4-Bike Hitch Mount Rack (2-Inch Receiver) : Automotive Bike Racks : Sports & Outdoors | 18:33 |
| brousch | yakima has a lot of them that look similar. swingdaddy, fulltilt, ridgeback, fullswing, doubledown | 18:33 |
| brousch | http://goo.gl/KYcXhL | 18:34 |
| bookiebot | Yakima Racks & Carriers › Error | 18:34 |
| brousch | Hm, aparently the prius is not supposed to tow anything. Looks like thehitch will be going on my wife's forester | 18:39 |
| cmaloney | http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000CQ6F42/ref=wms_ohs_product?ie=UTF8&psc=1 | 18:39 |
| rick_h__ | the forester didn't come with one? | 18:39 |
| bookiebot | http://goo.gl/HULvdB - Amazon.com : Thule 961XT Speedway 2-Bike Trunk Rack : Automotive Bike Racks : Sports & Outdoors | 18:39 |
| cmaloney | That's the one that I ordered. | 18:39 |
| cmaloney | so if anyone wants a nice rack please let me know and we can arrange something. :) | 18:39 |
| cmaloney | Lightly stored. | 18:40 |
| mrgoodcat | i prefer roof racks if hitch isn't available | 18:41 |
| rick_h__ | roof is high up on the touareg | 18:42 |
| mrgoodcat | my dad keeps a roof rack on his car for 2 bikes. it's pretty handy | 18:42 |
| rick_h__ | and blocks my view of the sky | 18:42 |
| mrgoodcat | it's high on my suburban and my dad's durango too | 18:42 |
| rick_h__ | heh | 18:42 |
| mrgoodcat | that's the only real problem though | 18:42 |
| * rick_h__ tries not to have conniption at the doc that was handed to me representing 3 days of a dev's work :s | 18:43 | |
| mrgoodcat | 5 bullet points | 18:45 |
| mrgoodcat | 3 of them don't even say anything useful | 18:45 |
| cmaloney | greg-g: Did you lose a domain? | 20:32 |
| greg-g | my home server, yeah | 20:33 |
| cmaloney | That's some sht | 20:34 |
| mrgoodcat | how did you lose a domain? | 21:04 |
| cmaloney | Microsoft did a questionable takedown with the help of a federal judge to take down all of No-Ip's domains | 21:16 |
| cmaloney | http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/06/millions-of-dymanic-dns-users-suffer-after-microsoft-seizes-no-ip-domains/ | 21:16 |
| mrgoodcat | oh yea that | 21:16 |
| bookiebot | http://goo.gl/sf9r5q - Millions of dynamic DNS users suffer after Microsoft seizes No-IP domains | Ars Technica | 21:16 |
| greg-g | that | 21:17 |
| greg-g | they couldn't handle the number of requests so a bunch of domains aren't working, like mine | 21:17 |
| mrgoodcat | sucks if you lost a domain but i haven't seen any more than clickbait buzz about it | 21:17 |
| greg-g | which wasn't nefarious in anyway | 21:17 |
| mrgoodcat | i haven't seen any real stats about the takedown | 21:17 |
| cmaloney | mrgoodcat: Um... | 21:17 |
| greg-g | mrgoodcat: then you aren't reading | 21:17 |
| greg-g | http://www.noip.com/blog/2014/06/30/ips-formal-statement-microsoft-takedown/ | 21:17 |
| bookiebot | http://goo.gl/pWdeAZ - No-IP's Formal Statement on Microsoft Takedown | No-IP Blog - Managed DNS Services | 21:17 |
| mrgoodcat | not what i meant | 21:17 |
| mrgoodcat | i know lots of people's domains aren't working | 21:18 |
| mrgoodcat | and that sucks | 21:18 |
| cmaloney | Basically they became the DNS provider for a ton of tomains | 21:18 |
| mrgoodcat | i meant more along the lines of what it was SUPPOSED to do. i haven't seen anything about if it actually worked | 21:18 |
| cmaloney | domains | 21:18 |
| cmaloney | Yeah, I'm not sure how it was ever supposed to end well | 21:19 |
| greg-g | mrgoodcat: sure, the small subset of domains that were serving malware are no longer server malware, but along with that went a ton of legitimate domains | 21:19 |
| cmaloney | The bigger problem is Microsoft was able to, with the help of the Federal Government, take down a bunch of sites | 21:19 |
| greg-g | just like when a copyright notice took down millions of domains under a top domain because of a few (dozens) of bad sites | 21:19 |
| cmaloney | If that isn't scary I don't know what is | 21:20 |
| greg-g | property is no longer property online, unless it is, when we (the gov) want to charge you for criminal charges | 21:20 |
| mrgoodcat | wonder what law allowed microsoft to act on this | 21:21 |
| mrgoodcat | i could see if the government took down domains, but idk how its even possible for microsoft to do | 21:21 |
| greg-g | http://blogs.technet.com/b/microsoft_blog/archive/2014/06/30/microsoft-takes-on-global-cybercrime-epidemic-in-tenth-malware-disruption.aspx | 21:22 |
