| === psivaa_ is now known as psivaa-off | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| Noskcaj | Could linux-firmware-nexus7 and perhaps linux-firmware-grouper be removed from the archive? | 08:38 |
|---|---|---|
| Noskcaj | the former has been superseeded by the latter | 08:38 |
| Noskcaj | and we no longer build grouper images anyway | 08:38 |
| === doko_ is now known as doko | ||
| === pete-woods is now known as pete-woods-lunch | ||
| Riddell | anyone able to tell me why this metapackage for kubuntu-plasma5-meta doesn't work? http://starsky.19inch.net/~jr/tmp/kubuntu-plasma5-meta_1.308.4.dsc | 13:12 |
| Riddell | I run update and it says ? Unknown desktop package: kubuntu-plasma5-desktop | 13:12 |
| Riddell | but kubuntu-plasma5-desktop does end up in metapackage-map | 13:12 |
| === pete-woods-lunch is now known as pete-woods | ||
| Riddell | ... think I got it | 13:54 |
| jibel | ogasawara, I marked bug 1333728 verification-done | 14:11 |
| ubot93 | bug 1333728 in update-notifier "update-manager should support HWE EOL transition" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1333728 | 14:11 |
| ogasawara | jibel: awesome, thanks! | 14:11 |
| ogasawara | when an archive admin has a moment, could we get both update-manager and update-notifier promoted out of -proposed to -updates in Precise? | 14:13 |
| cjwatson | bug 1311396 is still v-needed; but I guess we decided that the update-manager change just didn't change that one way or another? | 14:14 |
| ubot93 | bug 1311396 in update-manager "broken translations results in traceback in new release notification" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1311396 | 14:14 |
| cjwatson | in which case the update-manager task there should perhaps be Invalid and there should be a language pack task or something? | 14:15 |
| ogasawara | jibel: ^^ I think you were involved with that | 14:16 |
| jibel | cjwatson, I closed the task for u-m as invalid and will reopen one for each language pack affected | 14:19 |
| cjwatson | Thanks. Mind if I wait for pending-sru.html to update, just to make sure we've got it all right? | 14:22 |
| jibel | works for me. Tasks added for P, saucy will ends its life soon and checking which langpack is affected on trsuty | 14:33 |
| === bdmurray_ is now known as bdmurray | ||
| cjwatson | http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/history.html | 15:11 |
| cjwatson | will update automatically from now on | 15:13 |
| cjwatson | intuitively/roughly: blue = stuff that's stuck on transitions, yellow = stuff that's new or more broken than that | 15:18 |
| === SpamapS_ is now known as SpamapS | ||
| === oSoMoN_ is now known as oSoMoN | ||
| chrisccoulson | could someone please approve flash for trusty partner? (and then I will upload the others too) | 17:27 |
| slangasek | chrisccoulson: why distinct uploads to each release, vs. a single upload + pocket-copy? | 18:10 |
| zequence | cjwatson: Just want to give you heads up that I'll be gone between Thu-Fri, without a computer, so if you need me for anything, it'll have to wait until I come back (you mentioned you might do the ISO build thing sometime soon) | 18:48 |
| zequence | Er, Thu-Fri, but close enough | 18:48 |
| zequence | Fri-Thu, I mean of course | 18:48 |
| === DalekSec_ is now known as DalekSec | ||
| chrisccoulson | slangasek, good question. I guess we could do that in future | 19:51 |
| chrisccoulson | (although, I've just uploaded the others now) | 19:51 |
| === ajmitch_ is now known as ajmitch | ||
| Noskcaj | does xfburn gaining blu-ray support in 0.5.2 make it invalid for an MRE? | 21:32 |
| Noskcaj | http://sources.debian.net/src/xfburn/0.5.2-1/NEWS | 21:32 |
| infinity | Noskcaj: Generally, new features make something unsuitable for SRU period, MRE or otherwise, but exceptions can be made if the code is well-isolated and the old features are well regression-tested. | 21:34 |
| Noskcaj | infinity, None of the old features are affected, but it looks risky | 21:42 |
| slangasek | infinity, cjwatson: I'm considering nuking the bzip2 packaging and replacing it with dh(1), with or without Debian involvement, thanks to its lack of sanity wrt debugging symbols. Thoughts? | 21:50 |
| slangasek | Noskcaj: does this mean upstream is violating their own upstream update policy on the first go arounD? | 21:50 |
| Noskcaj | slangasek, Some of the non-core things leave the policy to interpretation. 0.5.0 is an unstable release anyways, we are only using it because 0.4 was 5 years old | 21:51 |
| slangasek | hmm | 21:52 |
| Noskcaj | I'm only going to be requesting MREs for actual bugfixes, if there's some odd change like this i won upload it | 21:52 |
| Noskcaj | this is similar to gnome development release microreleases | 21:53 |
| slangasek | Noskcaj: my concern is that the MRE is intended to be a blanket policy that the SRU team and the uploaders can rely on without having to do a lot of per-package or per-bugfix inspection | 21:53 |
| slangasek | and it sounds like you're saying *someone* is going to have to review the packages that were listed in the provisional MRE, beyond what upstream is doing, because the upstream policy isn't actually watertight | 21:54 |
| Noskcaj | I'm saying our current xfburn is an unstable release, like using gnome 3.13.X. What is the policy for gnome MREs | 21:55 |
| Noskcaj | ? | 21:55 |
| slangasek | the policy for GNOME MREs is for microreleases on top of a stable release | 21:55 |
| slangasek | (or in select cases, leading up to a stable release if the GNOME and Ubuntu release schedules are misaligned) | 21:56 |
| Noskcaj | I should probably have had that specified for the xfce mre | 21:56 |
| infinity | slangasek: Does it use dpkg -b directly or something? | 22:16 |
| slangasek | infinity: among other offenses | 22:16 |
| infinity | slangasek: The simple and small delta would be to build-dep on debhelper but invoke dh_builddeb, perhaps. | 22:16 |
| slangasek | except for the part where it would also need to be hooked into dh_strip | 22:17 |
| infinity | slangasek: But convincing the Debian maintainer to take sane and modern packaging might not be hard. | 22:17 |
| infinity | slangasek: Err, yes, dh_strip. dh_builddeb not required. | 22:17 |
| slangasek | I'm not keen on a simple and small delta against this ancient packaging | 22:17 |
| slangasek | I'll try to push it upstream; but I also am inclined to upload it to Ubuntu with or without Debian maintainer buy-in | 22:18 |
| infinity | slangasek: Then my thought unnecessary. Carry whatever delta you like and please forward it. :P | 22:18 |
| slangasek | heh | 22:18 |
| cjwatson | slangasek: be my guest | 22:49 |
| slangasek | ok | 22:49 |
| slangasek | oh, and neato, switching to debhelper has made the binary package install size slightly smaller | 22:49 |
| slangasek | CC64 += -march=x86-64 -mtune=x86-64 | 22:53 |
| slangasek | is it just me, or does that seem pointless? | 22:53 |
| slangasek | one of these days, I will actually feel strongly enough about it to make dh support multibuilds properly | 22:54 |
| robru | infinity, poke... I'm trying to debug a dbus segfault and it looks like the dbgsym on ddebs is out of date for dbus. | 23:26 |
| slangasek | rules | 325 ++++++++++++--------------------------------------- | 23:41 |
| slangasek | 12 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 271 deletions(-) | 23:41 |
| slangasek | getting closer, bzip | 23:41 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!