| === Ursinha-afk is now known as Ursinha | ||
| infinity | xnox: It's not noatime, it's ext3 versus ext4, I suspect. A testsuite that expects high resolution *times is probably broken, IMO. | 01:47 |
|---|---|---|
| xnox | infinity: built on sagari just fine =) and i'm going to ignore zsh for another decade if I can =) | 08:10 |
| bzoltan | Hello release team. I have a problem with a failing autopkgtests http://paste.ubuntu.com/7762643/ on the online_accounts_ui.tests.test_online_accounts_ui.OnlineAccountsUiTests.test_title. We cornered the issue and there is an MR https://code.launchpad.net/~elopio/ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts/clean_tests/+merge/225437 to address this problem. Is there a way to unblock the UITK landing as this failure is more about the flaky | 09:02 |
| cjwatson | bzoltan: I'd like to see the tests passing first, at which point, well, the easiest thing would be to just land the u-s-s-o-a change ... | 09:29 |
| bzoltan | cjwatson: that would block the UITK for an other day | 09:30 |
| cjwatson | I'm more worried about allowing regressions into the archive which will mean that we then lose our guard against other regressions in the same component | 09:31 |
| cjwatson | Has somebody run the u-s-s-o-a tests in a clean autopkgtest environment? | 09:31 |
| cjwatson | (with the change above) | 09:31 |
| bzoltan | cjwatson: I do not know, but I do not think so. | 09:31 |
| cjwatson | OK, I guess I have to then :-( | 09:32 |
| bzoltan | cjwatson: thank you | 09:32 |
| cjwatson | This will take some time | 09:32 |
| bzoltan | cjwatson: my problem is that the UITK tests cover practically _all_ app tests on _all_ environment ... and we suffer from flaky or badly written tests. elopio and timp are already fixing the tests for dozen of apps, because if I would just wait for the app devs to fix their tests I would never be able to release the UITK. Even now with the whole SDK team fixing other teams tests it takes a week to land the UITK. | 09:35 |
| cjwatson | Nevertheless, I'm not going to override a failure when I haven't confirmed that the putative fix actually fixes it | 09:38 |
| cjwatson | Because while I sympathise with what you're describing it *also* describes a component where we have to take care to ensure it doesn't genuinely regress | 09:39 |
| bzoltan | cjwatson: Your point is valid. If I were you most probably I would make the same call. Maybe it is just not realistic to expect daily UITK release. We better be careful with a component what is so broadly used. | 09:41 |
| bzoltan | cjwatson: I think I will take the autopkg tests on the UITK test plan. Is this guide valid : http://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/auto-pkg-test.html#executing-the-test ? | 09:42 |
| ginggs | Hi, nvidia-graphics-drivers Trusty SRU (LP: #1247736) has been sitting in unapproved for a month. Is anything needed? | 09:45 |
| ubot93 | Launchpad bug 1247736 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 "[SRU] nvidia-opencl-icd-* should not conflicts/replaces on opencl-icd" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1247736 | 09:45 |
| cjwatson | bzoltan: I believe so, though I haven't used the cloud-image-based execution mode as yet myself (there are more lightweight but less accurate versions); trying that for the first time now | 09:48 |
| cjwatson | argh, urllib.ContentTooShortError: retrieval incomplete: got only 202031681 out of 260178432 bytes | 09:48 |
| cjwatson | Maybe that was a bad time to upgrade squid | 09:49 |
| === doko__ is now known as doko | ||
| Saviq | cjwatson, hey, apparently http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#ubuntu-system-settings-online-accounts missed the new needed dep of ubuntu-ui-toolkit-autopilot for autopkgtests | 13:02 |
| Saviq | cjwatson, could you please do a direct upload with that added? | 13:02 |
| Laney | Saviq: I'll test/upload that | 13:08 |
| bzoltan | Laney: thank you for that | 13:09 |
| Saviq | Laney, thanks | 13:09 |
| Laney | sure | 13:09 |
| Laney | yeah that passes | 13:20 |
| === Adri2000_ is now known as Adri2000 | ||
| Mirv | excellent | 13:30 |
| bzoltan | Laney: cool | 13:38 |
| Laney | they asked me to increase the upstream version of ubuntu-ui-toolkit | 13:39 |
| Laney | so give me a few minutes to upload this and then version the test-dep | 13:39 |
| ginggs | Anyone in SRU team able to look at nvidia-graphics-drivers Trusty SRU (LP: 1247736) please? It has been sitting in 'unapproved' for some time. | 16:01 |
| ubot93 | Launchpad bug 1247736 in nvidia-graphics-drivers-340 "[SRU] nvidia-opencl-icd-* should not conflicts/replaces on opencl-icd" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1247736 | 16:01 |
| === gaughen_ is now known as gaughen | ||
| psivaa | infinity: cjwatson: Precise d-i installer throws 'no packages matching running kernel 3.11.0-23-generic in archive'. this transient mismatching kernel version issue? | 16:15 |
| psivaa | s/this/is this/ | 16:15 |
| infinity | psivaa: Erm, it shouldn't. | 16:29 |
| infinity | linux-image-3.11.0-23-generic | 3.11.0-23.40~precise1 | precise-updates | amd64, armhf, i386 | 16:30 |
| infinity | psivaa: Wait, is this a netinst, or an ISO? | 16:31 |
| psivaa | infinity: this is the iso | 16:31 |
| infinity | psivaa: Ahh, kay, CDs might be mismatched right now. | 16:31 |
| psivaa | infinity: ack, thanks | 16:31 |
| infinity | psivaa: And in need of s/saucy/trusty/ and other bits while we prep for the point release. | 16:31 |
| infinity | psivaa: I should go mangle some seeds to resolve that. | 16:32 |
| psivaa | infinity: ack | 16:32 |
| psivaa | infinity: wasn't urgent. just thought of informing :) | 16:32 |
| infinity | psivaa: Yeah. The ISOs will probably be a mess for the next week or so while we sort out .5 | 16:33 |
| infinity | psivaa: Should be a bit more testable (and on trusty's HWE stack) by next week, I hope. | 16:33 |
| psivaa | infinity: ack, will check by then. | 16:33 |
| bdmurray | Is there any way to SRU verify bug 1233185 on porter-armhf? I'd need to install the package from -proposed. | 17:42 |
| ubot93 | bug 1233185 in gdb "gdb-multiarch cannot read ARM cores: "wrong size gregset struct in core file"" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1233185 | 17:42 |
| doko | bdmurray, -proposed should be enabled on the porter boxes | 19:34 |
| bdmurray | doko: it wasn't when I looked | 19:36 |
| doko | hmm, well, makes sense for stable releases | 19:37 |
| doko | maybe we need chroots with proposed enabled for stable releases too | 19:37 |
| doko | anyway, semi finale now ... schlaaaaaaaaaaaaaand! | 19:37 |
| slangasek | bdmurray: have you worked around the SRU verification? Maybe running gdb under qemu-user in a chroot? | 19:51 |
| === xnox is now known as xnox_ | ||
| === xnox_ is now known as Eisbrecher | ||
| === Eisbrecher is now known as Eisbrecher_xnox | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!