| bookiebot | http://goo.gl/ZHkOem - Microsoft takes on global cybercrime epidemic in tenth malware disruption - The Official Microsoft Blog - Site Home - TechNet Blogs | 21:22 |
| greg-g | RTFA | 21:22 |
| cmaloney | "This is the third malware disruption by Microsoft since the November unveiling of the Microsoft Cybercrime Center—a center of excellence for advancing the global fight against cybercrime." | 21:24 |
| cmaloney | "Center [of|for] excellence" trips my doublespeak detector | 21:25 |
| greg-g | :) | 21:25 |
| cmaloney | Also would make an awesome safeword | 21:25 |
| cmaloney | Also, could someone please shitcan hotmail.com so we can "advance the global fight against stupidity"? | 21:27 |
| cmaloney | and yahoo.com email. | 21:27 |
| mrgoodcat | i read the article. what i meant is i wonder what mechanism is in place that allows a private organization to do this. obviously they got a court order handing over the domains but how were the domains transferred to microsoft instead of the government? | 21:27 |
| greg-g | sounds like you have some searching to do, mrgoodcat :) | 21:28 |
| cmaloney | mrgoodcat: likely because they were working with Federal Investigators | 21:28 |
| rick_h__ | heh, mrgoodcat has homework :) | 21:28 |
| cmaloney | eg: FBI and the like | 21:28 |
| rick_h__ | greg-g: the librarian comes out to play | 21:28 |
| mrgoodcat | right i get where the authority came from | 21:28 |
| cmaloney | Name Server:NS7.MICROSOFTINTERNETSAFETY.NET | 21:29 |
| cmaloney | Name Server:NS8.MICROSOFTINTERNETSAFETY.NET | 21:29 |
| cmaloney | That's some shit. | 21:29 |
| mrgoodcat | but shouldn't the domains have been transferred to the government if anything? | 21:29 |
| rick_h__ | dns is the great equalizer of the average person out there. | 21:29 |
| greg-g | mrgoodcat: why? private entities routinely play roles in govt work | 21:30 |
| cmaloney | What's the govt. going to do? | 21:30 |
| cmaloney | This is why I run my DNS with Linode | 21:31 |
| cmaloney | because if someone takes Linode down the Internet will revolt. | 21:31 |
| mrgoodcat | not sure if you're misunderstanding my questions, i'm not explaining myself properly, or you're answering the wrong questions on purpose but in any case nevermind. i obviously should have just let it go | 21:31 |
| cmaloney | mrgoodcat: You're asking by what legal authority did these domains get transferred to Microsoft? | 21:32 |
| greg-g | you're asking why MS got control of the no-ip.org domains instead of the govt, right? | 21:32 |
| mrgoodcat | no | 21:32 |
| greg-g | "17:29 < mrgoodcat> but shouldn't the domains have been transferred to the government if anything?" | 21:32 |
| mrgoodcat | well no to cmaloney yes to greg-g | 21:32 |
| cmaloney | Because Microsoft is trying to fix the problem of malware spreading on the net | 21:33 |
| mrgoodcat | making the assumption that ANYONE should have gotten control (which i don't believe but i'm allowing for the sake of the argument) | 21:33 |
| cmaloney | so likely they're having the machines report that they're infected and need service. | 21:33 |
| cmaloney | or providing patches | 21:33 |
| greg-g | domains are taken all the time due to law breaking, just like assests are seized all the time | 21:34 |
| mrgoodcat | but assets are usually not given to private parties | 21:34 |
| mrgoodcat | if my neighbor steals some stuff, the feds don't give that stuff to me, they take it | 21:34 |
| mrgoodcat | unless i'm completely misunderstanding the legality of the situation | 21:35 |
| greg-g | sure they are, if the private party has been contracted by the govt to do that work | 21:35 |
| cmaloney | Likely it's because Microsoft is acting as contractor for fixing "cybersecurity" threads. | 21:35 |
| cmaloney | threats. | 21:35 |
| cmaloney | so they're getting the redirects. | 21:35 |
| greg-g | and isn't monetizing or otherwise gaining from the domains | 21:36 |
| cmaloney | Well, that we're aware of. :) | 21:36 |
| greg-g | as you would if you were just given joe schmoe's belongings (in your example) | 21:36 |
| cmaloney | "You''re machine is infected with malware and is running XP. For $99.99 we'll fix both with a lovely copy of Windows 8" | 21:36 |
| cmaloney | bah, I fail grammar. | 21:37 |
| mrgoodcat | lol | 21:37 |
| cmaloney | "Your..." | 21:37 |
| jrwren | wow?!? ubuntuask.com is a fake-overflow clone of askubuntu.com? | 22:07 |
| cmaloney | That's awesome. | 23:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!